• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:29
CEST 17:29
KST 00:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy15ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research7Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone Behind the scenes footage of ASL21 Group E BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1516 users

StarCraft: Inconsummate - fan campaign - Page 3

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Ancestral
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States3230 Posts
July 23 2017 06:50 GMT
#41
On June 11 2017 20:11 Pr0nogo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2017 20:06 Pippah wrote:
Will this be made playable with 1.18 ?


Unfortunately, 1.18 only allows for simple modding, and the mod component for Inconsummate relies on button and exe editing not currently possible in the new versions. I'll look into how feasible it will be to update it once SC:R comes out, but until then, it'll be stuck in the past. 1.16.1 is free to download however (and I've included a link in the release party in case anyone needs it), so it shouldn't be too much a hassle!

Off-topic, but what's the reason for this? Does it have anything to do with preventing cheating or is Blizzard just being its inexplicable self?
The Nature and purpose of the martial way are universal; all selfish desires must be roasted in the tempering fires of hard training. - Masutatsu Oyama
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
July 23 2017 07:56 GMT
#42
On July 23 2017 15:50 Ancestral wrote:
Off-topic, but what's the reason for this? Does it have anything to do with preventing cheating or is Blizzard just being its inexplicable self?

More the latter than the former from what I understand. The file structure has changed significantly. If I had to guess why, I'd hazard that because the coders of SC:R have probably never come into contact with StarCraft's assembly before, reordering and restructuring the engine improved their workflow. It also could have been necessary to add additional graphical features and for plenty of other reasons that I can only speculate on.

Modding will persist on 1.16.1 (I myself will be continuing to create campaigns for years to come), and that's likely to remain the case at large until the SC:R team ceases updates for the game, since we'll need a stable version to design the more advanced memory-based programs like FireGraft and reverse-engineer the new data structure. This is no small feat and will likely take several months to even see minor progress given the perceived scope of the engine overhaul.
u
Coalmeister
Profile Joined July 2017
Serbia22 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-07-23 19:50:34
July 23 2017 19:49 GMT
#43
On July 23 2017 15:45 Pr0nogo wrote:

As for difficulty, be warned - the fourth and especially fifth maps are a bit of a spike. Save early and often!

Cheers everyone.


Huh, you weren't kidding... Could've finished Omega like twice in the time it took me to finish about 30% of the 4th mission and then get promptly destroyed by Gorn's guys :'(

Edit: I want my siege tanks...
Nick on Twitch TV / YouTube: Doktor_Naibmys
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
July 29 2017 00:13 GMT
#44
Inconsummate's 6th map has been released, and with it, Inconsummate's main story has been concluded! An accessory 7th map will enter active development sometime soon and will serve to set the stage for the sequel. Thanks to everyone who has supported the project during its lengthy public development time! If you only wish to download the most recent release, be sure to download the new mod file as well, as it contains the AI scripts and some additional data that allows map 6 to function correctly!
u
Coalmeister
Profile Joined July 2017
Serbia22 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-07-30 14:16:39
July 30 2017 14:16 GMT
#45
So it took me 6 days but I finally managed to beat the 4th map.
+ Show Spoiler +

It gets a lot easier once you realize that the mission is "Find Gorn" and not "Kill everything". Also, Guardians are amazing against AIs


I have a problem with the game itself though. I don't know if it's the custom launcher that's causing this, or the mods, but either way, every time I load a saved game, all my hatcheries set their rally points somewhere on the far right hand side of the map. And if I forget to reset them, once I start producing units they all run into the Protoss base and die... Any ideas?
Nick on Twitch TV / YouTube: Doktor_Naibmys
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-07-30 15:39:37
July 30 2017 15:11 GMT
#46
I'll take a look at the plugin code and get back to you on that. Hopefully I'll be able to resolve it soon. Thanks for the bug report, and I hope you enjoy the rest of the maps!

edit: the problem has been discovered and a fix is in the works. I'll post here when the final update has shipped.
u
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
August 30 2017 20:40 GMT
#47
Hey everyone! Inconsummate's final update just shipped. All 6 maps of the campaign can be accessed from the link in the OP. Hope you guys enjoy!
u
tankgirl
Profile Blog Joined May 2016
Canada450 Posts
August 30 2017 20:51 GMT
#48
send this to blizzard as a job application
https://tl.net/forum/brood-war/627255-progamer-settings
TL+ Member
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
August 31 2017 19:42 GMT
#49
On August 31 2017 05:51 tankgirl wrote:
send this to blizzard as a job application

I'll take that as a compliment! Hope you enjoyed!
u
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1533 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-12-28 00:26:02
December 28 2017 00:08 GMT
#50
I finally managed to actually play through this.

The voice acting is great and really helps the immersion and is something other campaigns sadly, though understandably, lack.

