• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:56
CEST 02:56
KST 09:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL1Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator2[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview21
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 19-25): Hindsight is 20/20?0DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack8[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)9Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3
StarCraft 2
General
(+2347044417593) How can I join occult for money The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Can anyone explain to me why u cant veto a matchup DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator
Tourneys
DreamHack Dallas 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group A SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat
Brood War
General
Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ GG Lan Party Bulgaria (Live in about 3 hours) BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL19] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11232 users

Brood War Unit Pathing

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Normal
D-Lite
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United Kingdom223 Posts
June 09 2010 13:46 GMT
#1
ill start off by saying, after searching for various terms relating to this search i didnt find anything relevant to what i actually want to convey but ive read several posts on the contrary to what i believe.

So there has been numerous countless issues with unit pathing in sc2, people complaining about gateways trapping units between pylons, units getting stuck in places they should, workers taking an extensively long path to get to minerals or a geyser.

yet i still found nothing relating to how STUPID the broodwar unit pathing is,i played wc3 before sc2 and had not played sc1 (bw wasnt out when i had sc1) since i got my very first pc with its fantastic 2gb hard drive and 1.2ghz processor, with a whopping 128mb of ram.

i digress, unit pathing i feel is such an important issue in sc2 that they scrapped the system totally from broodwar, clogging on ramps/bridges/chokes means you lose units on broodwar, as your units will for some reason try to find the longest way around the map when there is a single other unit blocking them (even when its your own units!)

i have a feeling im going to have alot of people telling me to stfu because of this post, and alot of people saying l2p, yes, i agree my unit control isnt the best it could be on broodwar but i never really considered getting units up and down ramps a big part of the micro-management.

on the other hand my unit control in sc2 is (id like to think) above average, dont get me wrong, i dont have a gripe with the entire bw control system, i actually appreciate watching good players even more now that i know what it entails to even move your units around the map.

really the topic i started this off with is simple, why have i seen so many complaints reflecting onto the pathing system on sc2, i know it has its flaws, but compared to broodwar its come a long LONG way,
of course there is always going to be the bw purists who dislike the pathing system in sc2 for no real reason other than its different

so with all that said my final thought and possibly a question to you all is, what do you make of the intelligent pathing systems in place in sc2 as opposed to broodwar?

Real men proxygate
faction123
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia949 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-09 13:56:17
June 09 2010 13:54 GMT
#2
broodwar isn't a better game than sc2 but the way things worked out with how bad alot of features are (12 unit selection limit, tons of bugs that greatly increased the skillcap, unit pathing being so bad etc) due to the fact the game was made 50 years ago, it's amazing to watch/play and requires ungodly amounts of skill. If you're not ready to guide your dragoons every step of the way on anything that isn't a completely open field then too bad, because for the people who can do it while still managing everything else it's extremely rewarding. I would not call SC2 "dumbed down", and the best player still wins 95% of the time in SC2, just like BW, but due to the massive interface improvements (which are great, and i'm not bashing them) it's no doubt a far easier game than broodwar. Using skill to get around the archaic interface, pathing issues etc are the reasons BW is such a great game and thats why we're able to watch korean players in total awe.
NA Legend - stream: http://twitch.tv/faction60
slowmanrunning
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada285 Posts
June 09 2010 14:08 GMT
#3
On June 09 2010 22:54 faction123 wrote:
broodwar isn't a better game than sc2 but the way things worked out with how bad alot of features are (12 unit selection limit, tons of bugs that greatly increased the skillcap, unit pathing being so bad etc) due to the fact the game was made 50 years ago, it's amazing to watch/play and requires ungodly amounts of skill. If you're not ready to guide your dragoons every step of the way on anything that isn't a completely open field then too bad, because for the people who can do it while still managing everything else it's extremely rewarding. I would not call SC2 "dumbed down", and the best player still wins 95% of the time in SC2, just like BW, but due to the massive interface improvements (which are great, and i'm not bashing them) it's no doubt a far easier game than broodwar. Using skill to get around the archaic interface, pathing issues etc are the reasons BW is such a great game and thats why we're able to watch korean players in total awe.

this.
I aim to become a hydralisk and then stop posting, cause I don't wanna be a queen...
samachking
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Bahrain4949 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-09 14:26:24
June 09 2010 14:13 GMT
#4
The only reason units in BW dont clump is because they occupy a 2D space with a set amount of pixels instead of a 3d space hence limiting the amount of stuff that can pass through in a certain time. If you think they don't clump, play TvP with bio against HT and see what happens. The other problem with the 2d engine is that only a certain amount of pixels can go through the ramp which is a certain amount of pixels, causing really weird pathing for large units with a large amount of pixels. The pathing is completely weird, that also allows for wall ins for T, and forge FE's for protoss to prevent ling runbys through really awkward looking stuff. It's the 2d interface more than the AI pathing imo. But again remember that SC2 ramps are much larger too than BW ramps, goons won't have the same problems with a python ramp in comparison to let's say a Luna ramp because it's much larger.

Honestly though, proper rally points will solve all your problems for BW, unless you are playing on sin peaks, but then you have to be skilled to play that anyways.

I really don't like the clumping movement of SC2, but that's only due to 3d unit design, for small units in BW(lings,rines) clump just as bad, you just dont notice it as much because the resolution is lower and they take up a much larger in game space due to the 2d interface.

Edit: Just remember because of that clunky 2d interface with huge units you get the epic mid-late game battles that take up screens, storms that cover entire screens, protoss engaging seige tank lines that take up a quarter of the map. Units being larger makes the game and the battles feel a lot more epic, BW 200/200 battles were much more awesome to look at in comparison to SC2 200/200 battles(see Idra vs Ra on metropolis).
"And then Earthlings discovered tools. Suddenly agreeing with friends could be a form of suicide or worse. But agreements went on, not for the sake of common sense, or decency, or self preservation, but for friendliness."
buhhy
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1113 Posts
June 09 2010 14:27 GMT
#5
Simply increasing the bounding box sizes for the units would reduce clumping in SC2.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
June 09 2010 14:40 GMT
#6
Clumping isn't as bad in SC1 because units don't clump as easily when they are inside the (Wiki)magic box
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Mylin
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden177 Posts
June 09 2010 14:48 GMT
#7
I'd say the main reason people don't complain very much is that old BW players (especially those who still favor the game over SC2) tend to enjoy the insane amount of babysitting you need to be doing in the game.

