70 APM C- oO - Page 4

Ilikestarcraft

Korea (South)17743 Posts

April 12 2009 12:11 GMT

#61

On April 12 2009 14:00 Geo.Rion wrote:
so now what's Kwark's APM?
The guy said 100, when i said no way s1 said it was a joke i did not get. Than discussion continues on Kwark's low apm succsess. Can s1 tell me who actually knows, what's up with him?

pm him

fusionsdf

Canada15390 Posts

April 12 2009 15:29 GMT

#62

On April 12 2009 14:07 TheYango wrote:

Show nested quote +

Fixed.

the jokes are irrelevant. It actually was a protoss lol

Xeris

Iran17695 Posts

April 12 2009 16:52 GMT

#63

you don't need apm

Racenilatr

United States2756 Posts

April 12 2009 17:49 GMT

#64

On April 11 2009 21:37 MasterReY wrote:
whats wrong about being C- with 77 apm?

once i played without spam and i got 72 apm and i've beaten a 282 apm C+ with that, so what?

Something is wrong if you don't have over 80 apm. I really think you NEED at lest 90 apm to play protoss at C level, otherwise how can you macro? Even with NO SPAM CLICKS Whatsoever, it's just about impossible to have perfect macro/micro with only 90 apm

arb

Noobville17922 Posts

April 12 2009 17:55 GMT

#65

On April 12 2009 05:09 Harem wrote:

Show nested quote +

Uh, Kwark is pretty known for his cheese.

the only zvp i played against him ended with like, 3 groups of +1 speedzeals at like..9 minutes in, was ridiculous

Racenilatr

United States2756 Posts

April 12 2009 18:01 GMT

#66

Lol How is that even possible? Not being able to spot/counter react to that.......actually maybe I'll try it

nAi.PrOtOsS

Canada784 Posts

April 12 2009 18:10 GMT

#67

Wouldn't a race requiring lower apm be a disadvantage? Wouldn't it mean that high apm protoss's are equivelent to low apm protoss's because the race doesn't require apm. Where as a high apm terran generally has better macro/micro then a lower apm terran?

Prev 1 2 3 4 All

Please or register to reply.

70 APM C- oO - Page 4

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming