| Forum Index > BW General |
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
The latest version should now work fine with replays and also have low CPU usage during BNET screens. Download: http://r-1.ch/cpusavior-1.6.zip Source (not required): http://r-1.ch/CPUSavior.cpp Install: Put in the ChaosLauncher/BWL directory and tick the 'CPU Savior' plugin when launching. | ||
|
ray1234
Canada679 Posts
| ||
|
MeriaDoKk
Chile1726 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:10 ray1234 wrote: this is false advertising Come on now, did you really expect an AI  sAviOr? | ||
|
haduken
Australia8267 Posts
email me at yma8000@gmail.com | ||
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
I did :p Thanks R1CH, much love <3 | ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5522 Posts
I don't think I'll use it though, i only play on a pentium 2 so im not too worried about energy costs ;p. Maybe on my laptop to stop it from burning me.. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:14 haduken wrote: give source code code code email me at yma8000@gmail.com Since you asked so nicely, here's the messy source with lots of notes and old ideas (requires BWLTemplate project to build of course): http://r-1.ch/CPUSavior.cpp | ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
YES | ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
 | ||
|
SnowFantasy
4173 Posts
T____T so did I. Or, at least, I wanted one. | ||
|
MoRe_mInErAls
Canada1210 Posts
One day.. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
| ||
|
Imagination
243 Posts
same here.=] | ||
|
SnowFantasy
4173 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:39 R1CH wrote: It actually never occurred to me until after I posted that it could be interpreted this way. I originally named it CPU Saver and then you can see where my line of thought went... Haha, I forgive you. I will try this program real soon. Thank you for your work. | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
VERY GOOD JOB! I appreciate it! | ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:39 R1CH wrote: It actually never occurred to me until after I posted that it could be interpreted this way. I originally named it CPU Saver and then you can see where my line of thought went... I'm still deeply hurt inside. I wanted to play against Savior  | ||
|
ilovejonn
Canada2548 Posts
| ||
|
noobienoob
United States1173 Posts
me too lol thanks, am going to try it out | ||
|
funkie
Venezuela9376 Posts
| ||
|
LumberJack
United States3355 Posts
| ||
pachi
Melbourne5338 Posts
| ||
|
caution.slip
United States775 Posts
hopefully this will help, thanks | ||
|
Raithed
China7078 Posts
| ||
|
Hollow
Canada2180 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:11 MeriaDoKk wrote: wow nice, specially to me that i dont have too much RAM ram =/= cpu consumption | ||
|
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:11 MeriaDoKk wrote: wow nice, specially to me that i dont have too much RAM sorry but i hate to shit myself with laughter at this one loooooool | ||
|
haduken
Australia8267 Posts
| ||
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
On February 06 2008 14:15 pachi wrote: i think you're more likely to get a official answer to that on the iccup forums Technically yes (atm, may change with future AH-Versions), and legally no But as it does not patch SC-Code it probably could be integrated into the Launcher. | ||
|
PePe QuiCoSE
Argentina1204 Posts
 | ||
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
This is very appreciated. I hope this doesn't increase players delay who use it. I don't care if it skips frames during replay just don't mess up normal game play. | ||
|
vhallee
899 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:10 ray1234 wrote: this is false advertising god damn it i fell for it too | ||
|
parkin
1082 Posts
System Spec: AMD Athlong 2.25Ghz 2Gb RAM Asus Geforce 6200 | ||
|
Tarson
Poland130 Posts
| ||
|
parkin
1082 Posts
 | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On February 07 2008 00:30 parkin wrote: I tried this in singleplayer, The game became EXTREMELY slow/choppy and laggy. Any other plugins or anything active? I played a full mission on SP without a single incident of lag / slowdown on my 3200+. I guess I could make an option to control how often a delay is introduced. | ||
|
parkin
1082 Posts