And I have to admit I definitely belong in that group; SC2 is just so user friendly it disgusts me.

That being said the game is of course very competitive and the better player usually wins but I think the "skills" what will allow future SC2 progamers to get ahead are gonna be very different from the ones needed in BW.

no
LxRogue
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United States1415 Posts
June 09 2010 14:57 GMT
#8
It's more than just the magic box mechanic. Say you have a group of 12 lings. (BW) Even though they easily fit inside the magic box, yhey will spread out into a single-file line if you just give them a single move command.

BW units are all very finicky about having enough space around them, and if you want have baller micro, you have to be mindful of that. The SC2 pathing engine implements a few things that make big changes to the way units move, mainly that each unit predicts the path of other units, and will alter their own path to make more room for the others. This makes controlling and splitting up small groups less important.
DorF
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Sweden961 Posts
June 09 2010 15:27 GMT
#9
yeah lol the unit pathing is better in SC2 but that's a part of what makes BW more fun to play , when you dodge lurkers or spread your marines and make manual arcs and so on...It's a part of what's fun in battle ,not just charging and casting a few spells then retreating with your massive ball(wich you can do in Bw too if you've got the mechanichs to actually control your army decently)
BW for life !
D-Lite
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United Kingdom223 Posts
June 09 2010 15:27 GMT
#10
On June 09 2010 23:13 samachking wrote:
The only reason units in BW dont clump is because they occupy a 2D space with a set amount of pixels instead of a 3d space hence limiting the amount of stuff that can pass through in a certain time. If you think they don't clump, play TvP with bio against HT and see what happens. The other problem with the 2d engine is that only a certain amount of pixels can go through the ramp which is a certain amount of pixels, causing really weird pathing for large units with a large amount of pixels. The pathing is completely weird, that also allows for wall ins for T, and forge FE's for protoss to prevent ling runbys through really awkward looking stuff. It's the 2d interface more than the AI pathing imo. But again remember that SC2 ramps are much larger too than BW ramps, goons won't have the same problems with a python ramp in comparison to let's say a Luna ramp because it's much larger.

Honestly though, proper rally points will solve all your problems for BW, unless you are playing on sin peaks, but then you have to be skilled to play that anyways.

I really don't like the clumping movement of SC2, but that's only due to 3d unit design, for small units in BW(lings,rines) clump just as bad, you just dont notice it as much because the resolution is lower and they take up a much larger in game space due to the 2d interface.

Edit: Just remember because of that clunky 2d interface with huge units you get the epic mid-late game battles that take up screens, storms that cover entire screens, protoss engaging seige tank lines that take up a quarter of the map. Units being larger makes the game and the battles feel a lot more epic, BW 200/200 battles were much more awesome to look at in comparison to SC2 200/200 battles(see Idra vs Ra on metropolis).


fantastic post, very well thought out and supremely informative, id never really given much thought to the 2d engine having alot to do with unit pathing, similar to the way you can hide small units (workers/rines/lings/blings) behind buildings in sc2 without them being at all visable (due to the 3d engine).

i much prefer the BW forum on TL as there is hardened vets of the game, as opposed to all the newbies (such as my self) that sc2 attracted.

sometimes i feel sorry for the mods when i think of the huge influx of visitors and spam posts they have had to take on due to sc2 making RTS a mainstream genre once again.

either way its super nice to have everybodys input in a topic i feel strongly about, and as mentioned in the post i quoted (a topic i covered very breifly in the OP) the crazy unit pathing makes for brilliant games in BW.

also one other thing, DROPSHIPS! i find them to be alot more micro intensive than in sc2 due to the improved AI of the dropship, in bw it will drop 3-4rines and still have half a load due to it not actually moving to drop the others in open space, where as the drop ships in sc2 will physically force units out of the way to unload them
Real men proxygate
eth3real
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden33 Posts
June 09 2010 15:32 GMT
#11
tl;dr (all). Do you think that getting a 200/200 army up a ramp in 4 seconds like in sc2 is better then?

User was temp banned for this post.
Artosis is the Ph.D and Masters equipped physicist of Starcraft while Day9 is the Dalai Lama of Starcraft
faction123
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia949 Posts
June 09 2010 15:33 GMT
#12
If you think thats cool, watch some pro games (TvT's) where they unload 6+ seperate moving dropships completely in 5 seconds.
NA Legend - stream: http://twitch.tv/faction60
D-Lite
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United Kingdom223 Posts
June 09 2010 15:33 GMT
#13
On June 10 2010 00:32 eth3real wrote:
tl;dr (all). Do you think that getting a 200/200 army up a ramp in 4 seconds like in sc2 is better then?



if you had actually bothered to read the OP you wouldnt be asking stupid questions like that, why bother posting on this thread at all?
Real men proxygate
eth3real
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden33 Posts
June 09 2010 15:39 GMT
#14
On June 10 2010 00:33 D-Lite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 00:32 eth3real wrote:
tl;dr (all). Do you think that getting a 200/200 army up a ramp in 4 seconds like in sc2 is better then?



if you had actually bothered to read the OP you wouldnt be asking stupid questions like that, why bother posting on this thread at all?


Read it and I don't know why you called my question stupid because you didn't adress anything remotely like it in the OP.
Artosis is the Ph.D and Masters equipped physicist of Starcraft while Day9 is the Dalai Lama of Starcraft
OreoBoi
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada1639 Posts
June 09 2010 15:43 GMT
#15
On June 10 2010 00:33 D-Lite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 00:32 eth3real wrote:
tl;dr (all). Do you think that getting a 200/200 army up a ramp in 4 seconds like in sc2 is better then?



if you had actually bothered to read the OP you wouldnt be asking stupid questions like that, why bother posting on this thread at all?