I also really like the highly detailed terrain work and custom doodads that really set a unique atmosphere. As a map maker, what I especially like is that the maps are not protected and can be looked at in the editor.
However, I don't like your seemingly complete disregard of terrain levels (or maybe tile flags in general). In particular, mission 3 has all those buildable medium ground spots with Bunkers and Turrets on otherwise low ground bridges. This may look aesthetically interesting in ScmDraft. but in-game being not able to see or hit those unit on those areas without there being any ramp or cliff is just weird and confusing. You could have just used low ground bridge or ruins (it's not as if the AI would rebuild those buildings) or, since you use modded tilesets anyway, created low ground tiles with the right looks.
What's worse is that there are high ground jungle tiles scattered everywhere on all of the maps. Conversely, your the "medium ground" versions of your custom doodads are all set to low ground.
The other problem with the terrain work is that almost everything is very tight, cramped and cluttered with doodads and other obstructive deco, so there's hardly any open space for comfortable base design or army movement. Together with the fact that all the maps feature plenty, but low resource bases and the fact that all the AIs seem to revolve around constant, but small attacks this also leads to a clear preference for static defense and mass air tactics (same old story with campaigns), I think.
As much as I like the custom player colours, the in-game colours not matching the score screen colours is a nuisance.
I also ran into quite a few bugs and frustrating features.

A detailed runthrough:
+ Show Spoiler [spoiler alert!] +

1st mission
I guess this one is meant more as warm up to familiarize players with the new heroes. I feel like the commando section could need some sort of difficulty spike towards the end, though.
I avoided safe-scumming, and this mission already had me regret that. The first time at the end of the commando section, one of the Marines ran back up the ramp and stayed there. out of sight range for the Lurkers, which caused the map to hang up. I guess the trigger to start the dialogue asks for no blue Terran units to be at that location.
So restart the Mission. All's fine, just until the same cutscene. This time a Firebat ran out of the location, causing the dialogue to start preemtively, and the FIrebat to kill one of the unburrowed Lurkers… I want my Lurkers, epsecially since the base has no gas. So I had to start from scratch a third time. This time everything worked (and I remembered to safe before the cutscene…). If you have triggers depending on unit deaths like this, you should probably also have a trigger that actually kills the units after some time, just to make sure it does not glitch out.
The rest of the mission also felt very easy. I am not sure if you really wanted players to have to take a gas base, but it turns out that the four initial Lurkers and Stroluum, with some Zerglings to consume for constant swarms, are more than enough to quickly finish off all the enemy bases.

2nd Mission
Dropping both Protoss bases seems to be the only way of getting a fast 2nd gas. Given the resource distribution, Hydralisks seem like an ideal strategy. But there are so many tight spots, especially on the entrance to the blue base, where it is basically impossible to not get stuck under Storm and lose half your army. On the other hand, the AI does not seem to react to Mutalisks at all. I suspect that none of them is even having any defensebuild/defenseuse lines in their AI scripts. Is this intended? Kind of reduces the whole challenge of the mission to "get one group of Mutalisks and micro away…"

3rd Mission
From the transmission I gather that you actually envisioned this to be run by ground, clockwise from the SW corner. However, I just took the mini base in that corner and the second gas base on the starting plateau in the SE, which was hardly even attacked by the AI, and that was enough to get a control group of Mutalisks to which, again, the AI seemed not at all to even respond. So again I Muta microed down the teal bases, took the resources and the whole thing felt like a giant sequence break once I had reached the NE corner and started to kill Starports.

4th Mission
Given my early lack of gas, I again decided to run this with Hydras. Can't ever go wrong with this. Again the AI seemed to hardly even react to attacks and it was mostly a smooth run-through from beginning to end. At no point did this feel challenging at all, apart from the fact that with 4+ control group of Hydras the long walking distances and claustrophobic pathways made me really wish I had switched to Mutas after 2nd gas. I once lost a base simply because my Hydras needed what felt like an hour to march all the way back to defend… I guess I should have just build Nydus Canals all over the place.

5th Mission
It can be a bit hard to cover against all the attacks at the beginning, but once you know what's coming the initial units are easily enough to get up the intial 2.5 bases (the few small mineral patches on the right side of the "main" really cannot be counted as a full expo) and get 2 or three control groups of Hydras. From there, and with help of Goska, it becomes pretty easy to just run around and take all the bases on the bottom half of the map. I had to get a control group of Mutas (later Kukulzas), just to be more mobile and be able to defend them all while my Hydras and Goska erratically tried to find their way to the next bases and mission objectives. For this kind of large-scale build and destroy missions I'd really rather see some actually big (even 256²), but more open map, rather than these frickin' mazes all the time. Had I just gone Guardian, Devourer, Kukulza, as any good campaign player ;D, I'd probably have completed this a lot faster. Having an AI ally is a nice touch, though, and something that I'd like to see use a lot more in campaigns (or alternatively coop missions, but not all campaign stories or potential mechanics involving allied AI are really suitable for co-op).

6th Mission
Hmm… Well, I obviously had to restart this a few times. It's obviously meant to be this way, I guess, and I personally like to min-max the hell out of the start of missions, so why did this still get so frustrating so quickly? It's not so much that a near-perfect build order is needed just to survive the first five minutes, but that the some aspects of the initial setup just seem like a "fuck you" to the player. The almost complete lack of building space, for example, but then, you don't actually need much, so it's workable and most buildings are best used to wallin the bottom choke and a bunker on the high ground, anyway.
But what really pissed me off is that mine on the low ground.
In one of my first trials the first Ling just dragged it right into the tank. Only went steeply down from there, as you can imagine. Next try, it was dragged into and killed both SCVs who were occupied walling the low ground choke with two depots. In the subsequent tries the first thing I did (after getting my SCVs to mine) was just to kill the bloody thing before it could hurt any one.…
The only major failure I had after that was because of my overcommitment to tanks, which for their huge price tag only managed to kill my own Marines all the time. So I went pure bio with a skeletal force of tanks, just to defend my back and clear the two Sunkens across the bridge just outside to the east of the base. Turns out that one or two control groups of M&M and Goska upgrades (detection, most of all!) is really all that's needed to finish the rest of the mission (killing the white Zerg first – damn, are those upgraded Sunkens hard to kill, though).
The no-liftoff for buildings felt more like a cheap cop-out and very much suspect that you just wanted to prevent the player from getting to the top left of the map at all costs ;P; that part would probably have fared better as a separate epilogue mission. With the nomadic playstyle this map forces unto the player, I feel like having to use lift-off would have felt more fitting, and as a bonus you could have adhered to the actual premise – why not make the AI produce a ton of Scourge (numbers depending on the number of Spires alive) and send them to immediately attack any lifted building that is detected?

Speaking of min-maxing mission starts:
A lot of the missions start with workers already mining. By canceling the intro cutscenes at the right moment, it is possible to start those missions with each worker holding a chunk of minerals, meaning you only need to select them and press C the moment you gain control and they'll start mining and immediately give you some extra starting bank. This is especially useful in the final mission, obviously.


I hope this did not sound too negative, because overall I really enjoyed these missions and they are definitely a lot better made than any of the Blizzard campaigns (or any other campaign I can think of). I just feel like there is still room for improvement.
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
December 28 2017 03:12 GMT
#51
Hey! First off, thanks for writing such an in-depth post about the campaign. As someone who worked on the project for months, it's very rewarding to read someone else's thoughts about it.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
The voice acting is great and really helps the immersion and is something other campaigns sadly, though understandably, lack.
I agree that the lack of voice acting in other campaigns is a tragedy. I hope to improve my acting and editing techniques in the future, and I can't see myself ever going back to using transmission.wav for the dialogues, so it's safe to say that voice acting will be standard-fare in my projects. Glad you liked it!

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
I also really like the highly detailed terrain work and custom doodads that really set a unique atmosphere. As a map maker, what I especially like is that the maps are not protected and can be looked at in the editor.
I've worked on the doodads quite a bit since, and I think they're more or less a complete set now. Inconsummate was the first project to ever see this level of asset creation for its terrain, and to facilitate it, some new tools had to be created (and some old ones had to be updated, like SCMDraft). This also lead to the height level issues (I'll explain more below), and as with any new tool that lets you do stuff you could never do before, I went a little overboard with the decoration. But I think the possibility for visual storytelling is unlocked in a very new way thanks to these modifications, so I've made it something of a priority to include the new doodads in all future projects.