On February 07 2008 05:58 R1CH wrote: Any other plugins or anything active? I played a full mission on SP without a single incident of lag / slowdown on my 3200+. I guess I could make an option to control how often a delay is introduced. No i used Chaoslauncher and CPU Savior is the unly plugin active/checked. Same issue in LAN vs computer, as in SC singleplayer and BW singleplayer. Its slow and choppy during all the menus as well unfortunatly. Edit: I tried it on Battle.net Europe against a random player and it became very slow for both of us. | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
thanks! | ||
|
ZidaneTribal
United States2800 Posts
yes i did =.=' | ||
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
| ||
|
Latham
9568 Posts
Ditto. | ||
|
parkin
1082 Posts
Could it be becouse something wrong with my processor? Or some 3rd party application? | ||
|
Tarson
Poland130 Posts
pls help ;; | ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9934 Posts
haven't experienced any lag at all | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
. | ||
|
Tarson
Poland130 Posts
| ||
Aesop
Hungary11305 Posts
| ||
|
Narrator
United States868 Posts
| ||
|
o3.power91
Bahrain5288 Posts
I was expecting that Wouldnt it be great to have one for different progamers | ||
|
illmatic
Canada53 Posts
| ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
I'm running XP SP2 with a 1GHZ celeron. Same problem on Intel 3 ghz. Not sure if this matters, but both system have integrated video. | ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5282 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
| ||
|
FirstBorn
Romania3955 Posts
yes. | ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5282 Posts
On March 02 2008 23:51 MasterOfChaos wrote: It is not allowed. But you could copy your iccscbn.icc to the chaoslauncher directory and rename it to iccscbn.bwl. But I am not sure it is compatible with the antihack. (Probably yes) it says antihack: NO it'd be great if you could include this to ICC launcher. | ||
|
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
| ||
|
nysikto
Norway337 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
On March 03 2008 02:45 niteReloaded wrote: it says antihack: NO it'd be great if you could include this to ICC launcher. I think the lag problem should be solved first. On March 03 2008 05:22 nysikto wrote: every god damn computer game take 100% of cpu so why bother with it. its normal Because SC wastes them. And it increases the powerusage of laptops. | ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
R1CH & MasterOfChaos , is there any specific info you want? I can look for it on my 2 computers. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
Download: http://r-1.ch/cpusavior-1.1.zip | ||
|
pheer
5391 Posts
| ||
|
RaiZ
2813 Posts
On February 06 2008 10:39 R1CH wrote: It actually never occurred to me until after I posted that it could be interpreted this way. I originally named it CPU Saver and then you can see where my line of thought went... Lol dunno if you really did it on purpose for more publicity... :p Either way it's a nice program. | ||
|
3 Lions
United States3705 Posts
yes | ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
| ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
as so many have said before me HELL YEAH | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On March 21 2008 23:49 [X]Ken_D wrote: I think it is possible that the program doesn't work for me because the feature is not available in P3 celeron and P4. It doesn't make use of any processor-specific instructions, it should work on anything. | ||
|
Darkmole
United States900 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
http://r-1.ch/cpusavior-1.2.zip | ||
|
distant_voice
Germany2521 Posts
On March 23 2008 09:41 Darkmole wrote: wats a CPU???? cuz im so confuzed right now google + wikipedia = win http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_processing_unit | ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
On March 27 2008 18:04 R1CH wrote: This version should hopefully fix the severe delay / lag issue some people were having. Please let me know if it works. http://r-1.ch/cpusavior-1.2.zip OMG!!@!! It works for me on my Celeron P3 laptop! I got to try this out on my P4 desktop. YOU'RE THE BEST R1CH! THANKS! | ||
|
kAra
Germany1388 Posts
| ||
|
ossguy
Canada20 Posts
StarCraft Power Saver is different from CPU Savior in that it modifies the StarCraft executable directly so you don't need to run any external programs. From what I've read of CPU Savior, StarCraft Power Saver is similar to CPU Savior in most other ways. Any feedback on the tool would be appreciated. | ||
Chosi
Germany1303 Posts
| ||
|
ossguy
Canada20 Posts
| ||
|
hunter3
United States155 Posts
| ||
|
ossguy
Canada20 Posts
