1.18 Public Test Realm - Now Available - Page 3
Forum Index > BW General |
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
purakushi
United States3300 Posts
On March 30 2017 07:21 Bakuryu wrote: LOL according to guy on nathasis stream, you cant change slots in ums map, this is getting better every second That just seems like an oversight lol. Though, I doubt they will fix that in the 1 day PTR lol. | ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
Bareleon
371 Posts
On March 30 2017 07:20 rand0MPrecisi0n wrote: Oh it wasn't too big? I guess that makes it ok then. I mean, I saw it with my very eyes but if you say so It never got in the way when I played. | ||
trutaCz
Poland686 Posts
| ||
purakushi
United States3300 Posts
On March 30 2017 07:34 trutaCz wrote: I cant run it, got error Blizzard post mentions that it doesn't play well with all the 3rd party launchers/addons, so if you haven't already, try removing those. | ||
trutaCz
Poland686 Posts
On March 30 2017 07:37 purakushi wrote: Blizzard post mentions that it doesn't play well with all the 3rd party launchers/addons, so if you haven't already, try removing those. but i dont have anything else being turned on | ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
| ||
trutaCz
Poland686 Posts
| ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
| ||
Bareleon
371 Posts
On March 30 2017 07:44 TT1 wrote: Holy shit the UI/chat channels are so ugly. Blizzard don't do this to me. imo everything is an improvement. | ||
DanteStyle55
14 Posts
| ||
duke91
Germany1458 Posts
| ||
trutaCz
Poland686 Posts
Can someone post it on battle net forum? my account is disabled to post there (WTF?) | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
It's puke-worthy, the interface makes the game feel so cold and isolated.. just like sc2! | ||
purakushi
United States3300 Posts
https://m.imgur.com/a/cs4Fm | ||
petro1987
Brazil374 Posts
| ||
Bakuryu
Germany1065 Posts
for modern os we already had ddraw fix (unless i missed some other problem) lan latency and antihack were basic features of iccup launcher/mcalauncher/others being able to host very nice (didnt shieldbattery also fix this? im not sure if this is 100% new) | ||
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On March 30 2017 08:00 petro1987 wrote: Not that I particularly like the BNET interface, but is it really a big deal? The fact that it works on modern OSes and have LAN latency/antihack/hosting is far more important in my opinion. It's a huge deal, if this is the interface that Fish server ends up with they clearly have no fucking clue about anything SC related. Korea is gonna be in an uproar. We already had lan latency/antihack/hosting on Fish on ICCup, we didn't need Blizzard to step in and shit on the interface. Why would they ever touch the old interface? It makes no goddamn sense. | ||
Chris_Havoc
United States597 Posts
| ||
| ||