• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:05
CEST 16:05
KST 23:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps [G] Progamer Settings [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 610 users

The Mothership Core - Problems and Solutions

Blogs > Treehead
Post a Reply
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-28 12:18:08
September 28 2012 05:09 GMT
#1
The Mothership Core is, was and will be undoubtedly my favorite new addition to the protoss arsenal. It was created to be a potent unit for economy, for early-game defense, and for use in recalling slow pushes once they are overextended. Currently, it is doing 2 of 3 jobs pretty adequately. The main problems are surrounding it’s attack, which I would like to talk a little about, and then propose a solution to these problems.

Problem: The Mothership Core is currently being used offensively. This is not what was intended for the unit.

The current version of the Mothership Core can be very useful for attacking early. The main challenge of doing so is getting it across the board into an attacking position safely, but this is sometimes a moot point because there tends to be so much space along the sides of the map.

Its range 10 allows it to avoid difficulty with every early Terran Anti-Air when positioned over open space. They can snipe Turrets before the turret can fight back, and 1-shot 0 armor marines from range 10. This means that when positioned over opened space near an expansion, the MC can effectively stop mining until Vikings. Once Vikings are available, they do quite well in taking it down, though it takes several Vikings to take down a MC without losing anything (and once you’ve lose something, the MC has traded effectively).

Against Zerg, as Day9 has pointed out in one of his dailies, the early game use of the MC along with a 4-gate seems very difficult to stop – at a time when the only response zerg has to the MC is Queens (which it outranges and generally trades quite well against). Spore crawlers get the same treatment as turrets – they get killed out of range to be effective as anti-air.

In PvP, the ability to use a MC effectively does a couple things. First, it makes the ramp much less of an advantage (since you can’t deny vision with a flying unit around). This can be a big issue playing against blink builds (whose only issue in engaging is vision) which were previously spending 225/175 on one observer to provide a much more fragile form of vision (40 health vs. the 250 of the MC). This provides blink/obs builds the ability to ignore the obs and get 175/125 more to spend on units (detection aside, this makes blink pushes without detection much harder to stop, and executing blink rushes against DTs semi-autoloss… because PvP needed to be more about build order wins, right?). And then, of course, I’m sure there will be a 4-gate recall build on that winter map with the incredibly close air distances (maybe that map won’t make it, or something – pure speculation).

As you can see offensive MC usage, if you can get away with it poses problems in all matchups. Maybe given sufficiently astute play by your opponent you can’t, but that remains to be seen.

How did this happen? Pre-beta, the MC was a unit attached to a building. It didn’t move and therefore you couldn’t attack with it unless you proxied a Nexus (which is a bit much). So why is it being used so much and so offensively now? It’s mobility has changed, so that it can participate in fights in which it didn’t used to be able to participate.

Problem: The Mothership Core has issues with defending. Because its attack is available for only a short window of time – and the cost of using it is a recall or an energize (both of which are ridiculously better in terms of having more units with which to defend later).

One energize on a Nexus is generally 90 seconds of build time over the next three minutes. That’s a little more than 5 probes, (or about 150-200 resources per minute – not to mention about 225-300 resources if you’re able to harvest at the 30-40 rate as probes emerge). If you get your MC around 4 minutes, your first 100 energy will come at about 5:30. You don’t get 100 energy again until 8:30. By 10 minutes, if you used your first Energize on probes, you’re both mining optimally (somehow, haven’t tweak build order stuff yet, but just in theory) and you’re both still making probes, you’re a solid 450-600 resources ahead. That’s a lot of money – It’s a full Colossus or almost two Immortals.

Ok, we’ve established that Energize is good. Recall is good, too (at least worth the cost of the units you save with it, isn’t it?).

Hey, wait a minute, wasn’t I talking about Purify? Here’s the point I’m coming to about Purify. If you need Energy for Purify, you’re not getting one of these other effects – and for what? If you’re not way behind in army size, your opponent will turn tail and run once Purify hits the field – and during that time you get a few marines, maybe a couple marauders, a stalker or two (perhaps none if they have blink), perhaps more than one roach. See how bad that is at defense? Because you can’t force your enemy to stay (with a lot of FFs – and no Medivacs or burrow - or bad positioning on your opponent’s part) once he’s begun attacking. You get nice bursts of dps – but you can’t keep them around for it, so it just goes unused. And if it is high enough that you can cream an army hard enough to make using the ability worth it, what happens when you get it to the front lines and it can be used offensively? (Hint: scroll up a little bit.)

The point is that energy for an attacking mode is great for offense – but not that good for defense, especially if its duration is low.

My solution
There is undoubtedly more than one, but here’s what I’ve decided I like best. The reason it’s become so good offensively is because it’s mobile. The reason it’s so poor at defense is because its attack is so temporary. So what happens if we make the attack passive, and make the movement the part that’s tied to energy use. This has several effects.

1. We can provide the MC with bursts of mobility during defense. Short bursts of attack may be horrible for defending, but short bursts of mobility are great for it. Why else does everyone and their mother get blink near the beginning of a game if they suspect mutas or drop play?

2. The MC is always available for defending. Maybe it’s not a 45 damage/10 range super-cannon, but who’s going to be able to use it as that anyway – if everytime you turn it on an enemy can just decide to engage again 20 seconds later without the super-cannon available?

