EPTChina sc:re server will stop on 23rd.Jan.2023 - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Hitokiri3
18 Posts
| ||
GTR
51574 Posts
On November 18 2022 19:51 digmouse wrote: Won't be an issue for WTL for now. All Chinese pros play on Korean ladder and all the matches are played on non Chinese servers. was WTL assisted/funded by netease at all? i feel like that'd be the main issue. my main concern is the wc3 scene; although with players slowly shifting from netease to war3 champions + the community picking up the slack with the absence of WGL over the past year has eased these concerns slightly. | ||
|
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
|
Cheesefome
314 Posts
On November 18 2022 11:09 s_k_911 wrote: 3000-5000 men login in china sc:re server everyday. Shield Battery is your next best bet and it's not a bad one at all, actually better than battle.net. | ||
|
iopq
United States1068 Posts
On November 19 2022 10:08 outscar wrote: I wonder if they can play through VPN? But if it's account issue if it's Chinese Blizz might nuke it so only option will be to change account region via ticket. You have to buy the game again, AFAIK | ||
|
Calvinbobo
China90 Posts
On November 19 2022 01:34 iopq wrote: So what? It's a Chinese only requirement that you need to have an agreement with a Chinese company. Blizzard can do whatever they want in most countries in the world. China is the one that's been tightening down on games, including limiting students' online play time to one hour a week. 8PM-9PM on Friday, lol Also, Steam doesn't connect from China anymore. But let's immediately blame Blizzard without proof Well, the proof is everywhere, if you read the news... Check Bloomberg (if you can think of any other source that is more trustworthy to you, check them instead). Blizzard asked for a higher cut, a prepayment of two years, and data from millions of Chinese users. And what is wrong with China asking Blizzard to get a license? Maybe Blizzard can "do what they want in most countries", but that certainly doesn't include China. If Blizzard wants to keep making money from China, then play by the rules and show some respect to the counterparty and long-term partner, Netease. | ||
|
Gesotsas
1 Post
| ||
digmouse
China6330 Posts
On November 19 2022 06:15 GTR wrote: was WTL assisted/funded by netease at all? i feel like that'd be the main issue. my main concern is the wc3 scene; although with players slowly shifting from netease to war3 champions + the community picking up the slack with the absence of WGL over the past year has eased these concerns slightly. Almost entirely self funded by Scboy alongside sponsors. | ||
|
iopq
United States1068 Posts
On November 20 2022 11:37 Calvinbobo wrote: Well, the proof is everywhere, if you read the news... Check Bloomberg (if you can think of any other source that is more trustworthy to you, check them instead). Blizzard asked for a higher cut, a prepayment of two years, and data from millions of Chinese users. And what is wrong with China asking Blizzard to get a license? Maybe Blizzard can "do what they want in most countries", but that certainly doesn't include China. If Blizzard wants to keep making money from China, then play by the rules and show some respect to the counterparty and long-term partner, Netease. In other countries Blizzard gets 100% for the products they make, since it's their games. Why should some Chinese company get a big cut for doing just user registrations and running a server? I've signed up in China, it's nothing different, it just checked the government id. That company does nothing to deserve a cut, considering Blizzard does this feature in Korea themselves to satisfy local laws for underage people | ||
|
s_k_911
China362 Posts
On November 21 2022 04:59 iopq wrote: In other countries Blizzard gets 100% for the products they make, since it's their games. Why should some Chinese company get a big cut for doing just user registrations and running a server? I've signed up in China, it's nothing different, it just checked the government id. That company does nothing to deserve a cut, considering Blizzard does this feature in Korea themselves to satisfy local laws for underage people 1. Blizzard choose to co-operate with netease at the very beginning ,but not to run a china company of his own. 2. I know lots of china players buy both china-server-sc-re and korea-server-sc-re. Maybe the players not the big companies are the victims. | ||
|
digmouse
China6330 Posts
On November 21 2022 04:59 iopq wrote: In other countries Blizzard gets 100% for the products they make, since it's their games. Why should some Chinese company get a big cut for doing just user registrations and running a server? I've signed up in China, it's nothing different, it just checked the government id. That company does nothing to deserve a cut, considering Blizzard does this feature in Korea themselves to satisfy local laws for underage people Chinese law does not allow foreign companies to operate online games solely on their own, requires a local partner. | ||
| ||
