https://www.twitch.tv/liquidret
https://www.twitch.tv/liquidtlo
https://www.twitch.tv/ptitdrogo
Forum Index > BW General |
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
https://www.twitch.tv/liquidret https://www.twitch.tv/liquidtlo https://www.twitch.tv/ptitdrogo | ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
| ||
psd
France91 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 02:54 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: Sc2 pros got instant access ? O-o I think ppl who played in blizzard events (WCS etc.) got access to it cus blizz has their contact info, just a theory tho. Blizzard said that there would be a closed beta, dunno how they're gonna go about inviting people tho. | ||
juvenal
2448 Posts
| ||
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
![]()
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
![]()
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
| ||
psd
France91 Posts
| ||
TaShadan
Germany1961 Posts
His probe split is amazing :D | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
![]()
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
Netto.
Poland523 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:09 TaShadan wrote: lol ptitdrogo the real bw pro. His probe split is amazing :D ye tlo's openings are funny too ;d | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:10 outscar wrote: You got one TT1? And how to check ? Email? Update launcher? nope, and yea just update launcher. so far it looks like sc2 wcs players got invites. | ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 26513
2376 Posts
| ||
K.H.J
Korea (South)769 Posts
They got a email from Blizzard. I also got a eamil few days ago, and some BJs purchase other's account. Blizzard said Okay for this behaviour. | ||
![]()
HaN-
France1919 Posts
| ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
On July 31 2017 02:54 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: Sc2 pros got instant access ? O-o Did you get an invite eonzerg ? | ||
mishimaBeef
Canada2259 Posts
| ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:21 mishimaBeef wrote: firebathero also appears to be streaming from home alot of the Korean (ex)-pro's are streaming HD from home. Sea, Last, Shuttle... | ||
K.H.J
Korea (South)769 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:22 Keniji wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 03:21 mishimaBeef wrote: firebathero also appears to be streaming from home alot of the Korean (ex)-pro's are streaming HD from home. Sea, Last, Shuttle... Yeah, they all buy account form fans like me. | ||
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:21 mishimaBeef wrote: firebathero also appears to be streaming from home yeah, and even on twitch.tv | ||
MadaoDotaSc2
Greece35 Posts
why did they made such a huge window between tournament and release... | ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
K.H.J
Korea (South)769 Posts
In korea, they discriminate pcbang users and home users. IDK why they concerned pcbang much,. But same situation is on OW and other Blizzard games now. Percentage of pcbang occuption is the moat important thing for them, i think | ||
psd
France91 Posts
| ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:19 ppp87 wrote: Did you get an invite eonzerg ? not, and im not frustated for this,i guess it just sux to have your name in the blacklist but i acept this with DOS COJONES! :D :D | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
![]() also you can play vs sc:r beta players even on 1.19 | ||
psd
France91 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:33 TT1 wrote: no need to be jelly, watching ppl play bw is as good as playing it yourself ![]() also you can play vs sc:r beta players even on 1.19 If 1.19 was as good as 1.18 i would agree with you, but it's not. Iccup i guess. | ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:33 TT1 wrote: no need to be jelly, watching ppl play bw is as good as playing it yourself ![]() also you can play vs sc:r beta players even on 1.19 this. nothing feels better than watching a guy eating one big sweet entrecot while you are eating a thin steak. LOOOL | ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:37 Bakuryu wrote: tlo, ret, mana, ptitdrago have their SC:R stream labeled under "Other Games". Does SC:R not qualify as SC:BW and will be a separate category? twitch deleted recently starcraft broodwar section,so looks like it has something to do with it. | ||
Jae Zedong
407 Posts
| ||
outscar
2832 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:40 Jae Zedong wrote: Twitch removed BW category. How they dare? 1.16.1 and iCCup is still a thing. | ||
mishimaBeef
Canada2259 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
![]() | ||
207aicila
1237 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:44 outscar wrote: How they dare? 1.16.1 and iCCup is still a thing. It's all under the umbrella category "StarCraft". Just like the got rid of Heart of the Swarm / Legacy of the Void to have all the SC2 stuff under "StarCraft II". | ||
Akara12345
164 Posts
| ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
mishimaBeef
Canada2259 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:55 Bakuryu wrote: best is playing 4:3 with the new graphics, i thought it was only 4:3 with SD and 16: 9 with HD? if u select letterbox in the game options u can play bw:hd in 4:3 | ||
xReWxpilau
9 Posts
| ||
AmstAff
Germany949 Posts
| ||
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
On July 31 2017 04:27 AmstAff wrote: Just a quick question, are custom hotkeys available on the latest public patch? Yes | ||
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
On July 31 2017 03:49 Akara12345 wrote: Someone pls take pictures of the PC bangs. i will be in korea soon, I will update for sure and post. | ||
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
so you can play in 4:3 with HD on? | ||
Ahli
Germany355 Posts
On July 31 2017 05:09 Golgotha wrote: Im watching some korean streams at pc bangs. holy shit the game looks smooth and much better in FPV. i thought it was a bit clunky in the GG tourney. so you can play in 4:3 with HD on? Yes. You just need to enable the "letterbox" video option. | ||
Chris_Havoc
United States596 Posts
| ||
Lazare1969
United States318 Posts
| ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:11 Lazare1969 wrote: Horrible. They made SCV's so fucking BRIGHT with the lighting that it's impossible to hide them in enemy bases for scouting. i didnt think about it LOL | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
| ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
But I am angry about beta style. Fish admins = no beta Flash, Jaedong, Bisu, Stork, Boxer, Effort, NaDa, ChulGu, HongGu, Last, Shine, Shinee, more = no beta SC2 players = beta??? | ||
kogeT
Poland2030 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:24 fish_radio wrote: I am so happy about the game. But I am angry about beta style. Fish admins = no beta Flash, Jaedong, Bisu, Stork, Boxer, Effort, NaDa, ChulGu, HongGu, Last, Shine, Shinee, more = no beta SC2 players = beta??? Last is playing remastered | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
| ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:41 ppp87 wrote: Why blizzard is not giving beta access to current active top bw foreigners ? how would they go about doing this? they don't any of their info ![]() | ||
Jae Zedong
407 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:46 Jae Zedong wrote: Pretty sure Blizzard could get their contact info if they tried. how? by sending them PMs on TL.net? lol | ||
CobaltBlu
United States919 Posts
| ||
Jae Zedong
407 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:47 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 06:46 Jae Zedong wrote: Pretty sure Blizzard could get their contact info if they tried. how? by sending them PMs on TL.net? lol You really think Blizzard doesn't have the connections to get a hold of famous e-sports figures? | ||
ShuriKn
Canada20 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:47 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 06:46 Jae Zedong wrote: Pretty sure Blizzard could get their contact info if they tried. how? by sending them PMs on TL.net? lol they could pm via bnet email like any advertising. this situation is a blasphemy | ||
Espers
United Kingdom606 Posts
| ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:47 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 06:46 Jae Zedong wrote: Pretty sure Blizzard could get their contact info if they tried. how? by sending them PMs on TL.net? lol It's not like they're hidden or something. Find out what's the current top 10 foreigners and reach them through twitch, twitter, facebook, tl, bnet whatever... It's like an 1 hour work at best, you make it sound like it's impossible. | ||
JungleTerrain
Chile799 Posts
And is it possible to play HD but also 4:3 instead of 16 ![]() Edit: LOL the " : 9 " part turns into an emote | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:51 Jae Zedong wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 06:47 TT1 wrote: On July 31 2017 06:46 Jae Zedong wrote: Pretty sure Blizzard could get their contact info if they tried. how? by sending them PMs on TL.net? lol You really think Blizzard doesn't have the connections to get a hold of famous e-sports figures? we were talking about top foreign bw players, i dont think blizzard even knows who the current top foreign players are. | ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
On July 31 2017 07:00 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 06:51 Jae Zedong wrote: On July 31 2017 06:47 TT1 wrote: On July 31 2017 06:46 Jae Zedong wrote: Pretty sure Blizzard could get their contact info if they tried. how? by sending them PMs on TL.net? lol You really think Blizzard doesn't have the connections to get a hold of famous e-sports figures? we were talking about top foreign bw players, i dont think blizzard even knows who the current top foreign players are. Of course they know, you can defend blizzard all you want but find better arguments. | ||
Jae Zedong
407 Posts
On July 31 2017 06:24 fish_radio wrote: I am so happy about the game. But I am angry about beta style. Fish admins = no beta Flash, Jaedong, Bisu, Stork, Boxer, Effort, NaDa, ChulGu, HongGu, Last, Shine, Shinee, more = no beta SC2 players = beta??? So I could not believe how you could think Blizzard couldn't get a hold of Jaedong, Flash, Boxer if they tried. Yeah I don't think current BW foreigners should get a beta key ahead of top BW Koreans. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
![]() | ||
ShuriKn
Canada20 Posts
On July 31 2017 07:07 Jae Zedong wrote: Sorry TT1, I thought we were talking about this comment: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 06:24 fish_radio wrote: I am so happy about the game. But I am angry about beta style. Fish admins = no beta Flash, Jaedong, Bisu, Stork, Boxer, Effort, NaDa, ChulGu, HongGu, Last, Shine, Shinee, more = no beta SC2 players = beta??? So I could not believe how you could think Blizzard couldn't get a hold of Jaedong, Flash, Boxer if they tried. Yeah I don't think current BW foreigners should get a beta key ahead of top Koreans. i wouldve expect both would get beta access over sc2 players tho | ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
On July 31 2017 07:07 Jae Zedong wrote: Sorry TT1, I thought we were talking about this comment: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 06:24 fish_radio wrote: I am so happy about the game. But I am angry about beta style. Fish admins = no beta Flash, Jaedong, Bisu, Stork, Boxer, Effort, NaDa, ChulGu, HongGu, Last, Shine, Shinee, more = no beta SC2 players = beta??? So I could not believe how you could think Blizzard couldn't get a hold of Jaedong, Flash, Boxer if they tried. Yeah I don't think current BW foreigners should get a beta key ahead of top Koreans. Who said current BW foreigners should get a beta key ahead of top Koreans ? | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
On July 31 2017 07:10 blade55555 wrote: Well Jaedong got a key. I know Larva did, Shine did (watching him right now ![]() Larva streaming from PC bang. Last got key from some fan. Shine sitting on bang too. Also remember this: SC2 guys got their hands to test out Remastered way before. | ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
i dunno why an ex pro like theboy (who currently works for blizzard korea) couldn't ask around and get everyone's email, oh well. | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
| ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On July 31 2017 07:43 The_Red_Viper wrote: This is done for advertising, korea already has it going on to the max. In the foreign scene these sc2 players are simply a good way to promote SC:R even more. thats the main point here. Especially for top foreign players, they have zero reach except for people that are already watching BW and are therefore hyped for remastered anyway. On the other hand, they could showcase the game better than people that have never played it. | ||
MymSlorm
Chile187 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 10:00 MymSlorm wrote: Not only for pros and ex pros, if you uploaded and made content for Broodwar you also get a Beta, i know a guy who got this beta just being a youtuber did blizzard contact him to get his email? or did they already have it? he could have just gotten randomly picked as well, i know casual bw players who got the beta. | ||
XERX
85 Posts
On July 31 2017 07:16 outscar wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 07:10 blade55555 wrote: Well Jaedong got a key. I know Larva did, Shine did (watching him right now ![]() Larva streaming from PC bang. Last got key from some fan. Shine sitting on bang too. Also remember this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EAshkRGp7c SC2 guys got their hands to test out Remastered way before. BW progamers played almost every iteration of remastered they kept going to Korea to test it. | ||
shin ken
Germany612 Posts
On July 31 2017 07:59 Keniji wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 07:43 The_Red_Viper wrote: This is done for advertising, korea already has it going on to the max. In the foreign scene these sc2 players are simply a good way to promote SC:R even more. thats the main point here. Especially for top foreign players, they have zero reach except for people that are already watching BW and are therefore hyped for remastered anyway. On the other hand, they could showcase the game better than people that have never played it. I don't know about the other streams but Ret and Mana were quite good in BW and TLO was playing lot's of BW on iccup as well (still got TLO replays from 2009) | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
MperorM1
90 Posts
![]() | ||
TelecoM
United States10661 Posts
On July 31 2017 18:08 MperorM1 wrote: This closed beta is giving me bluest of balls and it's only been one day. I can't imagine having to wait 2 weeks to actually get to play it ![]() Well, I guess you will have to imagine it bro, because it seems that way for most of us. T_T | ||
![]()
HaN-
France1919 Posts
| ||
TelecoM
United States10661 Posts
On July 31 2017 18:20 HaN- wrote: Nony didn't get SCR invite, even tho Blizzard has his infos from a previous event. That's really odd of all foreigners, NonY should def. get one. | ||
![]()
HaN-
France1919 Posts
| ||
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
On July 31 2017 18:20 HaN- wrote: Nony didn't get SCR invite, even tho Blizzard has his infos from a previous event. He should try starting Starcraft and logging in to battle.net. I was whining about not being able to play remastered. Then a couple of hours later I tried to log into battle.net on regular Starcraft... And once I logged in to the battle.net client the game just instantly switched from SD to HD. I was also at the SC:Remastered summit with Nony. Try logging on with your regular SC copy if you haven't already ![]() They should give out more keys because I have to search for 10+ minutes to get a game on the ladder. ![]() ![]() Also the ladder leaderboard seems to be broken for EU accounts. It won't load. Seems to happen to all EU players regardless of which server you connect to. | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
| ||
![]()
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
arb
Noobville17920 Posts
| ||
Flameling
United States413 Posts
| ||
Jae Zedong
407 Posts
On July 31 2017 21:15 arb wrote: Watching Larva earlier he was getting games basically instantly. Not sure if it creates channels everytime ones full(nor how many can be in one channel) but he was in Kor-31? maybe 39 which is insane It is possible his viewers (those with keys) were actively trying to get a game with him, so it may appear easier for him. | ||
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
So if it can't find me a European after 10 minutes it starts branching out and searching for Americans/Koreans. Just sucks waiting for 10+ minutes for each game. Latency feels good on ladder, but I can't confidently say what turn rate it is. I've lagged against koreans in 2 out of 3 games. One of the games was really good ping even though he was korean. | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
| ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
| ||
Demurity
United States424 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 31 2017 21:33 Demurity wrote: Can anyone who has remastered here say what the max count you can have on your friends list? Thanks friend list is linked to the bnet app so no limit most likely, that said the friend list is really buggy atm. | ||
Glioburd
France1911 Posts
On July 31 2017 21:33 Demurity wrote: Can anyone who has remastered here say what the max count you can have on your friends list? Thanks SC:R uses your b.net 2 account's friendlist. | ||
Flameling
United States413 Posts
On July 31 2017 21:21 LaLuSh wrote: I think the matchmaker is global as TT1 says. But it prioritizes matching you by geological proximity. So if it can't find me a European after 10 minutes it starts branching out and searching for Americans/Koreans. Just sucks waiting for 10+ minutes for each game. Latency feels good on ladder, but I can't confidently say what turn rate it is. I've lagged against koreans in 2 out of 3 games. One of the games was really good ping even though he was korean. Thanks for the reply. I'm a fan of global matchmaking, but being stuck in a laggy game with ladder points on the line sounds pretty horrible. | ||
![]()
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
So many people;; | ||
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
I've discovered the threshold for when the matchmaker starts matching me against koreans is after 700 seconds of searching. I think I'm going to stay away from the ladder until more euros get the beta. | ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On July 31 2017 21:39 Flameling wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 21:21 LaLuSh wrote: I think the matchmaker is global as TT1 says. But it prioritizes matching you by geological proximity. So if it can't find me a European after 10 minutes it starts branching out and searching for Americans/Koreans. Just sucks waiting for 10+ minutes for each game. Latency feels good on ladder, but I can't confidently say what turn rate it is. I've lagged against koreans in 2 out of 3 games. One of the games was really good ping even though he was korean. Thanks for the reply. I'm a fan of global matchmaking, but being stuck in a laggy game with ladder points on the line sounds pretty horrible. There is no other option really. If you are a top foreigner, there aren't enough non-Koreans good enough. That's why everyone plays fish even if the connection is not as good. If you are not as good, the match maker probably don't have any problems finding opponents regionally. (hopefully, with people coming back for HD) Can you still leave the game in the beginning without penalty? e.g. when lag is too bad? | ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
| ||
paralleluniverse
4065 Posts
1. How does the ladder ranking system work? Is there a global ladder that is sorted by points (as shown here https://starcraft.com/en-us/articles/20844309)? Are the points equal to MMR (base your opinion on if they move up and down in a similar way as MMR in SC2, or if there are other factors like bonus pool)? 2. How does the progression system and collection tab (as seen here https://starcraft.com/en-us/articles/20814255) work? Are there skins to unlock based on progression or is it only portraits? 3. How does the option to turn off pre-order skins work? Does it turn it off for everyone, or only on your end? And does it turn off other skins if there are any? | ||
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
| ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
| ||
Glioburd
France1911 Posts
| ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
And I only refer to you in the third person to be objective. O well. | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
| ||
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On August 01 2017 00:34 Ancestral wrote: In a completely objective sense, given that Nony went 1-2 in the last round of a courage tournament in the midst of the most competitive era in BW history, there's an argument for his being the best foreigner of all time. Really bizarre he wouldn't be on Blizz's radar. And I only refer to you in the third person to be objective. O well. Ret has had big successes too, but i was talking about recent accomplishment and current best players, not the best players from 8 years ago. I'm fine with inviting some great players of the good old days and im looking forward to see them play. But going over players like trutacz, eonzerg, bonyth etc. in favor of those is just not right. | ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
| ||
ppp87
Laos250 Posts
| ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 01 2017 00:58 Cele wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 00:34 Ancestral wrote: In a completely objective sense, given that Nony went 1-2 in the last round of a courage tournament in the midst of the most competitive era in BW history, there's an argument for his being the best foreigner of all time. Really bizarre he wouldn't be on Blizz's radar. And I only refer to you in the third person to be objective. O well. Ret has had big successes too, but i was talking about recent accomplishment and current best players, not the best players from 8 years ago. I'm fine with inviting some great players of the good old days and im looking forward to see them play. But going over players like trutacz, eonzerg, bonyth etc. in favor of those is just not right. I mean, look at the first showmatch from GG Together... neither has been a professional for basically 15 years. Grrrr... is a celebrity, but TheBoy? Blizzard could just give old legends, top players, and current actives all keys. They have very little to lose. The only excuse is they just don't have the resources to find everyone who "deserves" a beta key. That's actually a reasonable excuse, if it's true. | ||
franzji
United States581 Posts
| ||
JungleTerrain
Chile799 Posts
On August 01 2017 01:34 youngjiddle wrote: any big Koreans react to remastered yet? Yeah a 300 lb guy said it was great. Sorry I couldn't resist | ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
On August 01 2017 00:58 Cele wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 00:34 Ancestral wrote: In a completely objective sense, given that Nony went 1-2 in the last round of a courage tournament in the midst of the most competitive era in BW history, there's an argument for his being the best foreigner of all time. Really bizarre he wouldn't be on Blizz's radar. And I only refer to you in the third person to be objective. O well. Ret has had big successes too, but i was talking about recent accomplishment and current best players, not the best players from 8 years ago. I'm fine with inviting some great players of the good old days and im looking forward to see them play. But going over players like trutacz, eonzerg, bonyth etc. in favor of those is just not right. Actually I agree a lot with this. This was one of the things that annoyed me when I was at my peak, or maybe a bit before my peak, since that courage result and TSL2 obviously got me a lot of instant praise. Anyway, there's quite a bit of lag on recognition in general. The best players from a few years ago (or in this case, almost a decade ago) are treated better than the current best. If I was in charge of invites, I'd definitely go out and find the current best top foreigners and get them all in. Getting in a few "foreigner legends" and some current popular SC2 personalities would be great as well, but you've gotta be most in touch with the guys who are currently the most passionate and invested. | ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
Like I said, I acknowledge they have to economize their effort, so I'd concede they can't seek out everyone who has won over $2k in prizes total or achieved A- or higher on iCCup. | ||
Jae Zedong
407 Posts
Yeah I'm sure it makes financial sense for them, whatever. It makes financial sense for Nestlé to monetize tap water too. | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
I'm always unlucky in these beta's =[ but two weeks! Guess I'll hop back on original to get comfortable. | ||
Moonsalt
267 Posts
| ||
imre
France9263 Posts
On July 31 2017 20:27 LaLuSh wrote: Show nested quote + On July 31 2017 18:20 HaN- wrote: Nony didn't get SCR invite, even tho Blizzard has his infos from a previous event. He should try starting Starcraft and logging in to battle.net. I was whining about not being able to play remastered. Then a couple of hours later I tried to log into battle.net on regular Starcraft... And once I logged in to the battle.net client the game just instantly switched from SD to HD. I was also at the SC:Remastered summit with Nony. Try logging on with your regular SC copy if you haven't already ![]() They should give out more keys because I have to search for 10+ minutes to get a game on the ladder. ![]() ![]() Also the ladder leaderboard seems to be broken for EU accounts. It won't load. Seems to happen to all EU players regardless of which server you connect to. Exactly what happened to me. Tried a few games of bw for fun against a friend, ended up on the remastered. No email, no nothing, I just launched bnet. | ||
TaShadan
Germany1961 Posts
On August 01 2017 02:42 Moonsalt wrote: I'm so triggered. No offense to ret,tlo, drogo and other dudes but they just played it for like an hour on stream and will never touch this game ever again. And us, that have been waiting for this shit for months and just get absolutely nothing but a shitty 'advertisement' called 'closed beta'. FU Blizzudrdrd. Ret might stick to it, atleast for a while. But i agree with drogo, tlo and the other sc2 guys. They played so bad that they are not intersted anymore. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
The product will be out in 2 weeks for everyone. It's not like you could contribute a lot now anyway. Would it be nice to play 2 weeks before release? Sure. But damn if that actually angers you i don't know what to say tbh. | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
| ||
mca64Launcher_
Poland629 Posts
| ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
I would understand it if this was a closed beta which would run over a few months where blizzard actually asks for input, etc. But this isn't the case, it's simply a form of advertising it to a western audience. Players like TLO are valuable for that, Trutacz is not. It's that simple. In two weeks everybody will be able to play the final product. | ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 01 2017 03:38 The_Red_Viper wrote: You are mad over basically nothing, not surprised by this ofc. I would understand it if this was a closed beta which would run over a few months where blizzard actually asks for input, etc. But this isn't the case, it's simply a form of advertising it to a western audience. Players like TLO are valuable for that, Trutacz is not. It's that simple. In two weeks everybody will be able to play the final product. In my case, I'm not mad. But promotion is not all that matters. Current and past top-tier Brood War players obviously have something to contribute given their achievements. So a mixed strategy (get both coverage and the best possible feedback) wouldn't be a bad idea. All that said, you're right it's only two weeks, and all that really needs to be done is bug testing. | ||
aFF]ZuluNAtion[
Poland173 Posts
