• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:54
CET 12:54
KST 20:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners10Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!33$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship6[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win10
StarCraft 2
General
Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BW General Discussion [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1501 users

[MSL] Approximation of Game 3 in save file - Page 2

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
January 23 2010 23:36 GMT
#21
On January 24 2010 08:33 kNyTTyM wrote:
I've already accepted Flash lost. I still feel robbed of an epic series though.

So do I. This coming from a JD fanboy. We were all robbed.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
January 23 2010 23:39 GMT
#22
On January 24 2010 08:36 thopol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:33 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:32 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:30 jalstar wrote:
The actual "good arguments" have been ones relating to Kespa's unprofessionalism, whether it's right to ever award a game that's not over to someone (imo, no), and what the hell MBC was thinking in the first place with that stupid virtual studio.

Those aren't arguments. They're mostly just bitching.

Nobody liked how events turned out. That's not contentious, which is a feature that is mandatory to have arguments.


well that's why "good arguments" is in quotes, because everyone agrees, except for a few people saying the whole thing's fine and dandy because jaedong was ahead

I don't think that Kwark thought the series was fine and dandy. I don't think anyone did. I really think what he is doing is trying to illustrate to the wide world of noobs that Flash wasn't coming back from that. This issue has been irritatingly rampant, so why not applaud Kwark for working to dispel it.


Because Kwark is a dumbass for not realizing that giving a win to someone in any situation is terrible. A replay would have hurt Jaedong but it also would have been the fair thing to do, and the whole thing with Flash's dad and KT wouldn't have happened, leading to a fairer game 4.

Although there is no truly fair solution with the power going out, and whoever won regardless of what happened after that should get an asterisk next to the win.
jodogohoo
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada2533 Posts
January 23 2010 23:40 GMT
#23
rapidshit isn't working.
AoN.Warrior-350-
Profile Joined December 2008
United States147 Posts
January 23 2010 23:40 GMT
#24
This isnt about mbc/Kespa giving Jaedong the game.... its about the fact that Jaedong did deserve the win...
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43203 Posts
January 23 2010 23:42 GMT
#25
On January 24 2010 08:39 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:36 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:33 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:32 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:30 jalstar wrote:
The actual "good arguments" have been ones relating to Kespa's unprofessionalism, whether it's right to ever award a game that's not over to someone (imo, no), and what the hell MBC was thinking in the first place with that stupid virtual studio.

Those aren't arguments. They're mostly just bitching.

Nobody liked how events turned out. That's not contentious, which is a feature that is mandatory to have arguments.


well that's why "good arguments" is in quotes, because everyone agrees, except for a few people saying the whole thing's fine and dandy because jaedong was ahead

I don't think that Kwark thought the series was fine and dandy. I don't think anyone did. I really think what he is doing is trying to illustrate to the wide world of noobs that Flash wasn't coming back from that. This issue has been irritatingly rampant, so why not applaud Kwark for working to dispel it.


Because Kwark is a dumbass for not realizing that giving a win to someone in any situation is terrible. A replay would have hurt Jaedong but it also would have been the fair thing to do, and the whole thing with Flash's dad and KT wouldn't have happened, leading to a fairer game 4.

Although there is no truly fair solution with the power going out, and whoever won regardless of what happened after that should get an asterisk next to the win.

JaeDong didn't get given a win. He earned a win when he defended Flash's allin at 7 and won the game. Flash hadn't typed out yet but the game was over. The formality of the typing out is important and ideally I'd be all over that. But it's not so important as the denying of a clear cut victory in the MSL finals. And those are your options. Option 1, say "sorry Flash, I know you weren't planning to type out for another 20 seconds but that's the way it is". Option 2, say "sorry JaeDong, you gotta do over, better hope that build works twice lol".

The choice seems pretty clear cut to me.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
January 23 2010 23:42 GMT
#26
On January 24 2010 08:40 AoN.Warrior-350- wrote:
This isnt about mbc/Kespa giving Jaedong the game.... its about the fact that Jaedong did deserve the win...


