• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:06
CEST 11:06
KST 18:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play1Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8
Community News
[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)83ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo37Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611
StarCraft 2
General
Is the larve respawn broken? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) Old Replays From 1.4.6 The future of the SC game model
Tourneys
Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event INu's Battles#17 <BO.9> Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool ProGamer Paychecks Story Best thing happen to StarCraft since Remastered? Data needed BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL22] GosuLeague Casts - Tue & Thu 22:00 CEST
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Listen To The Coaches!
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8350 users

Physics Problem

Blogs > HeavOnEarth
Post a Reply
Normal
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-24 02:46:49
September 23 2008 21:22 GMT
#1
Sam heaves a shot with weight 16-lb straight upward, giving
it a constant upward acceleration from rest of 45.7 m/s2
for a height -----> 69.0 cm<----( Only goes up 69 cm! Doesn't go up higher than this point! ) He releases it at height 2.30 m above the ground. *Meaning the ball released his hand @ 2.30m above the ground* You may ignore air resistance.

What is the speed of the shot when he releases it?

How high above the ground does it go?

How much time does he have to get out of its way before it returns to the height of the top of his head, a distance 1.82 m above the ground?

It's not really a homework problem; she just posted it on the board and said try it at home , see if you can solve it ; and i wanna be the cool kid that knows the answer

Of course, I'm not blindly giving you this question without working on it, however i probably messed everything up :D

I don't expect anyone to do it but... if you could point me in the general direction that would be pretty awesome [: .

;edit;
Excuse my godawful drawing T_T
[image loading]


;edit2; Also 69cm = (69)1x10^-2 m or .69 m
And wow TL is really helpful :DD
Also, i suppose that when the ball is coming down ; g ( acceleration), due to gravity = ~9.81m/s^2

Ahh and also this wasn't a homework problem or anything she just gave it to us as a kind of eye opener , she's going to intro./ review it tomorrow in class.
So far we've just been doing physics I review so we're starting kinematics, plus the hurricane set us back a week( no school) so that would explain the lack of movement in the class? D:
Thanks for your help again !

*
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
Raithed
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
China7078 Posts
September 23 2008 21:24 GMT
#2
omg lol i did this but i dont remember it, almost exact problem too, it was a rock. O____O physics 2 seem easier than 1. =D
ketomai
Profile Joined June 2007
United States2789 Posts
September 23 2008 21:30 GMT
#3
Vf=Vi+at
D=Do+Vit+1/2at^2
Vf^2=Vi^2+2ad

Those are the formulas you need to use, and you should be able to figure it out.
vAltyR
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States581 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-23 22:03:30
September 23 2008 21:30 GMT
#4
Give me a bit, i'll post my answer in a spoiler. work through it yourself and check your answer to mine.

EDIT: @nevake: hahaha, I went through work and kinetic energy since i couldn't remember the formulas. oh well.

+ Show Spoiler [Velocity (Process)] +

a=45.7 m/s^2
d=1.61 m (2.30 m - .69 m)
m=7.25 kg (converted from lbs, screw english system.)

F=ma (Newton's 2nd)
W=Fd (work=force times distance force is applied)
W=K(final)-K(initial) (work= difference in kinetic energy)
K=1/2*mv^2

That's all the formula's you'll need. If you haven't covered all of those yet, well, that's why your teacher said to take it home and think about it instead of assigning it for homework.

Time to start plugging in.

F=ma
W=mad
K(final)=mad (since initial K is 0, just drop it.)
1/2*mv^2=mad (mass cancels on both sides, do a bit of algebra, and...)

v=sqrt(2ad)

Well, okay, now that I think about it, you probably know a kinematic equation that looks like that. It's been a year or two since i've taken physics, gimme a break!

