|
On April 27 2009 21:58 3 Lions wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2009 21:10 blapsd wrote:On April 27 2009 01:39 Apex wrote: 543 places up the standings ^_^
Biggest gainer so far~ Is it just me and my maths failing but do your points not add up correctly? Like way out infact Your detailed view has the correct points won at 53 but for some reason your rank and basic view has 69 points won. Yeah it doesn't add up. He has gained 53 points, lost 3 due to trading fee, and lost 10 on his anti-team. Should be 40, not 50 I think.
should be 34 actually, he has -16 on his antiteam (including yellow[arnc] who he traded later)
and sorry apex, didnt want to rain on your parade!
|
Braavos36370 Posts
|
|
Actually, it's been bugging me for a while: is there a 'perfect team' thing this season? I didn't notice it anywhere.
Yay I'm glad i sticked with Sea since the beginning instead of trading him for some noname nub :D
|
Braavos36370 Posts
On April 28 2009 02:58 Jaeden wrote: omg what ?! skt #1 :O hahaha the random SK Telecom team I made for fun is #1, that's funny
|
United States10328 Posts
On April 28 2009 03:54 Hot_Bid wrote:hahaha the random SK Telecom team I made for fun is #1, that's funny
you should trade hyuk for best >.>
|
Germany / USA16648 Posts
|
is awesome32269 Posts
|
Braavos36370 Posts
On April 28 2009 04:04 ]343[ wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2009 03:54 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 28 2009 02:58 Jaeden wrote: omg what ?! skt #1 :O hahaha the random SK Telecom team I made for fun is #1, that's funny you should trade hyuk for best >.> I should also trade Canata for Flash and Boxer for Jaedong.
>.>
|
3 Lions
United States3705 Posts
wow SKT is so imba, teams with many SKT players have really great trade options
edit: oops ignore the second part of my original post
|
Braavos36370 Posts
yeah i can just ignore all the rules for trading
|
|
United States10328 Posts
oh yeah oops I forgot
nah you can clearly ignore rules (or you should totally uh trade 2 players for 1 that would be cool)
|
I knew that I should grab Jaehoon and get rid of Pusan... but Jaehoon was a guaranteed loss this week, right? I fail...
|
NOTE: scores right now aren't including the -4 for Leta's forfeit.
|
On April 28 2009 20:24 Abydos1 wrote: NOTE: scores right now aren't including the -4 for Leta's forfeit. That -4 points is a total game-breaker.
|
they will? i could understand if leta does not get -4, but only 0 for a loss since kespa´s decision was stupid.
ps: i do not have leta in my team ^^
|
-4 for leta's forfeit?
Kespa costed leta's owners 8 points if he played and won against kal and ace, but instead we ll get punished because his monitor didnt work and couldnt write properly?
|
retarded or not, it was a rule that got passed and was not contested up until tonight so Leta's DQ is legit. (Before this I always wondered why there was even a scoring penalty for DQ since I don't know why a player would get DQ'd )
|
Germany / USA16648 Posts
On April 28 2009 20:38 Samurai- wrote: -4 for leta's forfeit?
Kespa costed leta's owners 8 points if he played and won against kal and ace, but instead we ll get punished because his monitor didnt work and couldnt write properly? If he won, if he played ace, if he won ace... That is assuming a lot. yes I know Leta plays most aces for Sparkyz, but still.
The Fantasy scoring rules clearly state the -4 for DQ, arbitrarily deciding not to go through with this would be at least as stupid as what KeSPA did.
Yes, it's tough luck for Leta owners, but it's the proper course of action. KeSPA determines the official result of a game, that's just how it is.
|
|
|
|