On March 31 2008 20:57 Chosi wrote: modyfing SC.exe = no Bnet = no use, sorry People who want to use StarCraft Power Saver or similar applications on Battle.net should read these two posts on the SC Power Saver thread: - Blizzard, cheating, and Battle.net protections - alternatives to Battle.net for Internet play | ||
|
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
But of cause there always is a small banrisk. Smaller for some plugins(Chaosplugin), and larger for others (APMAlert,most AdvLoader Plugins). | ||
|
flag
United States228 Posts
I am using windows 2000 with amd 2ghz dual core. Any idea why this would happen? Also if this can have all kinks worked out it would be great if it were an option in the iccup launcher as well. | ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5522 Posts
| ||
|
GinNtoniC
Sweden2945 Posts
See, my CPU tends to overheat and cause system crashes ever so often when I play starcraft. That is, more often than not lately. Using CPU savior I at least avoid the overheating, but it's a traddeoff for a pretty darn big portion of lagg, mouse-related or otherwise - I seriously have problem telling. I've run a performance monitor which claims my CPU is running at 45-50% and RAM at ~25% when playing without the CPU savior, and about 3% CPU usage and a bit lower RAM when using CPU savior. On top of it I've recently started getting application errors too, something along the line of "Faulty program starcraft.exe, version 1.15.2.1, wrong module , version 0.0.0.0, wrong adress 0x00000000." - roughly translated from Swedish. Said errors at least - thankfully enough - don't crash the system, just the game. Reinstalled and cleared all SC-related files on computer I think 3 times in the past 2 weeks. All proper drivers installed for graphics card and checked the CPU fans for dust. I'm clueless by now :S I suppose this is just a shoutout to whoever recognizes said problem or just has some insight to it. And help/tips would be greatly appreciated. (Playing on an Intel Core 2 Quad-core Graphics card: GeForce 8800GT 512MB GDDR3 all on a -07 GIGABYTE mothercard, which modelnumber I for the life of me can't remember) | ||
|
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
Also run a ramtest. | ||
|
Dagor
Germany64 Posts
How warm is your processor normally ? Is Starcraft the only game that crashes ? Maybe your heat sink isn't powerful enough (Quads get pretty hot). | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On June 02 2008 20:45 GinNtoniC wrote: Sorry for bumping this old baybe, but I'm having this issue (surprise surprise) where I basically have to choose between an overheated CPU and a laggy starcraft. Please try this version: http://r-1.ch/cpusavior-1.4.zip | ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
 | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
| ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
|
GinNtoniC
Sweden2945 Posts
Sorry for the late response. I spent the past two days formating and reinstalling Windows XP and setting up all the right drivers etc etc. Finally getting the computer up to speed again. Gonna get games installed and stuff tomorrow and do a RAM-test etc. I'll get back to you on how it turns out (don't have any method of checking CPU temperature though) Oh and thanks R1CH for the new version, gonna try that out too! | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
| ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5522 Posts
| ||
|
blabber
United States4448 Posts
On June 24 2008 07:14 R1CH wrote: Any word yet if version 1.4 fixes the laggy mouse problem? it definitely fixed it for me | ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5522 Posts
| ||
|
wifebeater
178 Posts
So while running SC without CPU Savior, the CPU usage of StarCraft.exe was about 90% all the fucking time.. And now with the fix, its about 0% all the time. And my mouse seems to be working like it should.. But don't take my words for granted because I haven't had the time to test it enough, just jet.. Maybe if I have the time later, I will check my CPU temperature while running CPU Savior and then do the same thing when I don't.. Brb, testing if I can run 16x in a replay without any further problems.. Thanks once again! ;-D | ||
|
pheer
5391 Posts
| ||
|
Aesop
Hungary11305 Posts
| ||
Liquid`HayprO
Iraq1230 Posts
| ||
|
iCCup.Trent
Argentina450 Posts
The next step would be to talk to ICCup guys to have them consider some of these great plugins. I'd love to have a timer on screen while on ICCup. | ||
|
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