+ Show Spoiler [Velocity (Answer)] +
v=sqrt(2ad)
v=sqrt(2(45.7 m/s^2)(1.61 m))
v=12.1 m/s


+ Show Spoiler [Height above ground (process)] +

Yay conservation of energy. Makes this problem cake. If I skip a few steps, sorry.
U=K (conservation of energy)
U=mgh
mgh=1/2*mv^2 (mass cancels)
h=v^2/2g (don't forget to add 2.3 m to this because i'm assuming h=0 where he let's go of the ball)

+ Show Spoiler [Height above ground (answer)] +

h=(v^2/2g) + 2.30 m
h=9.77 m


+ Show Spoiler [Time (process)] +
Since I did this a sort of strange way, I'll spare you the details and just give you the basics. So we already know the velocity of the ball when he launched it, and the max height. What I did, was figure out the velocity of the ball when it was at height=1.82 m coming down. To do this, figure it at v=0 at the peak, figure out the distance from the peak to 1.83 m and use v=sqrt(2ad) from before to get velocity. I came out with 10.5 m/s. This gives you a total change in velocity of 22.6 m/s, and the acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2. a=dv/dt (pretend the d's are delta), and grab a calculator. I got:

+ Show Spoiler [Time (answer)] +
t=2.31 s
내 호버크라프트는 장어로 가득 차 있어요
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
September 23 2008 21:33 GMT
#5
It's not really that hard, although it's annoying that she gives it to you with such strange values (mixing english and metric is especially annoying). Just realize that you have enough information to calculate the starting kinetic energy, which is equal to the overall change in potential energy (mass times gravity times change in height).
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
September 23 2008 21:33 GMT
#6
On September 24 2008 06:30 nevake wrote:
Vf=Vi+at
D=Do+Vit+1/2at^2
Vf^2=Vi^2+2ad

Those are the formulas you need to use, and you should be able to figure it out.


Thank you. Can you help me derive the kinematic formulas by any chance?
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
September 23 2008 21:34 GMT
#7
On September 24 2008 06:30 nevake wrote:
Vf=Vi+at
D=Do+Vit+1/2at^2
Vf^2=Vi^2+2ad

Those are the formulas you need to use, and you should be able to figure it out.

It always bugs me when people answer physics questions like this. If you're just blindly combining formulas from some formula sheet then, first of all you're not learning anything, and second there's a good chance that you'll do it wrong.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
ketomai
Profile Joined June 2007
United States2789 Posts
September 23 2008 21:38 GMT
#8
I was under the impression that he had not learned any of this, and so by giving him these formulas, I was hoping to let him figure out the answer by himself. And your physics textbook should show you how to derive these formulas.
ShaLLoW[baY]
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada12499 Posts
September 23 2008 21:39 GMT
#9
altqqplz
ALEXISONFIRE ARE FUCKING BACK (sAviOr for life)
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
September 23 2008 21:40 GMT
#10
If he's already learned it then did he not learn the formulas? If he had really learned he would already know which formulas to use because it would be intuitive. When you just copy paste formulas like that it just looks like gibberish, anyway. You didn't even define your variables.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
September 23 2008 21:41 GMT
#11
On September 24 2008 06:38 nevake wrote:
I was under the impression that he had not learned any of this, and so by giving him these formulas, I was hoping to let him figure out the answer by himself. And your physics textbook should show you how to derive these formulas.


there were no more physics C textbooks here and due to hurricane ike , we won't have them for a while T.T
However i googled some stuff and i should ... figure i out..
i hope
WB SHALLOW ^_^ how goes the army life
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
September 23 2008 21:44 GMT
#12
LOL are you serious? Your school doesn't have any textbooks? That's so ghetto.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
September 23 2008 21:46 GMT
#13
On September 24 2008 06:44 Luddite wrote:
LOL are you serious? Your school doesn't have any textbooks? That's so ghetto.


There's only one Calculus BC class
Only one Chem II class
Only one Physics C class

Repeat for basically every extra "advanced" elective
Not sure about Bio II i didn't take it
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
ketomai
Profile Joined June 2007
United States2789 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-23 22:12:12
September 23 2008 21:52 GMT
#14
Well, he stated he wanted to be the one that knew the answer, not learn and understand it right away. Of course I'm not going to go and teach him something that his teachers are paid to teach him.