| ||
Cryoc
Germany909 Posts
| ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 01 2017 04:02 Cryoc wrote: Maybe I am too old, but I don't understand the urge to play a game in beta stage. It is very likely that the issues with the occasional missing inputs or falsely allocated control groups from 1.18 still exist for players with higher apm. I wouldn't want to play BW with updated graphics but worse gameplay. And sadly I wouldn't be surprised if this continues to be the case for quite some time after the release date (or even forever). That's the point of a beta... to get feedback from people with knowledge about what the problems are. | ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
| ||
radley
Poland580 Posts
At the end it could be better for all of us - more relatively weaker players to smash. Honestly, the bad thing is that korean pros got access to beta (well most of them got it half-legally but accepted by Blizzard, if only someone's statement in this topic was correct). Their gameplay can be discouraging for sc2 players. | ||
CobaltBlu
United States919 Posts
On August 01 2017 04:25 NonY wrote: I cannot connect to multiplayer at all. It says I need to upgrade and when I click the upgrade button, BW crashes and b.net app does nothing. When I restart, it's still the old version. Try running the StarCraft Launcher exe in the install folder to install the update. | ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 01 2017 04:26 radley wrote: Guys stop yelling, since there is no logical reason in giving beta access to StaCraft: Brood War players, since they are going to buy Remastered edition anyway. I totally understand Blizzard decision - they know that in sc2 community there are many people who never touched sc1 and best way to make them interested is promoting game by their sc2 idols. At the end it could be better for all of us - more relatively weaker players to smash. Honestly, the bad thing is that korean pros got access to beta (well most of them got it half-legally but accepted by Blizzard, if only someone's statement in this topic was correct). Their gameplay can be discouraging for sc2 players. I repeat, because the message apparently got lost, Betas are not only for advertising. In fact, that is not even their primary purpose. The primary purpose is refinement and playtesting, so yes, it absolutely makes sense to include the people who know the most about the game in the Beta in addition to the people who can hype it up, and it is absolutely ridiculous not to include them. The hype people would be equally as effective after release, too, which is why the purpose of the Beta is what it is. | ||
Garmer
1286 Posts
| ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
On August 01 2017 04:30 CobaltBlu wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 04:25 NonY wrote: I cannot connect to multiplayer at all. It says I need to upgrade and when I click the upgrade button, BW crashes and b.net app does nothing. When I restart, it's still the old version. Try running the StarCraft Launcher exe in the install folder to install the update. hmm I don't even have that file ![]() launching with starcraft.exe causes same behavior | ||
Garmer
1286 Posts
| ||
![]()
NonY
8748 Posts
| ||
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
Wtfux
Northern Ireland163 Posts
On August 01 2017 04:49 NonY wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 04:30 CobaltBlu wrote: On August 01 2017 04:25 NonY wrote: I cannot connect to multiplayer at all. It says I need to upgrade and when I click the upgrade button, BW crashes and b.net app does nothing. When I restart, it's still the old version. Try running the StarCraft Launcher exe in the install folder to install the update. hmm I don't even have that file ![]() launching with starcraft.exe causes same behavior May I suggest you try running as administrator by right-clicking on the shortcut? I find that upgrades for Starcraft only seemed to work when I did this. | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
Eonzerg, Trutacz, fish admins cough, Schamtoo, Day9, Bisu, Jaedong, Flash, Stork, Effort, Larva, Chulgu, Last, Shine, Shinee, TOP, SuperNova, ForGG, Bogus/Innovation, NaDa, ggaemo, Snow, Best, and more Big faces with beta: A guy with a beard, talking why SC2 > BW the entire time.. | ||
Wtfux
Northern Ireland163 Posts
| ||
Garmer
1286 Posts
| ||
Piratezerg
54 Posts
| ||
dr.shrinker
Norway369 Posts
| ||
supernovamaniac
United States3046 Posts
On August 01 2017 02:59 The_Red_Viper wrote: I really don't get why people are mad now. This is called "beta" but in the end it's just advertising. The product will be out in 2 weeks for everyone. It's not like you could contribute a lot now anyway. Would it be nice to play 2 weeks before release? Sure. But damn if that actually angers you i don't know what to say tbh. Because since release of 1.18, plenty of players gave the game go and provided great feedback which allowed Blizzard to fix the game as much as possible. Even if remastered is running on 1.19 engine, there's bound to be bugs that need fixing. I'm only slightly irritated because there were plenty of people who were playing the new 1.18 version over 1.16 to provide great feedback that not only fixed many of the initial issues that 1.18 PTR brought, but also provided amazing discussion overall on BW itself. IMO, these people should have been granted an access to ensure that they can provide the same quality feedback before the actual release of the game. 2 weeks or 2 days, if these people are given a chance to try and test things out, they can encounter bugs that may have slipped through QA, much faster than the SC2 personalities who may not even realize that things changed from 1.16 till now. | ||
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On August 01 2017 01:46 NonY wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 00:58 Cele wrote: On August 01 2017 00:34 Ancestral wrote: In a completely objective sense, given that Nony went 1-2 in the last round of a courage tournament in the midst of the most competitive era in BW history, there's an argument for his being the best foreigner of all time. Really bizarre he wouldn't be on Blizz's radar. And I only refer to you in the third person to be objective. O well. Ret has had big successes too, but i was talking about recent accomplishment and current best players, not the best players from 8 years ago. I'm fine with inviting some great players of the good old days and im looking forward to see them play. But going over players like trutacz, eonzerg, bonyth etc. in favor of those is just not right. Actually I agree a lot with this. This was one of the things that annoyed me when I was at my peak, or maybe a bit before my peak, since that courage result and TSL2 obviously got me a lot of instant praise. Anyway, there's quite a bit of lag on recognition in general. The best players from a few years ago (or in this case, almost a decade ago) are treated better than the current best. If I was in charge of invites, I'd definitely go out and find the current best top foreigners and get them all in. Getting in a few "foreigner legends" and some current popular SC2 personalities would be great as well, but you've gotta be most in touch with the guys who are currently the most passionate and invested. And that's why i've always had a lot of respect for you. I always the impression that you are the kind of person to not rest on your laurels and who doesn't participate in stimulating the hype around your "persona" as a SC2 Pro / known celebrity. I salute you on your attitude and wanna add, that i think many invitees probably think like you do. It's Blizzards (understandable) interest to invite people who bring a lot of viewers that led to this invite distribution. And I'm sceptical about it for the same points you address. Adding to your observation, that there's some delay between peak and recognition i would like to add: from my pov, i sometimes think top player in 'post sc2 beta times' get a little less credit then they deserve. That's of course because Sc2 has a big audience that is informed about the best foreigners in Sc2 and there achievement's in Broodwar prior, but the audience for Broodwar itself between 2007 and today was very small by comparison. Our productions were smaller, with less budget, we did it without blizzard support and we had less viewers. That explains to me why there seems to be a slight lack of recognition. Then again it's not important, Beta is gonna be short and we still have 1.19 to play on in the meantime. | ||
Cryoc
Germany909 Posts
On August 01 2017 04:06 Ancestral wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 04:02 Cryoc wrote: Maybe I am too old, but I don't understand the urge to play a game in beta stage. It is very likely that the issues with the occasional missing inputs or falsely allocated control groups from 1.18 still exist for players with higher apm. I wouldn't want to play BW with updated graphics but worse gameplay. And sadly I wouldn't be surprised if this continues to be the case for quite some time after the release date (or even forever). That's the point of a beta... to get feedback from people with knowledge about what the problems are. Still leaves me in awe how people complain about not being able to play a half-finished game. Besides this, they already know about the gameplay problems for months, but they either don't care about it or are incompentent in that regard. The whole 1.18 patch was basically a beta for remastered. I am surprised Blizzard officially calls this pre-release a beta. But I doubt anything of substance will improve until mid August. | ||
aFF]ZuluNAtion[
Poland173 Posts
very good advertisement - hahaha, so nice decision by Blizzard - rofl. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On August 01 2017 06:14 aFF]ZuluNAtion[ wrote: So traitors who switched from BW to SC2 like Mana, ret, TLO have beta and they are just talking on streams like "SC2>bw", "lol bw so sux, units so stupid", "i will do not switch to this game, dont see future for it" seems like very good advertisement - hahaha, so nice decision by Blizzard - rofl. pretty sure ret would never say "sc2>bw". It's not the sc2 streamers/players fault BW players didn't get invites. | ||
dr.shrinker
Norway369 Posts
| ||
friendlyscv
12 Posts
On August 01 2017 06:14 aFF]ZuluNAtion[ wrote: So traitors who switched from BW to SC2 like Mana, ret, TLO have beta and they are just talking on streams like "SC2>bw", "lol bw so sux, units so stupid", "i will do not switch to this game, dont see future for it" seems like very good advertisement - hahaha, so nice decision by Blizzard - rofl. "traitors" ROFL if you were a BW pro once you're never allowed to play any other games besides BW ever again I guess | ||
Glueburn
United States496 Posts
On August 01 2017 06:20 dr.shrinker wrote: Haven't heard Ret speak badly of BW once when I watched him today, so that ain't entirely true. On the contrary, I've heard Ret say that SC:R ladder will be his life now. | ||
aFF]ZuluNAtion[
Poland173 Posts
| ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 01 2017 05:33 Cryoc wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 04:06 Ancestral wrote: On August 01 2017 04:02 Cryoc wrote: Maybe I am too old, but I don't understand the urge to play a game in beta stage. It is very likely that the issues with the occasional missing inputs or falsely allocated control groups from 1.18 still exist for players with higher apm. I wouldn't want to play BW with updated graphics but worse gameplay. And sadly I wouldn't be surprised if this continues to be the case for quite some time after the release date (or even forever). That's the point of a beta... to get feedback from people with knowledge about what the problems are. Still leaves me in awe how people complain about not being able to play a half-finished game. Besides this, they already know about the gameplay problems for months, but they either don't care about it or are incompentent in that regard. The whole 1.18 patch was basically a beta for remastered. I am surprised Blizzard officially calls this pre-release a beta. But I doubt anything of substance will improve until mid August. People aren't upset about not being able to play a "half-finished game." They are modestly perturbed other people with a high level of knowledge, expertise, and work devoted to the scene aren't able to play it. No one is saying "boo-hoo I can't play," they're saying "Blizzard should've given the nod to these people." | ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
| ||
SolaR-
United States2685 Posts
On August 01 2017 06:14 aFF]ZuluNAtion[ wrote: So traitors who switched from BW to SC2 like Mana, ret, TLO have beta and they are just talking on streams like "SC2>bw", "lol bw so sux, units so stupid", "i will do not switch to this game, dont see future for it" seems like very good advertisement - hahaha, so nice decision by Blizzard - rofl. I watched Ret's stream and he said he likes BW better and that he enjoys it more. Stop putting words into people's mouths and making shit up. You are one toxic individual. | ||
EndingLife
United States1587 Posts
| ||
arb
Noobville17920 Posts
On August 01 2017 06:48 SolaR- wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 06:14 aFF]ZuluNAtion[ wrote: So traitors who switched from BW to SC2 like Mana, ret, TLO have beta and they are just talking on streams like "SC2>bw", "lol bw so sux, units so stupid", "i will do not switch to this game, dont see future for it" seems like very good advertisement - hahaha, so nice decision by Blizzard - rofl. I watched Ret's stream and he said he likes BW better and that he enjoys it more. Stop putting words into people's mouths and making shit up. You are one toxic individual. If you've seen how much some of these Top Foreign players complain it shouldnt surprise you | ||
LRM)TechnicS
Bulgaria1565 Posts
On August 01 2017 01:46 NonY wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 00:58 Cele wrote: On August 01 2017 00:34 Ancestral wrote: In a completely objective sense, given that Nony went 1-2 in the last round of a courage tournament in the midst of the most competitive era in BW history, there's an argument for his being the best foreigner of all time. Really bizarre he wouldn't be on Blizz's radar. And I only refer to you in the third person to be objective. O well. Ret has had big successes too, but i was talking about recent accomplishment and current best players, not the best players from 8 years ago. I'm fine with inviting some great players of the good old days and im looking forward to see them play. But going over players like trutacz, eonzerg, bonyth etc. in favor of those is just not right. Actually I agree a lot with this. This was one of the things that annoyed me when I was at my peak, or maybe a bit before my peak, since that courage result and TSL2 obviously got me a lot of instant praise. Anyway, there's quite a bit of lag on recognition in general. The best players from a few years ago (or in this case, almost a decade ago) are treated better than the current best. If I was in charge of invites, I'd definitely go out and find the current best top foreigners and get them all in. Getting in a few "foreigner legends" and some current popular SC2 personalities would be great as well, but you've gotta be most in touch with the guys who are currently the most passionate and invested. Very well said, guys. SC:R early access for eon, trutacz, lancer, bony and dewalt seems reasonable. These were the guys that kept playing and streaming BW in the last 2 years. Most notably eon was streaming maybe the most from these and seeing him now struggling get past 65 viewers makes me think a little bit of boost and recognition will do him well. Sure, he will play with the old graphics and after 2 weeks with the new, but acknowledging him would be the better option perhaps. | ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
| ||
![]()
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19175 Posts
![]() | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:12 petro1987 wrote: I really don't see how giving access to closed beta to SC2 personalities who notoriously dislike BW good advertisement. They open up the game, and proceed to trash it and claim that SC2 is much better. What's the point? They are just making sure the SC2 playerbase is kept for personal gains. Wouldn't it be smarter for Blizzard to give access to people that actually enjoy BW and would praise it? Okay, have any of you people actually watched these sc2 pro's stream it and say it? So far I haven't seen or heard a single one say "Man BW fucking sucks, back to sc2!". It seems you have this thought process that anyone who plays sc2 must think BW is a shit game. | ||
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 01 2017 06:41 aFF]ZuluNAtion[ wrote: They wasnt even close to be a pro in BW. ret was pretty close. ![]() On August 01 2017 06:40 Galtath wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 06:20 dr.shrinker wrote: Haven't heard Ret speak badly of BW once when I watched him today, so that ain't entirely true. On the contrary, I've heard Ret say that SC:R ladder will be his life now. This is correct. | ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:19 blade55555 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 07:12 petro1987 wrote: I really don't see how giving access to closed beta to SC2 personalities who notoriously dislike BW good advertisement. They open up the game, and proceed to trash it and claim that SC2 is much better. What's the point? They are just making sure the SC2 playerbase is kept for personal gains. Wouldn't it be smarter for Blizzard to give access to people that actually enjoy BW and would praise it? Okay, have any of you people actually watched these sc2 pro's stream it and say it? So far I haven't seen or heard a single one say "Man BW fucking sucks, back to sc2!". It seems you have this thought process that anyone who plays sc2 must think BW is a shit game. In just 15 minutes, I've seen Nathanias and JimRising do it. And TB on Nathanias chat. | ||
Valikyr
Sweden2653 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:12 petro1987 wrote: I really don't see how giving access to closed beta to SC2 personalities who notoriously dislike BW good advertisement. They open up the game, and proceed to trash it and claim that SC2 is much better. What's the point? They are just making sure the SC2 playerbase is kept for personal gains. Wouldn't it be smarter for Blizzard to give access to people that actually enjoy BW and would praise it? Lol can you name one of these SC2 pros that trash BW? | ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:23 Valikyr wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 07:12 petro1987 wrote: I really don't see how giving access to closed beta to SC2 personalities who notoriously dislike BW good advertisement. They open up the game, and proceed to trash it and claim that SC2 is much better. What's the point? They are just making sure the SC2 playerbase is kept for personal gains. Wouldn't it be smarter for Blizzard to give access to people that actually enjoy BW and would praise it? Lol can you name one of these SC2 pros that trash BW? Where exactly is written pros? | ||
CobaltBlu
United States919 Posts
I think almost everyone, Ret especially, have had positive things to say about their experiences. I don't think it is a big deal and definitely not worth the drama. | ||
TelecoM
United States10661 Posts
| ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
| ||
Qikz
United Kingdom12022 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:39 GGzerG wrote: If anything, give fuckin NonY closed beta access, he got to the finals in a damn Courage tournament in Korea, that accomplishment basically trumps anything else anyone else has done. >_< Or just make it an open beta so everyone can play! That would be better for everyone rather than beiing upset x person didn't get it over y. | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
=.= | ||
Jae Zedong
407 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:53 Qikz wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 07:39 GGzerG wrote: If anything, give fuckin NonY closed beta access, he got to the finals in a damn Courage tournament in Korea, that accomplishment basically trumps anything else anyone else has done. >_< Or just make it an open beta so everyone can play! That would be better for everyone rather than beiing upset x person didn't get it over y. There is obviously a reason they made it closed and not open. Be it server related or whatever. I'm honestly a bit surprised how many BW people are tripping over eachother trying to find excuses for Blizzard. Literally any other option would have been normal. Open beta? Fine. Random beta? Fine. First come, first serve beta? Fine. BW and SC2 profiles plus retired legends beta? Fine (best option). Invite only SC2 profiles? Gimme a break. | ||
arb
Noobville17920 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:49 fish_radio wrote: Nathanias shit talking so much... Yeah but he's basically a dipshit/troll I wouldnt read into anything he says. User was warned for this post | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:21 petro1987 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 07:19 blade55555 wrote: On August 01 2017 07:12 petro1987 wrote: I really don't see how giving access to closed beta to SC2 personalities who notoriously dislike BW good advertisement. They open up the game, and proceed to trash it and claim that SC2 is much better. What's the point? They are just making sure the SC2 playerbase is kept for personal gains. Wouldn't it be smarter for Blizzard to give access to people that actually enjoy BW and would praise it? Okay, have any of you people actually watched these sc2 pro's stream it and say it? So far I haven't seen or heard a single one say "Man BW fucking sucks, back to sc2!". It seems you have this thought process that anyone who plays sc2 must think BW is a shit game. In just 15 minutes, I've seen Nathanias and JimRising do it. And TB on Nathanias chat. All right for those 3 that wouldn't surprise me at all. I guess I forgot Nathanias/JimRising got into it, I would have known they'd do that before hand. I watched TLO/Ret/Drogo and none of them shit on it. Most of them won't, but the people you listed don't surprise me at all. | ||
XERX
85 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:39 GGzerG wrote: If anything, give fuckin NonY closed beta access, he got to the finals in a damn Courage tournament in Korea, that accomplishment basically trumps anything else anyone else has done. >_< Idra was on ESTRO and Grrrr won an OSL | ||
EndingLife
United States1587 Posts
On August 01 2017 09:04 XERX wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 07:39 GGzerG wrote: If anything, give fuckin NonY closed beta access, he got to the finals in a damn Courage tournament in Korea, that accomplishment basically trumps anything else anyone else has done. >_< Idra was on ESTRO and Grrrr won an OSL Don't forget Nazgul, Elky, Legionnaire and Assem who also played on pro teams. | ||
eviltomahawk
United States11133 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:21 petro1987 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 07:19 blade55555 wrote: On August 01 2017 07:12 petro1987 wrote: I really don't see how giving access to closed beta to SC2 personalities who notoriously dislike BW good advertisement. They open up the game, and proceed to trash it and claim that SC2 is much better. What's the point? They are just making sure the SC2 playerbase is kept for personal gains. Wouldn't it be smarter for Blizzard to give access to people that actually enjoy BW and would praise it? Okay, have any of you people actually watched these sc2 pro's stream it and say it? So far I haven't seen or heard a single one say "Man BW fucking sucks, back to sc2!". It seems you have this thought process that anyone who plays sc2 must think BW is a shit game. In just 15 minutes, I've seen Nathanias and JimRising do it. And TB on Nathanias chat. TB wouldn't surprise me. He has said before that he doesn't enjoy the mechanical aspects of Starcraft as much, and he's rumored to be working on a mod that fits that vision. | ||
TelecoM
United States10661 Posts
| ||
Broodwar4lyf
303 Posts
| ||
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49626 Posts
On August 01 2017 13:12 Broodwar4lyf wrote: i was saddened looking at grrrs 120apm lol why? he hasn't played the game proper in over a decade | ||
arb
Noobville17920 Posts
On August 01 2017 13:21 BLinD-RawR wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 13:12 Broodwar4lyf wrote: i was saddened looking at grrrs 120apm lol why? he hasn't played the game proper in over a decade If i recall in the first OSL finals they show an FPview of Freemura? Whoever Giyoms opponent was and he is literally sitting there not even moving his mouse watching the eggs lol. 120 apm back in those times was fairly high id say | ||
Juaks
United States384 Posts
On the other hand I don't know if Day9 got access but I would have given him access instead of those two. | ||
)aguar
Czech Republic111 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 26513
2376 Posts
Will there be Open Beta for us - the mortal plebs ? | ||
sCuMBaG
United Kingdom1144 Posts
On August 01 2017 18:14 Pr0wler wrote: Well,both Nathanias and TB have business interest in SC2 so their opinion is not surprising. Also it's not surprising that they got keys, because they are considered "friends and family" at this point. I still wonder how winter got in, but whatever... Will there be Open Beta for us - the mortal plebs ? What's the point? The game will be out in just about two weeks. They're probably not even testing that much, just getting some hype going here. | ||
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49626 Posts
On August 01 2017 18:14 Pr0wler wrote: Well,both Nathanias and TB have business interest in SC2 so their opinion is not surprising. Also it's not surprising that they got keys, because they are considered "friends and family" at this point. I still wonder how winter got in, but whatever... Will there be Open Beta for us - the mortal plebs ? really for just 2 weeks? | ||
Slydie
1906 Posts
| ||
Garmer
1286 Posts
| ||
KameZerg
Sweden1752 Posts
| ||
Yiome
China1687 Posts
On August 01 2017 19:14 ICanFlyLow wrote: Whats the reason for giving some clueless sc2 streamers beta access and not those who played the game everyday. Is this really a beta where they want feedback or is it a marketing thing Marketing. This "beta" is likely just something to build up hype while they send out more invites and stress test server a bit. Nothing major would be changed. Typical practice in gaming industry these days and nothing wrong about it. | ||
TBO
Germany1350 Posts
On August 01 2017 19:04 Garmer wrote: so i didn't follow, why TLO is saying that the remastered is not good? He isn't. He enjoys it a lot. He might have said that lots of people will be disenchanted when they play it themselves because the game is hard and cheese is way harder to defend than in SC2, but that's not saying SC:R isn't good. | ||
ocrim_ger
Germany5 Posts
I am looking forward to the game - even though I am pretty bad at BW | ||
letian
Germany4221 Posts
On August 01 2017 07:49 fish_radio wrote: Nathanias shit talking so much... Who is it lol? Just yesterday ret said several times on stream that he was always a BW player and why playing BW feels more entertaining and fulfilling. Not just said but explained why. | ||
letian
Germany4221 Posts
On August 01 2017 19:24 TBO wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 19:04 Garmer wrote: so i didn't follow, why TLO is saying that the remastered is not good? He isn't. He enjoys it a lot. He might have said that lots of people will be disenchanted when they play it themselves because the game is hard and cheese is way harder to defend than in SC2, but that's not saying SC:R isn't good. haha, ret was saying just the contrary yesterday about how slower paced is BW and is more forgiving than SC2 and how it feels better ![]() | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
Qikz
United Kingdom12022 Posts
On August 01 2017 20:37 outscar wrote: Nathanias can talk all he wants, he still sucks on this game so he better go back to his dying game. Why does it always have to be like this? Why can it only be one or the other for most people? Both games are good in their own way. I prefer BW by a lot, but I still appreciate there's a lot of people who like SC2. Both games should be able to co-exist and people shouldn't shit on the other game purely because they don't care about it/tried it and don't like it. Maybe Nathanias just doesn't like Broodwar, that's his pejorative and unfortunately there's going to be a lot of people like him. | ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