And my stance on map protection is fairly public, but in case anyone didn't know, I think it's a foolish system to have when the mapmaking scene is as small and floundering as it is, and can only stifle learning, as opposed to enhance it, which is more harmful to the scene overall than the temporary trouble caused to a mapmaker if their work is "stolen". But I design stuff that almost always requires mod components and has historically been singleplayer, so I won't claim to have all the perspectives.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
However, I don't like your seemingly complete disregard of terrain levels (or maybe tile flags in general). In particular, mission 3 has all those buildable medium ground spots with Bunkers and Turrets on otherwise low ground bridges. This may look aesthetically interesting in ScmDraft. but in-game being not able to see or hit those unit on those areas without there being any ramp or cliff is just weird and confusing. You could have just used low ground bridge or ruins (it's not as if the AI would rebuild those buildings) or, since you use modded tilesets anyway, created low ground tiles with the right looks.
My solution to the bridges was to create map revealers when players approached them with units, which worked every time I tested (and I received no feedback on the height levels), though the miss chance is obviously not ideal. At the time I lacked a proper understanding of tile flags and wasn't able to clone the high dirt tiles, but that's obviously a chance I can make now that I've learned a thing or two.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
What's worse is that there are high ground jungle tiles scattered everywhere on all of the maps. Conversely, your the "medium ground" versions of your custom doodads are all set to low ground.
Yeah I still don't know what caused the issue with the jungle tile thing, probably an import error when PyTILE had less clear commands and/or I had no idea what I was doing. The tileset files Inconsummate uses were rebuilt dozens of times (with pathing painstakingly hand-painted each time :D), so I had no interest in going back to fix stuff. I didn't even find out about the jungle bug until after a few updates to SCMDraft were released and I realized the height display wasn't bugged. As for the medium doodads being set to low height, expect that to be fixed at some point.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
The other problem with the terrain work is that almost everything is very tight, cramped and cluttered with doodads and other obstructive deco, so there's hardly any open space for comfortable base design or army movement. Together with the fact that all the maps feature plenty, but low resource bases and the fact that all the AIs seem to revolve around constant, but small attacks this also leads to a clear preference for static defense and mass air tactics (same old story with campaigns), I think.
I personally like strangling the player's base areas and forcing them to expand, and additionally liked the challenge provided by aggressive AI and low resources, but I wouldn't expect it to be to everyone's taste. I don't think I used air units in any map besides To Free the Beast as my preferred strategy, instead opting for hydra/lurker/ling.

I playtested a few of the maps with muta-heavy builds to make sure they were an option for players who preferred those. Generally you can just build 2-3 sunkens at each expansion, support them with 1-2 spores and 1-2 lurkers, and move the lurkers around as you mine the map out. Feedback noted, though, and I'll look into offering more open/resource-rich maps in future projects, since I think it's better to have some variety where the challenge comes from other sources.

Another reason static defense is likely preferable is the fact that they benefit from upgrades. I'm still looking for ways to better balance the static defense, and will likely ship structure-specific upgrades (instead of having them benefit from vanilla ground/air/etc upgrades) in my next project. If you have any feedback on this point, I'm all ears.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
As much as I like the custom player colours, the in-game colours not matching the score screen colours is a nuisance.
I'll see what I can do to address that. If the score screen colors are just a pcx file somewhere I can hotswap the cyan color. The only (used) custom color is cyan in map 5, so I'll assume that's what you're referring to.

+ Show Spoiler +
On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
1st Mission
I guess this one is meant more as warm up to familiarize players with the new heroes. I feel like the commando section could need some sort of difficulty spike towards the end, though.
I personally feel like the first 4 maps are generally too easy for what I want them to be, but the vast majority of players complain that all maps are too difficult, so there's probably no happy medium for this project. I've cobbled together a difficulty selection plugin for future campaigns, though.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
The first time at the end of the commando section, one of the Marines ran back up the ramp and stayed there. out of sight range for the Lurkers, which caused the map to hang up.
Out of curiosity, was your run of the first map done on the latest update? I thought I had fixed an issue regarding this early on in the project's lifespan, and I haven't encountered it in any of my recent tests. I'll work on a more definitive fix either way.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
The rest of the mission also felt very easy. I am not sure if you really wanted players to have to take a gas base, but it turns out that the four initial Lurkers and Stroluum, with some Zerglings to consume for constant swarms, are more than enough to quickly finish off all the enemy bases.
Yeah, it's intended that you can win with the starting gas and some micro. I wanted to encourage players to go for early action against the AI, but maybe they fall over too quickly with little investment, so I can look into ways of beefing them up a bit. At the moment, the raider base expands to the gas expo on the high ground early on, so if you don't take it yourself you'll be in for a much tougher time (their attack and defense forces get beefed up after the CC completes).

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
2nd Mission
Dropping both Protoss bases seems to be the only way of getting a fast 2nd gas. Given the resource distribution, Hydralisks seem like an ideal strategy. But there are so many tight spots, especially on the entrance to the blue base, where it is basically impossible to not get stuck under Storm and lose half your army.
I'm sort of conflicted on how to update this mission since Goska is much more ideal to combat protoss, but I want to give players more alone time with Stroluum before map 3. The ideal fix is probably just a few extra mineral nodes and maybe lowering the number of zealots on the map to make hydras a bit more cost efficient without neutering the protoss' ability to counter them with reavers or storm. I'll think more on this.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
On the other hand, the AI does not seem to react to Mutalisks at all. I suspect that none of them is even having any defensebuild/defenseuse lines in their AI scripts. Is this intended? Kind of reduces the whole challenge of the mission to "get one group of Mutalisks and micro away…"
Definitely not the intention, but the AI for Inconsummate's first few maps (and in general) was designed when I had a very poor understanding of aiscript, so it's quite possible that I put in the wrong opcode for air defense or forgot it altogether. Thanks for the heads up.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
3rd Mission
From the transmission I gather that you actually envisioned this to be run by ground, clockwise from the SW corner. However, I just took the mini base in that corner and the second gas base on the starting plateau in the SE, which was hardly even attacked by the AI, and that was enough to get a control group of Mutalisks to which, again, the AI seemed not at all to even respond. So again I Muta microed down the teal bases, took the resources and the whole thing felt like a giant sequence break once I had reached the NE corner and started to kill Starports.
The triggers for this map are not great for the dialogue, since it does assume that the player will take a standard ground path in the early game. I will overhaul the conditions to better reflect the number of starports that have been destroyed, but I don't plan on recording new voice acting so it's likely that some awkwardness would still exist.

My favorite thing about this map is that you can do it any way you want, in any order you want. It's more open-ended than the previous missions since the objectives take far less time to destroy than proper protoss bases from map 2 or the main raider base from map 1. But the AI shouldn't ignore air units, obviously, so I'll run some tests at some point and make some changes.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
4th Mission
Given my early lack of gas, I again decided to run this with Hydras. Can't ever go wrong with this. Again the AI seemed to hardly even react to attacks and it was mostly a smooth run-through from beginning to end. At no point did this feel challenging at all, apart from the fact that with 4+ control group of Hydras the long walking distances and claustrophobic pathways made me really wish I had switched to Mutas after 2nd gas. I once lost a base simply because my Hydras needed what felt like an hour to march all the way back to defend… I guess I should have just build Nydus Canals all over the place.
I'm starting to suspect the AI bugged out or you ran the maps without an updated mod file. The white base definitely responds to attacks, but with 4+ control groups of hydras you can wipe anything besides maybe Gorn's base. I'll probably add some more gas to the bases you can expand to while beefing up the hostiles to make the mission feel more involved.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
5th Mission
It can be a bit hard to cover against all the attacks at the beginning, but once you know what's coming the initial units are easily enough to get up the intial 2.5 bases (the few small mineral patches on the right side of the "main" really cannot be counted as a full expo) and get 2 or three control groups of Hydras. From there, and with help of Goska, it becomes pretty easy to just run around and take all the bases on the bottom half of the map. I had to get a control group of Mutas (later Kukulzas), just to be more mobile and be able to defend them all while my Hydras and Goska erratically tried to find their way to the next bases and mission objectives. For this kind of large-scale build and destroy missions I'd really rather see some actually big (even 256²), but more open map, rather than these frickin' mazes all the time. Had I just gone Guardian, Devourer, Kukulza, as any good campaign player ;D, I'd probably have completed this a lot faster. Having an AI ally is a nice touch, though, and something that I'd like to see use a lot more in campaigns (or alternatively coop missions, but not all campaign stories or potential mechanics involving allied AI are really suitable for co-op).
As the magnum opus of Inconsummate, this mission is getting the largest and most significant update. Tuzor will train the same hero units you can requisition from him and will inform you of where he plans to attack thanks to some new tech, and all the AI will be far more involved. Similar to the previous map's proposed changes, more resources will be available in most cases, but you'll have to bleed for the land you take, because the AI will target expansions as they are taken, and will seek to expand out themselves (something that unfortunately is pretty absent). I'm actually glad you didn't make a billion air units since it allowed you to talk to me a bit about the mazes. I'll see what can be done about opening up the terrain, but keep in mind the AI would use this to their advantage as well, and you'd catch their armies out of position less often than you're able to now.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
6th Mission
Hmm… Well, I obviously had to restart this a few times. It's obviously meant to be this way, I guess, and I personally like to min-max the hell out of the start of missions, so why did this still get so frustrating so quickly? It's not so much that a near-perfect build order is needed just to survive the first five minutes, but that the some aspects of the initial setup just seem like a "fuck you" to the player. The almost complete lack of building space, for example, but then, you don't actually need much, so it's workable and most buildings are best used to wallin the bottom choke and a bunker on the high ground, anyway.
This mission had been updated a few times to add more starting build space and resources, so it used to be even worse! But I agree that it's challenging in a way that none of the other maps had prepared you for, so it could stand to have more of a warm-up period (though you'd probably stomp the AI now that you know what to expect, but you know what they say about first impressions).

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
But what really pissed me off is that mine on the low ground.
Yeah, a lot of people just killed the mines, so I'll probably remove them completely, or move them further up. It's not really worth the headache for players since they won't think about them as often as they would had they laid them down themselves.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
The only major failure I had after that was because of my overcommitment to tanks, which for their huge price tag only managed to kill my own Marines all the time. So I went pure bio with a skeletal force of tanks, just to defend my back and clear the two Sunkens across the bridge just outside to the east of the base. Turns out that one or two control groups of M&M and Goska upgrades (detection, most of all!) is really all that's needed to finish the rest of the mission (killing the white Zerg first – damn, are those upgraded Sunkens hard to kill, though).
Yeah, I'm pretty happy with the detection upgrade, though obviously it comes out of left field. I think it's pretty important for this mission though. Lurkers are impossible to deal with otherwise, since you have no comsat (I wonder why that is...)