But you complained about that...
The ramp is suppose to be a strategic location that you defend. You would never a-move up a ramp in sc1 because stuff would glitch out and you would lose units. That's part of the strategy of BW
.
It's not that we don't want improved unit pathing, its that the ramp is no longer a very strategic point on the map. As long as you can see up the ramp, it provides almost no strategic positioning.
AaronEB
Profile Joined May 2010
United States76 Posts
June 09 2010 15:45 GMT
#16
No body addresses it because everyone is used to it. But ya.. Ramps suck.
I'm pretty sure that if you a drink for everything Day[9] says bejewjaler and baller you will get alcohol poisoning.
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-09 15:52:53
June 09 2010 15:50 GMT
#17
After going back to BW since playing WoL, it amazes me how unbelievably frustrating BW is. Yea, it takes significantly more skill (solely due to an absolutely terrible UI by today's standards), but it's all just frustrating crap that makes me want to gouge out by eyeballs - I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction. I for one am glad that the archaic crap is gone - it leaves more room for skill to develop based on actual strategy/doing things instead of managing a terrible UI. Granted, WoL isn't there yet and definitely doesn't take as much skill as BW, but games need to evolve and not rely on meticulous, boring tasks in order to have a higher skill ceiling. WoL is (trying to) take us in that direction.


But you complained about that...
The ramp is suppose to be a strategic location that you defend. You would never a-move up a ramp in sc1 because stuff would glitch out and you would lose units. That's part of the strategy of BW
.
It's not that we don't want improved unit pathing, its that the ramp is no longer a very strategic point on the map. As long as you can see up the ramp, it provides almost no strategic positioning.


That isn't the issue at all. The issue is that in terms of game mechanics is it isn't nearly as destructive to A-move up a ramp - due to high ground advantage being much smaller than in BW, you can't punish people for trying to go up ramps as much. It has very little to do with the pathing. That "strategy" was just an incredibly annoying side-effect of the pathing.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
tyCe
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2542 Posts
June 09 2010 15:55 GMT
#18
I don't have anything to add to the topic since I think the posters before me have already provided very good reasons, but I'd just like to point out the maturity of the posts in this thread. Now I remember what I'm missing out on in the SC2 forums with all those Internet winners over there T_T

Oh, I would like to point out that the pathing in SC1 exaggerated the mobility discrepancies between the races. I loved it
Betrayed by EG.BuK
D-Lite
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United Kingdom223 Posts
June 09 2010 15:57 GMT
#19
ill leave it at this, its pretty clear people think im complaining about something when i actually stated in the OP im not complaining about anything at all, just high lighting an issue a bw newbie such as my self has noticed, and why there really isnt that much information on it.

id just like to say thanks to the people who input relevant information and provided theorys/answers

and id like to say to the ignorant few, please read posts before you jump in with your 2 cents

and yeah faction123, drop ship play is something i really admire in broodwar by pro's, it amazes me how they can act so fast and so controlled
Real men proxygate
VIB
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
Brazil3567 Posts
June 09 2010 16:47 GMT
#20
On June 09 2010 23:13 samachking wrote:
The only reason units in BW dont clump is because they occupy a 2D space with a set amount of pixels instead of a 3d space hence limiting the amount of stuff that can pass through in a certain time.
This is 100% wrong, the colision detection in sc2 is just as 2d as in BW. SC2 is a 2d game displayed in 3 dimensions, the gameplay is still 100% 2d.

The pathfinding logic used in sc2 is exactly the same as the one used in BW. Which is also exactly the same used of pretty much any other game that ever existed. Pathfinding is a very known science that any average computer science student knows of. There aren't much new tricks to how it's made in the last decades.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathfinding

The pathing in WC3 and SC2 only feels smoother than the one in BW because the calculations are done faster. Pathfinding is a very CPU intensive process and it's what games spend most of their processing time doing. Since at the time BW launched the computers were slower, if Blizzard pushed too much into the pathfinding the game would slow down. So they simply made units look for new paths less often and used less "pixels" (known as threads) to calculate paths. So computers of 10 years ago wouldn't crash.

In SC2 and WC3, since computers are now faster, Blizzard just made units recalculate more often and use more threads to calculate it. Since now computers can handle it. Other than that, the system is exactly the same. The only difference between BW and SC2 pathing is that SC2 is faster. Nothing else. All those dragoons getting blocked in ramps are just symptoms of units not re-calculating their paths more often into smaller threads.
Great people talk about ideas. Average people talk about things. Small people talk about other people.
Misrah
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States1695 Posts
June 09 2010 17:05 GMT
#21
for those players thinking that the tremendous amount of skill needed to play BW is figuring out unit pathing- your wrong.

SCBW has a less sophisticated than SC2 or other newer rts, but to say that unit pathing defines BW is grossly inaccurate. Doing so is an extremely obtuse view of the game imo.
A thread vaguely bashing SC2? SWARM ON, LOW POST COUNT BRETHREN! DEFEND THE GLORIOUS GAME THAT IS OUR LIVELIHOOD
Mylin
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden177 Posts
June 09 2010 17:29 GMT
#22
On June 10 2010 02:05 Misrah wrote:
for those players thinking that the tremendous amount of skill needed to play BW is figuring out unit pathing- your wrong.

SCBW has a less sophisticated than SC2 or other newer rts, but to say that unit pathing defines BW is grossly inaccurate. Doing so is an extremely obtuse view of the game imo.


Noone said that but it's one of many things that together adds up to increase the skill ceiling.
no
Xenocide_Knight
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Korea (South)2625 Posts
June 09 2010 17:40 GMT
#23
On June 09 2010 22:46 D-Lite wrote:
on the other hand my unit control in sc2 is (id like to think) above average, dont get me wrong, i dont have a gripe with the entire bw control system, i actually appreciate watching good players even more now that i know what it entails to even move your units around the map.


So what, you can kite?

I hate the sc2 unit pathing. At least in Broodwar, units moved in a line. Like a parade. And who doesn't like a parade? But in sc2, units are just like, "hey we need to move from point A to point B. I know! let's have an orgy on the way. wooo"

All the ground units in sc2 are men.
sc2 unit pathing is gay
Shine[Kal] #1 fan
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4835 Posts
June 09 2010 17:44 GMT
#24
I find it much easier to make my units do what I want in SC1. It's easier to create arcs when the units string out. It's easier to position units when they don't shove each other around. It's easier to select units when they actually occupy the space they're drawn in. (Bizarrely, it's air units that try to maintain a respectful distance from each other, even though they don't take up space...)

I think 1a or 1a2a syndrome is harder to break in SC2 (people did it in SC1, it was just 1a2a3a and maybe 4a) because it's actually harder to separate and position your units.
My strategy is to fork people.
HumanGod
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada24 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-09 18:03:29
June 09 2010 18:01 GMT
#25
rule 1

dumber units = smarter players

welcome to SC
wake up or get woke up
samachking
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Bahrain4949 Posts
June 09 2010 19:47 GMT
#26
On June 10 2010 01:47 VIB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2010 23:13 samachking wrote:
The only reason units in BW dont clump is because they occupy a 2D space with a set amount of pixels instead of a 3d space hence limiting the amount of stuff that can pass through in a certain time.
This is 100% wrong, the colision detection in sc2 is just as 2d as in BW. SC2 is a 2d game displayed in 3 dimensions, the gameplay is still 100% 2d.

The pathfinding logic used in sc2 is exactly the same as the one used in BW. Which is also exactly the same used of pretty much any other game that ever existed. Pathfinding is a very known science that any average computer science student knows of. There aren't much new tricks to how it's made in the last decades.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathfinding

The pathing in WC3 and SC2 only feels smoother than the one in BW because the calculations are done faster. Pathfinding is a very CPU intensive process and it's what games spend most of their processing time doing. Since at the time BW launched the computers were slower, if Blizzard pushed too much into the pathfinding the game would slow down. So they simply made units look for new paths less often and used less "pixels" (known as threads) to calculate paths. So computers of 10 years ago wouldn't crash.

In SC2 and WC3, since computers are now faster, Blizzard just made units recalculate more often and use more threads to calculate it. Since now computers can handle it. Other than that, the system is exactly the same. The only difference between BW and SC2 pathing is that SC2 is faster. Nothing else. All those dragoons getting blocked in ramps are just symptoms of units not re-calculating their paths more often into smaller threads.


Thanks for the correction and really informative post ^__^. I felt the pathing was similar in both games, but I thought it was due to the 2d spacing rather than the computer calculating pathways, thanks for the correction, I guess this makes sense. But again units in BW still felt like they clumped less( despite clumping i.e moving unseiged tanks) in comparison to SC2 units because they took up more space in general, but I guess pathways work for both, but it's messed up at BW ramps or weird places due to pathfinding I suppose.
"And then Earthlings discovered tools. Suddenly agreeing with friends could be a form of suicide or worse. But agreements went on, not for the sake of common sense, or decency, or self preservation, but for friendliness."
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
June 09 2010 20:53 GMT
#27
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?
Writerptrk
SuperJongMan
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Jamaica11586 Posts
June 09 2010 21:18 GMT
#28
Learn to balance move and a-move. Noobs!
POWER OVERWHELMING ! ! ! KRUU~ KRUU~
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-09 22:07:05
June 09 2010 22:06 GMT
#29
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
faction123
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia949 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-09 22:14:01
June 09 2010 22:12 GMT
#30
On June 10 2010 07:06 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.



but with proper control you can make them seamlessly move across, if you a move them yeah of course some are gonna stop in the middle to attack andblock the path of the others and cause them to try to find another way around, but obviously the solution is to manually control your units which is just one of the many reasons bw is an amazingly skillful game vs sc2
NA Legend - stream: http://twitch.tv/faction60
cloudica
Profile Joined May 2009
England43 Posts
June 09 2010 22:44 GMT
#31
The pathfinding logic used in sc2 is exactly the same as the one used in BW. Which is also exactly the same used of pretty much any other game that ever existed. Pathfinding is a very known science that any average computer science student knows of. There aren't much new tricks to how it's made in the last decades.


Not true - flowfield pathing is pretty new and only recent games use it (SupCom may have been the first - please correct me if I'm wrong). That didn't exist back in 1998. Like you say - it wouldn't be possible on decade old computers.

This demonstrates the difference pretty well:
+ Show Spoiler +


Pathing feels different in SC2 because it's done differently. Collision detection is only a small part of it; collision avoidance has a higher priority when it comes to pathing (Brood War basically didn't have any ).

If you tried this in brood war you would be waiting for a very long time:
+ Show Spoiler +

Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
June 09 2010 23:41 GMT
#32
On June 10 2010 07:12 faction123 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 07:06 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.



but with proper control you can make them seamlessly move across, if you a move them yeah of course some are gonna stop in the middle to attack andblock the path of the others and cause them to try to find another way around, but obviously the solution is to manually control your units which is just one of the many reasons bw is an amazingly skillful game vs sc2


The problem is that the thing that causes the game to require more skill is simply old and outdated programming that's frustrating. It's a terrible design philosophy to have to rely on archaic UI's in order to force the skill ceiling higher. Games should be evolving to make the skill ceiling raise with deeper strategic thinking and more interesting and complicated tasks. It shouldn't rely on bugs and a crappy UI.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4835 Posts
June 09 2010 23:54 GMT
#33
It's hard for a large group to move through a narrow passage, and often requires someone directing the flow of traffic if you want it to happen quickly. I dunno why it's unfair and 'outdated programming' for the game to reflect that truth.
My strategy is to fork people.
shalafi
Profile Joined July 2008
394 Posts
June 09 2010 23:54 GMT
#34
On June 10 2010 08:41 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 07:12 faction123 wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:06 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.



but with proper control you can make them seamlessly move across, if you a move them yeah of course some are gonna stop in the middle to attack andblock the path of the others and cause them to try to find another way around, but obviously the solution is to manually control your units which is just one of the many reasons bw is an amazingly skillful game vs sc2


The problem is that the thing that causes the game to require more skill is simply old and outdated programming that's frustrating. It's a terrible design philosophy to have to rely on archaic UI's in order to force the skill ceiling higher. Games should be evolving to make the skill ceiling raise with deeper strategic thinking and more interesting and complicated tasks. It shouldn't rely on bugs and a crappy UI.