![]() + Show Spoiler + im not serious about that advisor pack,didnt even heard it,i feel amazing a community caster/player has this in sc2 ![]() | ||
Dapper_Cad
United Kingdom964 Posts
I'd be curious if any fairly well known streamers (associated with Blizz but not with SC2) asked and got keys... Either way it seems to me to be a free blunder by Blizzard if they don't recognise smaller foreign streamers who have been dedicated to Broodwar. For example: It bums me out that Bisudagger wouldn't get an invite. Clearly it's not a problem for him... On August 01 2017 07:17 BisuDagger wrote: Didnt get an invite, not sweating it. It will be out soon enough and I can still play the best version right now. ![]() ... but that doesn't mean I can't sweat it. Even if that last thought was deadly serious, even if BisuDagger would ritually sacrifice his key live on stream to a heathen god to beg a destruction on remastered I'd still think; "Cool, Blizzard have been paying attention to a few dedicated and enthusiastic fans of one of it's older titles, that's nice" And I'm sure this reaction would be limited to hundreds of people but it's still a virtually zero cost investment on Blizzard's part and that's why I call it a "free blunder". As for SC2 commentators / streamers bagging on Remastered. I've been looking for clips, but haven't found any so I can't really direct these comments at anyone or any particular argument but IMO... -That there's no physical law that stops two RTSs from the same franchise being great at once. -From a purely game design perspective, Broodwar is, in some ways, a superior strategy game to SC2 and being unable to see or being unwilling to articulate that is a mistake. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
It's just two weeks EDIT: btw SC2 community had to deal with Winter for so long, now it's BW community turn ![]() | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
On August 01 2017 20:56 Qikz wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 20:37 outscar wrote: Nathanias can talk all he wants, he still sucks on this game so he better go back to his dying game. Why does it always have to be like this? Why can it only be one or the other for most people? Both games are good in their own way. I prefer BW by a lot, but I still appreciate there's a lot of people who like SC2. Both games should be able to co-exist and people shouldn't shit on the other game purely because they don't care about it/tried it and don't like it. Maybe Nathanias just doesn't like Broodwar, that's his pejorative and unfortunately there's going to be a lot of people like him. Nate deserves it. Before he was all crying that he wants to try out BW but can't run on newer OS, then PTR came and he started shitting. He even got beta and he continues saying crap on game. Think he got beta just for sake of saying crap about it. Even Avilo with his balance whine respects and treats this game tons better than those bunch SC2 fanboys. On August 01 2017 21:01 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i remember watching Nathanias talking lot of shit with the 1.18 PTR,about how bad this game is and blablabla.Why he even tried remastered ? to trash talk it again ? You know what really sux nathanias ? your sc2 soundpack ![]() + Show Spoiler + im not serious about that advisor pack,didnt even heard it,i feel amazing a community caster/player has this in sc2 ![]() No needed for spoiler. Those sound packs are for like 10EUR or smth are absolutely joke. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 01 2017 21:58 outscar wrote: Even Avilo with his balance whine respects and treats this game tons better than those bunch SC2 fanboys. Tbh avilo is probably saying it just to hate on SC2 so I wouldn't take his word as relevant, confirmation bias... | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
Or is that only an observing feature? | ||
riotjune
United States3392 Posts
Flash already went back to bw, forGG will probably do the same when he's done with his military service + Show Spoiler + cause it's the better game ![]() | ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
On August 01 2017 22:13 riotjune wrote: sc2 vs bw again? I think we should only listen to opinions of people who've won major titles for both games since they have mastery of both and a better overall picture. So like two people (Flash, forGG) FlaSh, ForGG and Jaedong, actually | ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33128 Posts
On August 01 2017 21:04 Dapper_Cad wrote: ... but that doesn't mean I can't sweat it. Even if that last thought was deadly serious, even if BisuDagger would ritually sacrifice his key live on stream to a heathen god to beg a destruction on remastered I'd still think; "Cool, Blizzard have been paying attention to a few dedicated and enthusiastic fans of one of it's older titles, that's nice" And I'm sure this reaction would be limited to hundreds of people but it's still a virtually zero cost investment on Blizzard's part and that's why I call it a "free blunder". same feeling exactly :[ I mean, it was pretty obvious that their relationship w/ the foreign BW scene was virtually nonexistent for the last 7 years, but it sucks to have it exposed again in such an obvious way. Hopefully they start investing some effort into community relations with the Western BW scene when SC:R actually gets released. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
Ha ha, that will teach those SC2 blokes! Good job! | ||
Greth
Belgium318 Posts
On August 01 2017 20:35 letian wrote: haha, ret was saying just the contrary yesterday about how slower paced is BW and is more forgiving than SC2 and how it feels better ![]() He's right though. SC2 has fewer actions to take, fewer branches on the decision making tree. So every mistake you make you reduce your chances of victory. It all comes down to minute timings and hard counters. So you could play the perfect game, only to lose because of a single engagement. Once you screw up you have to wait for your opponent to make a mistake in order to 'break even'. In BW there are SO many things to do, so many things for both players to fail at, that it is much easier to recover by focusing on something different - switching from macro to micro focus for a moment etc... The depth / Difficulty of BW makes it more forgiving, as both players are struggling equally in a near infinite decision making tree. | ||
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 01 2017 22:20 Waxangel wrote: Hopefully they start investing some effort into community relations with the Western BW scene when SC:R actually gets released. As nice as it would be, I wouldn't hold my breath for it... it seems like this product only exists to make Korean SC fans happy again. And don't get me wrong, that's great, I'm glad we (will) have it but yeah... | ||
riotjune
United States3392 Posts
On August 01 2017 22:17 Ej_ wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 22:13 riotjune wrote: sc2 vs bw again? I think we should only listen to opinions of people who've won major titles for both games since they have mastery of both and a better overall picture. So like two people (Flash, forGG) FlaSh, ForGG and Jaedong, actually I remember Jaedong being a close third but he got sc2 cannon rushed three games in a row. Didn't know about NorthCon, and he won over Scarlett, Life, and Innovation, cool. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 01 2017 22:27 207aicila wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 22:20 Waxangel wrote: Hopefully they start investing some effort into community relations with the Western BW scene when SC:R actually gets released. As nice as it would be, I wouldn't hold my breath for it... it seems like this product only exists to make Korean SC fans happy again. And don't get me wrong, that's great, I'm glad we (will) have it but yeah... Is there a demand for Blizzard to show that BW is going to be their another point of focus to raise interest? Because as last decade has shown, there is not much of interest in BW outside of Korea. There is interest, but not much. Shouldn't the community grow organically, without any intervention from Blizzard? The West likes flashy games with expensive skins, funny streamers and illegal gambling (not hating on CS, the game itself). | ||
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 01 2017 22:31 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 22:27 207aicila wrote: On August 01 2017 22:20 Waxangel wrote: Hopefully they start investing some effort into community relations with the Western BW scene when SC:R actually gets released. As nice as it would be, I wouldn't hold my breath for it... it seems like this product only exists to make Korean SC fans happy again. And don't get me wrong, that's great, I'm glad we (will) have it but yeah... Is there a demand for Blizzard to show that BW is going to be their another point of focus to raise interest? Because as last decade has shown, there is not much of interest in BW outside of Korea. There is interest, but not much. Shouldn't the community grow organically, without any intervention from Blizzard? The West likes flashy games with expensive skins, funny streamers and illegal gambling (not hating on CS, the game itself). I have no idea what you're talking about dude. Or rather, I perfectly understand what you're talking about, only what you're talking is completely unrelated to what myself, Waxangel and Dapper_Cad were talking about. Which is simply Blizzard reaching out to the current, existing BW community and acknowledging its existence. No one said anything about trying to push BW as a Western eSport or whatever. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 01 2017 22:36 207aicila wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 22:31 aQuaSC wrote: On August 01 2017 22:27 207aicila wrote: On August 01 2017 22:20 Waxangel wrote: Hopefully they start investing some effort into community relations with the Western BW scene when SC:R actually gets released. As nice as it would be, I wouldn't hold my breath for it... it seems like this product only exists to make Korean SC fans happy again. And don't get me wrong, that's great, I'm glad we (will) have it but yeah... Is there a demand for Blizzard to show that BW is going to be their another point of focus to raise interest? Because as last decade has shown, there is not much of interest in BW outside of Korea. There is interest, but not much. Shouldn't the community grow organically, without any intervention from Blizzard? The West likes flashy games with expensive skins, funny streamers and illegal gambling (not hating on CS, the game itself). I have no idea what you're talking about dude. Or rather, I perfectly understand what you're talking about, only what you're talking is completely unrelated to what myself, Waxangel and Dapper_Cad were talking about. Which is simply Blizzard reaching out to the current, existing BW community and acknowledging its existence. No one said anything about trying to push BW as a Western eSport or whatever. I know what you mean now that I've read it again, I apologize. I won't hold my breath for this too, but I hope the scene gets more attention | ||
KameZerg
Sweden1752 Posts
I just wanna know wether theres any invites coming to the normal plebs | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
![]() I also have a cool story, I turned on different pc that had not updated battle.net launcher and Remastered was there, I could install it and all... but I let it update and now it's gone | ||
aLt)nirvana
Singapore846 Posts
If you have access you can go to https://us.battle.net/account/management/ and it will look like this. ![]() It looks like the original sc until the moment you login. After you enter userid/pass the interface will snap change into the SC:R version. You can play vs normal brood war players, I joined a pub and the guys were beginners.. but the game still took 11mins. SC1 is a lot slower than SC2 I didn't believe it was on "fastest" speed at the start... | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
You don't have it listed in the battle.net launcher, do you? | ||
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On August 02 2017 00:24 aQuaSC wrote: By the way, does everyone else has Remastered listed on their battle.net account? Or is it there just to let me log in a pc bang? ![]() I also have a cool story, I turned on different pc that had not updated battle.net launcher and Remastered was there, I could install it and all... but I let it update and now it's gone Yes I have it on my battle.net account, but I can't play it or anything. | ||
ionONE
Germany605 Posts
I am doing something wrong? | ||
![]()
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
On August 02 2017 00:41 aLt)nirvana wrote: I didn't get the email invite but my account was given access cause Singapore is tiny and you can count the number of people who used to play competitively on two hands. If you have access you can go to https://us.battle.net/account/management/ and it will look like this. ![]() It looks like the original sc until the moment you login. After you enter userid/pass the interface will snap change into the SC:R version. You can play vs normal brood war players, I joined a pub and the guys were beginners.. but the game still took 11mins. SC1 is a lot slower than SC2 I didn't believe it was on "fastest" speed at the start... Not true. I have this since I've purchased SC:R. | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
![]() | ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
| ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
Kinda funny since I remember Nathanias trying to cast a FS game between Jaedong and ForGG (I think it was him) and talking afterwards about how he wants to learn the game so him shitting on it, well, guess things changed somewhere haha. I've only heard JimRising's name once? Some irrelevant NA/EU GM player or something. Wouldn't really be concerned what him or his small viewer base thinks. As for TB, he's stated before that he's not a fan of the game (not in those exact words but indirectly through his posts) so not a surprise either. In the end, all fans, both old and new ones will play the game if they desire and some players/casters won't change that from happening. On August 01 2017 22:20 Waxangel wrote: Show nested quote + On August 01 2017 21:04 Dapper_Cad wrote: ... but that doesn't mean I can't sweat it. Even if that last thought was deadly serious, even if BisuDagger would ritually sacrifice his key live on stream to a heathen god to beg a destruction on remastered I'd still think; "Cool, Blizzard have been paying attention to a few dedicated and enthusiastic fans of one of it's older titles, that's nice" And I'm sure this reaction would be limited to hundreds of people but it's still a virtually zero cost investment on Blizzard's part and that's why I call it a "free blunder". same feeling exactly :[ I mean, it was pretty obvious that their relationship w/ the foreign BW scene was virtually nonexistent for the last 7 years, but it sucks to have it exposed again in such an obvious way. Hopefully they start investing some effort into community relations with the Western BW scene when SC:R actually gets released. I'm not expecting anything to change tbh. Blizzard's eyes are on Korea and on maintaining that user base because it can translate to $$$ down the road. I hope I'm wrong but I just can't see it any other way. BW in Korea and SCII abroad. Best case scenario for them. | ||
Garmer
1286 Posts
| ||
TelecoM
United States10661 Posts
| ||
CHEONSOYUN
513 Posts
| ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
| ||
onlystar
United States971 Posts
i mean people have tried in the past to say the graphics are not up to date ... but even that is beautiful for lovers of the scbw ![]() and now there is scr HD so... | ||
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 02 2017 04:33 onlystar wrote: you just cant talk sh*t about the mother of all rts Let's not get carried away here, no one was talking about 1992 classic Dune II. ![]() | ||
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
On August 02 2017 02:01 petro1987 wrote: It also appears in my bnet account, but when I run the 1.19, it's still the regular BW. I guess this appears to everyone that preordered... When I click in the icon tho, nothings shows (when I click on Anthology, the CDKEY and other information appears). Same thing ![]() | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 02 2017 04:42 207aicila wrote: Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 04:33 onlystar wrote: you just cant talk sh*t about the mother of all rts Let's not get carried away here, no one was talking about 1992 classic Dune II. ![]() Yeah was about to say so ![]() | ||
Nathanias
United States290 Posts
I do not act professional on my stream so please do not delude yourselves into thinking off-hand comments are my final opinion on certain matters either. The Remaster is amazing and all the fun parts of the game are still there better than ever, however yeah there's a lot of stuff like the awful pathing etc that will not only keep me but many others from committing to it long-term. Edit: I would also like to add that I have watched the more recent BW stuff that is on at watchable hours, and I look forward to following whatever scene pops up with Remaster's release. But yeah it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. | ||
heyitsMiro
83 Posts
it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. ???? When has broodwar ever been dead? Are you ok? | ||
Broodwar4lyf
303 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On August 02 2017 12:32 Carnations wrote: Show nested quote + it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. ???? When has broodwar ever been dead? Are you ok? I think he means the foreign scene. The foreign BW scene has been pretty non existent. I don't see the foreign scene coming back for long (I would like to be wrong on this). The korean scene though is hopefully going to grow from this and hopefully get some new blood in there! | ||
Nathanias
United States290 Posts
On August 02 2017 12:32 Carnations wrote: Show nested quote + it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. ???? When has broodwar ever been dead? Are you ok? Oh I was talking about on Twitch in the streaming sense, there's no value in just streaming Broodwar as a normal person imo | ||
ruypture
United States367 Posts
On August 02 2017 13:55 Nathanias wrote: Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 12:32 Carnations wrote: it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. ???? When has broodwar ever been dead? Are you ok? Oh I was talking about on Twitch in the streaming sense, there's no value in just streaming Broodwar as a normal person imo And this is a fair analysis. It's okay to recognize the reality that BW:R is not long term entertainment for most people, watching or playing. It just feels different because everyone here plays bw | ||
dM-White
Chile340 Posts
| ||
vik7
United States227 Posts
| ||
Wolf
Korea (South)3290 Posts
| ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
On August 02 2017 18:16 Wolf wrote: I want to stream SC:R for you guys but it just shows up as a black screen for me in OBS. Any ideas? :< Are you using game capture option? | ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 02 2017 12:21 Nathanias wrote: Hi since a lot of people here take my words on stream far too seriously I'd like to say that there are many things about BW I do not like, however it was still a great game in its time but I definitely prefer SC2 more. I do not act professional on my stream so please do not delude yourselves into thinking off-hand comments are my final opinion on certain matters either. The Remaster is amazing and all the fun parts of the game are still there better than ever, however yeah there's a lot of stuff like the awful pathing etc that will not only keep me but many others from committing to it long-term. Edit: I would also like to add that I have watched the more recent BW stuff that is on at watchable hours, and I look forward to following whatever scene pops up with Remaster's release. But yeah it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. "Don't take me seriously, but I stand by what I said, and you are all wrong." I can see why people are annoyed by you. It's like a CombatEx justification/apology. | ||
heyitsMiro
83 Posts
On August 02 2017 13:55 Nathanias wrote: Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 12:32 Carnations wrote: it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. ???? When has broodwar ever been dead? Are you ok? Oh I was talking about on Twitch in the streaming sense, there's no value in just streaming Broodwar as a normal person imo There's no value in streaming anything as a "normal person" other than self enjoyment. Watching broodwar for the foreign scene is like watching baseball for little league. | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
On August 02 2017 18:57 Carnations wrote: Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 13:55 Nathanias wrote: On August 02 2017 12:32 Carnations wrote: it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. ???? When has broodwar ever been dead? Are you ok? Oh I was talking about on Twitch in the streaming sense, there's no value in just streaming Broodwar as a normal person imo There's no value in streaming anything as a "normal person" other than self enjoyment. Watching broodwar for the foreign scene is like watching baseball for little league. I mean nathanias has to think about value given that he apparently has barely anything else going on except for a dying game. That must suck hard | ||
Cheesefome
307 Posts
If you don't like the BW scene then just don't roam the BW section of the forums or play the game at all for that matter. It's so ridiculous seeing the same people bashing the game, playing the game they are bashing lolz. Starcraft/BW has always been fun and will always be fun because of the balance. It's near perfection. It's almost like the sc2 players are angry at the fact that BW is taking away some of their scene because of the remake. Some players dislike BW, others SC2. Deal with it and move on. If you don't like BW then continue to not like it and play the game you do. No need to be a downer for the people who are excited about the remake. I sware, every time i come to these forums theres always some grudgy old fella trying to ruin the fun for the rest of us. SC:R looks amazing. I can't even comprehend how anybody can talk badly about it. The only people i see complaining is sc2 hard core fans which doesn't make much sense since you aren't going to be playing the game anyways. | ||
Yiome
China1687 Posts
30min watching Artosis playing it is enough to remind me why I would prefer not to play the MP part of it. But with the new ob UI and graphic update I am looking forward to some tournament streams, preferably with good English casting. As for the game itself, I would probably pick it up later when it is out just to enjoy the campaign again and maybe some custom game like BGH. | ||
probelife66
142 Posts
On August 02 2017 12:21 Nathanias wrote: Hi since a lot of people here take my words on stream far too seriously I'd like to say that there are many things about BW I do not like, however it was still a great game in its time but I definitely prefer SC2 more. I do not act professional on my stream so please do not delude yourselves into thinking off-hand comments are my final opinion on certain matters either. The Remaster is amazing and all the fun parts of the game are still there better than ever, however yeah there's a lot of stuff like the awful pathing etc that will not only keep me but many others from committing to it long-term. Edit: I would also like to add that I have watched the more recent BW stuff that is on at watchable hours, and I look forward to following whatever scene pops up with Remaster's release. But yeah it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. We wouldn't expect someone like you to understand what makes broodwar as timeless as chess nor would we expect you to have the tenacity to tame a beast like bw. We don't need you or your negative input here. | ||
BossPurple
Sweden65 Posts
On August 02 2017 18:16 Wolf wrote: I want to stream SC:R for you guys but it just shows up as a black screen for me in OBS. Any ideas? :< Try running both OBS and BW as admin. | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
hitthat
Poland2253 Posts
On August 02 2017 19:19 Cheesefome wrote: I don't get why people have the need to bash the game. It's passive aggressive insults. Here, in this thread, we have much bashing of SC2 and no bashing of BW. Actually it is understandable. SC2 guys lost their hopes that the hard-headed BW guys will join their community long time ago, so they rarely talk in BW forum. Even guys who like both games dont believe that the most hardcore BW fanboys are possible to convert. Some milenials who are still angry of Koreans prefering obviously superior RTS game also are minority here and shits more on Twitch chat. Let it be, actually I love their anger ^^ I think that even r/Starcraft no longer try to "educate" us about how "outdated" our game is, as they know how it ends. Edit: also if I was SC2 fan, I would be more concerned about SC2 survival than BW bashing, as their own game is becoming niche and outdated too ^^ + Show Spoiler + actually SC2 was outdated game even in 2011, but heck, try to tell them that SC2 graphics was not even that good back than | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 02 2017 19:19 Cheesefome wrote: I don't get why people have the need to bash the game. It's passive aggressive insults. If you don't like the BW scene then just don't roam the BW section of the forums or play the game at all for that matter. It's so ridiculous seeing the same people bashing the game, playing the game they are bashing lolz. Starcraft/BW has always been fun and will always be fun because of the balance. It's near perfection. It's almost like the sc2 players are angry at the fact that BW is taking away some of their scene because of the remake. Some players dislike BW, others SC2. Deal with it and move on. If you don't like BW then continue to not like it and play the game you do. No need to be a downer for the people who are excited about the remake. I sware, every time i come to these forums theres always some grudgy old fella trying to ruin the fun for the rest of us. I swear I see exactly the same attitude towards SC2 from this forum. Constant passive aggressive insults towards SC2 (and directly/indirectly me as a fan), how superior BW is with ironic ^^ and ![]() SC:R looks amazing. I can't even comprehend how anybody can talk badly about it. The only people i see complaining is sc2 hard core fans which doesn't make much sense since you aren't going to be playing the game anyways. I played SC2 since beta so I guess it makes me a hardcore fan, I got internet at home too late to get into 1v1 BW back in the day but played few games of it once in a while, am I allowed to play your remaster? Some people just need to stop, imagine there are people that like both but one of those slightly more. Not defending Nathanias and his daed gmae remarks ^^ | ||
riotjune
United States3392 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
Bonyth
Poland537 Posts
| ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 02 2017 21:02 riotjune wrote: If people want to continue eating shit because they've never tried chocolate cake, by all means let them. + Show Spoiler + ![]() Wow you got me good, now I'm gonna go and eat some shit with chocolate on top thanks! Hope my stomach can take it ^^ On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. If only this bashing was directed at SC2, last time I've seen the post above you it told me that I eat shit | ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
