|
On December 23 2008 09:33 AdamS wrote:Can you guys go to the B.net forums and send in the dxdiag and msinfo that Dat asked for? We are having a hard time recreating this issue and it would help us immensely if we can find out exactly what hardware you are running and what background processes are running. thanks!! /AdamS Blizzard Tech Support http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=13769997583&sid=3000
we should pay attention to this guy yes?
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
You're such a wizard R1CH !
|
why do we need cpu savior at all? most of us have already upgraded to a better comp, and most 98 comps were good enough already that they ran sc well. unless people these days still play with a 95 comp, it's very likely that the majority nowadays play sc with a comp that can handle that and run other things in the background also.
|
Northern Ireland1200 Posts
On December 23 2008 16:32 Zalfor wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2008 09:33 AdamS wrote:Can you guys go to the B.net forums and send in the dxdiag and msinfo that Dat asked for? We are having a hard time recreating this issue and it would help us immensely if we can find out exactly what hardware you are running and what background processes are running. thanks!! /AdamS Blizzard Tech Support http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=13769997583&sid=3000 we should pay attention to this guy yes?
The Admins will be able to know if its a smurf or not. (there is an AdamS on bnet tech support forums). However, there IS a thread at the forums, which he has linked. I did bring this up in the 1.16 Patch thread a few days ago, but it got ignored...
|
On December 24 2008 08:55 sqwert wrote:
why do we need cpu savior at all? most of us have already upgraded to a better comp, and most 98 comps were good enough already that they ran sc well. unless people these days still play with a 95 comp, it's very likely that the majority nowadays play sc with a comp that can handle that and run other things in the background also.
Laptops running at 100% CPU usage consume more power and generate more heat. Those two features are usually not wanted.
|
Hm I noticed that when using this fix that there's some lag when naming replays, but otherwise it's great, thanks a lot. Makes everything smooth again :D
|
Hi all,
I have a question for R1CH (or anyone else who knows), can u tell me in what language (or languages with %) Starcraft has been programmed.
|
On December 25 2008 13:47 Sk0 wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question for R1CH (or anyone else who knows), can u tell me in what language (or languages with %) Starcraft has been programmed.
I would assume C++.
|
WOW R1CH
I dream of becoming half as decent at coding as you. You are truly amazing.
|
51633 Posts
On December 24 2008 10:20 Chewits wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2008 16:32 Zalfor wrote:On December 23 2008 09:33 AdamS wrote:Can you guys go to the B.net forums and send in the dxdiag and msinfo that Dat asked for? We are having a hard time recreating this issue and it would help us immensely if we can find out exactly what hardware you are running and what background processes are running. thanks!! /AdamS Blizzard Tech Support http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=13769997583&sid=3000 we should pay attention to this guy yes? The Admins will be able to know if its a smurf or not. (there is an AdamS on bnet tech support forums). However, there IS a thread at the forums, which he has linked. I did bring this up in the 1.16 Patch thread a few days ago, but it got ignored...
I checked his admin profile page and he is the real thing (unless he managed to spoof a Blizzard email account which I highly doubt).
|
On December 24 2008 08:55 sqwert wrote:
why do we need cpu savior at all? most of us have already upgraded to a better comp, and most 98 comps were good enough already that they ran sc well. unless people these days still play with a 95 comp, it's very likely that the majority nowadays play sc with a comp that can handle that and run other things in the background also.
the point is that our better comps can easily run sc without the 100% cpu power it calls for
cpu savior reduces the amount your computer puts in, not the amount that's needed
|
Germany2896 Posts
On December 25 2008 13:47 Sk0 wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question for R1CH (or anyone else who knows), can u tell me in what language (or languages with %) Starcraft has been programmed.
The compiler might be C++(some detector says visual c++, and the file extension is .cpp), but they didn't use OOP anywhere, so I'd call it C.
|
holy shit! great job R1ch
|
loool nice, was obv playing techies during the coding
|
On December 25 2008 20:02 MasterOfChaos wrote:
The compiler might be C++(some detector says visual c++, and the file extension is .cpp), but they didn't use OOP anywhere, so I'd call it C.
But, what do u mean with "The compiler", can u explain more please?
|
On December 26 2008 04:47 Sk0 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 25 2008 20:02 MasterOfChaos wrote:
The compiler might be C++(some detector says visual c++, and the file extension is .cpp), but they didn't use OOP anywhere, so I'd call it C. But, what do u mean with "The compiler", can u explain more please? The compiler is the program that translates the semi-English code that the programmers write into virtually unintelligible (to humans) machine language (basically 1s and 0s). C++ is an extension of C, so a compiler designed to translate things written in C++ will by definition be able to translate things written in regular C as well. (correct me if I'm wrong about something here)
|
|
|
On December 16 2008 19:24 Plexa wrote:
Fuck what we need is a huge petition -.-;
No, what we need is a huge rolled petition wrapped in barbed wire so we can shove it up their asses !
|
Northern Ireland1200 Posts
You dont need a petition, you just need to send some info to Blizzard.
On December 23 2008 09:33 AdamS wrote:Can you guys go to the B.net forums and send in the dxdiag and msinfo that Dat asked for? We are having a hard time recreating this issue and it would help us immensely if we can find out exactly what hardware you are running and what background processes are running. thanks!! /AdamS Blizzard Tech Support http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=13769997583&sid=3000
Go do it.
|
On December 26 2008 10:57 qrs wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2008 04:47 Sk0 wrote:On December 25 2008 20:02 MasterOfChaos wrote:
The compiler might be C++(some detector says visual c++, and the file extension is .cpp), but they didn't use OOP anywhere, so I'd call it C. But, what do u mean with "The compiler", can u explain more please? The compiler is the program that translates the semi-English code that the programmers write into virtually unintelligible (to humans) machine language (basically 1s and 0s). C++ is an extension of C, so a compiler designed to translate things written in C++ will by definition be able to translate things written in regular C as well. (correct me if I'm wrong about something here)
Yea you're right. Pretty much everything you can do in C can be done in C++. malloc(), free(), stuff like that even they you have new() and delete though it is never recommended that you use the C functions instead of the C++ ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
