chojja - Page 2
Forum Index > BW General |
Emlary
China3334 Posts
| ||
Bleww
United States1080 Posts
| ||
Mydnyte2
Canada101 Posts
There is no race. Just zerg. (ChOJJa gogo) | ||
ImaGe
Netherlands233 Posts
| ||
Mydnyte2
Canada101 Posts
I'm 5'10. | ||
ShAsTa
Belgium2841 Posts
| ||
Mydnyte2
Canada101 Posts
is that idiot for "angry"? | ||
[CS]Pablo
Brazil338 Posts
On May 22 2003 11:44 gricha wrote: Species is an objective concept. Two animals are considered belonging to the same species if (given the opposite sexes prerequisite, go ask your daddy...) they are capable of producing a healthy offspring. Almost right. Replace healthy with not sterile (sp?), and it's almost perfect. Horses and donkeys can produce a healthy offspring, but it is unable to reproduce itself, so they are 2 different species. And the other tiny adjustment is that you should consider transitivity. I mean, a chiuahua and a sheepdog cannot have direct descendents (it would probably blow the poor chiuahua's uterus), but we could make a chain of viable couples starting with a chiuahua and ending with a sheepdog. Well... | ||
gricha
Lesotho67 Posts
Almost right. Replace healthy with not sterile (sp?), and it's almost perfect. Horses and donkeys can produce a healthy offspring, but it is unable to reproduce itself, so they are 2 different species. And the other tiny adjustment is that you should consider transitivity. I mean, a chiuahua and a sheepdog cannot have direct descendents (it would probably blow the poor chiuahua's uterus), but we could make a chain of viable couples starting with a chiuahua and ending with a sheepdog. Oh thanks for pointing that out ! I had the feeling my criteria were flawed when thinking about horses/donkeys and lions/tigers. And about transitivity, yeah that makes sense, even for the simple relationship Chojja -> Liv Tyler -> Me Thank you very much ! I actually learned something in a Broodwar forum ! And they say videogames are stupid ^^ | ||
MPXMX
Canada4309 Posts
I take the term "race" from the other term "racism" - differentiation between black, white, and yellow people. If those are not races by definition, sorry, but English is not my first language. Statistics prove that on average, each "race" or "colour" of people has bigger something, smaller other things, differently shaped body parts and so on. Like black people always( I think ) have curly hair. I don't think diet is in business here. Maybe it only plays an insignificant part. And ObsoleteLogic, when one says that black people, for example, are taller than asian, what is meant is average height. That doesn't at all mean that every black man is taller than any asian. | ||
ejai63
United States2101 Posts
| ||
esk0
Sweden1393 Posts
| ||
Konni
Germany3044 Posts
he really just asked how tall chojja was ... and the metric system is the one & only. fucking inch/foot whatever | ||
SoA.FoxX
Denmark27 Posts
| ||
OsornO
Chile35 Posts
The differences of shape, height, color and body r caused by different weather, diet and shadow-light... When ur in third year of antropology, u must have that really clear... An example: Egipcians had a light black color cuz of the sun that's part of their geographic region... Gaules were red and blond-haired cuz of their different weather conditions changing in each season and plus, the sun was really soft... so... Nazi racist shit fuck off | ||
RaGe_banned
United States538 Posts
| ||
Grotfang
Belgium490 Posts
but funny though ^-^ | ||
Sw1tCh
United States2005 Posts
To OsornO: It's "Egyptians" not Egipcians silly :Thumbs: | ||
Seraph_idle
United States2 Posts
On May 22 2003 04:46 Casper... wrote: it's diet 100% You are wrong 100%. Save your pity for yourself. | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
who are you | ||
| ||