On August 02 2017 20:50 aQuaSC wrote: do u need forum aproval to play a game? Do u need people to talk good about bw to play it? Or metal gear from ps1 or pro evolution?(yeah they are all great games sorry to no include sc2 :p)every i heard from sc2 is that the game is crap,it didnt stop me to buy every expansion play somes games and never run it again.anyway dont force yourself to do something cuz others are doing it but cuz do you like it.nathanias said he did enjoy playing but the game is to hard and the pathing and the micro,no shit Pedro u re not even a good sc2 player how do you expect to master BW. Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 19:19 Cheesefome wrote: I don't get why people have the need to bash the game. It's passive aggressive insults. If you don't like the BW scene then just don't roam the BW section of the forums or play the game at all for that matter. It's so ridiculous seeing the same people bashing the game, playing the game they are bashing lolz. Starcraft/BW has always been fun and will always be fun because of the balance. It's near perfection. It's almost like the sc2 players are angry at the fact that BW is taking away some of their scene because of the remake. Some players dislike BW, others SC2. Deal with it and move on. If you don't like BW then continue to not like it and play the game you do. No need to be a downer for the people who are excited about the remake. I sware, every time i come to these forums theres always some grudgy old fella trying to ruin the fun for the rest of us. I swear I see exactly the same attitude towards SC2 from this forum. Constant passive aggressive insults towards SC2 (and directly/indirectly me as a fan), how superior BW is with ironic ^^ and ![]() Show nested quote + SC:R looks amazing. I can't even comprehend how anybody can talk badly about it. The only people i see complaining is sc2 hard core fans which doesn't make much sense since you aren't going to be playing the game anyways. I played SC2 since beta so I guess it makes me a hardcore fan, I got internet at home too late to get into 1v1 BW back in the day but played few games of it once in a while, am I allowed to play your remaster? Some people just need to stop, imagine there are people that like both but one of those slightly more. Not defending Nathanias and his daed gmae remarks ^^ | ||
Weavel
Finland9221 Posts
On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: Yeah and tbh similar things happened with sc2 and lol (or melee and smash 4). I guess it's to be expected. Tbh I really hate this part of bw community. BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. | ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On August 02 2017 21:17 Weavel wrote: Show nested quote + Yeah and tbh similar things happened with sc2 and lol (or melee and smash 4). I guess it's to be expected. Tbh I really hate this part of bw community. On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. I don't like the negative behavior either, but blizzard actively sabotaged the bw scene to promote sc2. So it's not really comparable with another game like lol taking share of the player's base. | ||
dr.shrinker
Norway369 Posts
On the other side; I'm not able to launch 1.19 today, after logging in the login-window just becomes blue and nothing happens. Tried both StarCraft Launcher and StarCraft, but the issue persists with both. Anyone having the same problem? Edit: nevermind, works now. | ||
Dante08
Singapore4121 Posts
On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. You go that pretty spot on haha | ||
SoleSteeler
Canada5409 Posts
| ||
PVJ
Hungary5214 Posts
On August 02 2017 20:01 Yiome wrote: Judging by the amount of viewers big streamers like flash and bisu get from afreeca, I can't say I am that confident in SC:R getting a lot of new people into it. But I would like to be proven wrong. 30min watching Artosis playing it is enough to remind me why I would prefer not to play the MP part of it. But with the new ob UI and graphic update I am looking forward to some tournament streams, preferably with good English casting. As for the game itself, I would probably pick it up later when it is out just to enjoy the campaign again and maybe some custom game like BGH. Flash has 36 thousand 200 viewers right now. I think that's a significant jump. edit: 40 000. | ||
hitthat
Poland2253 Posts
| ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 02 2017 23:31 SoleSteeler wrote: People get so emotional over SC2 vs. BW. It's always felt so incredibly childish to me. Somehow, someway, I like playing and watching both BW and SC2, and even WC3! Did you guys know WC3 was shit on extensively for years too on this site? Now people look at it and think of it as some masterpiece. It took a few years before it was modestly accepted. SC2 is an amazing game but there's obviously something about BW that is magical too. Personally it's fine for me to criticize both games with reasonable arguments, but looking at people who ran out of such and hurl insults as if players of the other game were deluded for their entire life makes me feel ashamed that I can accidentally be considered a member of the same community as them. Worse than bloody five year olds. + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
| ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33128 Posts
On August 02 2017 21:31 Keniji wrote: Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 21:17 Weavel wrote: On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: Yeah and tbh similar things happened with sc2 and lol (or melee and smash 4). I guess it's to be expected. Tbh I really hate this part of bw community. BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. I don't like the negative behavior either, but blizzard actively sabotaged the bw scene to promote sc2. So it's not really comparable with another game like lol taking share of the player's base. Are we doing this again? Blizzard did not maliciously try to "kill" BW. At WORST, they handled an IP-rights dispute in an indelicate, ham-fisted way. No one said you have to like SC2, or even have a polite attitude toward it, but it would be nice if people didn't mangle the facts so they can enjoy a perverse victimhood complex. | ||
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 03 2017 02:12 Waxangel wrote: Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 21:31 Keniji wrote: On August 02 2017 21:17 Weavel wrote: On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: Yeah and tbh similar things happened with sc2 and lol (or melee and smash 4). I guess it's to be expected. Tbh I really hate this part of bw community. BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. I don't like the negative behavior either, but blizzard actively sabotaged the bw scene to promote sc2. So it's not really comparable with another game like lol taking share of the player's base. Are we doing this again? Blizzard did not maliciously try to "kill" BW. At WORST, they handled an IP-rights dispute in an indelicate, ham-fisted way. No one said you have to like SC2, or even have a polite attitude toward it, but it would be nice if people didn't mangle the facts so they can enjoy a perverse victimhood complex. Maybe start handing out mod actions for it then? Would probably help defuse things somewhat as well. Just a thought. | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
| ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 03 2017 02:08 duke91 wrote: Is matchmaking with true random or fake random (almost never mirror matches)? I mean watching JD's stream he played mainly ZvZ and ZvT | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. There is nothing to defuse except Waxangel's one man crusade against opinion contrary to his own interests. Oh my, ulterior motives for Wax to deny that blizzard is evil, damn. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33128 Posts
On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here | ||
Nathanias
United States290 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) | ||
Deleted User 26513
2376 Posts
On August 02 2017 17:47 dM-White wrote: just checked starcraft.com and there is an update set for today "Spotlight: Pre-Purchase Rewards" and would be stupid if we get the nexus/cc/hatch skin in old graphics, maybe we can have beta access for remastered today, and maybe not and there's only more images of the skins... =/ It will probably be HoTS chest, OW chest, Heartstone card pack, DIabo 3 pet, WoW toy and SC2 portrait. The usual stuff. | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
| ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: How mature of you. yahShow nested quote + On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here You disagree with an opnion, but you'll rather be flippant. I don't understand why you have a problem with people expressing opnions contrary to your own. It's dangerous to do so in your position as administrator as the post after yours immediately lept upon your implication of censorship on shakey grounds simply becuase it was you who disagrees. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:05 Nathanias wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) There are very few reasonable people in the bw section on TL, this is nothing new. Well at least of the vocal part. Though tbf, in the case of you talking about bw it's really a bit one sided here and there from what i have seen. But then again, that's obviously your prerogative | ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:05 Nathanias wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) SCII is a fine game. Blizzard promoted it at the expense of BroodWar. The second one is the one people have a problem with. | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
no wait, the vocal ones, yeah if you are not speaking then maybe you're reasonable. Like, shut up. haha | ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:33 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Show nested quote + How mature of you. yahOn August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here You disagree with an opnion, but you'll rather be flippant. I don't understand why you have a problem with people expressing opnions contrary to your own. It's dangerous to do so in your position as administrator as the post after yours immediately lept upon your implication of censorship on shakey grounds simply becuase it was you who disagrees. I dunno, I'm about as die hard as BW fans come and this thread reads pretty bad to me. Certainly doesn't have the feel of reasoned discussion, and at times clothes to being outright hostile. I generally find this forum to be a pretty awesome bunch of people, but some of these SC2 based threads seem to bring out some pretty toxic mindsets...little like that Day9 one a few months ago. | ||
![]()
TheNewEra
Germany3128 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:42 ProMeTheus112 wrote: haha yeah ppl who post in bw section are just unreasonable man, cause I guess like, they post in the bw forum instead of sc2 (and they play bw :/) Tbf he isn't really wrong. Our community here has become way more bitter, unreasonable and butthurt over the last 1-2 years. No clue tho why it's the case. Everything new that happens in the bw scene nowadays will result in drama which is kinda sad ![]() | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 26513
2376 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:48 ProMeTheus112 wrote: idk but maybe some people are just trying to provoke hostility too then you might want to respond Should expressing different opinion lead to hostility ? What if Nathanias thinks that SC2 is better or whatever ? I'm pretty sure that intelligent human beings should be able to accept his opinion and move on. No. In BW forum every mention of SC2 leads to hostility. Pretty sad. | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
| ||
Little-Chimp
Canada948 Posts
| ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:37 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 03:05 Nathanias wrote: On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) There are very few reasonable people in the bw section on TL, this is nothing new. Well at least of the vocal part. Though tbf, in the case of you talking about bw it's really a bit one sided here and there from what i have seen. But then again, that's obviously your prerogative It goes without saying that grouping the whole community together is the wrong thing to do but your call. In that same vein, makes me wonder why you take part in these discussions if you think the majority of vocal posters are unreasonable enough to have a conversation with. I mean, that's a waste of your valuable time, isn't it? Wouldn't it be better spent doing something else? | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 03 2017 04:17 BigFan wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 03:37 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 03:05 Nathanias wrote: On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) There are very few reasonable people in the bw section on TL, this is nothing new. Well at least of the vocal part. Though tbf, in the case of you talking about bw it's really a bit one sided here and there from what i have seen. But then again, that's obviously your prerogative It goes without saying that grouping the whole community together is the wrong thing to do but your call. In that same vein, makes me wonder why you take part in these discussions if you think the majority of vocal posters are unreasonable enough to have a conversation with. I mean, that's a waste of your valuable time, isn't it? Wouldn't it be better spent doing something else? In general i am always open to discussion and even if i think that most people here are incredibly unreasonable, there obviously are still other forum users who have interesting perspectives. But yeah i don't think one qualifies as reasonable when he gets triggered by any mention of sc2, sees ulterior motives/conspiracy theories everywhere and pretends bw is literally perfect and thus equal to the word of god. A lot of people fall into at least one of these categories here. You are fine though ![]() | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
On August 03 2017 02:54 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 02:08 duke91 wrote: Is matchmaking with true random or fake random (almost never mirror matches)? I mean watching JD's stream he played mainly ZvZ and ZvT Thats not what I meant. If you pick random vs another random, the chances of getting a mirror matchup is 1/2 if it is true random. If you play 1.16, it is something like 1/27 or something like that. | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:05 Nathanias wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Then don't come back and never read in here again. No one is forcing you to deal with this community or do anything. It also not like I have heard anything remotely productive from you except bitching about this community. Kinda ironic don't you think? | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 04:28 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 04:17 BigFan wrote: On August 03 2017 03:37 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 03:05 Nathanias wrote: On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) There are very few reasonable people in the bw section on TL, this is nothing new. Well at least of the vocal part. Though tbf, in the case of you talking about bw it's really a bit one sided here and there from what i have seen. But then again, that's obviously your prerogative It goes without saying that grouping the whole community together is the wrong thing to do but your call. In that same vein, makes me wonder why you take part in these discussions if you think the majority of vocal posters are unreasonable enough to have a conversation with. I mean, that's a waste of your valuable time, isn't it? Wouldn't it be better spent doing something else? In general i am always open to discussion and even if i think that most people here are incredibly unreasonable, there obviously are still other forum users who have interesting perspectives. But yeah i don't think one qualifies as reasonable when he gets triggered by any mention of sc2, sees ulterior motives/conspiracy theories everywhere and pretends bw is literally perfect and thus equal to the word of god. A lot of people fall into at least one of these categories here. You are fine though ![]() Sorry to disappoint but I think BW is perfect lol. I would've figured my many posts and blogs would've conveyed that XD | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 03 2017 04:30 duke91 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 02:54 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 02:08 duke91 wrote: Is matchmaking with true random or fake random (almost never mirror matches)? I mean watching JD's stream he played mainly ZvZ and ZvT Thats not what I meant. If you pick random vs another random, the chances of getting a mirror matchup is 1/2 if it is true random. If you play 1.16, it is something like 1/27 or something like that. Oh yeah now your question makes more sense. But why 1/2? It should be 1/3, no? | ||
![]()
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21242 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
On August 03 2017 05:03 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: What if it went like this guys? ![]() + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
JungleTerrain
Chile799 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
On August 03 2017 04:36 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 04:30 duke91 wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 02:08 duke91 wrote: Is matchmaking with true random or fake random (almost never mirror matches)? I mean watching JD's stream he played mainly ZvZ and ZvT Thats not what I meant. If you pick random vs another random, the chances of getting a mirror matchup is 1/2 if it is true random. If you play 1.16, it is something like 1/27 or something like that. Oh yeah now your question makes more sense. But why 1/2? It should be 1/3, no? There are 6 matchups. 3 are mirror. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 03 2017 05:14 duke91 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 04:36 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 04:30 duke91 wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 02:08 duke91 wrote: Is matchmaking with true random or fake random (almost never mirror matches)? I mean watching JD's stream he played mainly ZvZ and ZvT Thats not what I meant. If you pick random vs another random, the chances of getting a mirror matchup is 1/2 if it is true random. If you play 1.16, it is something like 1/27 or something like that. Oh yeah now your question makes more sense. But why 1/2? It should be 1/3, no? There are 6 matchups. 3 are mirror. There are 9 possibilities though because ZvT and TvZ isn't the same here. | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
| ||
TBO
Germany1350 Posts
On August 03 2017 05:14 duke91 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 04:36 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 04:30 duke91 wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 02:08 duke91 wrote: Is matchmaking with true random or fake random (almost never mirror matches)? I mean watching JD's stream he played mainly ZvZ and ZvT Thats not what I meant. If you pick random vs another random, the chances of getting a mirror matchup is 1/2 if it is true random. If you play 1.16, it is something like 1/27 or something like that. Oh yeah now your question makes more sense. But why 1/2? It should be 1/3, no? There are 6 matchups. 3 are mirror. it's 1/3 for true random, non mirrors have a higher chance of happening because there is zvt and tvz instead of just zvz. Or looking differently at it: Race of first player doesn't matter, 2nd player has 1/3 chance to get same race as 1st player. Your question is still relevant for both 1/2 and 1/3 vs 1/27 though. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
On August 03 2017 05:03 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: What if it went like this guys? ![]() + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
CHEONSOYUN
513 Posts
On August 02 2017 12:21 Nathanias wrote: I do not act professional on my stream so please do not delude yourselves into thinking off-hand comments are my final opinion on certain matters either. The Remaster is amazing and all the fun parts of the game are still there better than ever, however yeah there's a lot of stuff like the awful pathing etc that will not only keep me but many others from committing to it long-term. Edit: I would also like to add that I have watched the more recent BW stuff that is on at watchable hours, and I look forward to following whatever scene pops up with Remaster's release. But yeah it's an ancient game and I have too much going on in my life to want to try learning something that might be dead when the hype after a month or two ends. what kind of stupid backhanded comment is this | ||
EndingLife
United States1587 Posts
On August 03 2017 05:17 duke91 wrote: It is the same here because all I care about is whether there is true random vs random or not. Are you a random player? Care to RvR in a bo##? | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
| ||
SoleSteeler
Canada5409 Posts
| ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On August 03 2017 05:26 Ansibled wrote: The actual odds of getting a mirror will depend on ladder population right? I assume it's not an even split. + Show Spoiler + ![]() Hahaha, that is great. The imagery, oh the sheer imagery. | ||
GoShox
United States1835 Posts
For more info: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/413197-few-mirrors-when-both-players-random#18 For the record, I don't know if the random algorithm was changed, might be worth posting on the Blizz forums about it. | ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
On August 03 2017 05:16 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 05:14 duke91 wrote: On August 03 2017 04:36 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 04:30 duke91 wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 02:08 duke91 wrote: Is matchmaking with true random or fake random (almost never mirror matches)? I mean watching JD's stream he played mainly ZvZ and ZvT Thats not what I meant. If you pick random vs another random, the chances of getting a mirror matchup is 1/2 if it is true random. If you play 1.16, it is something like 1/27 or something like that. Oh yeah now your question makes more sense. But why 1/2? It should be 1/3, no? There are 6 matchups. 3 are mirror. There are 9 possibilities though because ZvT and TvZ isn't the same here. nevermind, thought about it again you are right. Still in rnd vs rnd, mirror matchups almost never occur. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
The question is if people would want it to be true random or not, afaik mirror matchups aren't really popular | ||
-NegativeZero-
United States2141 Posts
| ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 03 2017 07:17 -NegativeZero- wrote: lmao how the fuck did a thread about the best BW news in years, by far devolve into yet another sc2 bashing thread The real answer, in case this question isn't completely rhetorical, is someone posted about how big SC2 streamers were getting beta access over older BW names, and about how a few of said SC2 streamers with beta access actively denigrated BW. So, given this is a BW subforum, everyone dogpiled those streamers. | ||
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
Fwiw I played broodwar at a competitive foreign level and always thought broodwar was better than SC2 but some of the broodwar purists in here are really annoying to read | ||
Endymion
United States3701 Posts
On August 03 2017 02:12 Waxangel wrote: Show nested quote + On August 02 2017 21:31 Keniji wrote: On August 02 2017 21:17 Weavel wrote: On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: Yeah and tbh similar things happened with sc2 and lol (or melee and smash 4). I guess it's to be expected. Tbh I really hate this part of bw community. BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. I don't like the negative behavior either, but blizzard actively sabotaged the bw scene to promote sc2. So it's not really comparable with another game like lol taking share of the player's base. Are we doing this again? Blizzard did not maliciously try to "kill" BW. At WORST, they handled an IP-rights dispute in an indelicate, ham-fisted way. No one said you have to like SC2, or even have a polite attitude toward it, but it would be nice if people didn't mangle the facts so they can enjoy a perverse victimhood complex. i mean they """defended""" an ""ip-rights"" ""violation"" when they had a fiscal incentive to kill broodwar and promote their shiny new replacement. quite the coincidence that activision blizzard's legion of lawyers weren't able to resolve the situation in a more amicable manner that didn't involve mangling broodwar while paving the road for sc2. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
ortseam
996 Posts
| ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
On August 03 2017 08:03 Endymion wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 02:12 Waxangel wrote: On August 02 2017 21:31 Keniji wrote: On August 02 2017 21:17 Weavel wrote: On August 02 2017 21:02 Bonyth wrote: Yeah and tbh similar things happened with sc2 and lol (or melee and smash 4). I guess it's to be expected. Tbh I really hate this part of bw community. BW fans had many years of misery because of SC2 release and Blizzard's intrusion into BW life. Because of that, u see the constant bashing directed at SC2. They got their "revange". Of course it would be healthier for everyone that the negative statements stop, from both sides, but it's not how the internet works. I don't like the negative behavior either, but blizzard actively sabotaged the bw scene to promote sc2. So it's not really comparable with another game like lol taking share of the player's base. Are we doing this again? Blizzard did not maliciously try to "kill" BW. At WORST, they handled an IP-rights dispute in an indelicate, ham-fisted way. No one said you have to like SC2, or even have a polite attitude toward it, but it would be nice if people didn't mangle the facts so they can enjoy a perverse victimhood complex. i mean they """defended""" an ""ip-rights"" ""violation"" when they had a fiscal incentive to kill broodwar and promote their shiny new replacement. quite the coincidence that activision blizzard's legion of lawyers weren't able to resolve the situation in a more amicable manner that didn't involve mangling broodwar while paving the road for sc2. Not to mention the fact that the IP rights violation didn't seem to be a problem for almost 11 years... Soon after SC2 launch, it suddenly becomes a big deal and Blizzard has to sue Kespa. After some time, Kespa announces the switch to SC2, even if the game had a much smaller following in Korea. That's gotta be a BIG coincidence. Anybody that thinks otherwise is clearly mad. =D | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. SC2 had the macro, but took WC3's superior micro importance and combined it. If you ever deny this, ask yourself why Flash and Jaedong, the two most dominating macro players, never accomplished anything in SC2??? Because SC2 had way more to it than just pure macro-ability. Players with strategical genius like MVP or Rain end up dominating SC2 instead, despite being "weaker" macro players in BW. Unfortunately, the game didn't quite work out the way as intended IMO, solely due to three things: too efficient of pathing/clumping/"deathballing" and the community having a horrible outlook on balance. The game has been pretty steady in balance outside of the BL/Infestor patch, yet every single era of SC2 has a huge majority of people crying about balance. In BW, as the game has had no patches for ~15 years, people are more likely to concede that it is in a good state of balance, and thats what I enjoy about it. You can't whine too much. SC2's balance whine ruined the mood to play the game, way more than no chat for years did.. Even Neeb gets very little respect, despite being the most successful foreigner possibly ever; solely due to what race he plays. My third issue with SC2 is just the fun factor.. Certain units just feel awkward to use, regardless of how long I play it. I've been GM at times in WoL, and even with that, I tried not to use colossus - I just hate them. Hate how they function, hate how they move, but it was necessary to win back then - I've lost a lot of PvP by being stubborn going pure stalker/immo vs colossus.. I feel the same with adepts; just not for me. I'm sure terran feels the same with things like thors, or zerg with swarm hosts.. But this may be more in the personal opinion realm than a serious issue to the game..? In hindsight, while SC2 missed the mark IMO, it is a good attempt and if it wasn't compared to BW, it would easily be up there, but BW is magical in it's perfect balance and counters... which is not really possible for any other game to get to without luck. It's unfair to expect blizzard to make another game like BW, its just too difficult. BW is clearly the most balanced, difficult esport of all time, but SC2 is pretty good minus a few mishaps. | ||