3. We can limit how much the MC is able to use its mobility by limiting the availability of its movement speed (through energy cost), and thereby eliminate the possibility of getting it across the map for a rush. If it takes the MC five minutes to get across the field on a map like Steppes of War – who cares if its good during the attack? On this note, you can make it worse during the attack, since its passive attack can have effectiveness of something like a photon cannon, rather than requiring a more potent attack due to its limited availability. Oh, and also, for all you zergies, they could also make it take long enough to get across the field for you to be able to have more anti-air available than hydras, or give it a short enough range to be susceptible to spores. This makes it much more defendable in a “rush” (if such thing is still allowed to occur).

4. This may have a slight “Energy tax” at the beginning of the game, in order to get it into defensive position once it emerges from the Nexus.

Example of Concept
Mothership Core
Cost: 50 minerals, 50 gas, 0 supply, 30 build time
Defense: 150 health, 100 shields, 1 armor
Sight: 14
Ground/Air Attack: 20
Cooldown: 1
Range: 7
Speed: 0

Abilities: Recall (as before), Energize (Range extended to 20 due to restricted mobility) and...
Psionic Thrust
Cost: 50 Energy
Description: Psionic Energy propels the motor-less core forward, granting it a movement speed of 1.0 for 10 seconds.

***
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 05:14 GMT
#2
If you like my solution, feel free to throw it up on the HotS Beta forums. I don't have a beta account and so cannot post there.
monk
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States8476 Posts
September 28 2012 05:28 GMT
#3
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.
Moderator
Jerubaal
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States7684 Posts
September 28 2012 05:36 GMT
#4
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.
I'm not stupid, a marauder just shot my brain.
GenesisX
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Canada4267 Posts
September 28 2012 06:00 GMT
#5
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.


MSC at least. MC is really really annoying since we already have a player after those initials
133 221 333 123 111
DRTnOOber
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
New Zealand476 Posts
September 28 2012 07:56 GMT
#6
I hereby declare it the "mcore".
But I'm off creep... and so I slow down, what are hellions doing here? I don't belong here...
RolleMcKnolle
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany1054 Posts
September 28 2012 08:35 GMT
#7
On September 28 2012 14:36 Jerubaal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


It should be the mofo'co'.

I second this one. Seems appropriate
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 12:20 GMT
#8
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.


I always liked MsC myself, but it seemed like I was the only one calling it that.

I edited into my example that normally the MC (MsC) would not have a movement speed, just to make sure it was clear. Anyone have anything they like/dislike about this idea? And is there any chance someone in the beta is going to reccomend this on the b.net beta forums?
SEA KarMa
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia452 Posts
September 28 2012 12:56 GMT
#9
mcore sounds better i reckon, people who are deficient with decoding antonyms have an easier time
"terrible, terrible damage". terrible, terrible design.
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
September 28 2012 13:22 GMT
#10
On September 28 2012 14:28 monk. wrote:
Is everyone using MC to denote mothership core now? I feel like that can get annoying real soon.

At least they didn't give it mind control.
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
September 28 2012 15:55 GMT
#11
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.
User was warned for too many mimes.
Treehead
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
999 Posts
September 28 2012 16:34 GMT
#12
On September 29 2012 00:55 docvoc wrote:
so basically, the players have found an amazing use for the new unit, the mofo'co, and because of this new strategy that people should have to figure out, instead of figuring it out, people just want a nerf. That sounds kind of... yeah it just sounds bad. Why not let it stay a bit, it isn't as broken as the warhound, its just strong, and it requires micro, so why hate.


The rules in the beta are different than the rules upon release. We don't know how strong it is yet. We only know that it's a unit that is doing something it wasn't designed to do and isn't doing something it is designed to do - hence, since we still have time to change it before it goes live, why not?

Once it's released and requires a patch, once they say it's a finished product, there's a different level of "broken" which actually requires a fix.
neoghaleon55
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7435 Posts
September 28 2012 20:12 GMT
#13
Psionic Thrust

heh....
I'm getting a dirty image...

what?!
my favorite player is known as yadongking
lol
moo...for DRG
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 55m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ForJumy 98
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3439
Flash 2057
Shuttle 1968
EffOrt 1276
firebathero 1139
Snow 498
Mini 490
Larva 452
actioN 427
hero 369
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 333
Soma 217
Zeus 175
ToSsGirL 114
TY 111
Hyun 100
soO 68
Pusan 62
sorry 44
Rush 41
JYJ37
Noble 31
JulyZerg 30
Sacsri 20
Terrorterran 18
GoRush 15
yabsab 12
Movie 12
HiyA 11
IntoTheRainbow 9
zelot 5
ivOry 3
GuemChi 0
Dota 2
Gorgc11712
qojqva1845
XcaliburYe213
League of Legends
singsing2374
Counter-Strike
byalli265
flusha240
allub228
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor132
Other Games
tarik_tv26362
gofns16085
FrodaN1480
B2W.Neo1189
hiko580
shahzam569
DeMusliM469
Fuzer 203
crisheroes187
Liquid`VortiX90
QueenE34
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick37110
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 74
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 12
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 367
League of Legends
• Nemesis4967
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1h 55m
WardiTV European League
1h 55m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
9h 55m
RSL Revival
19h 55m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
22h 55m
Replay Cast
1d 9h
RSL Revival
1d 19h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
2 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.