[SPL] Air Force ACE vs. KT Rolster - Page 19
Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
Taosu
Ukraine1074 Posts
| ||
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
On October 26 2010 19:33 rasnj wrote: So will Flash get a winner's interview? (assuming of course kt wins) Really looking forward to that. Getting a winner interview means you won a game. Having a win accounted in your record doesn't mean you will have a winner interview. I don't understand what you are trying to say. Look at the score on top of the screen if you are implying that the win is not taken in account. edit : anyway Flash will probably get an interview to know his thoughts about Kespa's decision. | ||
TimeOut
Germany1277 Posts
| ||
structuralinertia
Australia1426 Posts
On October 26 2010 19:31 thopol wrote: It's not ok really. The circumstances need to be taken into account in every decision. If legal systems worked that way there would be clerks instead of judges. in fact legal systems do largely work that way (well at least the common law ones that im familiar with); for complex matters and areas where there is a partial absence of legislation, due to perhaps the complex nature of the problem, there is some room for juridical discretion; but many things are simple and often even automatic, as in speeding (expiation) offences where there is no real ambiguity. The case at hand is pretty unambiguous and there is no room for discretion as long as the rule says what it does. But like Sirgery says if there is a problem with the rule then it is the rule that needs changing | ||
Fenrax
![]()
United States5018 Posts
On October 26 2010 19:32 Ryo wrote: He's no amateur, it was a silly mistake. If they rematch because he left 3 seconds after the start, the next player who leaves 20 seconds or 1 min into the start will demand a rematch as well. this. Seriously, stop raging over a 100% correct decision. Yeah it sucks that we don't get to see Flash playing, but if you want to rage, rage about Ruby for doing something completely retarded. | ||
nepeta
1872 Posts
| ||
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
| ||
Wala.Revolution
7579 Posts
But they should have a warning. | ||
| ||
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
| ||
Wala.Revolution
7579 Posts
| ||
thopol
Japan4560 Posts
Nah, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. | ||
Fenrax
![]()
United States5018 Posts
Poll: Was the Kespa decision to give Ruby a game loss correct? Yes (36) No (22) 58 total votes Your vote: Was the Kespa decision to give Ruby a game loss correct? | ||
![]()
mustaju
Estonia4504 Posts
More venting? No thanks. ![]() | ||
![]()
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
On October 26 2010 19:36 structuralinertia wrote: in fact legal systems do largely work that way (well at least the common law ones that im familiar with); for complex matters and areas where there is a partial absence of legislation, due to perhaps the complex nature of the problem, there is some room for juridical discretion; but many things are simple and often even automatic, as in speeding (expiation) offences where there is no real ambiguity. The case at hand is pretty unambiguous and there is no room for discretion as long as the rule says what it does. But like Sirgery says if there is a problem with the rule then it is the rule that needs changing those offences dont have criminal records, they're a fine. If they want to put a fine in for that, sure. but its like going "well you pointed a gun at someone, you're getting 6 years". Sure most of the time its justified, but one in 1000 times, someone is MAKING you do it, and THEY should go to prison not you. Honestly, so retarded | ||
Wala.Revolution
7579 Posts
| ||
HappyHour
Korea (South)12 Posts
| ||
imreker
Poland95 Posts
| ||
structuralinertia
Australia1426 Posts
On October 26 2010 19:39 Fenrax wrote: Poll: Was the Kespa decision to give Ruby a game loss correct? Yes (36) No (22) 58 total votes Your vote: Was the Kespa decision to give Ruby a game loss correct? perhaps it should be "is the rule correct" - i would say their decision to enforce it was correct, but the rule itself was faulty | ||
Wala.Revolution
7579 Posts
| ||
| ||