ortseam
996 Posts
![]() | ||
CUTtheCBC
Canada91 Posts
| ||
Nathanias
United States290 Posts
On August 03 2017 07:39 ROOTFayth wrote: I think most likely people like Nathanias might be attributing the fun of the game to the fame they earned through that game so for him he can't possibly enjoy broodwar as much because he is just so invested in SC2, like all his memories are from SC2... Understandable that he would think that way Fwiw I played broodwar at a competitive foreign level and always thought broodwar was better than SC2 but some of the broodwar purists in here are really annoying to read For what it's worth most people don't know I played BW for 6 years up to the release of SC2, I just wasn't a hardcore esport dude when I was 13 years old. It's not like I got handed the beta for something I didn't care about either ![]() | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: I've always had trouble arguing with "BW Elitists" back when SC2 was first released, because they don't want to hear about the upsides to SC2 - they act like the game is just pure shit regardless of how it actually is. I grew up on BW like most of us here, I was a ladder challenges guy, playing with the early days of Liquid/etc, and played through WGT/etc too, so I love BW obviously.. but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. SC2 had the macro, but took WC3's superior micro importance and combined it. If you ever deny this, ask yourself why Flash and Jaedong, the two most dominating macro players, never accomplished anything in SC2??? Because SC2 had way more to it than just pure macro-ability. Players with strategical genius like MVP or Rain end up dominating SC2 instead, despite being "weaker" macro players in BW. Unfortunately, the game didn't quite work out the way as intended IMO, solely due to two things: too efficient of pathing/clumping/"deathballing" and the community having a horrible outlook on balance. The game has been pretty steady in balance outside of the BL/Infestor patch, yet every single era of SC2 has a huge majority of people crying about balance. In BW, as the game has had no patches for ~15 years, people are more likely to concede that it is in a good state of balance, and thats what I enjoy about it. You can't whine too much. In hindsight, while SC2 missed the mark IMO, it is a good attempt and if it wasn't compared to BW, it would easily be up there, but BW is magical in it's perfect balance and counters... which is not really possible for any other game to get to without luck. It's unfair to expect blizzard to make another game like BW, its just too difficult. BW is clearly the most balanced, difficult esport of all time, but SC2 is pretty good minus a few mishaps. I wasn't watching as much SCII by the time Flash and Jaedong were both playing the game heavily but in 2013, Jaedong was constantly reaching the quarterfinals/semifinals/finals of most tournaments he participated in (Ignore that bizzare WCS season where he lost to theognis lol). I know this because I was following him until end of 2013 when he won ASUS RoG over Life and Innovation, two of the best players at the time then he just lost his drive completely after that so I chose a great time to just quit. Regardless, just take a look at his 2013 achievements and tell me again that Jaedong accomplished nothing: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Jaedong#Achievements As for Flash, he may not have been quite as dominant as in BW but he still had quite a lot of high placements as well. Just a quick look at his wiki and you'll see what I mean: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Flash#Achievements . I saw the tail end of his IEM Toronto victory where he slayed everyone and how he led his team to the 2014 PL finals win so make sure to check your sources next time before making such statements again please. | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
On August 03 2017 09:12 BigFan wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: I've always had trouble arguing with "BW Elitists" back when SC2 was first released, because they don't want to hear about the upsides to SC2 - they act like the game is just pure shit regardless of how it actually is. I grew up on BW like most of us here, I was a ladder challenges guy, playing with the early days of Liquid/etc, and played through WGT/etc too, so I love BW obviously.. but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. SC2 had the macro, but took WC3's superior micro importance and combined it. If you ever deny this, ask yourself why Flash and Jaedong, the two most dominating macro players, never accomplished anything in SC2??? Because SC2 had way more to it than just pure macro-ability. Players with strategical genius like MVP or Rain end up dominating SC2 instead, despite being "weaker" macro players in BW. Unfortunately, the game didn't quite work out the way as intended IMO, solely due to two things: too efficient of pathing/clumping/"deathballing" and the community having a horrible outlook on balance. The game has been pretty steady in balance outside of the BL/Infestor patch, yet every single era of SC2 has a huge majority of people crying about balance. In BW, as the game has had no patches for ~15 years, people are more likely to concede that it is in a good state of balance, and thats what I enjoy about it. You can't whine too much. In hindsight, while SC2 missed the mark IMO, it is a good attempt and if it wasn't compared to BW, it would easily be up there, but BW is magical in it's perfect balance and counters... which is not really possible for any other game to get to without luck. It's unfair to expect blizzard to make another game like BW, its just too difficult. BW is clearly the most balanced, difficult esport of all time, but SC2 is pretty good minus a few mishaps. I wasn't watching as much SCII by the time Flash and Jaedong were both playing the game heavily but in 2013, Jaedong was constantly reaching the quarterfinals/semifinals/finals of most tournaments he participated in (Ignore that bizzare WCS season where he lost to theognis lol). I know this because I was following him until end of 2013 when he won ASUS RoG over Life and Innovation, two of the best players at the time then he just lost his drive completely after that so I chose a great time to just quit. Regardless, just take a look at his 2013 achievements and tell me again that Jaedong accomplished nothing: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Jaedong#Achievements As for Flash, he may not have been quite as dominant as in BW but he still had quite a lot of high placements as well. Just a quick look at his wiki and you'll see what I mean: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Flash#Achievements . I saw the tail end of his IEM Toronto victory where he slayed everyone and how he led his team to the 2014 PL finals win so make sure to check your sources next time before making such statements again please. I stand by my statement. They are in almost every finals of every tournament they play in BW, and Flash is basically unbeatable in Bo3's - yet in SC2, he won one tournament, a non-korean one at that. There is clearly a drastic difference in the game that caused him to not be as dominate as BW (the "more difficult game") and I'm not buying any kind of "not-motivated cause he hates SC2 over BW" reasoning that BW elitists would have. Was he good? Obviously, but I wouldnt rate Flash or Jaedong in the top ~30 players to ever play SC2, and thats a large drop-off from their BW standings. And if you want to talk about "checking sources", maybe people should start checking sources of tournament prize pools for SC2 before they start calling it a "dead game".. as far as I can see, it still rates pretty high up there as far as esports goes, where many foreigners are still making their livings on pro teams. Thats not a dead game to me. | ||
Bonyth
Poland537 Posts
On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. SC2 had the macro, but took WC3's superior micro importance and combined it. If you ever deny this, ask yourself why Flash and Jaedong, the two most dominating macro players, never accomplished anything in SC2??? Because SC2 had way more to it than just pure macro-ability. Players with strategical genius like MVP or Rain end up dominating SC2 instead, despite being "weaker" macro players in BW. Unfortunately, the game didn't quite work out the way as intended IMO, solely due to three things: too efficient of pathing/clumping/"deathballing" and the community having a horrible outlook on balance. The game has been pretty steady in balance outside of the BL/Infestor patch, yet every single era of SC2 has a huge majority of people crying about balance. In BW, as the game has had no patches for ~15 years, people are more likely to concede that it is in a good state of balance, and thats what I enjoy about it. You can't whine too much. SC2's balance whine ruined the mood to play the game, way more than no chat for years did.. Even Neeb gets very little respect, despite being the most successful foreigner possibly ever; solely due to what race he plays. LOL what did i just read. I just read micro is not present in sc:bw. So ask yourself results of actions: - send carriers on a-move against terran goliaths - try move reaver without shuttle vs any race - send your zerglings or mutas on a-move against terran I could go on and on and on. If army control isn't micro in your opinion, then what is it? Spellcasting? That's present in both games. To counter your point, let me tell u this. My apm is about 200. About 160 is MICRO and 40 is MACRO and some people think of me as #1 protoss foreigner (god i hate u for making me say such self-promoting statement). | ||
ortseam
996 Posts
| ||
CHEONSOYUN
513 Posts
On August 03 2017 09:33 SnowfaLL wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 09:12 BigFan wrote: On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: I've always had trouble arguing with "BW Elitists" back when SC2 was first released, because they don't want to hear about the upsides to SC2 - they act like the game is just pure shit regardless of how it actually is. I grew up on BW like most of us here, I was a ladder challenges guy, playing with the early days of Liquid/etc, and played through WGT/etc too, so I love BW obviously.. but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. SC2 had the macro, but took WC3's superior micro importance and combined it. If you ever deny this, ask yourself why Flash and Jaedong, the two most dominating macro players, never accomplished anything in SC2??? Because SC2 had way more to it than just pure macro-ability. Players with strategical genius like MVP or Rain end up dominating SC2 instead, despite being "weaker" macro players in BW. Unfortunately, the game didn't quite work out the way as intended IMO, solely due to two things: too efficient of pathing/clumping/"deathballing" and the community having a horrible outlook on balance. The game has been pretty steady in balance outside of the BL/Infestor patch, yet every single era of SC2 has a huge majority of people crying about balance. In BW, as the game has had no patches for ~15 years, people are more likely to concede that it is in a good state of balance, and thats what I enjoy about it. You can't whine too much. In hindsight, while SC2 missed the mark IMO, it is a good attempt and if it wasn't compared to BW, it would easily be up there, but BW is magical in it's perfect balance and counters... which is not really possible for any other game to get to without luck. It's unfair to expect blizzard to make another game like BW, its just too difficult. BW is clearly the most balanced, difficult esport of all time, but SC2 is pretty good minus a few mishaps. I wasn't watching as much SCII by the time Flash and Jaedong were both playing the game heavily but in 2013, Jaedong was constantly reaching the quarterfinals/semifinals/finals of most tournaments he participated in (Ignore that bizzare WCS season where he lost to theognis lol). I know this because I was following him until end of 2013 when he won ASUS RoG over Life and Innovation, two of the best players at the time then he just lost his drive completely after that so I chose a great time to just quit. Regardless, just take a look at his 2013 achievements and tell me again that Jaedong accomplished nothing: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Jaedong#Achievements As for Flash, he may not have been quite as dominant as in BW but he still had quite a lot of high placements as well. Just a quick look at his wiki and you'll see what I mean: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Flash#Achievements . I saw the tail end of his IEM Toronto victory where he slayed everyone and how he led his team to the 2014 PL finals win so make sure to check your sources next time before making such statements again please. I stand by my statement. They are in almost every finals of every tournament they play in BW, and Flash is basically unbeatable in Bo3's - yet in SC2, he won one tournament, a non-korean one at that. There is clearly a drastic difference in the game that caused him to not be as dominate as BW (the "more difficult game") and I'm not buying any kind of "not-motivated cause he hates SC2 over BW" reasoning that BW elitists would have. Was he good? Obviously, but I wouldnt rate Flash or Jaedong in the top ~30 players to ever play SC2, and thats a large drop-off from their BW standings. And if you want to talk about "checking sources", maybe people should start checking sources of tournament prize pools for SC2 before they start calling it a "dead game".. as far as I can see, it still rates pretty high up there as far as esports goes, where many foreigners are still making their livings on pro teams. Thats not a dead game to me. Why are you arguing about and defending SC2 here? | ||
Starlightsun
United States1405 Posts
On August 03 2017 07:17 -NegativeZero- wrote: lmao how the fuck did a thread about the best BW news in years, by far devolve into yet another sc2 bashing thread Best BW news was Flash and other players switching back to BW, as well as the success of the ASL tournaments. Now Blizzard is threatening to shit all over that just like they did back when SC2 was released. I wish they would just leave BW the fuck alone. | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
On August 03 2017 09:49 Bonyth wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. SC2 had the macro, but took WC3's superior micro importance and combined it. If you ever deny this, ask yourself why Flash and Jaedong, the two most dominating macro players, never accomplished anything in SC2??? Because SC2 had way more to it than just pure macro-ability. Players with strategical genius like MVP or Rain end up dominating SC2 instead, despite being "weaker" macro players in BW. Unfortunately, the game didn't quite work out the way as intended IMO, solely due to three things: too efficient of pathing/clumping/"deathballing" and the community having a horrible outlook on balance. The game has been pretty steady in balance outside of the BL/Infestor patch, yet every single era of SC2 has a huge majority of people crying about balance. In BW, as the game has had no patches for ~15 years, people are more likely to concede that it is in a good state of balance, and thats what I enjoy about it. You can't whine too much. SC2's balance whine ruined the mood to play the game, way more than no chat for years did.. Even Neeb gets very little respect, despite being the most successful foreigner possibly ever; solely due to what race he plays. LOL what did i just read. I just read micro is not present in sc:bw. So ask yourself results of actions: - send carriers on a-move against terran goliaths - try move reaver without shuttle vs any race - send your zerglings or mutas on a-move against terran I could go on and on and on. If army control isn't micro in your opinion, then what is it? Spellcasting? That's present in both games. To counter your point, let me tell u this. My apm is about 200. About 160 is MICRO and 40 is MACRO and some people think of me as #1 protoss foreigner (god i hate u for making me say such self-promoting statement). Didn't say there was NO micro, but clearly macro is WAY more important. This is why BoxeR can't keep up in current BW, despite his micro being some of the best of all time. But like I've said, its impossible to talk about unbiased things with people on the BW forum when it comes to another game than BW. If you spent 160 APM solely on micro and only 40 on Macro on average, you sorely underestimate how much macro you are doing. The whole point of BW is that it is impossible to do everything perfectly, so pros (I'm talking the best of the best, Jaedong and Flash) will almost always choose the macro route in an intense game vs perfect microing, because they know having more units to reinforce is stronger than the 2003 days of microing your one dropship and tanks to kill a whole base. The only time micro actually takes precedent over macro in BW is critical situations where your macro is A) not established yet (earlygame/expoing) or when the whole map is mined out and you have a handful of units left. Go ahead, humor me and watch any pro game right now. I guarentee you there will be at least one major micro blunder in the game from when the player is busy macroing on the other side of the map - I just watched Flash vs Free from 21 July, and Flash walked his tanks into zealot/dragoon armies over 3 times, and got his front broken at least another two times just from not moving back in time.. If flash was using ~80% APM on micro and 20% macro like you used above, that wouldnt happen.. He chose to continue to macro, and almost won the game solely from macroing after at least 3 or 4 very bad decision making micro mistakes. This is what BW is all about, the power to macro through the game. This is why SC2 is drastically difference, a micro mistake losing ~10 tanks would be game ending in almost every situation. On August 03 2017 09:51 ortseam wrote: Macro is not what made players like Flash, JD and BIsu shine in BW. Every progamer and even high-level amateurs can macro just as well. And one of the few exceptions that can't, reached the last ASL final You really think everyone, including amateurs can macro like Flash or JD?? lol.. Macro is WHY they are the undisputed strongest players ever. I can't believe anyone would dispute that. Anyways, im done arguing semantics, its clear that as Nathanias says (and I couldn't disagree any further with his points about BW/SC2..) but this forum basically cannot discuss anything unbiased when it comes to BW. Its the same forum that bash Day9 and Tasteless for playing SC2, not realizing that this is their job, and MAYBE just MAYBE they actually enjoy both games?? It actually is possible to enjoy and see merit in both games, anywhere but this forum apparently. | ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) Literally never | ||
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
However, it is uneducated to call Jaedong a macro-oriented player. You can call ZerO a macro-oriented player. You can call Flash a macro-oriented player. Jaedong is a player who is best known for his zerg-versus-zerg during his peak years, a match-up of almost pure micro-management. | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 09:33 SnowfaLL wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 09:12 BigFan wrote: On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: I've always had trouble arguing with "BW Elitists" back when SC2 was first released, because they don't want to hear about the upsides to SC2 - they act like the game is just pure shit regardless of how it actually is. I grew up on BW like most of us here, I was a ladder challenges guy, playing with the early days of Liquid/etc, and played through WGT/etc too, so I love BW obviously.. but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. SC2 had the macro, but took WC3's superior micro importance and combined it. If you ever deny this, ask yourself why Flash and Jaedong, the two most dominating macro players, never accomplished anything in SC2??? Because SC2 had way more to it than just pure macro-ability. Players with strategical genius like MVP or Rain end up dominating SC2 instead, despite being "weaker" macro players in BW. Unfortunately, the game didn't quite work out the way as intended IMO, solely due to two things: too efficient of pathing/clumping/"deathballing" and the community having a horrible outlook on balance. The game has been pretty steady in balance outside of the BL/Infestor patch, yet every single era of SC2 has a huge majority of people crying about balance. In BW, as the game has had no patches for ~15 years, people are more likely to concede that it is in a good state of balance, and thats what I enjoy about it. You can't whine too much. In hindsight, while SC2 missed the mark IMO, it is a good attempt and if it wasn't compared to BW, it would easily be up there, but BW is magical in it's perfect balance and counters... which is not really possible for any other game to get to without luck. It's unfair to expect blizzard to make another game like BW, its just too difficult. BW is clearly the most balanced, difficult esport of all time, but SC2 is pretty good minus a few mishaps. I wasn't watching as much SCII by the time Flash and Jaedong were both playing the game heavily but in 2013, Jaedong was constantly reaching the quarterfinals/semifinals/finals of most tournaments he participated in (Ignore that bizzare WCS season where he lost to theognis lol). I know this because I was following him until end of 2013 when he won ASUS RoG over Life and Innovation, two of the best players at the time then he just lost his drive completely after that so I chose a great time to just quit. Regardless, just take a look at his 2013 achievements and tell me again that Jaedong accomplished nothing: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Jaedong#Achievements As for Flash, he may not have been quite as dominant as in BW but he still had quite a lot of high placements as well. Just a quick look at his wiki and you'll see what I mean: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Flash#Achievements . I saw the tail end of his IEM Toronto victory where he slayed everyone and how he led his team to the 2014 PL finals win so make sure to check your sources next time before making such statements again please. I stand by my statement. They are in almost every finals of every tournament they play in BW, and Flash is basically unbeatable in Bo3's - yet in SC2, he won one tournament, a non-korean one at that. There is clearly a drastic difference in the game that caused him to not be as dominate as BW (the "more difficult game") and I'm not buying any kind of "not-motivated cause he hates SC2 over BW" reasoning that BW elitists would have. Was he good? Obviously, but I wouldnt rate Flash or Jaedong in the top ~30 players to ever play SC2, and thats a large drop-off from their BW standings. Stand by your statements all you want but the objective results show otherwise. Jaedong was considered one of the best Zergs in 2013, only behind Life and a couple of others. I can't say much for Flash in terms of where he stacked but I'm pretty sure that he's accomplished more as a Terran than a lot of SCII players. Also, something that you seem to forget is that international SCII tournaments and even things like WCS were at times stacked with Korean because of no region lock so just stating a non-korean tournament as a retort doesn't work. Now, if you actually checked the player list and used that as an argument for the difficulty of a tournament, I'll fold. Using that IEM tournament as an example, here are some Koreans that participated: + Show Spoiler + Leenock- was a GSL finalist back in WoL, was on a decline but still. Life- best Zerg player at the time. Maru- was a solid Terran player who was slowly becoming a champ StarDust- better known as m18m, he was actually the only BW protoss player that went undefeated against Flash (2-0 record against Flash). He also was pretty strong, beating Jaedong and many others in 2013. herO- back when he first switched to protoss, herO was a force to be reckoned with and one of the best protoss players. I can't remember how his skills were at this period but he was still a strong foe regardless. Taeja- no need for an introduction to one of the better terrans to touch the game. sOs- there's a reason he was being called $o$ in the community and had some of the wackiest but most effective games in the scene at the time. MC- boss toss, no introductions needed. First- meh Zest- another great protoss who knew Flash really well yet Flash dismantled him in the finals. Polt- One of the best terrans player around and was a constant presence in tournaments YoDa- said by Mvp to be really solid in practice from what I remember. So, tell me again how this was a lacking field? Anyways, your call in the end. Also, I'm not even trying to argue prize pools here so I don't know why you seem to mention that. I was talking about you claiming that neither Jaedong or Flash did anything in SCII which is completely false especially when LP is a click away. For an early period in SCII's history, there were lots of different organizers that threw money at the game but nowadays, most of it is from Blizzard. Heck, even GSL was being helped greatly by Blizzard since 2010+ and the whole WCS is being financed from Blizzard. Compare that to MSL, OSL, PL then we had stuff like SSL, VNSL and eventually ASL. Sponsors in most of these cases that weren't Blizzard-related. | ||
ortseam
996 Posts
And yeah, almost every progamer can macro like that, including MVP (when he was playing) and Rain, they are not noobs who float minerals wtf . Shine can't and he reached ASL finals, that's a fact. If it was that simple, people would just macro better and play like Flash. The Boxer thing also isn't an argument, everyone has similar or better micro these days Also, lol at calling out Bonyth. Just wasted his time to explain some things, only to get bashed immediately after | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
On August 03 2017 10:26 ortseam wrote: No one brought up SC2 in the last posts except for you, we just tried to explain fundamentals aspects of BW, then you start talking about SC2 and bias.. lol And yeah, almost every progamer can macro like that, including MVP (when he was playing) and Rain, they are not noobs who float minerals wtf . Shine can't and he reached ASL finals, that's a fact. If it was that simple, people would just macro better and play like Flash. The Boxer thing also isn't an argument, everyone has similar or better micro these days Also, lol at calling out Bonyth. Just wasted his time to explain some things, only to get bashed immediately after No one brought up SC2?? Did you even read the last 5 pages? Sigh, why am I even responding? I'll call out Bonyth when he makes an incorrect statement, I don't care who he is. Bash me all you want, if you truly think "anyone can macro like Flash, even amateurs" then that says it all about your knowledge of this game. | ||
Bonyth
Poland537 Posts