In a smaller venue I would agree, since no one would want their time wasted with a rematch. But in a Flash vs Jaedong MSL finals? As a fan I wanted a Best of 5 with complete games all around. I don't think anyone would complain about another game of Flash vs Jaedong.
Suc
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Australia1569 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-23 23:44:06
January 23 2010 23:43 GMT
#27
You want to download the following file:

http://rapidshare.com/files/340058642/6.mlx | 238 KB

Currently a lot of users are downloading files. Please try again in 2 minutes or become a Premium member

Unfortunately right now our servers are overloaded and we have no more download slots left for non-members.
Deathfate
Profile Joined November 2008
Spain555 Posts
January 23 2010 23:43 GMT
#28
On January 24 2010 08:25 Mindcrime wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:19 KwarK wrote:
I'm not trying to recreate the game perfectly, I'm trying to demonstrate why Flash loses in that situation, no matter what.


What if he had a control group of bcs. We can't know he didn't, man. Maybe he did. This is flash we're talking about


He had his Science Facility lifted somewhere in the middle-right part of the map so that impossible.
Feel the power of the zerg swarm.
thopol
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Japan4560 Posts
January 23 2010 23:43 GMT
#29
On January 24 2010 08:39 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:36 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:33 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:32 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:30 jalstar wrote:
The actual "good arguments" have been ones relating to Kespa's unprofessionalism, whether it's right to ever award a game that's not over to someone (imo, no), and what the hell MBC was thinking in the first place with that stupid virtual studio.

Those aren't arguments. They're mostly just bitching.

Nobody liked how events turned out. That's not contentious, which is a feature that is mandatory to have arguments.


well that's why "good arguments" is in quotes, because everyone agrees, except for a few people saying the whole thing's fine and dandy because jaedong was ahead

I don't think that Kwark thought the series was fine and dandy. I don't think anyone did. I really think what he is doing is trying to illustrate to the wide world of noobs that Flash wasn't coming back from that. This issue has been irritatingly rampant, so why not applaud Kwark for working to dispel it.


Because Kwark is a dumbass for not realizing that giving a win to someone in any situation is terrible. A replay would have hurt Jaedong but it also would have been the fair thing to do, and the whole thing with Flash's dad and KT wouldn't have happened, leading to a fairer game 4.

Although there is no truly fair solution with the power going out, and whoever won regardless of what happened after that should get an asterisk next to the win.

Stooping to personal attacks hardly makes your rote, inciting, comments more convincing.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43203 Posts
January 23 2010 23:44 GMT
#30
On January 24 2010 08:40 jodogohoo wrote:
rapidshit isn't working.

[url blocked]
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
jalstar
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States8198 Posts
January 23 2010 23:44 GMT
#31
On January 24 2010 08:42 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:39 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:36 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:33 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:32 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:30 jalstar wrote:
The actual "good arguments" have been ones relating to Kespa's unprofessionalism, whether it's right to ever award a game that's not over to someone (imo, no), and what the hell MBC was thinking in the first place with that stupid virtual studio.

Those aren't arguments. They're mostly just bitching.

Nobody liked how events turned out. That's not contentious, which is a feature that is mandatory to have arguments.


well that's why "good arguments" is in quotes, because everyone agrees, except for a few people saying the whole thing's fine and dandy because jaedong was ahead

I don't think that Kwark thought the series was fine and dandy. I don't think anyone did. I really think what he is doing is trying to illustrate to the wide world of noobs that Flash wasn't coming back from that. This issue has been irritatingly rampant, so why not applaud Kwark for working to dispel it.


Because Kwark is a dumbass for not realizing that giving a win to someone in any situation is terrible. A replay would have hurt Jaedong but it also would have been the fair thing to do, and the whole thing with Flash's dad and KT wouldn't have happened, leading to a fairer game 4.

Although there is no truly fair solution with the power going out, and whoever won regardless of what happened after that should get an asterisk next to the win.

JaeDong didn't get given a win. He earned a win when he defended Flash's allin at 7 and won the game. Flash hadn't typed out yet but the game was over. The formality of the typing out is important and ideally I'd be all over that. But it's not so important as the denying of a clear cut victory in the MSL finals. And those are your options. Option 1, say "sorry Flash, I know you weren't planning to type out for another 20 seconds but that's the way it is". Option 2, say "sorry JaeDong, you gotta do over, better hope that build works twice lol".

The choice seems pretty clear cut to me.


Let him play on a proleague map then, you'd think that with WL coming up they have builds prepared for those.

To me, the formality is what's important because it's the FINALS. It should be uncontested, and leave us with an undisputed better player. That's not what we got, especially with game 4 being what it was.
Neos
Profile Joined June 2009
United States400 Posts
January 23 2010 23:45 GMT
#32
On January 24 2010 08:33 kNyTTyM wrote:
I've already accepted Flash lost. I still feel robbed of an epic series though.

