On January 04 2012 22:31 Abort Retry Fail wrote: epic. fail.
this guy?
I didn't. Manners and watch your mouth.
why so agressive? you should be polite oo
It's not aggressive. I'm just reminding him that it's bad manners to accuse someone without proof. It was totally uncalled for and I'm offended, especially that I enjoyed free winning against early adversity in that game!
On January 04 2012 22:31 Abort Retry Fail wrote: epic. fail.
this guy?
I didn't. Manners and watch your mouth.
why so agressive? you should be polite oo
It's not aggressive. I'm just reminding him that it's bad manners to accuse someone without proof. It was totally uncalled for and I'm offended, especially that I enjoyed free winning against early adversity in that game!
I put a ?.
so again why so aggressive?
The question mark doesn't change that you singled him out amongst all the other people in this LR thread, that's why he's aggressive
On January 04 2012 22:31 Abort Retry Fail wrote: epic. fail.
this guy?
I didn't. Manners and watch your mouth.
why so agressive? you should be polite oo
It's not aggressive. I'm just reminding him that it's bad manners to accuse someone without proof. It was totally uncalled for and I'm offended, especially that I enjoyed free winning against early adversity in that game!
I put a ?.
so again why so aggressive?
The question mark doesn't change that you singled him out amongst all the other people in this LR thread, that's why he's aggressive
I think this calls for MORTAL KOMBAT Test your might!
On January 04 2012 22:31 Abort Retry Fail wrote: epic. fail.
this guy?
I didn't. Manners and watch your mouth.
why so agressive? you should be polite oo
It's not aggressive. I'm just reminding him that it's bad manners to accuse someone without proof. It was totally uncalled for and I'm offended, especially that I enjoyed free winning against early adversity in that game!
I put a ?.
so again why so aggressive?
The question mark doesn't change that you singled him out amongst all the other people in this LR thread, that's why he's aggressive
I think this calls for MORTAL KOMBAT Test your might!
On January 04 2012 22:31 Abort Retry Fail wrote: epic. fail.
this guy?
I didn't. Manners and watch your mouth.
why so agressive? you should be polite oo
It's not aggressive. I'm just reminding him that it's bad manners to accuse someone without proof. It was totally uncalled for and I'm offended, especially that I enjoyed free winning against early adversity in that game!
I put a ?.
so again why so aggressive?
The question mark doesn't change that you singled him out amongst all the other people in this LR thread, that's why he's aggressive
On January 04 2012 22:31 Abort Retry Fail wrote: epic. fail.
this guy?
I didn't. Manners and watch your mouth.
why so agressive? you should be polite oo
It's not aggressive. I'm just reminding him that it's bad manners to accuse someone without proof. It was totally uncalled for and I'm offended, especially that I enjoyed free winning against early adversity in that game!
I put a ?.
so again why so aggressive?
The question mark doesn't change that you singled him out amongst all the other people in this LR thread, that's why he's aggressive
On January 04 2012 22:31 Abort Retry Fail wrote: epic. fail.
this guy?
I didn't. Manners and watch your mouth.
why so agressive? you should be polite oo
It's not aggressive. I'm just reminding him that it's bad manners to accuse someone without proof. It was totally uncalled for and I'm offended, especially that I enjoyed free winning against early adversity in that game!
I put a ?.
so again why so aggressive?
The question mark doesn't change that you singled him out amongst all the other people in this LR thread, that's why he's aggressive
On January 04 2012 23:15 FMStyles wrote: i would like to thank kal and free for totaly runing my fpl.
FPL is 100% luck. You pick players who fail for an entire year and suddenly they start winning again.
I must confirm, that applying 100% scientific approach with precise statistics from last season, scores, and automated optimization of the picks for main and anti, ended up average at best, pretty bad at worst, and bad in general. And that's with Soulkey and Best on-board, who happened to do pretty well.
By the way, will Woongjin stop it with the 3-hatch ling runby strat? I mean, it sort of worked for ZerO this game since fbh left his army exposed, but he still managed to lose after that.
On January 05 2012 00:32 VGhost wrote: By the way, will Woongjin stop it with the 3-hatch ling runby strat? I mean, it sort of worked for ZerO this game since fbh left his army exposed, but he still managed to lose after that.
Well, there has been many moment where ZerO was attacking FBH's right corner expos and therefore resulting in FBH needing to lift the CCs. Since ZerO have only Zergling/Ultralisk in his army composition, he couldn't attack air. Hypothetically speaking if ZerO had brought Scourges + Queen to that undefended Command Center, THEN game 1 of this set would be somewhat different.
On January 05 2012 00:32 VGhost wrote: By the way, will Woongjin stop it with the 3-hatch ling runby strat? I mean, it sort of worked for ZerO this game since fbh left his army exposed, but he still managed to lose after that.
Well, there has been many moment where ZerO was attacking FBH's right corner expos and therefore resulting in FBH needing to lift the CCs. Since ZerO have only Zergling/Ultralisk in his army composition, he couldn't attack air. Hypothetically speaking if ZerO had brought Scourges + Queen to that undefended Command Center, THEN game 1 of this set would be somewhat different.
Wouldn't Hydras and Mutas be better than Scourges for that?
EPT