On August 15 2008 05:05 haypro wrote: is there anything like this for iccup launcher. i cant stay on iccup for long before my cpu overheats and my comp restarts. I really hope its possible to add something like this to the launcher, i can play maybe 2-3games on iccup before my cpu gets too hot. | ||
|
riotjune
United States3394 Posts
| ||
|
blabber
United States4448 Posts
One thing we could do is nag Blizzard to fix the problem | ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
Hahahhaha I did | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
http://r-1.ch/cpusavior-1.5.zip | ||
|
Cadical
United States469 Posts
i was waiting one for new patch | ||
|
blabber
United States4448 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36383 Posts
| ||
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
You should really try getting hte iccup staff to include this in the iccup launcher, that'd make my day. And yeah your new animated icon rocks | ||
|
NPU)Disso(
United States14 Posts
| ||
|
blabber
United States4448 Posts
On September 15 2008 14:32 NePlus(Ultra) wrote: What exactly is the point of this? If you need a program to reduce the amount of CPU useage a 10 year old game uses, I think you should stop using a 10 year old computer. You can get a mid-range dual or quad core with atleast an 8xxx series graphics card for like ~600 these days. I have a Core 2 Duo computer and SC is taking up 50% CPU usage. Maybe you should take a look at task manager after logging on to battle.net and see for yourself. And lol at thinking getting a geforce 8 series video card will change anything. Just shows how misinformed you are | ||
|
NPU)Disso(
United States14 Posts
| ||
|
blabber
United States4448 Posts
On September 15 2008 14:50 NePlus(Ultra) wrote: Yeah, I've got an E8400 running @ 4.2ghz and Starcraft takes about 56% CPU useage, but that is because its only utilizing 1 core. What the hell does it matter? Does it slow my machine down in the least bit? Nope. Infact, I can run Prime95 with Large FFTs and Starcraft still runs smooth and fine. saves energy, money, environment, less heat, more CPU life, etc (ie. all the advantages of not working your CPU as hard) I mean if you wanna kill your CPU faster, go ahead... edit: not saying your CPU is gonna die from SC, but it's still not as healthy as using CPU Savior | ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
| ||
|
Realpenguin
8253 Posts
My machine is already overkill for Starcraft, but I like it anyways. | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On September 15 2008 14:50 NePlus(Ultra) wrote: I guess you really do need the extra 6000~ frames per secondYeah, I've got an E8400 running @ 4.2ghz and Starcraft takes about 56% CPU useage, but that is because its only utilizing 1 core. What the hell does it matter? Does it slow my machine down in the least bit? Nope. Infact, I can run Prime95 with Large FFTs and Starcraft still runs smooth and fine. | ||
|
NPU)Disso(
United States14 Posts
| ||
|
Narrator
United States868 Posts
| ||
|
Jaskwith
United States197 Posts
| ||
|
Tropics
United Kingdom1132 Posts
| ||
|
Schnake
Germany2819 Posts
On September 15 2008 14:32 NePlus(Ultra) wrote: What exactly is the point of this? If you need a program to reduce the amount of CPU useage a 10 year old game uses, I think you should stop using a 10 year old computer. You can get a mid-range dual or quad core with atleast an 8xxx series graphics card for like ~600 these days. If you neither understand the benefit of the plugin nor need it, then shut up and don't post. There are enough people, like myself, who play on a laptop and benefit GREATLY from this super duper plugin. | ||
|
liosama
Australia843 Posts
On September 15 2008 15:17 NePlus(Ultra) wrote: Seeing as how the human eye can really only process 30 frames per second I think it is, you're right, I do! just cause it can 'see' 30 doesn't mean you cant perceive anything higher. | ||
|
jaleel
1 Post
| ||
|
Sakoulaki
Greece54 Posts
Is there a way to use CPU Savior for the latest patch (1.16.1) ? Many thanks to R1CH for all the amazing work! | ||
|
blabber
United States4448 Posts
On June 26 2009 07:53 Sakoulaki wrote: Hello and first of all sorry for the bump. Is there a way to use CPU Savior for the latest patch (1.16.1) ? Many thanks to R1CH for all the amazing work! if you read the patch notes, you'll see that a similar function has already been implemented into the game | ||
|
aeonshifter
United States123 Posts
