EPTOn July 02 2009 22:28 zatic wrote:
VOD finally up, thanks aers for converting!
VOD finally up, thanks aers for converting!
Well there goes his 4000 or so subscribers
[Over] Chill vs Combat-Ex - Page 77
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
ryuu_
United States1266 Posts
Well there goes his 4000 or so subscribers | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
On July 02 2009 22:30 kurtcobain wrote: i thot chill seemed more calm and confident during d game wich allowed him 2 b more aggresive. i guess combat was nervos or somthng wich lead to the mistakes he made.. is there any possibility of a rematch? Combat is just a couple of levels lower than Chill. It has nothing to do with nerves. In Starcraft if you're a few Iccup ranks lower you struggle to win any game and have no chance in a Bo5. That's not a biased opinion. That's the opinion of anyone who understands Starcraft. | ||
|
29 fps
United States5725 Posts
| ||
|
reincremate
China2216 Posts
On July 02 2009 23:21 Klive5ive wrote: Combat is just a couple of levels lower than Chill. It has nothing to do with nerves. Most likely more than a couple levels lower. I doubt combat is higher than C-. Even D+ tosses don't screw up sim cities on popular maps like Python (or at least I and other D+ tosses I've seen don't). I think, however, that Chill is either rusty, or wasn't even trying (should have been), since his play was kind of sloppy. edit: nvm I always thought "a couple" meant two. Didn't realize it meant "more than two, but not many". >.< | ||
|
RedTerror
New Zealand742 Posts
On July 02 2009 23:32 reincremate wrote: Most likely more than a couple levels lower. I doubt combat is higher than C-. Even D+ tosses don't screw up sim cities on popular maps like Python (or at least I and other D+ tosses I've seen don't). I think, however, that Chill is either rusty, or wasn't even trying (should have been), since his play was kind of sloppy. edit: nvm I always thought "a couple" meant two. Didn't realize it meant "more than two, but not many". >.< yes, combat was bad because he sucks and chill was bad because he was rusty bias much? | ||
|
gettodaroflchoppa
104 Posts
| ||
|
reincremate
China2216 Posts
On July 02 2009 23:41 ViruX wrote: yes, combat was bad because he sucks and chill was bad because he was rusty bias much? Okay, if you want me to be completely fair, Combat may have been better before, and was just rusty/not trying during this BO5 for whatever reason. But watching his FPVODs would strongly indicate otherwise. His skill level in those VODs looks like D+/C- to me. I may be wrong, since I'm barely D+ myself. It's just speculation. The reason I say Chill was rusty was because his play didn't seem like B-. I may be wrong, since I haven't seen too many games with B- players. Just speculation, again. In the end, the only important thing is that combat-ex was unequivocally and hilariously exposed as a lying blowhard to any who doubted he was, which is always fun. | ||
Chill
Calgary25995 Posts
On July 02 2009 23:32 reincremate wrote: Most likely more than a couple levels lower. I doubt combat is higher than C-. Even D+ tosses don't screw up sim cities on popular maps like Python (or at least I and other D+ tosses I've seen don't). I think, however, that Chill is either rusty, or wasn't even trying (should have been), since his play was kind of sloppy. edit: nvm I always thought "a couple" meant two. Didn't realize it meant "more than two, but not many". >.< Look guys, it's simple. When you see good players play all day, you don't see mistakes. When you see players who have very well-practised builds, everything looks tight. When you see players like myself and Combat, who are both decidedly bad, and play by feel instead of builds, you get the sloppy play shown in the VODs. I'm out of practise but I'm not THAT out of practise. I played 100 ICCup games last season, finishing high B-. I am B-. My play and results reflect that; no higher, no worse. Combat-Ex is not D+. I would put him decidedly at low C+. He understands the fundamentals and macro just fine. In game 2 he crushed me. He is not B- and certainly not B. Obviously I was trying every game. | ||
|
vx70GTOJudgexv
United States3161 Posts
On July 02 2009 22:30 kurtcobain wrote: i thot chill seemed more calm and confident during d game wich allowed him 2 b more aggresive. i guess combat was nervos or somthng wich lead to the mistakes he made.. is there any possibility of a rematch? WTF is it with Combat-EX and his fucking groupies not being able to type out full words? Shit man, I mean, I use small abbreviations like "WTF" and "TBH" here and there, but for god's sake, it's one or two extra letters most of the time! 2 = to. Oh my fucking god, one more letter! b = be. Again, one more letter! d = the. Two. Holy shit. Two. learn to type please. /angryrant I enjoyed the cast, it definitely made it worth it. Some of the humor was kind of lame, but to be completely honest, I just don't think Day[9] has enough asshole/douchebaggery in him. He's always just struck me as a manner guy. | ||