So you think the macro mechanics should be removed? (Or at least, allow more options, like autocast)
USn
Profile Joined March 2010
United States376 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-10 00:18:27
June 10 2010 00:09 GMT
#35
On June 10 2010 08:54 Severedevil wrote:
It's hard for a large group to move through a narrow passage, and often requires someone directing the flow of traffic if you want it to happen quickly. I dunno why it's unfair and 'outdated programming' for the game to reflect that truth.


It's also really hard to shoot flesheating bouncing worms at people.

Trotting something like the realism argument out brings the level of the forum down.
Lexpar
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
1813 Posts
June 10 2010 00:10 GMT
#36
Pathing is fine in broodwar. As loads of people have already stated, it's the fact the broodwar is hard to play that makes it fun.
Prototype
Profile Joined November 2009
Sweden56 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-10 00:19:39
June 10 2010 00:17 GMT
#37
On June 10 2010 07:44 cloudica wrote:
Show nested quote +
The pathfinding logic used in sc2 is exactly the same as the one used in BW. Which is also exactly the same used of pretty much any other game that ever existed. Pathfinding is a very known science that any average computer science student knows of. There aren't much new tricks to how it's made in the last decades.


Not true - flowfield pathing is pretty new and only recent games use it (SupCom may have been the first - please correct me if I'm wrong). That didn't exist back in 1998. Like you say - it wouldn't be possible on decade old computers.

This demonstrates the difference pretty well:
+ Show Spoiler +
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tGEDppMsHk


Pathing feels different in SC2 because it's done differently. Collision detection is only a small part of it; collision avoidance has a higher priority when it comes to pathing (Brood War basically didn't have any ).

If you tried this in brood war you would be waiting for a very long time:
+ Show Spoiler +
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukmd3-C92ic


Indeed. The pathing ai of BW considers other units as simple obstructions, no different from static terrain or dodads. Each unit does not consider the movements of other units, hence why they make no effort to 'unblock' ramps and chokepoints.

This problem is 'fixed' in SC2, however it is also worth noting that units will in fact 'artifically' clump (more than in BW) as their normal bounding boxes are actually compromised when they move (as can be seen in the video).
"Do we live to play, or do we play to live?"
QibingZero
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
2611 Posts
June 10 2010 00:17 GMT
#38
I would really love a nice balance between BW's 'wtf are my dragoons doing' and SC2's ridiculous unit bunching. =/
Oh, my eSports
FlameSworD
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States414 Posts
June 10 2010 00:49 GMT
#39
cant believe you posted sumperme commander 2 rofl it looks so dumb
skyhighftw on iccup
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-10 00:55:47
June 10 2010 00:53 GMT
#40
On June 10 2010 04:47 samachking wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 01:47 VIB wrote:
On June 09 2010 23:13 samachking wrote:
The only reason units in BW dont clump is because they occupy a 2D space with a set amount of pixels instead of a 3d space hence limiting the amount of stuff that can pass through in a certain time.
This is 100% wrong, the colision detection in sc2 is just as 2d as in BW. SC2 is a 2d game displayed in 3 dimensions, the gameplay is still 100% 2d.

The pathfinding logic used in sc2 is exactly the same as the one used in BW. Which is also exactly the same used of pretty much any other game that ever existed. Pathfinding is a very known science that any average computer science student knows of. There aren't much new tricks to how it's made in the last decades.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathfinding

The pathing in WC3 and SC2 only feels smoother than the one in BW because the calculations are done faster. Pathfinding is a very CPU intensive process and it's what games spend most of their processing time doing. Since at the time BW launched the computers were slower, if Blizzard pushed too much into the pathfinding the game would slow down. So they simply made units look for new paths less often and used less "pixels" (known as threads) to calculate paths. So computers of 10 years ago wouldn't crash.

In SC2 and WC3, since computers are now faster, Blizzard just made units recalculate more often and use more threads to calculate it. Since now computers can handle it. Other than that, the system is exactly the same. The only difference between BW and SC2 pathing is that SC2 is faster. Nothing else. All those dragoons getting blocked in ramps are just symptoms of units not re-calculating their paths more often into smaller threads.


Thanks for the correction and really informative post ^__^. I felt the pathing was similar in both games, but I thought it was due to the 2d spacing rather than the computer calculating pathways, thanks for the correction, I guess this makes sense. But again units in BW still felt like they clumped less( despite clumping i.e moving unseiged tanks) in comparison to SC2 units because they took up more space in general, but I guess pathways work for both, but it's messed up at BW ramps or weird places due to pathfinding I suppose.

The beautiful thing about SC1 is that you can force your units to recalculate their path as many times as you want just by spam clicking. It even works if you put move commands in a que (good for getting a big fat tank through your scvs or whatever).

Anyway, thanks OP for your beta testing of SC:BW. It's just kind of 10 years too late. Take a look at the system requirements on the side of you SC Box. Do you see the Operating System called Windows 95? You may have never heard of it, but that's what SC was designed to run on.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
sc4k
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United Kingdom5454 Posts
June 10 2010 01:16 GMT
#41
Lol D-Lite is my IRL nickname . Hi op ^-^. On topic, agree with your points.
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
June 10 2010 01:16 GMT
#42
On June 10 2010 08:54 shalafi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 08:41 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:12 faction123 wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:06 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.



but with proper control you can make them seamlessly move across, if you a move them yeah of course some are gonna stop in the middle to attack andblock the path of the others and cause them to try to find another way around, but obviously the solution is to manually control your units which is just one of the many reasons bw is an amazingly skillful game vs sc2


The problem is that the thing that causes the game to require more skill is simply old and outdated programming that's frustrating. It's a terrible design philosophy to have to rely on archaic UI's in order to force the skill ceiling higher. Games should be evolving to make the skill ceiling raise with deeper strategic thinking and more interesting and complicated tasks. It shouldn't rely on bugs and a crappy UI.