On June 26 2009 07:53 Sakoulaki wrote: Hello and first of all sorry for the bump. Is there a way to use CPU Savior for the latest patch (1.16.1) ? Many thanks to R1CH for all the amazing work! It's built in now: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - patch 1.16.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Feature Changes - In-game Speed Options menu now has a "Enable CPU Throttling" checkbox. Enabling this option will allow StarCraft to consume fewer CPU cycles. By default this option is off. | ||
|
Sakoulaki
Greece54 Posts
Thanx again tl.net! | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
| ||
|
BraveNewWorld
United States229 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
seRapH
United States9776 Posts
not trying to demean your plugin, just trying to understand. | ||
|
Yogurt
United States4258 Posts
does it make the game slower or is it always advised to use it? | ||
|
arcticStorm
United States295 Posts
On January 11 2010 13:26 BraveNewWorld wrote: does this mean there will be more lag too? Lag has more to do with network/internet issues than hardware/computational issues | ||
|
Loser777
1931 Posts
On January 11 2010 11:23 R1CH wrote: CPU Savior 1.6 supporting 1.16.1 is now available for those of you who have issues with CPU Throttling. Isn't this unnecessary now, especially with the CPU Throttling function built in? | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
| ||
|
Durak
Canada3685 Posts
On January 11 2010 14:03 Loser777 wrote: Isn't this unnecessary now, especially with the CPU Throttling function built in? If you read what you quoted... I've been using your timerInfo exe to get rid of my bnet menu lag. I don't know if this would accomplish the same thing but I'll try it out. | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On January 11 2010 14:06 Durak wrote: I've been using your timerInfo exe to get rid of my bnet menu lag. I don't know if this would accomplish the same thing but I'll try it out. It should, provided you disable CPU Throttling. | ||
|
Mobius
Canada1268 Posts
sAviOr so i clicked | ||
|
Cadical
United States469 Posts
I just wish it was allowed with iccup ah plugin.. | ||
|
darnoconrad
Canada110 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On January 11 2010 15:10 Cadical wrote: Thanks for the update. Really appreciate it. I've been getting bnet menu lag and slight ingame mouse lag as well with just throttleing feature. I just wish it was allowed with iccup ah plugin.. It shouldn't be detected by iccup, but chaos launcher refuses to load it for some reason. | ||
|
Cadical
United States469 Posts
On January 11 2010 15:42 R1CH wrote: It shouldn't be detected by iccup, but chaos launcher refuses to load it for some reason. Oh I see, I found it odd because before the chaos launcher update it used to work (old version of cpu savior) with iccup ah. | ||
|
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
Get the latest Chaoslauncher (0.5.4.3) and it will work again. | ||
|
BraveNewWorld
United States229 Posts
| ||
|
SuperKiller
United States97 Posts
thanks for the bump! | ||
|
BraveNewWorld
United States229 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10341 Posts
On January 12 2010 08:10 BraveNewWorld wrote: ok so just to clarify this is basically a surrogate for the cpu throttling except this doesnt have the small jitter/lag the throttling comes with right? Correct. On January 15 2010 14:26 BraveNewWorld wrote: btw, aren't the functions of this basically the opposite of what nagle's algorithm does? Nagle's algorithm is related to TCP coalescing, I have no idea what it has to do with throttling BW. Maybe you're thinking of something else? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagle's_algorithm | ||
|
asianskill
United States289 Posts
| ||
|
daniel_NOcheats
3 Posts
| ||
|
pebble444
Italy2499 Posts
| ||
|
art_of_turtle
United States1202 Posts
![[image loading]](https://www.dropbox.com/s/qkbfoeqzc3n6n7r/snip_20170425101306.png?raw=1) Its on mca64launcher | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2  25821Calm  3519Horang2 1357GuemChi 1279actioN 693Jaedong 519BeSt 442Shuttle 331Hyuk 290firebathero  261[ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations StarCraft: Brood War Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
OSC
Demi vs Mixu
Nicoract vs TBD
Babymarine vs MindelVK
ForJumy vs TBD
Shameless vs Percival
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV 2025
SC Evo League
BSL 21
Sziky vs OyAji
Gypsy vs eOnzErG
OSC
Solar vs Creator
ByuN vs Gerald
Percival vs Babymarine
Moja vs Krystianer
EnDerr vs ForJumy
sebesdes vs Nicoract
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV 2025
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
