Zer defenetly as you have to micro and macro the most since there tend be be a lot of hatcheries in mid to late game and is very hard to manage them all as well as do decent micro defending from storms, irradiate and so on...

diehilde1

Germany522 Posts

May 16 2008 10:55 GMT

#271

On May 16 2008 13:18 Seraphim wrote:

Show nested quote +

And any competent player of any race would know what you said is a pile of shit.

pf i guess playing in bwcl-1a would qualify me as a competent player u protoss nooob.
also interesting people say that its only a "what race do you play?" when the majority of non-kors play protoss. Why is protoss still the landslide loser of this poll when most users play protoss?
Cus every t/z votes for p to be the easiest and NOT for z/t. Of course, this can only be the case cus all t/z players are delusional and only the p players got a grip on reality when it comes down to judging the difficulty of their own race...
As others said, on pro level it is a whole different story, the lack of flexibility is a disadvantage at pro level, but it makes the race much easier up to that level.

diehilde1

Germany522 Posts

May 16 2008 11:05 GMT

#272

On May 16 2008 15:13 0xDEADBEEF wrote:
Even if all races were exactly equal in how difficult it is to master them (which I don't believe - I think P is also the easiest here). It's still undeniable that P is the easiest to play on low levels.
This alone is enough to say that P is the easiest race overall (Easy macro; A few micro mistakes are tolerable because the units can take a punch; Generally fewer APM needed).
Of course saying it's a "noob race" is a bit harsh, because it also takes a lot of skill to master, but still, P is the easiest of the three. Plus, current maps tend to favor P.

I'm not surprised at all that P players are doing so damn well in non-Korean tournaments.
Non-Korean pros don't have the rigorous mechanics training the Korean pros get, so naturally P does best in the foreigner area, T worst, and Z is in the middle. We have very, very few successful Terrans. It's just too demanding on speed/mechanics to play well.

yeah my german fellow got it right imo.
Almost all foreigners dont have more than 220apm constantly. With protoss that is enough to put up a -relatively- flawless game, while with Z and T it just doesnt cut it against a good P who is using his speed as efficiently as you are.

fusionsdf

Canada15390 Posts

May 16 2008 16:26 GMT

#273

On May 16 2008 16:46 OneOther wrote:

Show nested quote +

I said why I wanted to ;o

I thought it was normal to respond to a pm through pm, not by posting. but that's cool too.

lol

Im really glad you dont post a lot since I would have to shoot myself if I had to put up with your stupidity

sohee_pink

Philippines447 Posts

May 16 2008 16:33 GMT

#274

for some reason I'm more comfortable using Terran and Protoss. Zerg isn't just meant for me... lolol ^^;;
But since I'm a Terran player, I find Protoss just a bit slower for me and harder to think of what to do next :/