EPT[Fantasy] PL R4 Daily Blog - Page 25
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
[AhunGrY]MelOn
United States357 Posts
| ||
|
Samurai-
Slovenia2035 Posts
On April 25 2009 15:49 [AhunGrY]MelOn wrote: fuck couldve been at 1st if i didnt trade ˘_˘ | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
Sold tempest befor he took down leta-> fail luxury losing to his bro, not even briging teamwinpoint -> fail having piano on antiteam, and hero on mainteam -> epic fail | ||
|
Jaksiel
United States4130 Posts
| ||
|
hasuprotoss
United States4690 Posts
On April 25 2009 16:06 Jaksiel wrote: Having so many Stars on my team really shows when I shoot up the standings (+351 today) after a good day, and then slowly start going back down again. Just like me and Hite. So I might as well enjoy this quick first place while it lasts (and hopefully skyrocket high enough near the end to where I can't be touched)! | ||
|
Rostam
United States2552 Posts
| ||
|
CursOr
United States6335 Posts
half as retarded as me. i am the king of stupid. | ||
|
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
Wk ▼Traded Acquired Pt ± 1  SangHo  PianO -32 PianO Canata +3Sub-Total: 0 SangHo for Piano was a positive trade last week but is now showing up as negative because Piano won, even though he's no longer on my anti-team. | ||
|
ShloobeR
Korea (South)3851 Posts
I have the 2nd highest scoring team (admittedly with a lot of STX - WOONGJIN) but a horrrrrible anti-team : ( why does thezerg suddenly have to start winning | ||
|
Crunchums
United States11144 Posts
On April 25 2009 16:36 ShloobeR wrote: dohhhh I have the 2nd highest scoring team (admittedly with a lot of STX - WOONGJIN) but a horrrrrible anti-team : ( why does thezerg suddenly have to start winning I think the real question is why did you pick a player who's guaranteed to play every single time his team does? | ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
...oh wait, he's played three times and hurt me exactly the same as oov, who doesn't play at all. And this was predictable. | ||
|
gdcrimson
New Zealand148 Posts
 . | ||
|
orcsmash
Canada319 Posts
| ||
|
dranjam
Poland198 Posts
 ). | ||
|
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On April 25 2009 16:32 ShadowDrgn wrote: It appears that the trade gain section doesn't handle the situation where you trade for a player and then trade him away. Wk ▼Traded Acquired Pt ± 1 SangHo PianO -32 PianO Canata +3Sub-Total: 0 SangHo for Piano was a positive trade last week but is now showing up as negative because Piano won, even though he's no longer on my anti-team. Just add them together, the SangHo >>> PianO >>> Canata trade is a 0 point gain. | ||
|
Aurra
United States469 Posts
I'm so emo right now. | ||
|
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
On April 26 2009 02:39 Abydos1 wrote: Just add them together, the SangHo >>> PianO >>> Canata trade is a 0 point gain. But it's not a 0 point gain. SangHo >>> PianO was a 1 point net gain because SangHo scored 3 in week 2 and PianO scored 1. PianO >>> Canata is so far a 3 point net gain because PianO got 4 and Canata still has 0. These should total to a 4 point gain, not 0. | ||
|
Abydos1
United States832 Posts
On April 26 2009 03:16 ShadowDrgn wrote: But it's not a 0 point gain. SangHo >>> PianO was a 1 point net gain because SangHo scored 3 in week 2 and PianO scored 1. PianO >>> Canata is so far a 3 point net gain because PianO got 4 and Canata still has 0. These should total to a 4 point gain, not 0. If you look at this long term though, if you had just stuck with SangHo you'd have -3 points from weeks 2 & 3; the SangHo >>> PianO trade only would have you at -5 points (-1 from the trade); the full trade of SangHo >>> PianO >>> Canata puts you at -3 points (-2 from the two trades). Thus, the whole series of trades there is a net of 0 points compared to if you had just kept SangHo on your team and never made the two trades. | ||
|
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
| ||
]343[
United States10328 Posts
| ||
| ||