V=velocity (Vi = initial, Vf=final)
D=displacement
Do=original displacement from origin
t=time
a= acceleration

Notice that the 3rd equation doesn't need time.

To find the initial velocity, use the 3rd equation. The initial velocity is 0 in that equation, since you're starting from rest. The actual "initial velocity" they want is the "final velocity" in respect to this equation, since you're using it only to find the speed at which the ball leaves his hands. The acceleration is given, the distance is given (convert to meters). Solve for Vf.

To find the time, use the second equation. d=do+vit+1/2at^2. Do is 2.3-1.82 since that's where it was starting (above his head). d is given (1.82), you found the vi in the last problem, the acceleration is -9.8 m/s^2 because that is the acceleration of a body through gravity. So now you have everything to solve for time.

edit: Oops forgot 2nd one.
Equation is the 3rd one.

Vf is 0, since at the peak of the ball's trajectory, it's velocity is 0. The acceleration is still -9.8. The Vi, you already found in #1. So just solve for d.

Or you can use the energy way vAltyR described (the way I learned it was kinematics first, and energy second, but you can do either one).
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-23 23:23:45
September 23 2008 21:59 GMT
#15
whoaa @_@ confusing gimme a sec to write this all down

nice one vAltyR *posted above*
I'll compare answers when i'm done
Lmao, i spent like 10 minutes figuring out what the d value was, when i realized "OH, I'm Solving for D!" Doh >.<"
+ Show Spoiler [Solving for Vf] +
Vf^2= Vi^2 + 2ad
Vf^2=(0)^2 + 2(45.7m/s^2)(.69m)
Vf^2= 31.553m^2/s^2
Vf=5.6154m/s


+ Show Spoiler [In process!] +

0= 5.6154m/s+ (2)(-9,8m/s^2)(d)
-d= -13.9846 eer D: meters?
d= ??


+ Show Spoiler [inprocess] +
-.48= -4.9t^2+5.6154t
eh eff it quadratic formula ftw gg

"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
September 23 2008 22:04 GMT
#16
OK that's a better explanation but it's also like the most confusing possible way to do this problem...
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24779 Posts
September 23 2008 22:17 GMT
#17
Taking Physics C without taking another physics class before is quite tough.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-23 22:20:12
September 23 2008 22:17 GMT
#18
+ Show Spoiler +
On September 24 2008 06:52 nevake wrote:
Well, he stated he wanted to be the one that knew the answer, not learn and understand it right away. Of course I'm not going to go and teach him something that his teachers are paid to teach him.

V=velocity (Vi = initial, Vf=final)
D=displacement
Do=original displacement from origin
t=time
a= acceleration

Notice that the 3rd equation doesn't need time.

To find the initial velocity, use the 3rd equation. The initial velocity is 0 in that equation, since you're starting from rest. The actual "initial velocity" they want is the "final velocity" in respect to this equation, since you're using it only to find the speed at which the ball leaves his hands. The acceleration is given, the distance is given (convert to meters). Solve for Vf.

To find the time, use the second equation. d=do+vit+1/2at^2. Do is 2.3-1.82 since that's where it was starting (above his head). d is given (1.82), you found the vi in the last problem, the acceleration is -9.8 m/s^2 because that is the acceleration of a body through gravity. So now you have everything to solve for time.

edit: Oops forgot 2nd one.
Equation is the 3rd one.

Vf is 0, since at the peak of the ball's trajectory, it's velocity is 0. The acceleration is still -9.8. The Vi, you already found in #1. So just solve for d.

Or you can use the energy way vAltyR described (the way I learned it was kinematics first, and energy second, but you can do either one).


I vaguely remember acceleration always being positive. However, What do i know Anyone else verify acceleration negative?

