• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:13
CEST 20:13
KST 03:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues27LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers?
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
Is there English video for group selection for ASL [ASL20] Ro16 Group B [ASL20] Ro16 Group A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1465 users

The Mothership Core - Problems and Solutions

Blogs > Treehead
Post a Reply
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-28 12:18:08
September 28 2012 05:09 GMT
#1
The Mothership Core is, was and will be undoubtedly my favorite new addition to the protoss arsenal. It was created to be a potent unit for economy, for early-game defense, and for use in recalling slow pushes once they are overextended. Currently, it is doing 2 of 3 jobs pretty adequately. The main problems are surrounding it’s attack, which I would like to talk a little about, and then propose a solution to these problems.

Problem: The Mothership Core is currently being used offensively. This is not what was intended for the unit.

The current version of the Mothership Core can be very useful for attacking early. The main challenge of doing so is getting it across the board into an attacking position safely, but this is sometimes a moot point because there tends to be so much space along the sides of the map.

Its range 10 allows it to avoid difficulty with every early Terran Anti-Air when positioned over open space. They can snipe Turrets before the turret can fight back, and 1-shot 0 armor marines from range 10. This means that when positioned over opened space near an expansion, the MC can effectively stop mining until Vikings. Once Vikings are available, they do quite well in taking it down, though it takes several Vikings to take down a MC without losing anything (and once you’ve lose something, the MC has traded effectively).

Against Zerg, as Day9 has pointed out in one of his dailies, the early game use of the MC along with a 4-gate seems very difficult to stop – at a time when the only response zerg has to the MC is Queens (which it outranges and generally trades quite well against). Spore crawlers get the same treatment as turrets – they get killed out of range to be effective as anti-air.

In PvP, the ability to use a MC effectively does a couple things. First, it makes the ramp much less of an advantage (since you can’t deny vision with a flying unit around). This can be a big issue playing against blink builds (whose only issue in engaging is vision) which were previously spending 225/175 on one observer to provide a much more fragile form of vision (40 health vs. the 250 of the MC). This provides blink/obs builds the ability to ignore the obs and get 175/125 more to spend on units (detection aside, this makes blink pushes without detection much harder to stop, and executing blink rushes against DTs semi-autoloss… because PvP needed to be more about build order wins, right?). And then, of course, I’m sure there will be a 4-gate recall build on that winter map with the incredibly close air distances (maybe that map won’t make it, or something – pure speculation).

As you can see offensive MC usage, if you can get away with it poses problems in all matchups. Maybe given sufficiently astute play by your opponent you can’t, but that remains to be seen.

How did this happen? Pre-beta, the MC was a unit attached to a building. It didn’t move and therefore you couldn’t attack with it unless you proxied a Nexus (which is a bit much). So why is it being used so much and so offensively now? It’s mobility has changed, so that it can participate in fights in which it didn’t used to be able to participate.

Problem: The Mothership Core has issues with defending. Because its attack is available for only a short window of time – and the cost of using it is a recall or an energize (both of which are ridiculously better in terms of having more units with which to defend later).

One energize on a Nexus is generally 90 seconds of build time over the next three minutes. That’s a little more than 5 probes, (or about 150-200 resources per minute – not to mention about 225-300 resources if you’re able to harvest at the 30-40 rate as probes emerge). If you get your MC around 4 minutes, your first 100 energy will come at about 5:30. You don’t get 100 energy again until 8:30. By 10 minutes, if you used your first Energize on probes, you’re both mining optimally (somehow, haven’t tweak build order stuff yet, but just in theory) and you’re both still making probes, you’re a solid 450-600 resources ahead. That’s a lot of money – It’s a full Colossus or almost two Immortals.

Ok, we’ve established that Energize is good. Recall is good, too (at least worth the cost of the units you save with it, isn’t it?).

Hey, wait a minute, wasn’t I talking about Purify? Here’s the point I’m coming to about Purify. If you need Energy for Purify, you’re not getting one of these other effects – and for what? If you’re not way behind in army size, your opponent will turn tail and run once Purify hits the field – and during that time you get a few marines, maybe a couple marauders, a stalker or two (perhaps none if they have blink), perhaps more than one roach. See how bad that is at defense? Because you can’t force your enemy to stay (with a lot of FFs – and no Medivacs or burrow - or bad positioning on your opponent’s part) once he’s begun attacking. You get nice bursts of dps – but you can’t keep them around for it, so it just goes unused. And if it is high enough that you can cream an army hard enough to make using the ability worth it, what happens when you get it to the front lines and it can be used offensively? (Hint: scroll up a little bit.)

The point is that energy for an attacking mode is great for offense – but not that good for defense, especially if its duration is low.

My solution
There is undoubtedly more than one, but here’s what I’ve decided I like best. The reason it’s become so good offensively is because it’s mobile. The reason it’s so poor at defense is because its attack is so temporary. So what happens if we make the attack passive, and make the movement the part that’s tied to energy use. This has several effects.

1. We can provide the MC with bursts of mobility during defense. Short bursts of attack may be horrible for defending, but short bursts of mobility are great for it. Why else does everyone and their mother get blink near the beginning of a game if they suspect mutas or drop play?

2. The MC is always available for defending. Maybe it’s not a 45 damage/10 range super-cannon, but who’s going to be able to use it as that anyway – if everytime you turn it on an enemy can just decide to engage again 20 seconds later without the super-cannon available?

3. We can limit how much the MC is able to use its mobility by limiting the availability of its movement speed (through energy cost), and thereby eliminate the possibility of getting it across the map for a rush. If it takes the MC five minutes to get across the field on a map like Steppes of War – who cares if its good during the attack? On this note, you can make it worse during the attack, since its passive attack can have effectiveness of something like a photon cannon, rather than requiring a more potent attack due to its limited availability. Oh, and also, for all you zergies, they could also make it take long enough to get across the field for you to be able to have more anti-air available than hydras, or give it a short enough range to be susceptible to spores. This makes it much more defendable in a “rush” (if such thing is still allowed to occur).

4. This may have a slight “Energy tax” at the beginning of the game, in order to get it into defensive position once it emerges from the Nexus.

Example of Concept
Mothership Core
Cost: 50 minerals, 50 gas, 0 supply, 30 build time
Defense: 150 health, 100 shields, 1 armor
Sight: 14
Ground/Air Attack: 20
Cooldown: 1
Range: 7
Speed: 0

Abilities: Recall (as before), Energize (Range extended to 20 due to restricted mobility) and...
Psionic Thrust
Cost: 50 Energy
Description: Psionic Energy propels the motor-less core forward, granting it a movement speed of 1.0 for 10 seconds.

***
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 05:14 GMT
#2
If you like my solution, feel free to throw it up on the HotS Beta forums. I don't have a beta account and so cannot post there.
monk
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States8476 Posts
September 28 2012 05:28 GMT
#3
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.
Moderator
Jerubaal
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States7684 Posts
September 28 2012 05:36 GMT
#4
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.
I'm not stupid, a marauder just shot my brain.
GenesisX
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Canada4267 Posts
September 28 2012 06:00 GMT
#5
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.


MSC at least. MC is really really annoying since we already have a player after those initials
133 221 333 123 111
DRTnOOber
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
New Zealand476 Posts
September 28 2012 07:56 GMT
#6
I hereby declare it the "mcore".
But I'm off creep... and so I slow down, what are hellions doing here? I don't belong here...
RolleMcKnolle
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany1054 Posts
September 28 2012 08:35 GMT
#7
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.

I second this one. Seems appropriate
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 12:20 GMT
#8
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


I always liked MsC myself, but it seemed like I was the only one calling it that.

I edited into my example that normally the MC (MsC) would not have a movement speed, just to make sure it was clear. Anyone have anything they like/dislike about this idea? And is there any chance someone in the beta is going to reccomend this on the b.net beta forums?
SEA KarMa
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia452 Posts
September 28 2012 12:56 GMT
#9
mcore sounds better i reckon, people who are deficient with decoding antonyms have an easier time
"terrible, terrible damage". terrible, terrible design.
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
September 28 2012 13:22 GMT
#10
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.

At least they didn't give it mind control.
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
September 28 2012 15:55 GMT
#11
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.
User was warned for too many mimes.
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 16:34 GMT
#12
On September 29 2012 00:55 docvoc wrote:
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.


The rules in the beta are different than the rules upon release. We don't know how strong it is yet. We only know that it's a unit that is doing something it wasn't designed to do and isn't doing something it is designed to do - hence, since we still have time to change it before it goes live, why not?

Once it's released and requires a patch, once they say it's a finished product, there's a different level of "broken" which actually requires a fix.
neoghaleon55
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7435 Posts
September 28 2012 20:12 GMT
#13
Psionic Thrust

heh....
I'm getting a dirty image...

what?!
my favorite player is known as yadongking
lol
moo...for DRG
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Maestros of the Game
13:00
Playoffs - Round of 8
herO vs ZounLIVE!
ComeBackTV 1760
RotterdaM1120
PiGStarcraft457
IndyStarCraft 382
SteadfastSC253
CranKy Ducklings142
Rex119
EnkiAlexander 92
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1120
PiGStarcraft457
IndyStarCraft 382
SteadfastSC 253
Rex 119
MindelVK 26
JuggernautJason20
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16604
sSak 36
sas.Sziky 19
Dota 2
The International226749
Gorgc20616
Dendi1107
BananaSlamJamma193
PGG 54
Counter-Strike
flusha143
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu315
Other Games
tarik_tv28900
gofns21229
FrodaN1068
B2W.Neo473
Hui .198
KnowMe196
ToD177
ArmadaUGS117
Khaldor102
SortOf100
Trikslyr68
Mew2King54
NeuroSwarm40
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV723
BasetradeTV27
StarCraft 2
angryscii 13
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 23
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler118
League of Legends
• Jankos1882
Other Games
• imaqtpie698
• Shiphtur225
Upcoming Events
BSL Team Wars
47m
Afreeca Starleague
15h 47m
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
16h 47m
OSC
1d 5h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 15h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 15h
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
BSL Team Wars
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.