So you think the macro mechanics should be removed? (Or at least, allow more options, like autocast)


Not at all, and I've been a big supporter of keeping the macro game intact. However, we shouldn't purposely rely on an old UI and bugs to keep that high skill ceiling in - we should be pushing for developers to fix these annoyances and come up with new and interesting things to add depth to the game. BW is a great game and undoubtedly the best RTS/best competitive video game ever, but I don't think it's a great game because of the shitty UI and bugs. I find that the ridiculously high skill ceiling is an unintended side-effect of these frustrating features and we should work to improve and find better ways to challenge gamers mechanically.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
HumanGod
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada24 Posts
June 10 2010 04:05 GMT
#43
are you people retarded, its not old its not crappy, its just basic and simple. Like any game that requires skill. There just isn't much to it except playing the game and figuring out what works best for yourself.
wake up or get woke up
hellokitty[hk]
Profile Joined June 2009
United States1309 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-10 04:27:29
June 10 2010 04:27 GMT
#44
On June 09 2010 22:46 D-Lite wrote:
i have a feeling im going to have alot of people telling me to stfu because of this post

People are imbeciles, lucky thing god made cats.
faction123
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia949 Posts
June 10 2010 04:28 GMT
#45
On June 10 2010 08:41 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 07:12 faction123 wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:06 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.



but with proper control you can make them seamlessly move across, if you a move them yeah of course some are gonna stop in the middle to attack andblock the path of the others and cause them to try to find another way around, but obviously the solution is to manually control your units which is just one of the many reasons bw is an amazingly skillful game vs sc2


The problem is that the thing that causes the game to require more skill is simply old and outdated programming that's frustrating. It's a terrible design philosophy to have to rely on archaic UI's in order to force the skill ceiling higher. Games should be evolving to make the skill ceiling raise with deeper strategic thinking and more interesting and complicated tasks. It shouldn't rely on bugs and a crappy UI.



SC didn't rely on archaic AI's to make the skill ceiling higher because it was made in 1998. Of course if a developer released an RTS that purposefully limited itself instead of fully utilizing 12 years of advances they'd be retarded, no ones stating otherwise.
NA Legend - stream: http://twitch.tv/faction60
AaronEB
Profile Joined May 2010
United States76 Posts
June 10 2010 04:28 GMT
#46
surprised this topic hasn't died yet. I think its pretty much agreed that the pathing is (at this point) just another obstacle to overcome.
I'm pretty sure that if you a drink for everything Day[9] says bejewjaler and baller you will get alcohol poisoning.
xOchievax
Profile Joined April 2010
United States69 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-10 04:51:53
June 10 2010 04:47 GMT
#47
I dont like it when people call the BW unit behavior a terrible bug, or accuse it of having a "crippled" interface because in reality it just doesnt do as much for you as games like WC3 or SC2. As many have already said, the difficulty in BW of controling your units and workers while simultaneously keeping your other mechanics up is tremendous compared to SC2 because units are much better at going where you tell them to without you issuing multiple commands just to get those dragoons moving to the low ground.

One thing to think about is exacty how much of the game would idealy be automated and how much should be manual. In order to give a definite answer you have to specify what the priorities of the game are. If you wanted to make the skill cap as high as you possibly could then the game might involve you sending every single worker back and forth while they mine instead of an automated system. This would be so increadably difficult that only the absolute best could get anywhere close to an efficient game. In fact the skill cap would be soo high that the majority of the market would be effectively incapable of having fun playing the game due to its lack of user friendliness.

Now on the other side of the spectrum a game totally designed to be as user friendly as possible would allow any player to play the game compotently right from when they learn the basics by eliminating the difficulty by making much of the mentally challenging multitasking automatic. This game might have autocast worker production and automatic army formation (units form up in a logical formation automatically). It might also lower the damages of units just enough that the new gamer will have time to back out if they realize the battle has become unfavorable or a counter has been played. Lastly the game would probably reduce the player's ability to harass the enemy, as such a thing can overwhelm a new player, and make it too stressfull.

Neither of these games would technically be worse than the other. They both just have their own goals in mind. Starcraft BW is closer to the first game presented while Starcraft 2 is closer to the second. Saying one of the two is "better" than the other is incorrect when the goals under which they are made are different. Which game you like is a matter of personal preference.

I personally perfer BW, and love it's difficulty even if im not that good.
buhhy
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1113 Posts
June 10 2010 13:25 GMT
#48
On June 10 2010 13:28 AaronEB wrote:
surprised this topic hasn't died yet. I think its pretty much agreed that the pathing is (at this point) just another obstacle to overcome.


Not quite... would you consider fitness an obstacle to overcome when playing basketball?
HumanGod
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada24 Posts
June 10 2010 15:06 GMT
#49
PRECISELY WHAT BUHHY said.
wake up or get woke up
shalafi
Profile Joined July 2008
394 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-10 17:07:59
June 10 2010 17:05 GMT
#50
On June 10 2010 10:16 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 08:54 shalafi wrote:
On June 10 2010 08:41 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:12 faction123 wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:06 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.



but with proper control you can make them seamlessly move across, if you a move them yeah of course some are gonna stop in the middle to attack andblock the path of the others and cause them to try to find another way around, but obviously the solution is to manually control your units which is just one of the many reasons bw is an amazingly skillful game vs sc2


The problem is that the thing that causes the game to require more skill is simply old and outdated programming that's frustrating. It's a terrible design philosophy to have to rely on archaic UI's in order to force the skill ceiling higher. Games should be evolving to make the skill ceiling raise with deeper strategic thinking and more interesting and complicated tasks. It shouldn't rely on bugs and a crappy UI.