Ooh there's different ways to solve it?
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-23 22:22:10
September 23 2008 22:19 GMT
#19
On September 24 2008 07:17 micronesia wrote:
Taking Physics C without taking another physics class before is quite tough.


How'd you know i didn't take a physics class before this? D:
Mind reader, you are.
The units are driving me crazy... everything has to be perfect
and u can't use like SI units with... metrics and god damn how are you supposed to remember everything D::::
O well, i'm a glutton for pain ;D
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
ketomai
Profile Joined June 2007
United States2789 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-23 22:29:16
September 23 2008 22:28 GMT
#20
It depends on which way you are saying is positive. Usually, I find that making UP positive is the easiest, therefore making acceleration negative (since when something falls, it's accelerating down). If you make acceleration positive, then you have to make Y distance negative since the acceleration is opposite to where the object is going (on the way up). It's much easier to picture that way. Yea taking physics C is hard then. Taking calculus and phys B before or during makes it much easier.
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
September 23 2008 22:34 GMT
#21
I'm taking Calc BC right now
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
ketomai
Profile Joined June 2007
United States2789 Posts
September 23 2008 22:49 GMT
#22
d=do+vit+1/2at^2
1.82=2.3+5.6154*t+.5*-9.8*t^2
0= -4.9t^2+5.6154t+.48
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24779 Posts
September 23 2008 22:58 GMT
#23
On September 24 2008 07:19 HeavOnEarth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2008 07:17 micronesia wrote:
Taking Physics C without taking another physics class before is quite tough.


How'd you know i didn't take a physics class before this? D:
Mind reader, you are.

I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not.

If yes: meh

If no: Kinda obvious from the OP.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-23 23:24:32
September 23 2008 23:01 GMT
#24
The "D:" within lies many unsolved mysteries...
For me it's sarcasm
or just friendly joking around :O
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
MuShu
Profile Joined March 2005
United States3223 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-24 00:04:11
September 23 2008 23:40 GMT
#25
Here's how I solved it (I think I did it all correctly), and I put each successive step in spoilers in case you wanna try it out yourself first:

You can ignore the weight, since gravity is always -9.8m/s^2 if down is negative.

So you have:
a=45.7m/s^2
g=-9.8m/s^2
initial v=0
distance to release=.69m converted from cm

To find the speed of the shot as it's released, use the third equation posted by nevake, and you'll get:

v^2= 0 + 2(45.7)(0.69)

+ Show Spoiler +
v= 7.94 m/s

Next I find the time it takes from the beginning to the releasing of the rock. To do that, I use the 1st equation, using the final velocity I found and the acceleration provided

7.94 - 9.8t
time to release = + Show Spoiler +
.174s


To find the time to the highest point, I also use the first equation. I know the final velocity is 0 because at the very top of the flight, the velocity is always zero, since to go from positive to negative velocity, it has to pass through 0 velocity. Also, the acceleration is -9.8m/s^2 since now that the man released the rock, only gravity is acting on it. So you get this equation:

0 = 7.94 - 9.8t
time to top = + Show Spoiler +
.81s


With the time from release to the highest point discovered, we can now use the 2nd equation to find the distance it takes to reach the top

distance to top = 0.69 + 7.94(.81) -4.9(.81^2) = + Show Spoiler +
3.91m


To find the time it takes to reach the man's head, we again use the 2nd equation, since we have the distance, initial velocity, and acceleration:

+ Show Spoiler +
1.82 = 4.9t
time man has to move before rock hits his head = + Show Spoiler +
.37s



And there you go. This problem you will consider easy later on after you've practiced how to apply the three equations, and other ones will be pretty much the same, you just need to apply them differently as they add in angles and two directions.


