EPT[Over] Chill vs Combat-Ex - Page 78
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Jawa~
United States291 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25991 Posts
On July 03 2009 01:21 arb wrote: Not tos ound like im trolling But this means you dont think he Is terrible(D+) like people says but is an all around semi alright player? Gj btw i predicted you winning 3-1 many days ago :D He's a fine player. I've never said that except in jest. He's just not B- and certainly not B. | ||
|
Strayline
United States330 Posts
On July 02 2009 23:53 Chill wrote: Look guys, it's simple. When you see good players play all day, you don't see mistakes. When you see players who have very well-practised builds, everything looks tight. When you see players like myself and Combat, who are both decidedly bad, and play by feel instead of builds, you get the sloppy play shown in the VODs. I'm out of practise but I'm not THAT out of practise. I played 100 ICCup games last season, finishing high B-. I am B-. My play and results reflect that; no higher, no worse. Combat-Ex is not D+. I would put him decidedly at low C+. He understands the fundamentals and macro just fine. In game 2 he crushed me. He is not B- and certainly not B. Obviously I was trying every game. That seems like a pretty honest analysis of what happened to me TBH. No place for that in this thread imo  | ||
|
killanator
United States549 Posts
| ||
|
Kyo Yuy
United States1286 Posts
On July 03 2009 01:57 killanator wrote: combat is alright... c, maybe c+ without abusing. He has gotten to C+ without abusing before. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25991 Posts
How do you know? Every time I've taken some time to look into his account's game list when he's past C, there's evidence of abuse all around. How do you know where he got without abusing? The point of this was to show that what he says is complete bullshit. | ||
|
shafiru
111 Posts
| ||
|
poilord
Germany3252 Posts
| ||
|
stk01001
United States786 Posts
| ||
|
Kyo Yuy
United States1286 Posts
On July 03 2009 02:05 Chill wrote: How do you know? Every time I've taken some time to look into his account's game list when he's past C, there's evidence of abuse all around. How do you know where he got without abusing? The point of this was to show that what he says is complete bullshit. The first time I saw his ICCUP record I saw that he played C's at the C level, then reached C+. That was a long time ago though. It's not abuse if you play someone whose ICCUP rank matches your own, correct? That's not meant to be sarcasm, I just wanted to make sure I understand the concept of abuse correctly. | ||
LosingID8
CA10829 Posts
On July 03 2009 02:16 Kyo Yuy wrote: The first time I saw his ICCUP record I saw that he played C's at the C level, then reached C+. That was a long time ago though. It's not abuse if you play someone whose ICCUP rank matches your own, correct? That's not meant to be sarcasm, I just wanted to make sure I understand the concept of abuse correctly. you also have to examine the games to make sure that the other player actually made units etc (which is not the case in some of combat-ex's games) anyway, chill was definitely warmed up to play this series, seeing as he was bghing w/ me an hour or two before he played combat-ex. | ||
|
stroggos
New Zealand1543 Posts
| ||
|
Eggplant
United States120 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25991 Posts
| ||
micronesia
United States24753 Posts
Come on people on the internet, put chill in his place. | ||
|
killanator
United States549 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25991 Posts
On July 03 2009 02:29 micronesia wrote: I'm sick of chill coming out on top in all of his challenges and arguments (zulu marine vs lurker is another one that comes to mind). The only time he's ever wrong is when he argues with me about my job. Come on people on the internet, put chill in his place. Obviously I only get into challenges I know I can win micro. Come on now. | ||
|
Mutaahh
Netherlands859 Posts
to bad it was out of sync | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
and hotbid screaming was one of the best moments of my life. | ||
|
h3r1n6
Iceland2039 Posts
| ||
| ||