On August 03 2017 10:01 SnowfaLL wrote: If you spent 160 APM solely on micro and only 40 on Macro on average, you sorely underestimate how much macro you are doing. The whole point of BW is that it is impossible to do everything perfectly, so pros (I'm talking the best of the best, Jaedong and Flash) will almost always choose the macro route in an intense game vs perfect microing, because they know having more units to reinforce is stronger than the 2003 days of microing your one dropship and tanks to kill a whole base. The only time micro actually takes precedent over macro in BW is critical situations where your macro is A) not established yet (earlygame/expoing) or when the whole map is mined out and you have a handful of units left. I didn't come up with the numbers, specialized programs for replay analysis did. I could give you tons of replays, even mirror matches so u get the picture more easily, where I had far inferior army and eco but managed to win. In your picture of BW I would never be able to win. Also, u still didn't answer me how should I send my carriers on a-move and win or how zergs should do the same with their units. I don't deny that macro has a huge impact on the game. Decision making is even bigger factor. Saying everything can be sent on a-move in BroodWar makes u look incompetent at best. Granted, u will meet situations where progamers will go for a production circle, but don't make that the standard for the whole game, will ya? I think i need to spend less time on the forums. My blood pressure rises after reading certain posts. | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 10:26 ortseam wrote: No one brought up SC2 in the last posts except for you, we just tried to explain fundamentals aspects of BW, then you start talking about SC2 and bias.. lol And yeah, almost every progamer can macro like that, including MVP (when he was playing) and Rain, they are not noobs who float minerals wtf . Shine can't and he reached ASL finals, that's a fact. If it was that simple, people would just macro better and play like Flash. The Boxer thing also isn't an argument, everyone has similar or better micro these days Also, lol at calling out Bonyth. Just wasted his time to explain some things, only to get bashed immediately after ya, it's quite silly to state that micro is on such a low end of the game. Like, these pros macro so fast and switch back to the battle to micro. If micro is nowhere as important as macro, then why even bother? After all, macro is that much more important. The facts are that both macro and micro are important in the end. You obviously need to macro in order to have units to micro and you can have the best macro in the world but if you are running your mnm constantly into lurkers because your micro sucks, you won't be winning any games. Your example is also quite good. People seem to forget that Mvp actually took a game off Flash on MP back in the day (Flash went to win the series in the next 2 games) and as we all know, Shine sucks at macroing. His unit control and micro can be really great though and strategically, I think he was one of the better zerg player in the last ASL. | ||
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
On August 03 2017 10:41 SnowfaLL wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 10:26 ortseam wrote: No one brought up SC2 in the last posts except for you, we just tried to explain fundamentals aspects of BW, then you start talking about SC2 and bias.. lol And yeah, almost every progamer can macro like that, including MVP (when he was playing) and Rain, they are not noobs who float minerals wtf . Shine can't and he reached ASL finals, that's a fact. If it was that simple, people would just macro better and play like Flash. The Boxer thing also isn't an argument, everyone has similar or better micro these days Also, lol at calling out Bonyth. Just wasted his time to explain some things, only to get bashed immediately after No one brought up SC2?? Did you even read the last 5 pages? Sigh, why am I even responding? I'll call out Bonyth when he makes an incorrect statement, I don't care who he is. Bash me all you want, if you truly think "anyone can macro like Flash, even amateurs" then that says it all about your knowledge of this game. I think you are confusing mechanical prowess with macro-management. Jaedong's forte is not macro-management, Jaedong had a 72.69% win rate in zerg-versus-zerg at the end of his career, a career win percentage that is not matched by any zerg player in history, while his win rates in the other two match-ups have been matched by other great zergs in history. Jaedong shined the most when the strategical elements of the game were lessened, and flourished when it became a pure battle of mechanical ability. Jaedong was in posession of the greatest micro-management abilities seen in recent years, and was in posession of superlative multi-tasking and macro-management. However, he has openly said on television that his greatest strength was his micro-management ability. Jaedong was a mechanical monster who at his peak, found the greatest success in maps that had hundreds of games played on it, and was relatively figured out strategically, such as Sin Peaks of Baekdu, Tau Cross, Python, Fighting Spirit, Match Point, and Circuit Breaker. Of course, Jaedong added some guile to his game as the years went by, but that was not the main reason he became the most successful zerg of all time. | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
On August 03 2017 10:47 Bonyth wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 10:01 SnowfaLL wrote: If you spent 160 APM solely on micro and only 40 on Macro on average, you sorely underestimate how much macro you are doing. The whole point of BW is that it is impossible to do everything perfectly, so pros (I'm talking the best of the best, Jaedong and Flash) will almost always choose the macro route in an intense game vs perfect microing, because they know having more units to reinforce is stronger than the 2003 days of microing your one dropship and tanks to kill a whole base. The only time micro actually takes precedent over macro in BW is critical situations where your macro is A) not established yet (earlygame/expoing) or when the whole map is mined out and you have a handful of units left. I didn't come up with the numbers, specialized programs for replay analysis did. I could give you tons of replays, even mirror matches so u get the picture more easily, where I had far inferior army and eco but managed to win. In your picture of BW I would never be able to win. Also, u still didn't answer me how should I send my carriers on a-move and win or how zergs should do the same with their units. I don't deny that macro has a huge impact on the game. Decision making is even bigger factor. Saying everything can be sent on a-move in BroodWar makes u look incompetent at best. Granted, u will meet situations where progamers will go for a production circle, but don't make that the standard for the whole game, will ya? I think i need to spend less time on the forums. My blood pressure rises after reading certain posts. Where did I ever say that micro is non-existent and you can LITERALLY a-move every single unit in this game?? I just said macro is MORE IMPORTANT and you occasionally see pros a-moving at times for a production cycle (if the game was 80% micro based, that wouldnt happen EVER).. Reading comprehension.. please! The whole point of my original post is that BW, JUST like SC2, is a game where you are unable to play perfect - so everyone, even Flash, occassionally make mistakes. But due to the importance of Macro, it is different than SC2 where you can miss a few cycles and still be fine, but one micro mistake in SC2 is game ending while in BW you can walk your tanks into zealots by mistake and still win the game with superior macro. (And to not piss off the BW elitists.. obviously BW macro is 10x harder than SC2 macro). Wasn't even saying one is better or worse than the other, just talking about the differences because someone mentioned it before me.. I don't even care that you are "the legendary Bonyth, best foreigner protoss" (quoted by yourself) - If you are going to make statements like that, Its hard to take you seriously.. Ok im seriously done in this conversation if this is the kind of rebuttals I'm dealing with lol.. Someone saying amateurs can macro like Flash no problem, and Bonyth thinking I said you can literally A-move every unit in every game.. Holy cow. | ||
JohnSmithII
3 Posts
| ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
But if you don't micro in big battles, you lose tons of units. So if the end goal is as many units as possible, you have to do both, period. And the player who does both better will wind. If you just a-move on the minimap and forget your units afterwards, but train them with 100% precision and all your timings for adding production buildings is perfect, you'll lose. It's ridiculous to say people win through macro alone. | ||
wishbonesaka
Canada117 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
On August 03 2017 11:30 JohnSmithII wrote: Wrong thread. This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On August 03 2017 14:49 GoDannY wrote: This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? They're giving out beta keys every day, got mine today. | ||
GoShox
United States1835 Posts
On August 03 2017 15:05 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 14:49 GoDannY wrote: On August 03 2017 11:30 JohnSmithII wrote: Wrong thread. This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? They're giving out beta keys every day, got mine today. Like you logged in and randomly had remastered? | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On August 03 2017 15:05 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 14:49 GoDannY wrote: On August 03 2017 11:30 JohnSmithII wrote: Wrong thread. This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? They're giving out beta keys every day, got mine today. Lucky guy! Hope I get mine tomorrow (although I doubt it!) | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On August 03 2017 15:09 GoShox wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 15:05 TT1 wrote: On August 03 2017 14:49 GoDannY wrote: On August 03 2017 11:30 JohnSmithII wrote: Wrong thread. This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? They're giving out beta keys every day, got mine today. Like you logged in and randomly had remastered? Launched BW, logged into my acc and the screen changed to HD. | ||
Qikz
United Kingdom12022 Posts
On August 03 2017 15:33 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 15:09 GoShox wrote: On August 03 2017 15:05 TT1 wrote: On August 03 2017 14:49 GoDannY wrote: On August 03 2017 11:30 JohnSmithII wrote: Wrong thread. This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? They're giving out beta keys every day, got mine today. Like you logged in and randomly had remastered? Launched BW, logged into my acc and the screen changed to HD. *rocks back and forth* Not long now until I get in right? ;_; | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
| ||
CHEONSOYUN
513 Posts
sadness... | ||
shakigami
218 Posts
On August 03 2017 15:05 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 14:49 GoDannY wrote: On August 03 2017 11:30 JohnSmithII wrote: Wrong thread. This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? They're giving out beta keys every day, got mine today. how can u get one? | ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On August 03 2017 11:10 SnowfaLL wrote: "the legendary Bonyth, best foreigner protoss" (quoted by yourself) - If you are going to make statements like that, Its hard to take you seriously.. Bonyth and some people think of me as #1 protoss foreigner (god i hate u for making me say such self-promoting statement). When you blatantly change quotes misrepresenting what was said to prove your narrative, it is indeed very hard to take you seriously. Maybe if you wanted a real discussion on the differences you shouldn't have started with everything that counts in BW is pure macro-ability. Which is just a false statement, as pointed out by the other posters. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 03 2017 15:33 TT1 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 15:09 GoShox wrote: On August 03 2017 15:05 TT1 wrote: On August 03 2017 14:49 GoDannY wrote: On August 03 2017 11:30 JohnSmithII wrote: Wrong thread. This. You may want to continue here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/525100-what-wrecked-sc2 Back on topic: anyone got the beta recently or has Blizzard stopped giving out beta keys? They're giving out beta keys every day, got mine today. Like you logged in and randomly had remastered? Launched BW, logged into my acc and the screen changed to HD. Did anything change on your bn account? Is there any text when you go into SC:Remastered license on the list? | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
On August 03 2017 18:36 Keniji wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 11:10 SnowfaLL wrote: "the legendary Bonyth, best foreigner protoss" (quoted by yourself) - If you are going to make statements like that, Its hard to take you seriously.. Show nested quote + Bonyth and some people think of me as #1 protoss foreigner (god i hate u for making me say such self-promoting statement). When you blatantly change quotes misrepresenting what was said to prove your narrative, it is indeed very hard to take you seriously. Maybe if you wanted a real discussion on the differences you shouldn't have started with everything that counts in BW is pure macro-ability. Which is just a false statement, as pointed out by the other posters. lol why bother sucking up to him, hoping for free lessons? He took my whole post out of context to fit his narrative, thats way worse than a tongue n cheek slight at his "#1 protoss foreigner" quote. | ||
Bonyth
Poland537 Posts
On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. The answer is: not many times u see flash or jaedong just a-move units without micro. And that's why there are so many replies against you, because u made a false statement (well actually just implied one). Now go ahead, win a ZvZ match up without microing too hard. I've heard somewhere on the internet "the best way to find an answer for your question is not to ask, but to make a false statement". And that's what happened here. | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 19:40 Bonyth wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. The answer is: not many times u see flash or jaedong just a-move units without micro. And that's why there are so many replies against you, because u made a false statement (well actually just implied one). Now go ahead, win a ZvZ match up without microing too hard. I've heard somewhere on the internet "the best way to find an answer for your question is not to ask, but to make a false statement". And that's what happened here. It's because his question is extremely silly. You can see the importance of micro throughout the game. Take TvZ for example. You see Flash move out with 4 marines sometimes and in some cases, he'll get caught but does some great splits to minimize the damage. I mean it's only 4 marines right? Who cares if he loses them, no? Then once he's expanded, he goes up to his favourite 5rax build and he's moving all over the map, targeting mutas, placing firebats in front for lings and pulling back (or into chokes to minimize damage) depending on situation. Heck, sometimes if he looks away to macro, he gets caught and quickly switches back. Losing map control as terran can be devastating. In the same vein, if the zerg can't micro his mutalisks, he may as well not make them lol. These scenarios are also very simplistic and don't even consider the late game with either mech or the older apm intensive SK Terran. Then once you consider that ZvZ is a microfest and well, you wonder how he would make such a statement. | ||
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 03 2017 20:18 BigFan wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 19:40 Bonyth wrote: On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. The answer is: not many times u see flash or jaedong just a-move units without micro. And that's why there are so many replies against you, because u made a false statement (well actually just implied one). Now go ahead, win a ZvZ match up without microing too hard. I've heard somewhere on the internet "the best way to find an answer for your question is not to ask, but to make a false statement". And that's what happened here. It's because his question is extremely silly. You can see the importance of micro throughout the game. Take TvZ for example. You see Flash move out with 4 marines sometimes and in some cases, he'll get caught but does some great splits to minimize the damage. I mean it's only 4 marines right? Who cares if he loses them, no? Then once he's expanded, he goes up to his favourite 5rax build and he's moving all over the map, targeting mutas, placing firebats in front for lings and pulling back (or into chokes to minimize damage) depending on situation. Heck, sometimes if he looks away to macro, he gets caught and quickly switches back. Losing map control as terran can be devastating. In the same vein, if the zerg can't micro his mutalisks, he may as well not make them lol. These scenarios are also very simplistic and don't even consider the late game with either mech or the older apm intensive SK Terran. Then once you consider that ZvZ is a microfest and well, you wonder how he would make such a statement. The only interpretation that I can come up with that isn't completely, demonstrably false when it comes to the notion of micro being less important in BW (compared to SC2 micro) is the fact that generally speaking, on average, a BW match will very rarely be decided by a single micro or positioning mistake, especially in the late game. The same is obviously not true of SC2, where many many games over the years have been decided by a single engagement; and in that sense sure you could say micro is more important in SC2 because if you lose that one big fight you will lose the game, therefore you have to micro really hard when it does happen. (It's certainly not anything to brag about or point to as evidence of SC2 being a more "strategically balanced micro/macro RTS" though, and therein lies the irony.) | ||
neptunusfisk
2286 Posts
On August 03 2017 20:18 BigFan wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 19:40 Bonyth wrote: On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. The answer is: not many times u see flash or jaedong just a-move units without micro. And that's why there are so many replies against you, because u made a false statement (well actually just implied one). Now go ahead, win a ZvZ match up without microing too hard. I've heard somewhere on the internet "the best way to find an answer for your question is not to ask, but to make a false statement". And that's what happened here. It's because his question is extremely silly. You can see the importance of micro throughout the game. Take TvZ for example. You see Flash move out with 4 marines sometimes and in some cases, he'll get caught but does some great splits to minimize the damage. I mean it's only 4 marines right? Who cares if he loses them, no? Then once he's expanded, he goes up to his favourite 5rax build and he's moving all over the map, targeting mutas, placing firebats in front for lings and pulling back (or into chokes to minimize damage) depending on situation. Heck, sometimes if he looks away to macro, he gets caught and quickly switches back. Losing map control as terran can be devastating. In the same vein, if the zerg can't micro his mutalisks, he may as well not make them lol. These scenarios are also very simplistic and don't even consider the late game with either mech or the older apm intensive SK Terran. Then once you consider that ZvZ is a microfest and well, you wonder how he would make such a statement. Micro is very important. What makes the pros so good is that they macro so efficiently that they also have time for micro, and they know when to focus on what. | ||
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
On August 03 2017 20:18 BigFan wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 19:40 Bonyth wrote: On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. The answer is: not many times u see flash or jaedong just a-move units without micro. And that's why there are so many replies against you, because u made a false statement (well actually just implied one). Now go ahead, win a ZvZ match up without microing too hard. I've heard somewhere on the internet "the best way to find an answer for your question is not to ask, but to make a false statement". And that's what happened here. It's because his question is extremely silly. You can see the importance of micro throughout the game. Take TvZ for example. You see Flash move out with 4 marines sometimes and in some cases, he'll get caught but does some great splits to minimize the damage. I mean it's only 4 marines right? Who cares if he loses them, no? Then once he's expanded, he goes up to his favourite 5rax build and he's moving all over the map, targeting mutas, placing firebats in front for lings and pulling back (or into chokes to minimize damage) depending on situation. Heck, sometimes if he looks away to macro, he gets caught and quickly switches back. Losing map control as terran can be devastating. In the same vein, if the zerg can't micro his mutalisks, he may as well not make them lol. These scenarios are also very simplistic and don't even consider the late game with either mech or the older apm intensive SK Terran. Then once you consider that ZvZ is a microfest and well, you wonder how he would make such a statement. I think he had a fair point about Flash though, Flash is indeed a fearsome mechanical player, but his forte was never otherworldly micro-management. I first noticed it when his bionic micro-management wasn't as jaw-dropping as someone like BoxeR, or Casy during their primes, despite making his debut being initially dubbed as the "Bionic Genius". Flash didn't have many moments like Jaedong, JangBi, or Stork, making a situation out of nothing with naught but micro-management magic. He would often get out micro-managed by players with precise siege tank utilization like FBH during the early game, which is why he initially had so much trouble against FBH. Flash's initial relationship with Stork was Flash getting the advantageous situation, but gradually losing his grip on the game to Stork's masterful micro-management of protoss units. Flash was usually on the receiving end of godlike micro-managament super plays, rather than Flash winning from a bleak situation with nothing but his micro-management to fall back on. Even the game you mentioned, Flash lost that game to MVP because his late-game Battlecruiser micro-management was nothing out of the ordinary, and if I remember correctly, Flash was leading for most of the game, so it was his micro-management that let him down. NaDa during his prime would often win disadvantageous games just with his superior Battlecruiser micro-management in the late game. It's not to say that Flash had sub-par micro-management, but rather that his forte lied elsewhere. Even now when he streams, and plays custom maps with other streamers like EffOrt and BeSt, Flash doesn't tend to fair that well when he plays in micro-management intensive custom maps (although I admit familiarity is more important in this situation). I personally think Flash's micro-management, even during his prime, was good enough to be not abused by the very best micro-management players, but Flash himself didn't belong to that very few select group of players. Perhaps if another game has incredibly high demand for managing a single death ball of units (like late-game terran-versus-terran with Battlecruisers), rather than multi-tasking from multiple bases, Flash might have been rendered mortal. However, the theory that every top class Starcraft 2 player had superior micro-management abilities to their Brood War counterpart is quite clearly false. For example Jaedong must rank within the top five micro-management players of all time of any race and era, and yet from what I hear his Starcraft 2 success didn't mirror that ability. That's why I hoped someone would give clarification of exactly which skill-sets were required to reach the top in Starcraft 2, because that would be really helpful in characterizing some of the players I am interested in. | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. BW isn't just macro or micro or both, it's the real trategy, it's about everything: timing, decision making, positioning, spell casting, multitasking, map control. BW requires everything and pros master all of them to get ahead of their opponent. Having macro but not having micro and vice versa never works. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: The guy who thinks BW is all about macro has no idea how it works. To macro like FlaSh you need to bind all your production building from 4 to 8,9 and produce units without even looking back to your base while moving with your army on map where he microes which requires a lot APM. Can we then equate macro cycle to micro? Because it requires so many constant actions. I believe you're overexaggerating a little. I don't think macro in BW works that way, at least for all the players, someone may correct me - from what I've seen to produce units people bind one of the buildings and while having camera over the production they just click each building and produce units separately. That's what I try to do as well, is it the wrong way? Although it may be true when the production building number is low. | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
micro and tactics are really important in BW all the time, only if you have a big advantage you can afford to do A-move, when you have won and for some reason you don't care about playing out the last battle or smtg. There can be some a-move situations but.. it's hard to justify really a-moving. It's just you rly want to get your macro right sure, so many times you will sacrifice some micro to macro, but the opposite can be true as well in some situations I think. I used to have a style where I focused a lot on micro or tactics, trying to make the most of my units all the time, it's nice because it can scare/pressure your opponent too. You just want to make sure you don't sacrifice macro for it unless it's justified, like you are sure that you will get smtg worth more out of it. But macro comes in cycles, so if you are fast and organized enough you should have time to get a lot of micro done most of the time. There is so much you can potentially do, that you can argue it's impossible to micro everything to the max. It's part of personal style to choose how much/when to focus on what. But since it's lot less volatile compared to SC2, yes you have some extra freedom to leave some stuff behind sometimes. Also of note is you more often spread your units and engage with parts of them instead of all, and action occurs over more spread out area and time, plus the defender or positional advantage gives you space to let something be for a few seconds without being too harshly punished for that (if not out of position etc). Since its all very hard and there is a lot to do and lot that can happen, any player can make mistake so you can see a pro not pay attention to some units and lose smtg he could have done better with.. Trying to prey on your opponent's units not reacting in time is a tactic that can works just like in SC2, you will just not gain as much in as little time out of it. | ||
Sihrtogg
Netherlands29 Posts
| ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 20:52 Letmelose wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 20:18 BigFan wrote: On August 03 2017 19:40 Bonyth wrote: On August 03 2017 08:43 SnowfaLL wrote: but SC2 had the opportunity to make a more strategically balanced micro/macro setting RTS over the macro-oriented BW (how many times do you see flash or jaedong, the top 2 players of all time, just a-move units without micro because they know macroing is more important) - BW is the definition of macro-intensive, speed-based RTS. The answer is: not many times u see flash or jaedong just a-move units without micro. And that's why there are so many replies against you, because u made a false statement (well actually just implied one). Now go ahead, win a ZvZ match up without microing too hard. I've heard somewhere on the internet "the best way to find an answer for your question is not to ask, but to make a false statement". And that's what happened here. It's because his question is extremely silly. You can see the importance of micro throughout the game. Take TvZ for example. You see Flash move out with 4 marines sometimes and in some cases, he'll get caught but does some great splits to minimize the damage. I mean it's only 4 marines right? Who cares if he loses them, no? Then once he's expanded, he goes up to his favourite 5rax build and he's moving all over the map, targeting mutas, placing firebats in front for lings and pulling back (or into chokes to minimize damage) depending on situation. Heck, sometimes if he looks away to macro, he gets caught and quickly switches back. Losing map control as terran can be devastating. In the same vein, if the zerg can't micro his mutalisks, he may as well not make them lol. These scenarios are also very simplistic and don't even consider the late game with either mech or the older apm intensive SK Terran. Then once you consider that ZvZ is a microfest and well, you wonder how he would make such a statement. I think he had a fair point about Flash though, Flash is indeed a fearsome mechanical player, but his forte was never otherworldly micro-management. I first noticed it when his bionic micro-management wasn't as jaw-dropping as someone like BoxeR, or Casy during their primes, despite making his debut being initially dubbed as the "Bionic Genius". Flash didn't have many moments like Jaedong, JangBi, or Stork, making a situation out of nothing with naught but micro-management magic. He would often get out micro-managed by players with precise siege tank utilization like FBH during the early game, which is why he initially had so much trouble against FBH. Flash's initial relationship with Stork was Flash getting the advantageous situation, but gradually losing his grip on the game to Stork's masterful micro-management of protoss units. Flash was usually on the receiving end of godlike micro-managament super plays, rather than Flash winning from a bleak situation with nothing but his micro-management to fall back on. Even the game you mentioned, Flash lost that game to MVP because his late-game Battlecruiser micro-management was nothing out of the ordinary, and if I remember correctly, Flash was leading for most of the game, so it was his micro-management that let him down. NaDa during his prime would often win disadvantageous games just with his superior Battlecruiser micro-management in the late game. It's not to say that Flash had sub-par micro-management, but rather that his forte lied elsewhere. Even now when he streams, and plays custom maps with other streamers like EffOrt and BeSt, Flash doesn't tend to fair that well when he plays in micro-management intensive custom maps (although I admit familiarity is more important in this situation). I personally think Flash's micro-management, even during his prime, was good enough to be not abused by the very best micro-management players, but Flash himself didn't belong to that very few select group of players. Perhaps if another game has incredibly high demand for managing a single death ball of units (like late-game terran-versus-terran with Battlecruisers), rather than multi-tasking from multiple bases, Flash might have been rendered mortal. However, the theory that every top class Starcraft 2 player had superior micro-management abilities to their Brood War counterpart is quite clearly false. For example Jaedong must rank within the top five micro-management players of all time of any race and era, and yet from what I hear his Starcraft 2 success didn't mirror that ability. That's why I hoped someone would give clarification of exactly which skill-sets were required to reach the top in Starcraft 2, because that would be really helpful in characterizing some of the players I am interested in. I think you missed my point lol. I wasn't trying to argue whether Flash or Jaedong is doing more macro or micro, just that both are important in the game. The guy I responded to was understating the importance of micro in the game. Having said that, this was a nice small piece about Flash. Thanks! On August 03 2017 21:21 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: The guy who thinks BW is all about macro has no idea how it works. To macro like FlaSh you need to bind all your production building from 4 to 8,9 and produce units without even looking back to your base while moving with your army on map where he microes which requires a lot APM. Can we then equate macro cycle to micro? Because it requires so many constant actions. I believe you're overexaggerating a little. I don't think macro in BW works that way, at least for all the players, someone may correct me - from what I've seen to produce units people bind one of the buildings and while having camera over the production they just click each building and produce units separately. That's what I try to do as well, is it the wrong way? Although it may be true when the production building number is low. I'm not sure if I've seen Flash doing it that way before (only tune in here and there) but early to mid game, lots of pros will bind their production buildings and cycle through to make units. If you watch the Camelot game between Bisu vs sSak in the last ASL, Bisu is mine sweeping while making probes and goons. The way you describe is something that typically gets done mid to late. Flash for example does it when he has 5 rax and onwards. I think it all comes down to comfort level in the end as well. I only bind 1-2 buildings and stick to that camera method because I'm slow at cycling etc... | ||
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: [...] Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. [...] I don't play sc2 and rarely watch it, but that statement seems as ignorant as the statement that bw only needs macro. | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:09 Keniji wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: [...] Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. [...] I don't play sc2 and rarely watch it, but that statement seems as ignorant as the statement that bw only needs macro. His production facilities structure is true afaik, you can tab between structures. As for the army one, I think the better players try to split their army up into 3-4 control groups. The AI does a great job of giving you a concave during engagements but I wouldn't say there's no micro at all. Just highly depends on what's facing what. An immortal all-in requires a great deal of micro for example which is why only Parting managed to keep winning with it while something like the 1-1-1 against protoss back in the early was more of establish a position and do target firing etc... | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:09 Keniji wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: [...] Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. [...] I don't play sc2 and rarely watch it, but that statement seems as ignorant as the statement that bw only needs macro. I just read that post again... what does this mean, "a move mostly works"? Does it not work in BW? Do you actualy have to micro each unit individually in Brood War for any attack to work? You can win without micro if your army composition is better? Is it impossible to happen in BW? I'll give you benefit of the doubt and assume you had in mind those early to mid-game engagements where units are not as numerous and micro really counts, but you are trying really, really hard to twist arguments to your favor and make SC2 sound as dumb as possible. BW isn't just macro or micro or both, it's the real trategy, it's about everything: timing, decision making, positioning, spell casting, multitasking, map control. Please, PLEASE tell me which of those beautifully pointed out terms does not apply to SC2. On August 03 2017 22:12 BigFan wrote: The AI does a great job of giving you a concave during engagements but I wouldn't say there's no micro at all What do you mean by "AI giving you a concave"? In SC2 AI just makes units execute orders in the quickest possible manner, it never does anything else. Back to topic, can anyone with Remastered tell me how does it look on their battle.net account? Does the Remastered license have any text or is it this image of box and nothing next to it? | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
On August 03 2017 21:21 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: The guy who thinks BW is all about macro has no idea how it works. To macro like FlaSh you need to bind all your production building from 4 to 8,9 and produce units without even looking back to your base while moving with your army on map where he microes which requires a lot APM. Can we then equate macro cycle to micro? Because it requires so many constant actions. I believe you're overexaggerating a little. I don't think macro in BW works that way, at least for all the players, someone may correct me - from what I've seen to produce units people bind one of the buildings and while having camera over the production they just click each building and produce units separately. That's what I try to do as well, is it the wrong way? Although it may be true when the production building number is low. Some players macro without looking back to their bases early to mid game when you don't have more than 5 producing buildings. Then of course players bind camera location to macro point when they got more buildings. In SC2 I'm saying A move mostly works because AI has no issues with pathfinding. AI auto gives you concave the rest is up to you to make split and micro your units etc. | ||
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
I think you missed my point lol. I wasn't trying to argue whether Flash or Jaedong is doing more macro or micro, just that both are important in the game. The guy I responded to was understating the importance of micro in the game. Having said that, this was a nice small piece about Flash. Thanks! Well we can't be correct about everything. I did think he had some interesting points (albeit with some misinformation) which is why I wanted to bounce some ideas around. Starcraft is a very taxing game, but rather than looking from a quantitative point of view, other games might have differing orders of importance. I don't know whether Brood War or Starcraft 2 is more demanding from a sheer micro-management perspective, but it could be the case that excellence in micro-management could be rewarded more heavily in the latter. Maybe he had a point about the reasons for Flash not being able to sustaining his level of domination in Starcraft 2, although it cannot be denied that his thoughts on Brood War was riddled with inaccuracies. Since professional Brood War and professional Starcraft 2 has a decent overlap of players, trying to come up with an order of importance in various skill-sets may be an interesting way of finding out which player was good at what. If it of some interest to someone, you could do the reverse, and use successful players from each game to figure out which skill-sets were rewarded the most highly. It's not that I trusted his opinion on Brood War, but more that I wanted to know what some of his thoughts on Starcraft 2, but he got tilted off the face of the earth after being called out on his ignorance. | ||
[DUF]MethodMan
Germany1716 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:19 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 22:09 Keniji wrote: On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: [...] Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. [...] I don't play sc2 and rarely watch it, but that statement seems as ignorant as the statement that bw only needs macro. I just read that post again... what does this mean, "a move mostly works"? Does it not work in BW? Do you actualy have to micro each unit individually in Brood War for any attack to work? You can win without micro if your army composition is better? Is it impossible to happen in BW? I'll give you benefit of the doubt and assume you had in mind those early to mid-game engagements where units are not as numerous and micro really counts, but you are trying really, really hard to twist arguments to your favor and make SC2 sound as dumb as possible. Show nested quote + BW isn't just macro or micro or both, it's the real trategy, it's about everything: timing, decision making, positioning, spell casting, multitasking, map control. Please, PLEASE tell me which of those beautifully pointed out terms does not apply to SC2. Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 22:12 BigFan wrote: The AI does a great job of giving you a concave during engagements but I wouldn't say there's no micro at all What do you mean by "AI giving you a concave"? In SC2 AI just makes units execute orders in the easiest possible manner, it never does anything else. Back to topic, can anyone with Remastered tell me how does it look on their battle.net account? Does the Remastered license have any text or is it this image of box and nothing next to it? Mate, you sound like you never played BW or SC2 lol. You never noticed the nice surround the SC2 AI is giving you when you a-move your units into the opponents? When you a-click in SC2 (1 action), does the AI just execute that single action you did, or does it really give you something, you would have to apply maybe 20-40 actions for in BW? Get a full surround of a control group of units with another 1 or 2 full control groups (thats 12 btw) in BW, record it. Do the same in SC2. Come back here, post your evidence of it being the same. Nobody will laugh at you, promised. | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:39 [DUF]MethodMan wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 22:19 aQuaSC wrote: On August 03 2017 22:09 Keniji wrote: On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: [...] Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. [...] I don't play sc2 and rarely watch it, but that statement seems as ignorant as the statement that bw only needs macro. I just read that post again... what does this mean, "a move mostly works"? Does it not work in BW? Do you actualy have to micro each unit individually in Brood War for any attack to work? You can win without micro if your army composition is better? Is it impossible to happen in BW? I'll give you benefit of the doubt and assume you had in mind those early to mid-game engagements where units are not as numerous and micro really counts, but you are trying really, really hard to twist arguments to your favor and make SC2 sound as dumb as possible. BW isn't just macro or micro or both, it's the real trategy, it's about everything: timing, decision making, positioning, spell casting, multitasking, map control. Please, PLEASE tell me which of those beautifully pointed out terms does not apply to SC2. On August 03 2017 22:12 BigFan wrote: The AI does a great job of giving you a concave during engagements but I wouldn't say there's no micro at all What do you mean by "AI giving you a concave"? In SC2 AI just makes units execute orders in the easiest possible manner, it never does anything else. Back to topic, can anyone with Remastered tell me how does it look on their battle.net account? Does the Remastered license have any text or is it this image of box and nothing next to it? Mate, you sound like you never played BW or SC2 lol. You never noticed the nice surround the SC2 AI is giving you when you a-move your units into the opponents? When you a-click in SC2 (1 action), does the AI just execute that single action you did, or does it really give you something, you would have to apply maybe 20-40 actions for in BW? Get a full surround of a control group of units with another 1 or 2 full control groups (thats 12 btw) in BW, record it. Do the same in SC2. Come back here, post your evidence of it being the same. Nobody will laugh at you, promised. I thought we were talking about real in-game scenarios, this 'nice surround' and '1 action a-click' can be very inefficient no matter how beautiful it may seem to you. Are we now quantifying amount of actions needed to do actions, more clicks = better game? Have you ever seen a regular player in SC2 making attacks by clicking a-move once with his army? All these comments on how easy control in SC2 is are just continuous attempts to make the game look overly simple while suggesting that Brood War is better simply because you have to click more. You can laugh at me all you want, it doesn't bother me. I promise. You could also hold those comments about me supposedly being an idiot for yourself. Or is it how old-school Brood War elite talks? Because I've seen this attitude towards me here repeatedly, along with ^^ and ![]() | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
| ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:59 outscar wrote: ^ Ignore this SC2 guy, he came here to defend his game. Why don't you go back to SC2 general mate? No one cares anymore what you say because either you troll or act dumb. Can I play your game still at least? I can't imagine how some of you guys can act in real life being so bitter and trying to downplay everybody's else different arguments, I never said one bad thing towards any of you or Brood War and yet I'm treated like that for no reason. Or maybe it's because I try to put my perspective on SC2 that you hate purely because it's not BW. I guess that's what TL has become, an ultimate circlejerk. | ||
CobaltBlu
United States919 Posts
On August 03 2017 23:00 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 22:59 outscar wrote: ^ Ignore this SC2 guy, he came here to defend his game. Why don't you go back to SC2 general mate? No one cares anymore what you say because either you troll or act dumb. Can I play your game still at least? You guys can play whatever you want but I don't know what it has to do with the SC:R closed beta. Isn't there an active thread for arguing about SC2 around here already | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:33 Letmelose wrote: Show nested quote + I think you missed my point lol. I wasn't trying to argue whether Flash or Jaedong is doing more macro or micro, just that both are important in the game. The guy I responded to was understating the importance of micro in the game. Having said that, this was a nice small piece about Flash. Thanks! Well we can't be correct about everything. I did think he had some interesting points (albeit with some misinformation) which is why I wanted to bounce some ideas around. Starcraft is a very taxing game, but rather than looking from a quantitative point of view, other games might have differing orders of importance. I don't know whether Brood War or Starcraft 2 is more demanding from a sheer micro-management perspective, but it could be the case that excellence in micro-management could be rewarded more heavily in the latter. Maybe he had a point about the reasons for Flash not being able to sustaining his level of domination in Starcraft 2, although it cannot be denied that his thoughts on Brood War was riddled with inaccuracies. Since professional Brood War and professional Starcraft 2 has a decent overlap of players, trying to come up with an order of importance in various skill-sets may be an interesting way of finding out which player was good at what. If it of some interest to someone, you could do the reverse, and use successful players from each game to figure out which skill-sets were rewarded the most highly. It's not that I trusted his opinion on Brood War, but more that I wanted to know what some of his thoughts on Starcraft 2, but he got tilted off the face of the earth after being called out on his ignorance. ya, I see your point. From playing a decent amount of SCII, I think SCII's micro is more positional, target firing, splitting and kiting. Positional because of the forcefield aspect (and other similar cases) and in TvT, you'll keep jousting then the first opponent to get that siege and position usually wins the engagement (back when it was MMT mostly). Splitting and kiting was more for avoiding banes and trying to reduce AOE damage. Might be other types of micro but these were the most relevant when I played back in WoL/bits of HoTS. | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
On August 03 2017 23:00 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 22:59 outscar wrote: ^ Ignore this SC2 guy, he came here to defend his game. Why don't you go back to SC2 general mate? No one cares anymore what you say because either you troll or act dumb. Can I play your game still at least? Sure play, at least touch it before writing comments. | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
| ||
infinity2k17
22 Posts
As for skill-sets being different, since SC2 kept changing that must be a huge factor compared to simply refining your core macro and micro skills. So a player who is going to keep adapting will be better; Flash came back to BW and was just as good. | ||
CHEONSOYUN
513 Posts
they're not entitled to a safe space to their beloved game why act like they're being personally attacked? | ||
aQuaSC
717 Posts
On August 03 2017 23:21 CHEONSOYUN wrote: why are sc2 people coming in and picking fights and making themselves upset. they're not entitled to a safe space to their beloved game why act like they're being personally attacked? BW forums on TL: A) I think SC2 is stupid [insert arguments here] B) I don't think SC2 is stupid [insert argumens here] A) You're an idiot C) Why come to BW forums if you don't think SC2 is stupid?? My last post here, sorry for the mess mods | ||
CHEONSOYUN
513 Posts
On August 03 2017 23:27 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 23:21 CHEONSOYUN wrote: why are sc2 people coming in and picking fights and making themselves upset. they're not entitled to a safe space to their beloved game why act like they're being personally attacked? BW forums on TL: A) I think SC2 is stupid [insert arguments here] B) I don't think SC2 is stupid [insert argumens here] A) You're an idiot C) Why come to BW forums if you don't think SC2 is stupid?? My last post here, sorry for the mess mods why are you getting upset so quickly!!!!!!!!!!!! it's okay i love you just stop putting yourself in a difficult enviornment!!!! | ||
outscar
2832 Posts
SC2 newcomer) I think SC2 > BW BW player) I don't think SC2 > BW SC2 newcomer) You're an idiot. SC2 newcomer has left the forum. | ||
Lorch
Germany3669 Posts
| ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 03 2017 23:56 Lorch wrote: Jesus fucking Christ. BW is back for fucks sake. Am I the only one who remembers Tving OSL 2012? The sadness in the eyes of casters, players, journalists and fans alike? You can blame blizz/sc2 or whatever you want for that. Who cares? It is back now and it refused to die when the times were darkest. We are on the brink of the beginning of the 3rd chapter of bw. The one where it rises from the ashes like a phoenix. And instead of being happy you guys can't stop arguing what has been argued for 7 years now? Let SC2 be SC2, let CS be CS, let LoL be LoL etc. BW is BW and it's fucking back! I would hope that to be the case, but what worries me personally is that for ti to be truly back you need new blood. So far the pc bang stats don't really show that new blood is streaming in, in fact there is no real difference between now with SC:R and before (which seems weird?) For reference: http://gametrics.com/ | ||
Chef
10810 Posts
On August 03 2017 20:52 Letmelose wrote: I think he had a fair point about Flash though, Flash is indeed a fearsome mechanical player, but his forte was never otherworldly micro-management. I first noticed it when his bionic micro-management wasn't as jaw-dropping as someone like BoxeR, or Casy during their primes, despite making his debut being initially dubbed as the "Bionic Genius". But Jaedong said Flash's marine micro is beyond your imagination... BEYOND YOUR IMAGINATION!! I think Flash was always praised for his control of large armies. Terrans used to complain they try to copy Flash's builds but only he can get away with them, which is another testament to his precision. I am hard put to think of players better than Flash at micro, to be honest. You might be a little nostalgic for marine vs lurker micro in low econ games. Because Flash definitely gets a lot more mileage from his units than any other player I can think of. | ||
EndingLife
United States1587 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
| ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
On August 03 2017 23:58 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 23:56 Lorch wrote: Jesus fucking Christ. BW is back for fucks sake. Am I the only one who remembers Tving OSL 2012? The sadness in the eyes of casters, players, journalists and fans alike? You can blame blizz/sc2 or whatever you want for that. Who cares? It is back now and it refused to die when the times were darkest. We are on the brink of the beginning of the 3rd chapter of bw. The one where it rises from the ashes like a phoenix. And instead of being happy you guys can't stop arguing what has been argued for 7 years now? Let SC2 be SC2, let CS be CS, let LoL be LoL etc. BW is BW and it's fucking back! I would hope that to be the case, but what worries me personally is that for ti to be truly back you need new blood. So far the pc bang stats don't really show that new blood is streaming in, in fact there is no real difference between now with SC:R and before (which seems weird?) For reference: http://gametrics.com/ gametrics is unreliable. many believe they are fake to give a fake popularity of games. gametrics measure only put on certain rows dedicated leagueoflegend/overwatch/fifa riot believed to pay to put starcraft lower =.= trust something else. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On August 04 2017 00:38 fish_radio wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 23:58 The_Red_Viper wrote: On August 03 2017 23:56 Lorch wrote: Jesus fucking Christ. BW is back for fucks sake. Am I the only one who remembers Tving OSL 2012? The sadness in the eyes of casters, players, journalists and fans alike? You can blame blizz/sc2 or whatever you want for that. Who cares? It is back now and it refused to die when the times were darkest. We are on the brink of the beginning of the 3rd chapter of bw. The one where it rises from the ashes like a phoenix. And instead of being happy you guys can't stop arguing what has been argued for 7 years now? Let SC2 be SC2, let CS be CS, let LoL be LoL etc. BW is BW and it's fucking back! I would hope that to be the case, but what worries me personally is that for ti to be truly back you need new blood. So far the pc bang stats don't really show that new blood is streaming in, in fact there is no real difference between now with SC:R and before (which seems weird?) For reference: http://gametrics.com/ gametrics is unreliable. many believe they are fake to give a fake popularity of games. gametrics measure only put on certain rows dedicated leagueoflegend/overwatch/fifa riot believed to pay to put starcraft lower =.= trust something else. I mean what should i rather trust then? :D That's a fairly big accusation tbh, right now it's the best i have. | ||
ReTr0[p.S]
Argentina1590 Posts
Also, somebody mentioned on Bisu's stream thread that big battles are causing some delay/lag in HD, can anybody confirm? Yesterday the whisper command wasn't working for me, anyone with that issue? | ||
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:47 aQuaSC wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 22:39 [DUF]MethodMan wrote: On August 03 2017 22:19 aQuaSC wrote: On August 03 2017 22:09 Keniji wrote: On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: [...] Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. [...] I don't play sc2 and rarely watch it, but that statement seems as ignorant as the statement that bw only needs macro. I just read that post again... what does this mean, "a move mostly works"? Does it not work in BW? Do you actualy have to micro each unit individually in Brood War for any attack to work? You can win without micro if your army composition is better? Is it impossible to happen in BW? I'll give you benefit of the doubt and assume you had in mind those early to mid-game engagements where units are not as numerous and micro really counts, but you are trying really, really hard to twist arguments to your favor and make SC2 sound as dumb as possible. BW isn't just macro or micro or both, it's the real trategy, it's about everything: timing, decision making, positioning, spell casting, multitasking, map control. Please, PLEASE tell me which of those beautifully pointed out terms does not apply to SC2. On August 03 2017 22:12 BigFan wrote: The AI does a great job of giving you a concave during engagements but I wouldn't say there's no micro at all What do you mean by "AI giving you a concave"? In SC2 AI just makes units execute orders in the easiest possible manner, it never does anything else. Back to topic, can anyone with Remastered tell me how does it look on their battle.net account? Does the Remastered license have any text or is it this image of box and nothing next to it? Mate, you sound like you never played BW or SC2 lol. You never noticed the nice surround the SC2 AI is giving you when you a-move your units into the opponents? When you a-click in SC2 (1 action), does the AI just execute that single action you did, or does it really give you something, you would have to apply maybe 20-40 actions for in BW? Get a full surround of a control group of units with another 1 or 2 full control groups (thats 12 btw) in BW, record it. Do the same in SC2. Come back here, post your evidence of it being the same. Nobody will laugh at you, promised. I thought we were talking about real in-game scenarios, this 'nice surround' and '1 action a-click' can be very inefficient no matter how beautiful it may seem to you. Are we now quantifying amount of actions needed to do actions, more clicks = better game? Have you ever seen a regular player in SC2 making attacks by clicking a-move once with his army? All these comments on how easy control in SC2 is are just continuous attempts to make the game look overly simple while suggesting that Brood War is better simply because you have to click more. You can laugh at me all you want, it doesn't bother me. I promise. You could also hold those comments about me supposedly being an idiot for yourself. Or is it how old-school Brood War elite talks? Because I've seen this attitude towards me here repeatedly, along with ^^ and ![]() Micro in SCII is not "easy." But you're attacking a strawman - no you don't control every unit individually, in either game, in massive battles. But you sure as hell better have your tanks and vultures in different groups, for example, and have them in different positions filling different roles. That's micro. You don't need to control every single unit individually for it to be micro. You MUST micro your army in BW or you will lose. And then in the early game, the micro is obvious, since it's just a few units vs. a few units for harassment for example. | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On August 04 2017 00:44 ReTr0[p.S] wrote: It's safe to assume that when the beta is done, both ladder and MMR will reset, right? Also, somebody mentioned on Bisu's stream thread that big battles are causing some delay/lag in HD, can anybody confirm? Yesterday the whisper command wasn't working for me, anyone with that issue? yea screen starts freezing | ||
