EPTKenya wasn't a Republic till late 1964
before that, it was a Dominion
forgery thx k
Obama born in Kenya! - Page 4
| Blogs > motbob |
|
StRyKeR
United States1739 Posts
Kenya wasn't a Republic till late 1964 before that, it was a Dominion forgery thx k | ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
| ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:36 Jayme wrote: I honestly think anyone who claims to be a US citizen should take this test. Most of them would fail fucking miserably. Beyond miserably in fact. I remember taking a citizenship test back in history 1301 just to see what we knew as a class. I was one of like three people out of THIRTY FIVE that passed the thing. It was embarrassing and by your definition I'm "merely" a naturalized citizen because my mother is not a citizen of the United States. It just enrages me when your entire post comes off as if only a Natural Born citizen has any clue about how the United States works. I personally find the law regarding that a president has to be Natural Born and it's definition to be insanely ludicrous and irrelevant. That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying, per the law only a Natural born Citizen may become President. That is the only thing that matters, that is why we are a Republic, and why we have a Constitution that is the supreme law of the land. That is what makes this country so great. You are entitled to all the freedoms and liberties america has to offer as with any other citizen, no more, no less, unless of course you fall under any categories in which the Government discriminates in based on creed, ethnicity, etc. The point of the law is in John Jays explicit context. No Foreigners should have any proclivity to being so easily able to influence this country. If we were to amend and repel this pre-requisite then anyone who comes here as an illegal immigrant or otherwise yet a naturalized citizen and gives birth; their son or daughter can lawfully become the President. When you have people so willing to blow themselves up against America, it is not too far fetched for them to home grow a Manchurian Candidate. What other way to best destroy America than from the inside? In fact, that is the only way America will fail and is failing. I think having the most safe guards to prevent this scenario is a wise and just law. I guess you will disagree in the end, but I defer to the wisdom of my Founding Fathers and their timeless forethought. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
More problems have surfaced 1. In was dated Feb 14, 1964 and had the designation Republic of Kenya. However that designation was not official until December 1964. 2. It’s number 44 O 47 is a bit coincidental with 44th President Obama 47th President 3. The name EF Lavender. Earth Friendly Lavender is a detergent 4. Mombasa did not become part of Kenya until 1963. It used to be part of Zanzibar 5. The Coast General Hospital is actually called the Coast Provincial General Hospital 6. There are unconfirmed statements that women who would give birth in 1961 would go to the “Lady Grigg Maternity Hospital” which was later rolled into the Coast Provincial General hospital. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:50 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/third-obama-birth-certificate-appears-in-court/ Look, I just want the damn truth. I don't see why Obama is so reluctant and has spent so much money hiding his Birth Certificate. Personally, there are better avenues and more legit avenues to pursure congruent to his invalidation of Presidency. Most of this would be over if he just furnished his Birth Certificate just like pretty much every other President. End-game GG no re. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:04 Hot_Bid wrote: its relevant to him being president of the united states lol it's relevant to laws that I don't think are important you knew what I meant. I am obviously speaking about my opinions, which is why I said "I think" oh... jibba got my back. thanks jibba | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:54 Aegraen wrote: Look, I just want the damn truth. I don't see why Obama is so reluctant and has spent so much money hiding his Birth Certificate. Personally, there are better avenues and more legit avenues to pursure congruent to his invalidation of Presidency. Most of this would be over if he just furnished his Birth Certificate just like pretty much every other President. End-game GG no re. For the love of God. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html | ||
|
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 31060
3788 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:54 Aegraen wrote: Look, I just want the damn truth. I don't see why Obama is so reluctant and has spent so much money hiding his Birth Certificate. Personally, there are better avenues and more legit avenues to pursure congruent to his invalidation of Presidency. Most of this would be over if he just furnished his Birth Certificate just like pretty much every other President. End-game GG no re. iirc the white house posted his birth certificate on the internet... http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/13/bobirthcertificate.jpg conservatives these days... | ||
|
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
On August 03 2009 13:04 d(O.o)a wrote: Oh my god seriously guys what does it matter where he's born... Where did he grow up? and do you doubt that he'd be a great president? Truthfully, I think that the presidency should awarded based on ability, not popularity. But it's in the Constitution. The President MUST be a natural born citizen of the United States, must be at least 35 years old and must have been a permanent resident of the United States for at least 14 years. This is the basis behind the "Birther movement" which is possibly one of the dumbest things I've ever heard of. I can't believe Congressmen and even people like Lou Dobbs support this kind of "activism", even if they try to keep their statements subtle. | ||
