• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:20
CEST 10:20
KST 17:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers15Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid24
StarCraft 2
General
Maestros of the Game 2 announced 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
INu's Battles#14 <BO.9 2Matches> 2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Data needed ASL21 Strategy, Pimpest Plays Discussions Pros React To: ASL S21, Ro.16 Group C BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro16 Group D Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL21] Ro16 Group C Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Dawn of War IV Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1557 users

The Mothership Core - Problems and Solutions

Blogs > Treehead
Post a Reply
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-28 12:18:08
September 28 2012 05:09 GMT
#1
The Mothership Core is, was and will be undoubtedly my favorite new addition to the protoss arsenal. It was created to be a potent unit for economy, for early-game defense, and for use in recalling slow pushes once they are overextended. Currently, it is doing 2 of 3 jobs pretty adequately. The main problems are surrounding it’s attack, which I would like to talk a little about, and then propose a solution to these problems.

Problem: The Mothership Core is currently being used offensively. This is not what was intended for the unit.

The current version of the Mothership Core can be very useful for attacking early. The main challenge of doing so is getting it across the board into an attacking position safely, but this is sometimes a moot point because there tends to be so much space along the sides of the map.

Its range 10 allows it to avoid difficulty with every early Terran Anti-Air when positioned over open space. They can snipe Turrets before the turret can fight back, and 1-shot 0 armor marines from range 10. This means that when positioned over opened space near an expansion, the MC can effectively stop mining until Vikings. Once Vikings are available, they do quite well in taking it down, though it takes several Vikings to take down a MC without losing anything (and once you’ve lose something, the MC has traded effectively).

Against Zerg, as Day9 has pointed out in one of his dailies, the early game use of the MC along with a 4-gate seems very difficult to stop – at a time when the only response zerg has to the MC is Queens (which it outranges and generally trades quite well against). Spore crawlers get the same treatment as turrets – they get killed out of range to be effective as anti-air.

In PvP, the ability to use a MC effectively does a couple things. First, it makes the ramp much less of an advantage (since you can’t deny vision with a flying unit around). This can be a big issue playing against blink builds (whose only issue in engaging is vision) which were previously spending 225/175 on one observer to provide a much more fragile form of vision (40 health vs. the 250 of the MC). This provides blink/obs builds the ability to ignore the obs and get 175/125 more to spend on units (detection aside, this makes blink pushes without detection much harder to stop, and executing blink rushes against DTs semi-autoloss… because PvP needed to be more about build order wins, right?). And then, of course, I’m sure there will be a 4-gate recall build on that winter map with the incredibly close air distances (maybe that map won’t make it, or something – pure speculation).

As you can see offensive MC usage, if you can get away with it poses problems in all matchups. Maybe given sufficiently astute play by your opponent you can’t, but that remains to be seen.

How did this happen? Pre-beta, the MC was a unit attached to a building. It didn’t move and therefore you couldn’t attack with it unless you proxied a Nexus (which is a bit much). So why is it being used so much and so offensively now? It’s mobility has changed, so that it can participate in fights in which it didn’t used to be able to participate.

Problem: The Mothership Core has issues with defending. Because its attack is available for only a short window of time – and the cost of using it is a recall or an energize (both of which are ridiculously better in terms of having more units with which to defend later).

One energize on a Nexus is generally 90 seconds of build time over the next three minutes. That’s a little more than 5 probes, (or about 150-200 resources per minute – not to mention about 225-300 resources if you’re able to harvest at the 30-40 rate as probes emerge). If you get your MC around 4 minutes, your first 100 energy will come at about 5:30. You don’t get 100 energy again until 8:30. By 10 minutes, if you used your first Energize on probes, you’re both mining optimally (somehow, haven’t tweak build order stuff yet, but just in theory) and you’re both still making probes, you’re a solid 450-600 resources ahead. That’s a lot of money – It’s a full Colossus or almost two Immortals.

Ok, we’ve established that Energize is good. Recall is good, too (at least worth the cost of the units you save with it, isn’t it?).

Hey, wait a minute, wasn’t I talking about Purify? Here’s the point I’m coming to about Purify. If you need Energy for Purify, you’re not getting one of these other effects – and for what? If you’re not way behind in army size, your opponent will turn tail and run once Purify hits the field – and during that time you get a few marines, maybe a couple marauders, a stalker or two (perhaps none if they have blink), perhaps more than one roach. See how bad that is at defense? Because you can’t force your enemy to stay (with a lot of FFs – and no Medivacs or burrow - or bad positioning on your opponent’s part) once he’s begun attacking. You get nice bursts of dps – but you can’t keep them around for it, so it just goes unused. And if it is high enough that you can cream an army hard enough to make using the ability worth it, what happens when you get it to the front lines and it can be used offensively? (Hint: scroll up a little bit.)

The point is that energy for an attacking mode is great for offense – but not that good for defense, especially if its duration is low.

My solution
There is undoubtedly more than one, but here’s what I’ve decided I like best. The reason it’s become so good offensively is because it’s mobile. The reason it’s so poor at defense is because its attack is so temporary. So what happens if we make the attack passive, and make the movement the part that’s tied to energy use. This has several effects.

1. We can provide the MC with bursts of mobility during defense. Short bursts of attack may be horrible for defending, but short bursts of mobility are great for it. Why else does everyone and their mother get blink near the beginning of a game if they suspect mutas or drop play?

2. The MC is always available for defending. Maybe it’s not a 45 damage/10 range super-cannon, but who’s going to be able to use it as that anyway – if everytime you turn it on an enemy can just decide to engage again 20 seconds later without the super-cannon available?

3. We can limit how much the MC is able to use its mobility by limiting the availability of its movement speed (through energy cost), and thereby eliminate the possibility of getting it across the map for a rush. If it takes the MC five minutes to get across the field on a map like Steppes of War – who cares if its good during the attack? On this note, you can make it worse during the attack, since its passive attack can have effectiveness of something like a photon cannon, rather than requiring a more potent attack due to its limited availability. Oh, and also, for all you zergies, they could also make it take long enough to get across the field for you to be able to have more anti-air available than hydras, or give it a short enough range to be susceptible to spores. This makes it much more defendable in a “rush” (if such thing is still allowed to occur).

4. This may have a slight “Energy tax” at the beginning of the game, in order to get it into defensive position once it emerges from the Nexus.

Example of Concept
Mothership Core
Cost: 50 minerals, 50 gas, 0 supply, 30 build time
Defense: 150 health, 100 shields, 1 armor
Sight: 14
Ground/Air Attack: 20
Cooldown: 1
Range: 7
Speed: 0

Abilities: Recall (as before), Energize (Range extended to 20 due to restricted mobility) and...
Psionic Thrust
Cost: 50 Energy
Description: Psionic Energy propels the motor-less core forward, granting it a movement speed of 1.0 for 10 seconds.

***
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 05:14 GMT
#2
If you like my solution, feel free to throw it up on the HotS Beta forums. I don't have a beta account and so cannot post there.
monk
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States8476 Posts
September 28 2012 05:28 GMT
#3
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.
Moderator
Jerubaal
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States7684 Posts
September 28 2012 05:36 GMT
#4
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.
I'm not stupid, a marauder just shot my brain.
GenesisX
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Canada4267 Posts
September 28 2012 06:00 GMT
#5
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.


MSC at least. MC is really really annoying since we already have a player after those initials
133 221 333 123 111
DRTnOOber
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
New Zealand476 Posts
September 28 2012 07:56 GMT
#6
I hereby declare it the "mcore".
But I'm off creep... and so I slow down, what are hellions doing here? I don't belong here...
RolleMcKnolle
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany1054 Posts
September 28 2012 08:35 GMT
#7
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.

I second this one. Seems appropriate
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 12:20 GMT
#8
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


I always liked MsC myself, but it seemed like I was the only one calling it that.

I edited into my example that normally the MC (MsC) would not have a movement speed, just to make sure it was clear. Anyone have anything they like/dislike about this idea? And is there any chance someone in the beta is going to reccomend this on the b.net beta forums?
SEA KarMa
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia452 Posts
September 28 2012 12:56 GMT
#9
mcore sounds better i reckon, people who are deficient with decoding antonyms have an easier time
"terrible, terrible damage". terrible, terrible design.
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
September 28 2012 13:22 GMT
#10
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.

At least they didn't give it mind control.
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
September 28 2012 15:55 GMT
#11
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.
User was warned for too many mimes.
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 16:34 GMT
#12
On September 29 2012 00:55 docvoc wrote:
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.


The rules in the beta are different than the rules upon release. We don't know how strong it is yet. We only know that it's a unit that is doing something it wasn't designed to do and isn't doing something it is designed to do - hence, since we still have time to change it before it goes live, why not?

Once it's released and requires a patch, once they say it's a finished product, there's a different level of "broken" which actually requires a fix.
neoghaleon55
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7435 Posts
September 28 2012 20:12 GMT
#13
Psionic Thrust

heh....
I'm getting a dirty image...

what?!
my favorite player is known as yadongking
lol
moo...for DRG
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 0
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 68571
Leta 436
Dewaltoss 81
Mini 53
actioN 48
soO 42
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm430
XaKoH 281
League of Legends
JimRising 564
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1107
shoxiejesuss972
ceh9475
allub196
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King116
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr18
Other Games
gofns6202
crisheroes244
Happy182
Livibee55
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream8264
Other Games
gamesdonequick643
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 34
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt733
• Jankos663
• TFBlade658
Upcoming Events
Escore
1h 41m
INu's Battles
2h 41m
ByuN vs Zoun
ByuN vs Rogue
RSL Revival
8h 41m
Big Brain Bouts
8h 41m
PiG vs DeMusliM
Reynor vs Bunny
Replay Cast
15h 41m
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 2h
Classic vs SHIN
MaxPax vs Percival
herO vs Clem
ByuN vs Rogue
Ladder Legends
1d 6h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 6h
BSL
1d 10h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
2 days
Ladder Legends
2 days
BSL
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs hero
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
KCM Race Survival
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-22
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Escore Tournament S2: W4
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W5
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.