Agreed, seeing that the 4th set could've been very different.
jodogohoo
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada2533 Posts
January 23 2010 23:46 GMT
#33
just upload to sharebee
Mindcrime
Profile Joined July 2004
United States6899 Posts
January 23 2010 23:46 GMT
#34
On January 24 2010 08:43 Battle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:25 Mindcrime wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:19 KwarK wrote:
I'm not trying to recreate the game perfectly, I'm trying to demonstrate why Flash loses in that situation, no matter what.


What if he had a control group of bcs. We can't know he didn't, man. Maybe he did. This is flash we're talking about


He had his Science Facility lifted somewhere in the middle-right part of the map so that impossible.


It's flash, man. He might have built another and left that one out there to throw jaedong off.
That wasn't any act of God. That was an act of pure human fuckery.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43203 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-01-23 23:48:23
January 23 2010 23:47 GMT
#35
On January 24 2010 08:44 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:42 KwarK wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:39 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:36 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:33 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:32 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:30 jalstar wrote:
The actual "good arguments" have been ones relating to Kespa's unprofessionalism, whether it's right to ever award a game that's not over to someone (imo, no), and what the hell MBC was thinking in the first place with that stupid virtual studio.

Those aren't arguments. They're mostly just bitching.

Nobody liked how events turned out. That's not contentious, which is a feature that is mandatory to have arguments.


well that's why "good arguments" is in quotes, because everyone agrees, except for a few people saying the whole thing's fine and dandy because jaedong was ahead

I don't think that Kwark thought the series was fine and dandy. I don't think anyone did. I really think what he is doing is trying to illustrate to the wide world of noobs that Flash wasn't coming back from that. This issue has been irritatingly rampant, so why not applaud Kwark for working to dispel it.


Because Kwark is a dumbass for not realizing that giving a win to someone in any situation is terrible. A replay would have hurt Jaedong but it also would have been the fair thing to do, and the whole thing with Flash's dad and KT wouldn't have happened, leading to a fairer game 4.

Although there is no truly fair solution with the power going out, and whoever won regardless of what happened after that should get an asterisk next to the win.

JaeDong didn't get given a win. He earned a win when he defended Flash's allin at 7 and won the game. Flash hadn't typed out yet but the game was over. The formality of the typing out is important and ideally I'd be all over that. But it's not so important as the denying of a clear cut victory in the MSL finals. And those are your options. Option 1, say "sorry Flash, I know you weren't planning to type out for another 20 seconds but that's the way it is". Option 2, say "sorry JaeDong, you gotta do over, better hope that build works twice lol".

The choice seems pretty clear cut to me.


Let him play on a proleague map then, you'd think that with WL coming up they have builds prepared for those.

To me, the formality is what's important because it's the FINALS. It should be uncontested, and leave us with an undisputed better player. That's not what we got, especially with game 4 being what it was.

You honestly think it'd be less contested if JD won a game in all but name (as he did in game 3) and then had it taken away? Really? Imagine if Flash won game 3 then JD won game 4 and Flash won game 5. Everyone would know that it should have been 3-1. There would still be no doubt that JD won the original game 3, just as there is no doubt about it now. The difference is that it cost him the series.

I don't get how you can say that in order to make the winner less disputed you should take away a win from a player. Someone had to get something. Flash getting a regame would be way more disputable (such as the 3-2 win situation I mentioned above) than this was.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
thopol
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Japan4560 Posts
January 23 2010 23:47 GMT
#36
On January 24 2010 08:44 jalstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:42 KwarK wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:39 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:36 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:33 jalstar wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:32 thopol wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:30 jalstar wrote:
The actual "good arguments" have been ones relating to Kespa's unprofessionalism, whether it's right to ever award a game that's not over to someone (imo, no), and what the hell MBC was thinking in the first place with that stupid virtual studio.

Those aren't arguments. They're mostly just bitching.

Nobody liked how events turned out. That's not contentious, which is a feature that is mandatory to have arguments.


well that's why "good arguments" is in quotes, because everyone agrees, except for a few people saying the whole thing's fine and dandy because jaedong was ahead

I don't think that Kwark thought the series was fine and dandy. I don't think anyone did. I really think what he is doing is trying to illustrate to the wide world of noobs that Flash wasn't coming back from that. This issue has been irritatingly rampant, so why not applaud Kwark for working to dispel it.