|
Lucktar
United States526 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:08 zeppelin wrote: Chester A. Arthur's father was a British subject at the time of the future president's birth, and there was a bit of a "birther" movement back then claiming he was actually born in Canada and not northern Vermont as claimed. The "natural born citizen" argument is just a sad moving of goalposts that were fixed over a hundred years ago. The term appears exactly once in the Constitution and any other founding documents, so anyone who claims to say it's "obvious" what it means are simply pushing an agenda. It's especially funny since if it means what Orly Taitz and friends say it does, it means any president prior to Van Buren would have been constitutionally ineligible by those exact same standards. This. Honestly, I don't particularly care whether Obama's parents were naturalized, or native, or whatever. But the thing that gets to me is the fucking attitude of righteous indignation, that people somehow think that everyone who doesn't buy into their crackpot view of the world is ignorant or better yet, un-American, whatever the fuck that means. | ||
|
rredtooth
5461 Posts
WASHINGTON – California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication. so is this guy boned? | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On August 03 2009 13:06 Sunyveil wrote: iirc the white house posted his birth certificate on the internet... http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/13/bobirthcertificate.jpg conservatives these days... That was a copy not the original. I had to furnish my birth certificate upon entering into the USCG, but yet the President of the US doesn't have to? No double standards there. Simply furnish the original and this whole arguement would be null and void. Then we can move on to the substantive issue of the 14th amendment and clarification of natural born citizen. To be quite honest, I'd expect and want this of any President that has such an auspicious background. It is the damn law, the supreme law of the land which no one is above and damn well, will be abided by. | ||
|
Dazed.
Canada3301 Posts
On August 03 2009 10:59 skronch wrote: I'd rather a true conservative or a libertarian get in office; definitely not the incompetent bumbling socialist wannabe that is Oh bam bam.who the fuck else do you want in office? not saying that this is you necessarily, but all the people who think that if only we had the right president, all our problems will magically dissapear in half a year need to pull their heads out of their asses | ||
|
zeppelin
United States565 Posts
On August 03 2009 13:26 redtooth wrote: so is this guy boned? if by "this guy" you mean orly taitz (who is a woman) and by "boned" you mean "potentially disbarred for trying to pass off a clear forgery as legal evidence" then quite possibly yes | ||
|
Deleted User 31060
3788 Posts
On August 03 2009 13:26 redtooth wrote: so is this guy boned? girl she was on the colberr reporr the other day | ||
|
SiZ.FaNtAsY
Korea (South)1497 Posts
On August 03 2009 13:28 Aegraen wrote: That was a copy not the original. I had to furnish my birth certificate upon entering into the USCG, but yet the President of the US doesn't have to? No double standards there. Simply furnish the original and this whole arguement would be null and void. Then we can move on to the substantive issue of the 14th amendment and clarification of natural born citizen. To be quite honest, I'd expect and want this of any President that has such an auspicious background. It is the damn law, the supreme law of the land which no one is above and damn well, will be abided by. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Edit: People like you only look at one or two evidence that supports your conspiracy hypothesis while ignoring thousands of logical and proven evidence that prove you hypothesis wrong. | ||
|
skronch
United States2717 Posts
On August 03 2009 13:30 Dazed_Spy wrote: I'd rather a true conservative or a libertarian get in office; definitely not the incompetent bumbling socialist wannabe that is Oh bam bam. realistically speaking, the chances of that are very slim. look how poorly ron paul did compared to mccain. the problem is that majority of americans don't really know anything about politics and let news networks or prior biases form their political opnions. unless that changes, any democratic process will just result in us electing another politician. | ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
On August 03 2009 12:47 Aegraen wrote: When you have people so willing to blow themselves up against America, it is not too far fetched for them to home grow a Manchurian Candidate. What other way to best destroy America than from the inside? In fact, that is the only way America will fail and is failing. The Know-Nothings were right and those damn Pope-loving Irish Catholics have been destroying America from the inside since the 1830s? | ||
|
Sky
Jordan812 Posts
On August 03 2009 13:52 SiZ.FaNtAsY wrote: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Edit: People like you only look at one or two evidence that supports your conspiracy hypothesis while ignoring thousands of logical and proven evidence that prove you hypothesis wrong. Obvious photoshop and payoffs. + Show Spoiler + Thanks for the link. I finally get to shut up my repub friends )= | ||
| ||