|
mIsUZu
New Zealand528 Posts
i'm ex C+ ~ B- protoss. can we have bo5 sometimes??? | ||
|
MorningMusume11
United States3490 Posts
On July 03 2009 00:02 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: WTF is it with Combat-EX and his fucking groupies not being able to type out full words? Shit man, I mean, I use small abbreviations like "WTF" and "TBH" here and there, but for god's sake, it's one or two extra letters most of the time! 2 = to. Oh my fucking god, one more letter! b = be. Again, one more letter! d = the. Two. Holy shit. Two. learn to type please. /angryrant I enjoyed the cast, it definitely made it worth it. Some of the humor was kind of lame, but to be completely honest, I just don't think Day[9] has enough asshole/douchebaggery in him. He's always just struck me as a manner guy. The Bear Semen definitely helped him out though | ||
|
Julmust
Sweden4867 Posts
On July 03 2009 00:02 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: WTF is it with Combat-EX and his fucking groupies not being able to type out full words? Shit man, I mean, I use small abbreviations like "WTF" and "TBH" here and there, but for god's sake, it's one or two extra letters most of the time! 2 = to. Oh my fucking god, one more letter! b = be. Again, one more letter! d = the. Two. Holy shit. Two. learn to type please. /angryrant I enjoyed the cast, it definitely made it worth it. Some of the humor was kind of lame, but to be completely honest, I just don't think Day[9] has enough asshole/douchebaggery in him. He's always just struck me as a manner guy. haha then you obviously missed him ranting on ret's stream! | ||
|
Xusneb
Canada612 Posts
| ||
|
Puosu
7005 Posts
Nice showmatch, I never really liked Combat-EX or his commentarys but it really seemed like he was extremely nervous here, I mean, if Chill is right and he is around C+ then I really can't see how all those building placement mistakes and multiple tech buildings of the same type can be anything but being nervous, maybe thats just how he is i have no idea. Thanks to the players and commentator and everyone behind organising this anyway~!! | ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
Kyo Yuy
United States1286 Posts
On July 03 2009 00:36 Puosu wrote: After having listened to the educational audios by Day this commentary he did here felt really weird, not that it was bad though. Nice showmatch, I never really liked Combat-EX or his commentarys but it really seemed like he was extremely nervous here, I mean, if Chill is right and he is around C+ then I really can't see how all those building placement mistakes and multiple tech buildings of the same type can be anything but being nervous, maybe thats just how he is i have no idea. Thanks to the players and commentator and everyone behind organising this anyway~!! Watch his FPVODs. He always walls himself in when he plays and then takes out the blocking gateway. While his building placement may be considered "stupid," it is not a mistake. He always walls himself in when he plays PvZ. The observatory thing was probably nerves though. | ||
|
vx70GTOJudgexv
United States3161 Posts
On July 03 2009 00:55 Kyo Yuy wrote: Watch his FPVODs. He always walls himself in when he plays and then takes out the blocking gateway. I enjoy my positive IQ, thanks. The wall-in thing looked very planned, though. Probably is something he always does. For what reason, God and Combat only know, but he definitely looked like he intended on doing that the whole time. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25995 Posts
| ||
|
barth
Ireland1272 Posts
More like 10000 hating, Combat-EX fans  | ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On July 02 2009 23:53 Chill wrote: Look guys, it's simple. When you see good players play all day, you don't see mistakes. When you see players who have very well-practised builds, everything looks tight. When you see players like myself and Combat, who are both decidedly bad, and play by feel instead of builds, you get the sloppy play shown in the VODs. I'm out of practise but I'm not THAT out of practise. I played 100 ICCup games last season, finishing high B-. I am B-. My play and results reflect that; no higher, no worse. Combat-Ex is not D+. I would put him decidedly at low C+. He understands the fundamentals and macro just fine. In game 2 he crushed me. He is not B- and certainly not B. Obviously I was trying every game. Not tos ound like im trolling But this means you dont think he Is terrible(D+) like people says but is an all around semi alright player? Gj btw i predicted you winning 3-1 many days ago :D | ||
| ||