ReTr0[p.S]
Argentina1590 Posts
| ||
ortseam
996 Posts
On August 04 2017 00:32 TT1 wrote: Bisu is weird tho, his carrier micro isnt really good but he has good reaver micro. I find that he micros way way better with small groups of units as opposed to big army engagements. Agree with this, Stork was better with large armies when he was good imo, even in PvZ. But Bisu is pure magic with stuff like, sairs dodging scourge, shuttle reaver micro, 2 zealots killing 8 zerglings in the open and both surviving with 0.5 hp(lol). | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On August 03 2017 23:58 The_Red_Viper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 23:56 Lorch wrote: Jesus fucking Christ. BW is back for fucks sake. Am I the only one who remembers Tving OSL 2012? The sadness in the eyes of casters, players, journalists and fans alike? You can blame blizz/sc2 or whatever you want for that. Who cares? It is back now and it refused to die when the times were darkest. We are on the brink of the beginning of the 3rd chapter of bw. The one where it rises from the ashes like a phoenix. And instead of being happy you guys can't stop arguing what has been argued for 7 years now? Let SC2 be SC2, let CS be CS, let LoL be LoL etc. BW is BW and it's fucking back! I would hope that to be the case, but what worries me personally is that for ti to be truly back you need new blood. So far the pc bang stats don't really show that new blood is streaming in, in fact there is no real difference between now with SC:R and before (which seems weird?) For reference: http://gametrics.com/ SC:R isn't out yet. | ||
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On August 04 2017 00:52 ReTr0[p.S] wrote: Well that's a big fucking issue if I've ever seen one, hopefully it's related to PC specs and not bad programming. it doesnt always happen tho, maybe once every 2 games | ||
Jealous
10102 Posts
| ||
RaccyG
14 Posts
On the whole, the data from the next weekend might be more telling of how much extra interest in BW the remastering has generated that has not been only mere curiousity because that would have largely died down after the showmatches and a week of streaming the beta. Anyway, while I think these are reasonable assumptions they could of course be wrong. I'm just saying even if the data of that chart was not tampered with we need to consider more information to tell the whole story. And when there will be starleagues again I am sure they will be a success. And it will bring a tear to my eyes regardless of data ![]() | ||
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
On August 04 2017 00:04 Chef wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 20:52 Letmelose wrote: I think he had a fair point about Flash though, Flash is indeed a fearsome mechanical player, but his forte was never otherworldly micro-management. I first noticed it when his bionic micro-management wasn't as jaw-dropping as someone like BoxeR, or Casy during their primes, despite making his debut being initially dubbed as the "Bionic Genius". But Jaedong said Flash's marine micro is beyond your imagination... BEYOND YOUR IMAGINATION!! I think Flash was always praised for his control of large armies. Terrans used to complain they try to copy Flash's builds but only he can get away with them, which is another testament to his precision. I am hard put to think of players better than Flash at micro, to be honest. You might be a little nostalgic for marine vs lurker micro in low econ games. Because Flash definitely gets a lot more mileage from his units than any other player I can think of. Flash himself said on stream that his best strengths were not his micro-management. Flash was probably the best at controlling large groups of ground armies for all three match-ups, and his science vessel usage was beyond approach. Apart from that, I don't think he was the absolute best in small scale micro-management for pretty much any composition of units. I don't think that highly of his early game terran-versus-terran skirmishing abilities, nor did I think his vulture micro-management was any better than somebody like FanTaSy, for example. His mastery of aerial units such as wraiths, valkyries, and battlecruisers was nothing special, while players such as Leta, and FanTaSy were more famous for using these kind of aerial units to their fullest potential. Flash was the clear cut best in four things in my opinion, large scale groundarmy management in all three match-ups, and science vessel micro-management in terran-versus-protoss match-up. Apart from that, he was just one of the best, or one of the better terran players. Overall, Flash may be the best modern day terran player in terms of micro-management, but if you consider all three races, and the kind of superlative micro-managements someone like Jaedong, and Stork during his prime was capable of doing, I don't think Flash can be considered in the same tier in terms of micro-management. In terms of micro-management, these two during their absolute prime had almost all aspects of their race mastered in my opinion, which cannot be said for Flash during his professional years. Of course, Flash was untouchable in some regards, especially his large scale army micro-management, but like people said, Bisu too was godlike with some of the units he was more familiar with, but never fully mastered the art of battle in the protoss-versus-terran match-up, both in terms of large scale ground troop battles, and aerial warfare with carriers. I think both were incomplete in terms of micro-management, but it doesn't mean that they were bad at micro-management at all, like you said, it's hard to list players who were better. I just think that their other strengths such as decision making, multi-tasking, and macro-management masked their relative incomplete mastery of micro-management compared to the very, very best. They didn't rely on their sheer micro-management abilities for all occasions like Jaedong, or Stork, and spent time honing other skill-sets. | ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
| ||
sabas123
Netherlands3122 Posts
On August 03 2017 22:39 [DUF]MethodMan wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 22:19 aQuaSC wrote: On August 03 2017 22:09 Keniji wrote: On August 03 2017 21:08 outscar wrote: [...] Now take a look at SC2: 1 key for all production facilites (yes, if you have 5 rax and 5 facts, 2 ports you can just bind them to one key then switch them via TAB), 1 key for your army, A move mostly works. The only thing depends is a bit micro when deathball vs. deathball scenario occurrs. You can win without micro if your army composition is better. [...] I don't play sc2 and rarely watch it, but that statement seems as ignorant as the statement that bw only needs macro. I just read that post again... what does this mean, "a move mostly works"? Does it not work in BW? Do you actualy have to micro each unit individually in Brood War for any attack to work? You can win without micro if your army composition is better? Is it impossible to happen in BW? I'll give you benefit of the doubt and assume you had in mind those early to mid-game engagements where units are not as numerous and micro really counts, but you are trying really, really hard to twist arguments to your favor and make SC2 sound as dumb as possible. BW isn't just macro or micro or both, it's the real trategy, it's about everything: timing, decision making, positioning, spell casting, multitasking, map control. Please, PLEASE tell me which of those beautifully pointed out terms does not apply to SC2. On August 03 2017 22:12 BigFan wrote: The AI does a great job of giving you a concave during engagements but I wouldn't say there's no micro at all What do you mean by "AI giving you a concave"? In SC2 AI just makes units execute orders in the easiest possible manner, it never does anything else. Back to topic, can anyone with Remastered tell me how does it look on their battle.net account? Does the Remastered license have any text or is it this image of box and nothing next to it? Mate, you sound like you never played BW or SC2 lol. You never noticed the nice surround the SC2 AI is giving you when you a-move your units into the opponents? When you a-click in SC2 (1 action), does the AI just execute that single action you did, or does it really give you something, you would have to apply maybe 20-40 actions for in BW? Get a full surround of a control group of units with another 1 or 2 full control groups (thats 12 btw) in BW, record it. Do the same in SC2. Come back here, post your evidence of it being the same. Nobody will laugh at you, promised. The ai sucks compared to manual micro, the units that won't shoot will try and move around friendly units until it can attack. The reasons why it sucks are: 1) It takes up a lot of extra time vs manually creating in arc the way how you would in brood war 2) you want all your units to attack instantly, thus you normally move your army forward 3) In most cases the enemy has so form of splash, so you want to split manually. A moving makes this really hard because it if timed wrong you ruin your pre-split Lets not pretend it a-move suddenly gives you godlike micro skills. | ||
fish_radio
182 Posts
| ||
dr.shrinker
Norway369 Posts
| ||
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
I wanted to do a rough outline of the strengths and weaknesses of these players as professionals, in order to figure out what made them tick as players. Then I realized that somebody had already been doing that for years on end, way back since 2007. It was an online game that worked somewhat like Football Manager, called MyStarcraft. It was first released in 2007, and due to its popularity, there were numerous patches until 2011. They did release some patches until 2012, but I think the game was mostly popular until 2011. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/brood-war/82691-mystarcraft-fm-like-scsim-with-translation-guide Now, I'm not saying this game had captured the essence of Brood War professionals, but the person who made the game was an obvious fanatic of the game, and had a lot of help from numerous people as he modified, and improved his game. I think it is unwise to rank or define certain players from the statistics decided for a simulation game, just like you don't judge football players soley from the numbers crunched for games such as Pro Evolution Soccer, or Football Manager. However, considering many of the discussions going over the various characteristics of the professional players in Brood War communities are lost after many of those sites got shut down, I think the numbers decided for the last ever version of MyStraft that was released in December 2012 can be of some use to how these players were viewed by at least some of the community members as the professional Brood War scene ended. Before going into it, I'd like to define the parametres used for this simulation game. 1) Decision making: Self explanatory. 2) Micro-management: Self explanatory. 3) Aggression: Killer instinct, the weakest statistic in the game. Defines the players stylistically, and is good when combined with other skill-sets, but by itself is basically useless. 4) Multi-tasking: A statistic that is good for over-coming difficult match-ups (protoss-versus-zerg, zerg-versus-terran, and terran-versus-protoss), where it is more difficult to win head on. 5) Strategy: How good players are coming up with cheese. A good statistic when combined with good micro-management. Another statistic that is defines a style, rather than being a statistic that becomes better with bigger numbers. It is more of a useful statistic for the zerg players in general. 6) Macro-management: Self explanatory. 7) Reliability: Defensive capabilities. Another stylistic statistic that is the most useful statistic for the terran race. 8) Awareness: Scouting ability, and ability the read the enemy player. Helps against defending against players with high numbers for strategy (defending against cheese). Here are the stastics for some of the players after professional Brood War ended. Stork ![]() A fairly even distribution. Recognizes Stork's micro-management abilities. Bisu ![]() Has the highest statistics for multi-tasking in the game, which is accurate in my opinion both in terms of style, and capacity. Bisu also has a very high statistics for awareness, which is something I'm not that sure about. I don't know why his macro-management is rated so lowly, perhaps his poor performances in 2012 hurt his statistics. I also think believe that his micro-management shouldn't be a single value, but categorized for each of the match-ups, because of the huge discrepancies he had (godlike corsair micro-management, and embarassing carrier micro-management, for example). Jaedong ![]() Represents the characteristics of Jaedong fairly well in my opinion, with the highest figures for micro-management in the game. However, I'm not so sure about Jaedong's decision making being that high. Flash ![]() Just an all around great numbers, with decision making, macro-management, and reliability being highlighted the most. I would rate his decision making higher (it was rated 950 in the 2011 version, but I guess his relatively mortal performances in 2012 must have influenced the statistics). Now, Flash had a rating of 800 for his micro-management abilities, a figure that was also found in numerous terran players such as Leta, Light, and Baby. I wouldn't agree with a lot of the numbers used for this game, but it does show that people who watched a lot of professional games didn't regard Flash's micro-management to same degree as some of the top micro-management players from the other races, even if he was still top tier. It is true that Flash had great large scale ground army management, but how much of that is due to the set-up that he had leading up to that point? When it came to the late-game, and other players were struggling with multi-tasking, and macro-management from multiple bases, that's when Flash started to differentiate himself the most from the other players in terms of micro-management. When it came to a battle of pure micro-management, Flash was still top tier, but had flaws that I pointed out previously. That's why I didn't rate Flash as a godlike player just in terms of micro-management. | ||
SnowfaLL
Canada730 Posts
Anyways, Those charts seem pretty accurate to me except Jaedong's macro, I think his macro is one of the best for zergs, even if his micro is top-notch too (which is why he's such a dangerous player). To be fair though, I haven't really watched much BW since 2011ish, maybe he had a decline or something from his glory years. (and before people start freaking out as usual, I mean decline as in not as god-like as 2007-2009.. still clearly a top 3 zerg/overall player) And judging by those statistics, clearly no one can catch Flash's "macro" level.. not something an amateur can do. I think letmelose stated it perfectly - "When it came to the late-game, and other players were struggling with multi-tasking and macro from multiple bases, thats when Flash started to differentiate himself from most of the other players".. | ||
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
On August 04 2017 12:11 SnowfaLL wrote: Anyways, Those charts seem pretty accurate to me except Jaedong's macro, I think his macro is one of the best for zergs, even if his micro is top-notch too (which is why he's such a dangerous player). Even if you take the version patched for 2011, Jaedong's macro-management is rated at 700, and I believe it was taken down a notch due to his severe drop in form after transfering to Team 8 after Hwaseung Oz disbanded. Jaedong had one of the smallest hands out of all professional players, which is probably the reason why he can't make use of all the hotkeys, which is perhaps part of the reason for his relatively weaker macro-management compared to his micro-management despite having an insanely high eAPM. In version 1.28.03 of the game (released in July 2011) herO was rated a fair bit higher for his macro-management abilities, which I personally think is fair. ZerO and Hydra also had significantly higher ratings for macro-management, which could be considered reasonable, but I'm not so certain it was actually the case for these two. I do agree that Jaedong's macro-management abilities are being under-rated in general, but I don't think his macro-management was ever that exceptional, especially compared to his micro-management, which was the reason why he was such a force of nature earlier on during his career, even before he developed into a more complete player. Jaedong's micro-management abilities were best showcased in the match-up of zerg-versus-zerg (a match-up more influenced by micro-management than any other) during his peak form as a mechanical player between 2007 and 2008, when he was having a win percentage that went beyond 80%, a number that wouldn't be matched by any player for such a prolonged period of time. Not even iloveoov in his prime managed to hold such a success rate versus zerg for two years. Name any player in history, be it BoxeR, NaDa, iloveoov, sAviOr, Bisu, or Flash, none managed to have a record that went above 80% for any single match-up for a period as long as two calendar years. Most would have their most prized match-up rise above a 70% win rate at best. So yes, Jaedong was very good at macro-management, even if it wasn't necessarily the absolute best at times, but it is an insult to his micro-management to put his macro-management abilities on a similar level. | ||
PVJ
Hungary5214 Posts
I wish they would still work on bringing some parts of SC:R closer to remastered: - Toss death animation is too similar to hallucination - Toss archon - SCV being too bright and probably a few other element of the game I'm forgetting now. It would be good to know what Classic Games thinks of the feedback and what their plan is in this regard. | ||
probelife66
142 Posts
On August 03 2017 03:05 Nathanias wrote: Show nested quote + On August 03 2017 03:02 Waxangel wrote: On August 03 2017 02:54 Dangermousecatdog wrote: It's a generalised opinion across the bw community and there is no problem in expressing it. yah, it's a pretty awful circlejerk here Honestly I'm impressed at how few fucks anyone here gives about actually having a conversation. It's literally just people pissing all over SC2 and anyone that doesn't think BW is the holy grail of games. I wanted to give this a chance and see what discussions people were having but it's literally just nonstop whine which I find pretty amazing. I'm glad so many people here also know the intricate details of my life ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Your a sad little man.. just leave bro lol | ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
also, is the ingame font of minerals/gas/unit health different because it is the korean version or because of remastered? | ||
nighcol
298 Posts
On August 04 2017 17:13 PVJ wrote: Does anyone know if Blizzard plans to finetune the design before or after release or if this is the final version forever? I wish they would still work on bringing some parts of SC:R closer to remastered: - Toss death animation is too similar to hallucination - Toss archon - SCV being too bright and probably a few other element of the game I'm forgetting now. It would be good to know what Classic Games thinks of the feedback and what their plan is in this regard. Seems like the version isn't quite final since the dynamic lighting feature is not in yet so I think there's a good chance for at least the third item on your list. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
PVJ
Hungary5214 Posts
On August 04 2017 20:20 nighcol wrote: Show nested quote + On August 04 2017 17:13 PVJ wrote: Does anyone know if Blizzard plans to finetune the design before or after release or if this is the final version forever? I wish they would still work on bringing some parts of SC:R closer to remastered: - Toss death animation is too similar to hallucination - Toss archon - SCV being too bright and probably a few other element of the game I'm forgetting now. It would be good to know what Classic Games thinks of the feedback and what their plan is in this regard. Seems like the version isn't quite final since the dynamic lighting feature is not in yet so I think there's a good chance for at least the third item on your list. That's reassuring to hear. | ||
![]()
HaN-
France1919 Posts
I posted it on Blizzard forums LINK TO POST. Please add your suggestions, it's important that we give as many feedback as possible, Blizzard do listen, they'll make changes only if we're loud enough. - SCV Light This is the biggest issue in my opinion. The SCV jetpack light is so big and bright that it actually disturb the visibility on the screen. I would reduce it by at least 50%. - Health Bars Health Bars feels too flat and lazy, bring back the scale. - Probes Antennas The SCR probe design doesn’t look good especially due to the little antennas. - Explosions I’m not a fan of the new explosions, too big and too smoky. When the animation of a zergling destroying a turret looks like a nuke just landed, you know something is wrong. - Zerg Buildings Of all 3 races it feels like Zerg got the short end of the stick when it comes to Buildings Design. The texture feels weird, some say it looks too plastic, I feel it looks metallic. And when it comes to shapes I really dislike the new Spawning Pool. - Nexus The Nexus looks a bit fade, lacking shadows. - Observer Mode Interface The Observer Mode Interface could be improved a lot but the first thing I noticed is that the Bottom Right window (where you get infos on the selected unit/building) is too big, hindering the vision. - Burrowed Lurkers Burrowed Lurkers looked better in the original, now they look too flat like potholes. - Dark Swarm The new Dark Swarm makes it hard to see / click units underneath. I’ve heard some players hit F5 as soon as Dark Swarm is casted. - Tanks It’s now harder to distinguish the difference between a sieged and an unsieged Tank - Storm The storm is less visible than in the original, it shouldn't be the case. | ||
PVJ
Hungary5214 Posts
On August 05 2017 01:33 HaN- wrote: I tried to compile the main complaints plus my own regarding the new SCR designs and animations. I posted it on Blizzard forums LINK TO POST. Please add your suggestions, it's important that we give as many feedback as possible, Blizzard do listen, they'll make changes only if we're loud enough. Show nested quote + - SCV Light This is the biggest issue in my opinion. The SCV jetpack light is so big and bright that it actually disturb the visibility on the screen. I would reduce it by at least 50%. - Health Bars Health Bars feels too flat and lazy, bring back the scale. - Probes Antennas The SCR probe design doesn’t look good especially due to the little antennas. - Explosions I’m not a fan of the new explosions, too big and too smoky. When the animation of a zergling destroying a turret looks like a nuke just landed, you know something is wrong. - Zerg Buildings Of all 3 races it feels like Zerg got the short end of the stick when it comes to Buildings Design. The texture feels weird, some say it looks too plastic, I feel it looks metallic. And when it comes to shapes I really dislike the new Spawning Pool. - Nexus The Nexus looks a bit fade, lacking shadows. - Observer Mode Interface The Observer Mode Interface could be improved a lot but the first thing I noticed is that the Bottom Right window (where you get infos on the selected unit/building) is too big, hindering the vision. - Burrowed Lurkers Burrowed Lurkers looked better in the original, now they look too flat like potholes. - Dark Swarm The new Dark Swarm makes it hard to see / click units underneath. I’ve heard some players hit F5 as soon as Dark Swarm is casted. - Tanks It’s now harder to distinguish the difference between a sieged and an unsieged Tank - Storm The storm is less visible than in the original, it shouldn't be the case. That's a great compilation. The health bars! That was one I forgot although that's annoying me a lot. EDIT: I'm just watching Larva play and the health bars are normal. Is that b/c he's playing at 4:3? Another one was siege mode. The burrowed lurkers are ugly too. Some of these others I haven't noticed but I'll keep an eye out. Thanks for letting Blizz know on their forums, I hope they will take these into considerations and change for the better. | ||
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
I have to diasgree on probes and storm and all the other points - I enjoy watching these in the HD version. | ||
kli6891
United States143 Posts
On August 05 2017 04:37 PVJ wrote: The health bars! That was one I forgot although that's annoying me a lot. EDIT: I'm just watching Larva play and the health bars are normal. Is that b/c he's playing at 4:3? The 'continuous' health bars are present only in observer mode and when watching replays. | ||
![]()
Legionnaire
Australia4514 Posts
- Replays will desync with what really happened. - Replays. Click 'View Players' button. If you are on 'Allied colours' (green/red) then the view players colours should also change to reflect that. - Reverse ramps still look like the original game... (look at circuit breaker) (old sc bug) - Someone in the channel created a private game. It would not show up. And vice versa. - Some of my accounts are still locked with error 4:2. - Some spots on reverse ramps when you are at the top. You do not have vision down. (old sc bug) - Clicking 'Ladder' -> 'See myself' -> doesn't show you.It sorta gets close to your rank but thats it. Unconfirmed bugs: - Dragoon freeze bug still occurs. (i think... i could be wrong - was busy dying at the time, so wasn't able to double check) - Ladder. Loading screen 'stays on loading'. Doesn't do the ready / 3...2...1.. countdown or anything? Nice to haves - Game Play - 'Diplomacy' should show starting race next to the players names. (i think this is needed. For me anyway. The countdown screen is so much less visible/obvious than it was back in the day solely due to having to manually create a game together and you are both ready to go. So its a lot easier to miss their race before the start of the game) - Replays. 'View Players'. Should also show starting race next to the players names. - Burrowed lurkers and the black hole in the startup screen look less than optimal. Having said that. My god is it pretty. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g10673 shahzam789 C9.Mang0712 Beastyqt500 WinterStarcraft463 Skadoodle140 Nina110 ViBE86 febbydoto18 kaitlyn1 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Hupsaiya StarCraft: Brood War![]() • practicex ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • AfreecaTV YouTube • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel ![]() Other Games |
CranKy Ducklings
3D!Clan Event
BSL 2025: Kraków LAN Pa…
WardiTV Spring Champion…
AllThingsProtoss
SC Evo Complete
Bellum Gens Elite
Hatchery Cup
SC Evo League
SOOP Global
Creator vs ByuN
Bunny vs GuMiho
[ Show More ] SOOP
NightMare vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL 2025: Kraków LAN Pa…
WardiTV Spring Champion…
AllThingsProtoss
3D!Clan Event
SC Evo League
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
Clem vs Dark
ByuN vs herO
Code For Giants Cup
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
OSC
SC Evo League
Replay Cast
|
|