edit: I'm solving these algebraically by the way, not with Calculus, since my school only has 3 students who took AP Calc taking AP Physics as seniors, so most other people don't know any Calculus. I looked at some of the other answers ppl posted and they're different than mine, so I dunno, I guess check with your teacher since I don't wanna spend more time on this XD. I did this the most straightforward way I could think of using the 3 equations, and since he was throwing a 16 pound rock at that acceleration for about half a bodylength, 3.91m to the top sounds about right compared to like 10m in one of the other problems.

o yea, and make sure to tell us what the real answer is lol
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
September 24 2008 00:31 GMT
#26
Will do. Probably update with answer tomorrow.
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
SayaSP
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Laos5494 Posts
September 24 2008 00:53 GMT
#27
On September 24 2008 07:19 HeavOnEarth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2008 07:17 micronesia wrote:
Taking Physics C without taking another physics class before is quite tough.


How'd you know i didn't take a physics class before this? D:
Mind reader, you are.
The units are driving me crazy... everything has to be perfect
and u can't use like SI units with... metrics and god damn how are you supposed to remember everything D::::
O well, i'm a glutton for pain ;D

He's a certified physics teacher
[iHs]SSP | I-NO-KI BOM-BA-YE | のヮの http://tinyurl.com/MLIStheCV , MLIS.
Polyphasic
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States841 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-24 02:25:36
September 24 2008 02:19 GMT
#28
On September 24 2008 06:22 HeavOnEarth wrote:
Sam heaves a shot with weight 16-lb straight upward, giving
it a constant upward acceleration from rest of 45.7 m/s2
for a height 69.0 cm. He releases it at height 2.30 m above the ground. *Meaning the ball released his hand @ 2.30m above the ground* You may ignore air resistance.

What is the speed of the shot when he releases it?

How high above the ground does it go?

How much time does he have to get out of its way before it returns to the height of the top of his head, a distance 1.82 m above the ground?

It's not really a homework problem; she just posted it on the board and said try it at home , see if you can solve it ; and i wanna be the cool kid that knows the answer

Of course, I'm not blindly giving you this question without working on it, however i probably messed everything up :D

I don't expect anyone to do it but... if you could point me in the general direction that would be pretty awesome [: .

;edit;
Excuse my godawful drawing T_T
[image loading]


;edit2; Also 69cm = (69)1x10^-2 m or .69 m
And wow TL is really helpful :DD
Also, i suppose that when the ball is coming down ; g ( acceleration), due to gravity = ~9.81m/s^2

Ahh and also this wasn't a homework problem or anything she just gave it to us as a kind of eye opener , she's going to intro./ review it tomorrow in class.
So far we've just been doing physics I review so we're starting kinematics, plus the hurricane set us back a week( no school) so that would explain the lack of movement in the class? D:
Thanks for your help again !



please try to type the problem correctly so it can be solved.

you can't give something a constant acceleration by throwing it. constant acceleration means that it keeps accelerating, which isn't possible if you throw it.

if it is as you say, that there is a constant upward acceleration of 45.7m/s2, (and if you take into account that downward acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s2), then the result is that the object will continue to accelerate upwards indefinitely.

the problem should be straightforward if the 45.7 is velocity rather than acceleration. the object starts by having an upward velocity of 45.7. from then, each second that passes by, it loses 9.8 of its original velocity due to gravity. this means that it goes upwards for (45.7/9.8) seconds before it reaches its highest point.

=> so if while going upwards, its time spent is 45.7/9,8, and its average velocity is 45.7/2, you can figure out the distance.


=> now you can find the total height at the highest point. from there, you can find how long it takes for the object to reach a height of 1.82.


can't making a relationship last longer than 2 weeks, since 1984 :thumbs:
Hippopotamus
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
1914 Posts
September 24 2008 02:35 GMT
#29
On September 24 2008 11:19 Polyphasic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2008 06:22 HeavOnEarth wrote:
Sam heaves a shot with weight 16-lb straight upward, giving
it a constant upward acceleration from rest of 45.7 m/s2
for a height 69.0 cm. He releases it at height 2.30 m above the ground. *Meaning the ball released his hand @ 2.30m above the ground* You may ignore air resistance.