Because Kwark is a dumbass for not realizing that giving a win to someone in any situation is terrible. A replay would have hurt Jaedong but it also would have been the fair thing to do, and the whole thing with Flash's dad and KT wouldn't have happened, leading to a fairer game 4.

Although there is no truly fair solution with the power going out, and whoever won regardless of what happened after that should get an asterisk next to the win.

JaeDong didn't get given a win. He earned a win when he defended Flash's allin at 7 and won the game. Flash hadn't typed out yet but the game was over. The formality of the typing out is important and ideally I'd be all over that. But it's not so important as the denying of a clear cut victory in the MSL finals. And those are your options. Option 1, say "sorry Flash, I know you weren't planning to type out for another 20 seconds but that's the way it is". Option 2, say "sorry JaeDong, you gotta do over, better hope that build works twice lol".

The choice seems pretty clear cut to me.


Let him play on a proleague map then, you'd think that with WL coming up they have builds prepared for those.

To me, the formality is what's important because it's the FINALS. It should be uncontested, and leave us with an undisputed better player. That's not what we got, especially with game 4 being what it was.

Disputing game 3 is worthless. You finally have come around to making a comment that is relevant to this thread if interpreted a certain way. You frame it in a way that is totally irrelevant though, which is confusing.

Also, to suggest they play on a map for which they did not have the week of preparation is ludicrous. It boggles the mind how you would consider a spur of the moment rematch on a map that wasn't on the lineup would be more fair than awarding the game to the player who was winning by a vast margin.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
January 23 2010 23:47 GMT
#37
On January 24 2010 08:43 Battle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:25 Mindcrime wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:19 KwarK wrote:
I'm not trying to recreate the game perfectly, I'm trying to demonstrate why Flash loses in that situation, no matter what.


What if he had a control group of bcs. We can't know he didn't, man. Maybe he did. This is flash we're talking about


He had his Science Facility lifted somewhere in the middle-right part of the map so that impossible.

Its Flash we're talking about.

Nothing is impossible.
Amnesia
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3818 Posts
January 23 2010 23:48 GMT
#38
On January 24 2010 08:43 Battle wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2010 08:25 Mindcrime wrote:
On January 24 2010 08:19 KwarK wrote:
I'm not trying to recreate the game perfectly, I'm trying to demonstrate why Flash loses in that situation, no matter what.


What if he had a control group of bcs. We can't know he didn't, man. Maybe he did. This is flash we're talking about


He had his Science Facility lifted somewhere in the middle-right part of the map so that impossible.


WHAT IF HE HAD TWO HUH?
Foucault
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Sweden2826 Posts
January 23 2010 23:49 GMT
#39
What about possible dropships?
I know that deep inside of you there's a humongous set of testicles just waiting to pop out. Let 'em pop bro. //////////////////// AKA JensOfSweden // Lee Yoon Yeol forever.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
January 23 2010 23:49 GMT
#40
What about possible battlecruisers?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #140
CranKy Ducklings94
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 191
ProTech126
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 7395
Horang2 3581
GuemChi 3100
Jaedong 731
actioN 403
Larva 361
Soma 337
Mini 240
Stork 237
BeSt 221
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 157
Killer 151
Backho 113
ToSsGirL 91
Hyun 79
Rush 65
Mind 50
PianO 32
Sharp 25
Icarus 18
Bale 12
HiyA 12
soO 11
sorry 11
Sacsri 8
Terrorterran 7
Dota 2
Gorgc4675
singsing1652
XcaliburYe271
Counter-Strike
fl0m2320
zeus618
edward56
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor136
Other Games
B2W.Neo624
Sick332
XaKoH 121
Fuzer 101
nookyyy 28
MindelVK15
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL138
StarCraft 2
WardiTV28
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH158
• StrangeGG 65
• Dystopia_ 4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2318
• Stunt940
Upcoming Events
IPSL
6h 6m
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
LAN Event
6h 6m
Lambo vs Clem
Scarlett vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs TBD
Zoun vs TBD
BSL 21
8h 6m
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs OyAji
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
11h 6m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
22h 6m
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d
LAN Event
1d 3h
IPSL
1d 6h
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
1d 8h
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
1d 21h
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.