| Blogs > IzzyCraft |
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
I'm not regular to teaching shit on youtube but i said just about everything if you can't follow along i'll make a write up soon a general youtube HD write up for everything ill make it tommrow thou. This one is hd just go to youtube and click watch in hd I fail at life so this is the first one i tried but i didn't follow my own rules lol so no hd on this one below They also added this annoying search thing...which i find very frustrating every time you hover over it.   | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32278 Posts
| ||
|
ilovejonn
Canada2548 Posts
| ||
|
Puosu
7012 Posts
| ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
Oh well, interesting video though. | ||
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
| ||
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
| ||
|
Kami
United States127 Posts
Like this | ||
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
It's more interesting because youtube resized it back down to 960x720 (i downloaded the vid and took a look at it. He lost quality thought it's not that noticeable) to fit. It resize bigger on youtube full screen but i've always been opposite to letting youtube resize anything. The fullscreen works better though ionno how it compared to how i did it. Which is what i used to test what people liked they liked the 4:3 better | ||
zatic
Zurich15365 Posts
I could theoretically upscale them first to trick youtube but I rather release quickly | ||
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
Apparently uploading a 2x sc size 1280x960 you get a downscaled 960x720 youtube which i find appalling letting youtube scale anything just cuz they porb use a generic filter that only good at down or upscaling Optimally you would want to make it 5:4 for people because that is more used then 4:3 so a 1280 x 1024 would give full screen to most only crt are still 4:3. Personally i prefer my way even though your full screen isn't as big i just don't like youtube scaling anything. | ||
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
| ||
cgrinker
United States3824 Posts
| ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
... is that wifebeater??? | ||
|
MetalMarine
United States1559 Posts
| ||
|
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
On December 04 2008 17:54 MetalMarine wrote: Damn comp is too crappy to run it on HD, it lags every 5 seconds LOL A Pentium 3 at lest is necessary to run a H.264 codec using a best decoder knowing youtube you'd porb need a bit higher then a p4 or maybe a p4 with hyerthreading. Although it could just be your Internet or do you mean after loading lol. | ||
|
MetalMarine
United States1559 Posts
| ||
|
Kami
United States127 Posts
On December 04 2008 16:12 IzzyCraft wrote: It porb take him awhile to encode a full match unless he had a good quadcore to get a 1 to 1 encoding time 1 min of encoding for every 1 min of vid. If the source is encoded in some form of h264 video, then it takes merely seconds to upconvert it to some form of HD. You only need processing power if you want to upconvert from xvid to h264. | ||
|
Kami
United States127 Posts
On December 04 2008 17:48 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: huh williaml232 ... is that wifebeater??? Nope | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