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
The no-liftoff for buildings felt more like a cheap cop-out and very much suspect that you just wanted to prevent the player from getting to the top left of the map at all costs ;P; that part would probably have fared better as a separate epilogue mission. With the nomadic playstyle this map forces unto the player, I feel like having to use lift-off would have felt more fitting, and as a bonus you could have adhered to the actual premise – why not make the AI produce a ton of Scourge (numbers depending on the number of Spires alive) and send them to immediately attack any lifted building that is detected?
I like the idea of scourge fucking with you if you lift off as an alternative to disabling liftoff, so maybe I will do that. The problem with allowing liftoff at all is that you can easily aggro units and such that are pre-placed in Stroluum's area, and I'm pretty sure I'm at the string cap for this level, so I can't make new locations to create them. I could use the create_unit aiscript opcode if I were so inclined, I suppose.

On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
A lot of the missions start with workers already mining. By canceling the intro cutscenes at the right moment, it is possible to start those missions with each worker holding a chunk of minerals, meaning you only need to select them and press C the moment you gain control and they'll start mining and immediately give you some extra starting bank. This is especially useful in the final mission, obviously.
That's pretty clever, I probably would never have thought of that. I leave it to the melee specialists at TL to find ways to make the most out of my silly shit.

One thing I might be able to do is run an aiscript for the player that makes their workers continue to harvest after they take control. It's always bothered me that the drones stop working, so I'll see what I can come up with.


On December 28 2017 09:08 Freakling wrote:
I hope this did not sound too negative, because overall I really enjoyed these missions and they are definitely a lot better made than any of the Blizzard campaigns (or any other campaign I can think of). I just feel like there is still room for improvement.

Again, thanks a lot for the post. I'm proud of what I was able to accomplish with Inconsummate, but more than that, I'm excited to show off all the new stuff I've learned. You'll get a sneak peak before the sequel's done, since I'll update Inconsummate with a bunch of new stuff (some of which I've gone over here), and your honest feedback is an integral part of the process.

Cheers!
u
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1533 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-12-28 09:17:00
December 28 2017 09:12 GMT
#52
+ Show Spoiler [Potential spoilers, read at own peril] +
Well, the tight bases were not such a huge problem this time as most of the time you are playing as Zerg anyways and in the Terran mission two barracks is really all you need in terms of macro. However, usually it is hard to even place a macro Hatch (though I used them to wall-in most of the time, anyway). You could at least forgo using so much unbuildable terrain in base locations next time. And if you ever do a Terran or Protoss campaign, please make sure that in a macro-heavy mission there is actually a space where a nice matrix of Gates or Factories can be set up.

I missed out on those Map Revealers, I guess, because I used Mutas all the time. Still. if I had gone for Hydras the miss chance would have been really annoying, at best.

Yes, static defenses are crazy strong with upgrades in these missions. But I hated that I needed to invest a few hundred minerals into colonies to be able to hold all the bases when they all yielded so little resources to begin with. I find an expansion design that favours a fast, nomadic playstyle and a map layout that hinders mobility don't make a good combination together. Separating structure upgrades would definitely be better, as it helps differentiate playstyles and choices for players; and Sunkens profiting from melee upgrades does not make a whole lot of sense, anyway.
If I play these maps again, I'll probably run everything on Muta-Ling, just for the mobility it gives.

It's not just the cyan colour. All the colours seem off in the score screen. For example, the player is playing as green Zerg most of the time, but the score screen shows them as red.

As for general map difficulty, the best way to go about this is probably to have two versions of each map, one in easy and one in hard difficulty. I looked into a playthrough on youtube, and the guy's not even using control groups most of the time, it seems. So the difficulty is basically self-made…

As for the map version: I guess I was using the newest ones, as I just downloaded them a few days ago from the SEN link you provided here on TL. Is there a version numbering somewhere in the map file so I can check? Terran does not expand to the high ground gas in this version, though, as that is occupied by Protoss at the beginning. Or maybe I was just to quick, that is where I took my gas (which I then never really made any use of, except for additional upgrades).

In the second mission I actually lost twice due to Stroluum dying off-screen to some Reavers, because I left him as a front line defense. But he's a great one-man-army to defend some back expansion against any stray Scouts and whatnot, where he then spent a happy game burrowed for my Muta stacks.

As for catching opponent armies off-guard in more open maps: I am pretty certain coordinated army movements, besides sending X units to attack or pulling y units for defense, is among the things AI scripts cannot do. So it would probably make no difference.

Is there actually a way to run Ai scripts for human players to make workers mine? Without modding that's definitely not working.
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
December 28 2017 10:28 GMT
#53
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 28 2017 18:12 Freakling wrote:
You could at least forgo using so much unbuildable terrain in base locations next time. And if you ever do a Terran or Protoss campaign, please make sure that in a macro-heavy mission there is actually a space where a nice matrix of Gates or Factories can be set up.
Noted. With some new aiscript plugins I can make the AI allies/enemies play nicer with larger maps, so more open designs shouldn't be as cumbersome to implement in future projects.

On December 28 2017 18:12 Freakling wrote:
I find an expansion design that favours a fast, nomadic playstyle and a map layout that hinders mobility don't make a good combination together.
Right. These kinds of things will always be able to be improved upon in the future, and as this was my first campaign I don't doubt I'll be changing a lot about the design paradigms.

On December 28 2017 18:12 Freakling wrote:
It's not just the cyan colour. All the colours seem off in the score screen. For example, the player is playing as green Zerg most of the time, but the score screen shows them as red.
I thought this was just a bug with SC in general. I'll look into what in the mod is causing this issue and attempt to resolve it.

On December 28 2017 18:12 Freakling wrote:
As for general map difficulty, the best way to go about this is probably to have two versions of each map, one in easy and one in hard difficulty.
Easy to do if maps aren't 100mb+ each. I'd much rather have the current solution, which is to add a plugin that allows users to select between easy/normal/hard in the map selection screen. I'll show that off in a few months, probably.

On December 28 2017 18:12 Freakling wrote:
I guess I was using the newest ones, as I just downloaded them a few days ago from the SEN link you provided here on TL.
I'll stress test the issue and see if I can narrow it down, then. That is indeed the latest version (older links wouldn't work since I removed the older files). The readme should include some note that says "this is to be the final update" in the patch history section.

On December 28 2017 18:12 Freakling wrote:
I am pretty certain coordinated army movements, besides sending X units to attack or pulling y units for defense, is among the things AI scripts cannot do. [...] Is there actually a way to run Ai scripts for human players to make workers mine? Without modding that's definitely not working.
There are new plugins that have been developed for another one of my projects that make for much more varied AI behaviors. I'm hoping to get a plugin developed that will allow spellcasting behavior to be set on a script level, for example giving the AI a list of units to prioritize when casting lockdown/broodling/mind control. New code already exists to have AI land buildings (see here) as well as all other orders (e.g. a floating barracks could build a command center, since the plugin overrides tech reqs), which is the same tech that would be used to order drones to do the harvest order on mineral fields. AI scripts are hardcoded to not run for players except for the share vision scripts, which can be modified to detect death counters as a sort of map-side variable, which would then jump to a new block that contains appropriate commands. So, short answer: yeah, it's very possible.
u
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1533 Posts
December 28 2017 12:02 GMT
#54
Yes, the readme has the "final update" notice.

Being able to use death counters as an interface variable between triggers and AI scripts sound great. Back in the day I used modulation of mineral amounts for that purpose, but that's obviously not ideal. But it allows to keep track of the player in a lot more detail (normal AIscripts can only detect the presence of specific tech buildings, but not of unit composition, macro building counts or upgrade status, triggers can [upgrades probably via EUD]), so it is possible to get a lot more smart and adaptive AI scripts that can adjust their own compositions and macro to what the player has.
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1533 Posts
December 29 2017 14:10 GMT
#55
+ Show Spoiler [more spoilers…] +
There is a very fast way to beat mission 4: get ovi speed asap, fly an ovi over the water, in between the purple Zerg, to the dead Cerebrate location, then use the Mutas and Guardians you get to kill the Protoss and any stray Protoss buildings on the map while getting Goska to the beacon via Nydus and ovi transport.
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
December 29 2017 14:55 GMT
#56
Yep, map 4 could use some adjustments to the cheese potential. I'll see about adding more anti-air defenses, and maybe making the final threat a bit more significant.
u
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1533 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-12-30 14:42:28
December 29 2017 15:58 GMT
#57
+ Show Spoiler +
What final threat? The Protoss? I thought that was basically a dummy base to be walked over. Templar haven't even got Storm.
Pr0nogo
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States312 Posts
December 29 2017 16:15 GMT
#58
Yeah that's what I was referring to. They're designed as a victory map, but maybe I can have them be attacked by the other AI, so the longer you take the easier they are and vice versa.
u
Peeano
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Netherlands5353 Posts
December 29 2017 23:38 GMT
#59
I just finished the first 3 scenarios and I'm overjoyed with the amount of work that has been put into this. It really shows!
The voice acting only took me a bit to get used to, it's a really nice fit to the original nilla and BW voices.
Smart rally is a really cool feature! I bet it pleases many SC2 fanboys who also like to play BW.
The difficulty is well tuned, it fits the BW campaign's difficulty level.


Some nitpicking feedback on Goska:

Goska's C-26 Assault Rifle what kind of damage type is used here? It makes no sense to me. It seems to consists of 2 hits like the zealot attack? Or even damage over time? The damage output seems closest to concussive damage, but it's very random and it seems to disregard armor?

I remember as a kid I was let down that Infested Duran didn't receive a bonus on his weapon when I upgraded Zerg missile attacks. But it made sense - unlike Infested Kerrigan he was still using his Terran gun, right?
As such I feel Infested Goska shouldn't receive a bonus on his attack from upgrading Zerg missile attacks.
The numbers also seem very overpowered, especially when you get +10 per upgrade.

I'm not a gun expert, so I wouldn't know how it should sound, but imho its soundeffect doesn't fit the game too well.
I think this could be hot fixed by bringing down it's volume by 15~25%, right now I feel it stands out too much, especially since it's rather unique already.
(Louder sound would make more sense if the damage it displays is also its output damage.)

Traditionally ghosts don't wield automatic rifles.
While his weapon is more in line with the marine's or goliath's, it's attack cooldown is still of a ghost.

Repeated selection on Goska is a bit meh. I expected something good giving his voice over is so cool.


Some suggestions I'd implement:

Mission briefings have way too much delay. It should be made more obvious that I have to wait for a briefing or address the delay. I only found out on the second scenario there are pregame briefings because I had received a text that occupied me.

When the game freezes to tell you the mission objectives that duration should be tuned down by 2-3 seconds, but I'd actually prefer no freeze at all.

Default game speed should really be on fastest or faster, but not fast. The few noobies who can't handle that are free to select their preferred speed. (Preferred game speed doesn't get saved which is why I'm bitching about this, so if that is possible to tackle it would be the best solution).

I would have given Goska a sniper rifle to fit to ghost theme or either given him some sort of zerg weapon *think Half-Life where you get to fire living alien weapons?* It would also debunk my comments about benefiting from missile attack upgrades. For simplicity sake I'd probably change the attack type to normal. And I'd definitely keep his special ability!


Just some thoughts:

Most (if not all?) speech in Starcraft has a distinct ambient sound in the background. While I didn't miss that, it would have made it feel even more authentic.

If you run another project it would be cool to see a hero return in a different form. Like Jim Raynor knows 3 forms, as marine, vulture and BC. It would be sweet to see a prequel of Goska as an original ghost, like Samir Duran.

I really like the formulation in which Stroluum speaks, but his intonation feels a bit too out there (rancid) or perhaps his speech is a bit too slow for my liking.

Playing this gets me to relive my childhood. Thank you! I could totally see you create a Remastered scenario that gets a Blizzard stamp of approval. I'm not much of a reader nor am I writer - perhaps someone in that field can reflect on that - but to me your story line seems really legit.

Teal is a much cooler hero color than orange

Doodads really add to the experience and the dancing zealots really blew my mind!

(I initially loaded up the first scenario as UMS in 1.16.1 because I was too lazy to read the readme and I figured Freakling would go apeshit in his posts about the terrains. Did you originally design this as an UMS without mods?)

Perhaps I should first finish the campaign, but I am just too excited that I wanted to share my feedback now.
I don't mean to be your director and I'm totally going to recommend your product as it is.
FBH #1!
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1533 Posts
December 30 2017 00:09 GMT
#60
Pretty sure the voices have ambient sound effects. They could be tuned up a bit more, as well as the effects (reverb, distortion, general radio squawkiness). Especially the Cerebrates sound much too clean. But you cannot really expect professional sound engineering from what is essentially a one-man project.

Game speed can probably be set via EUD triggers

I found the pause times for mission objectives a bit irritating at first as well, but on the plus side this gives players to actually read them with undivided attention (at least in theory). I just canceled them and that was quite alright,
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Team League
12:45
Group B
WardiTV770
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech126
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 32180
Calm 6440
Bisu 2591
Horang2 2566
Sea 2415
Mini 1098
EffOrt 928
Soma 824
Hyuk 556
Stork 504
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 406
actioN 401
Rush 386
firebathero 323
Snow 281
Soulkey 222
hero 149
PianO 103
Sea.KH 68
sorry 64
Aegong 42
Hyun 38
Terrorterran 26
Shinee 25
910 24
Movie 19
scan(afreeca) 18
Rock 16
Hm[arnc] 11
IntoTheRainbow 11
Noble 8
soO 7
Sexy 7
Dota 2
Gorgc5189
canceldota120
Counter-Strike
oskar76
Heroes of the Storm
XaKoH 135
Other Games
singsing1752
B2W.Neo1222
FrodaN849
hiko586
Beastyqt432
crisheroes270
DeMusliM219
KnowMe176
QueenE57
Trikslyr34
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3311
• TFBlade1227
Upcoming Events
OSC
8h 31m
RSL Revival
18h 31m
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 18h
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-31
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.