So you think the macro mechanics should be removed? (Or at least, allow more options, like autocast)


Not at all, and I've been a big supporter of keeping the macro game intact. However, we shouldn't purposely rely on an old UI and bugs to keep that high skill ceiling in - we should be pushing for developers to fix these annoyances and come up with new and interesting things to add depth to the game. BW is a great game and undoubtedly the best RTS/best competitive video game ever, but I don't think it's a great game because of the shitty UI and bugs. I find that the ridiculously high skill ceiling is an unintended side-effect of these frustrating features and we should work to improve and find better ways to challenge gamers mechanically.



Do you know that they removed UI features from SC2 to make it more challenging? Namely, the wireframe-casting?Do you think that was a right decision?
Subversive
Profile Joined October 2009
Australia2229 Posts
June 10 2010 18:04 GMT
#51
On June 09 2010 23:08 slowmanrunning wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2010 22:54 faction123 wrote:
broodwar isn't a better game than sc2 but the way things worked out with how bad alot of features are (12 unit selection limit, tons of bugs that greatly increased the skillcap, unit pathing being so bad etc) due to the fact the game was made 50 years ago, it's amazing to watch/play and requires ungodly amounts of skill. If you're not ready to guide your dragoons every step of the way on anything that isn't a completely open field then too bad, because for the people who can do it while still managing everything else it's extremely rewarding. I would not call SC2 "dumbed down", and the best player still wins 95% of the time in SC2, just like BW, but due to the massive interface improvements (which are great, and i'm not bashing them) it's no doubt a far easier game than broodwar. Using skill to get around the archaic interface, pathing issues etc are the reasons BW is such a great game and thats why we're able to watch korean players in total awe.

this.

Yup. This pretty much sums it all up.
#1 Great fan ~ // Khan // FlaSh // JangBi // EffOrt //
arb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Noobville17920 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-10 18:13:57
June 10 2010 18:12 GMT
#52
Basically what im getting from the OP is,

1. Started as a War3 Player.
2. Moved onto SC2 with its nice unit pathing and very few movement problems.
3. Decides to play SC:BW
4. Gets to bw and doesnt like having to do things himself.
5. Creates a thread on TL complaining about it
6. ????
7. profit.

Thats just me though, SC1 is soooo superior cause of the bugs and bad AI its not even funny, yeah you have to do stuff yourself but big fucking deal, id ont like the ai making my shit mine for me, i dont like it showing my idle workers and as such making me into a lazy bastard, i dont like how it takes no skill to fill an entire screen with a spell,I dont like my units moving in a big sex ball or any of that either but hey man thats just me.
Artillery spawned from the forges of Hell
TheNikeYork
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States389 Posts
June 10 2010 18:13 GMT
#53
On June 11 2010 03:12 arb wrote:
Basically what im getting from the OP is,

1. Started as a War3 Player.
2. Moved onto SC2 with its nice unit pathing and very few movement problems.
3. Decides to play SC:BW
4. Gets to bw and doesnt like having to do things himself.
5. Creates a thread on TL complaining about it
6. ????
7. profit.

Thats just me though, SC1 is soooo superior cause of the bugs and bad AI its not even funny, yeah you have to do stuff yourself but big fucking deal, id ont like the ai making my shit mine for me, i dont like it showing my idle workers and as such making me into a lazy bastard, i dont like how it takes no skill to fill an entire screen with a spell, but hey man thats just me.


Notice where this man is from, gentlemen. Please be kind to him.
Everyone knows cucumbers have terrible souls
buhhy
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1113 Posts
June 10 2010 18:16 GMT
#54
On June 11 2010 03:12 arb wrote:
Basically what im getting from the OP is,

1. Started as a War3 Player.
2. Moved onto SC2 with its nice unit pathing and very few movement problems.
3. Decides to play SC:BW
4. Gets to bw and doesnt like having to do things himself.
5. Creates a thread on TL complaining about it
6. ????
7. profit.

Thats just me though, SC1 is soooo superior cause of the bugs and bad AI its not even funny, yeah you have to do stuff yourself but big fucking deal, id ont like the ai making my shit mine for me, i dont like it showing my idle workers and as such making me into a lazy bastard, i dont like how it takes no skill to fill an entire screen with a spell, but hey man thats just me.


Haha yeah... though I do believe the SC UI can be improved, like a higher resolution, better pathfinding AI (search through more paths) and maybe increased unit selection based on race or supply.
Roffles *
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Pitcairn19291 Posts
June 10 2010 18:20 GMT
#55
Rofl, Noobville. Poor Empyrean and Arb. =(

But Arb makes legitimate claims, cause SC2 has pretty much been dumbed down to where the AI can handle much for you, making it much easier to play. Because units don't clump as well, it takes more time to move them into advantageous positions simply because they don't clump into a big ball that you can move up a ramp in less than like 3 seconds. I wouldn't say BW unit pathing is necessarily a bug or something, just a slight flaw that helps distinguish between a good multitasker and a not so experienced player. But in SC2, it's hard to see that skill gap.

Btw, goons and goliaths are still the dumbest units alive.
God Bless
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
June 10 2010 20:15 GMT
#56
On June 11 2010 02:05 shalafi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2010 10:16 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 08:54 shalafi wrote:
On June 10 2010 08:41 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:12 faction123 wrote:
On June 10 2010 07:06 Stratos_speAr wrote:
On June 10 2010 05:53 ArvickHero wrote:
On June 10 2010 00:50 Stratos_speAr wrote:
I really don't see how people enjoy telling their Dragoon to walk across a bridge and then watching it walk literally in the opposite direction.

...What the hell have you been doing?


If you tell a bunch of Dragoons to move across a small bridge, some will inevitably walk the opposite direction for a certain amount of time because they tried to find a new path due to the fact that other Dragoons block their path. They'll walk a different direction for a certain amount of time before turning around again and actually walking across the bridge. It's the same with ramps and small chokes.



but with proper control you can make them seamlessly move across, if you a move them yeah of course some are gonna stop in the middle to attack andblock the path of the others and cause them to try to find another way around, but obviously the solution is to manually control your units which is just one of the many reasons bw is an amazingly skillful game vs sc2


The problem is that the thing that causes the game to require more skill is simply old and outdated programming that's frustrating. It's a terrible design philosophy to have to rely on archaic UI's in order to force the skill ceiling higher. Games should be evolving to make the skill ceiling raise with deeper strategic thinking and more interesting and complicated tasks. It shouldn't rely on bugs and a crappy UI.


So you think the macro mechanics should be removed? (Or at least, allow more options, like autocast)


Not at all, and I've been a big supporter of keeping the macro game intact. However, we shouldn't purposely rely on an old UI and bugs to keep that high skill ceiling in - we should be pushing for developers to fix these annoyances and come up with new and interesting things to add depth to the game. BW is a great game and undoubtedly the best RTS/best competitive video game ever, but I don't think it's a great game because of the shitty UI and bugs. I find that the ridiculously high skill ceiling is an unintended side-effect of these frustrating features and we should work to improve and find better ways to challenge gamers mechanically.



Do you know that they removed UI features from SC2 to make it more challenging? Namely, the wireframe-casting?Do you think that was a right decision?



All-or-nothing is a pretty bad logical fallacy to rely on. Just because I think we should add some things doesn't mean I think we should add everything under the sun.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
arb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Noobville17920 Posts
June 11 2010 00:18 GMT
#57
On June 11 2010 03:20 Roffles wrote:
Rofl, Noobville. Poor Empyrean and Arb. =(

But Arb makes legitimate claims, cause SC2 has pretty much been dumbed down to where the AI can handle much for you, making it much easier to play. Because units don't clump as well, it takes more time to move them into advantageous positions simply because they don't clump into a big ball that you can move up a ramp in less than like 3 seconds. I wouldn't say BW unit pathing is necessarily a bug or something, just a slight flaw that helps distinguish between a good multitasker and a not so experienced player. But in SC2, it's hard to see that skill gap.

Btw, goons and goliaths are still the dumbest units alive.

well i didnt mean to imply it was a bug but yeah..it is verrrry buggy at times, but its what makes the game amazing.

as for bugs, you ever tried to move stuff up a ramp and it all starts getting stacked and messing up?
Artillery spawned from the forges of Hell
clickrush
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Switzerland3257 Posts
June 11 2010 14:17 GMT
#58
besides the bad pathing (which is a flaw in my book) the magic boxes are bigger in bw (which is better).
oGsMC: Zealot defense, Stalker attack, Sentry forcefieldu forcefieldu, Marauder die die
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-13 01:19:53
June 13 2010 01:15 GMT
#59
The reason the BW pathfinding is "better" is exactly because of the baby sitting element. Focusing on what your army is doing should directly correlate to how effective your army is. Just look at Effort vs Flash, Effort capitalised on Flash's un-attended marines by flanking and contributed a lot to winning the game, this would be a completely different story in SC2 because the marines would remain in a ball.

The other thing is magic boxing, in BW I could micro my dragoons in magic boxes against tanks to avoid splash damage, I can't do this in SC2 they just ball up. In fact it is much harder for good players to spread their units out like in BW.

So the new AI makes it easier for bad players who just A-move, but it makes it impossible for anyone better than that to actually do anything about it, and that makes for a less exciting game.

On June 10 2010 01:47 VIB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2010 23:13 samachking wrote:
The only reason units in BW dont clump is because they occupy a 2D space with a set amount of pixels instead of a 3d space hence limiting the amount of stuff that can pass through in a certain time.
This is 100% wrong, the colision detection in sc2 is just as 2d as in BW. SC2 is a 2d game displayed in 3 dimensions, the gameplay is still 100% 2d.

The pathfinding logic used in sc2 is exactly the same as the one used in BW. Which is also exactly the same used of pretty much any other game that ever existed. Pathfinding is a very known science that any average computer science student knows of. There aren't much new tricks to how it's made in the last decades.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathfinding

The pathing in WC3 and SC2 only feels smoother than the one in BW because the calculations are done faster. Pathfinding is a very CPU intensive process and it's what games spend most of their processing time doing. Since at the time BW launched the computers were slower, if Blizzard pushed too much into the pathfinding the game would slow down. So they simply made units look for new paths less often and used less "pixels" (known as threads) to calculate paths. So computers of 10 years ago wouldn't crash.

In SC2 and WC3, since computers are now faster, Blizzard just made units recalculate more often and use more threads to calculate it. Since now computers can handle it. Other than that, the system is exactly the same. The only difference between BW and SC2 pathing is that SC2 is faster. Nothing else. All those dragoons getting blocked in ramps are just symptoms of units not re-calculating their paths more often into smaller threads.


Its not exactly the same, SC2s pathfinding algorithm is a lot more advanced than SC1, but yes both still uses 2D collision detection. It is to do with processing power but also pathfinding AI knowledge of the time. Threading has nothing to do with pixels or pathing either, but it allows multi-core processors to process more things at once or asynchronously.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#33
PiGStarcraft546
CranKy Ducklings90
SteadfastSC66
rockletztv 45
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft546
RuFF_SC2 150
CosmosSc2 69
SteadfastSC 66
EnDerr 5
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 964
ZZZero.O 53
NaDa 38
Icarus 6
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm89
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2208
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang01068
PPMD44
Other Games
summit1g12410
tarik_tv12409
Day[9].tv1116
shahzam621
ViBE302
Maynarde218
Sick99
Trikslyr61
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1278
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 83
• OhrlRock 1
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 28
• Rasowy 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4735
Other Games
• Scarra2465
• Day9tv1116
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
8h 34m
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
9h 4m
Road to EWC
9h 4m
Online Event
14h 4m
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
HupCup
14h 4m
Road to EWC
15h 4m
Road to EWC
21h 4m
GSL Code S
1d 8h
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
Road to EWC
1d 9h
Online Event
1d 11h
[ Show More ]
Road to EWC
1d 15h
Road to EWC
1d 21h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
Road to EWC
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
Road to EWC
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Road to EWC
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Road to EWC
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 19
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
YSL S1
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.