What is the speed of the shot when he releases it?

How high above the ground does it go?

How much time does he have to get out of its way before it returns to the height of the top of his head, a distance 1.82 m above the ground?

It's not really a homework problem; she just posted it on the board and said try it at home , see if you can solve it ; and i wanna be the cool kid that knows the answer

Of course, I'm not blindly giving you this question without working on it, however i probably messed everything up :D

I don't expect anyone to do it but... if you could point me in the general direction that would be pretty awesome [: .

;edit;
Excuse my godawful drawing T_T
[image loading]


;edit2; Also 69cm = (69)1x10^-2 m or .69 m
And wow TL is really helpful :DD
Also, i suppose that when the ball is coming down ; g ( acceleration), due to gravity = ~9.81m/s^2

Ahh and also this wasn't a homework problem or anything she just gave it to us as a kind of eye opener , she's going to intro./ review it tomorrow in class.
So far we've just been doing physics I review so we're starting kinematics, plus the hurricane set us back a week( no school) so that would explain the lack of movement in the class? D:
Thanks for your help again !



please try to type the problem correctly so it can be solved.

you can't give something a constant acceleration by throwing it. constant acceleration means that it keeps accelerating, which isn't possible if you throw it.

if it is as you say, that there is a constant upward acceleration of 45.7m/s2, (and if you take into account that downward acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s2), then the result is that the object will continue to accelerate upwards indefinitely.

the problem should be straightforward if the 45.7 is velocity rather than acceleration. the object starts by having an upward velocity of 45.7. from then, each second that passes by, it loses 9.8 of its original velocity due to gravity. this means that it goes upwards for (45.7/9.8) seconds before it reaches its highest point.

=> so if while going upwards, its time spent is 45.7/9,8, and its average velocity is 45.7/2, you can figure out the distance.


=> now you can find the total height at the highest point. from there, you can find how long it takes for the object to reach a height of 1.82.




You say all this in light of a posted solution on the 1st page?
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-24 02:52:53
September 24 2008 02:43 GMT
#30


please try to type the problem correctly so it can be solved.

but but i typed out the 69cm , it only goes up to 69 cm

if it is as you say, that there is a constant upward acceleration of 45.7m/s2, (and if you take into account that downward acceleration due to gravity is 9.8m/s2), then the result is that the object will continue to accelerate upwards indefinitely.

noooh it stops after the .69m thing
im sry ill make it clearer even though i bolded it and drew a picture and everything

;edit; im soo confused now T.T
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
Polyphasic
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States841 Posts
September 24 2008 02:59 GMT
#31
my bad. haha, in that case:

if the ball accelerates for .69 meters, after which its acceleration is 0 (presumably because it took .69 meters to throw the ball).

1- find the time it takes for the ball to go .69 meters if it starts at rest, and its acceleration is 45.7m/s2. (this is an equation you use)

2- after that, the scenario is that the ball starts from the end of the throw (starting point plus .69 meters) at the velocity you calculated earlier. from this point, the solution is same as my previous post.

=) don't take my toneless post too hard. i tend to be very friendly in real life.
can't making a relationship last longer than 2 weeks, since 1984 :thumbs:
HeavOnEarth
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States7087 Posts
September 24 2008 03:05 GMT
#32
Well i'll post all my answers and stuff + teachers solutions tomorrow! for now i finish my english work =/
"come korea next time... FXO house... 10 korean, 10 korean"
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24779 Posts
September 24 2008 10:41 GMT
#33
On September 24 2008 09:53 SayaSP wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2008 07:19 HeavOnEarth wrote:
On September 24 2008 07:17 micronesia wrote:
Taking Physics C without taking another physics class before is quite tough.


How'd you know i didn't take a physics class before this? D:
Mind reader, you are.
The units are driving me crazy... everything has to be perfect
and u can't use like SI units with... metrics and god damn how are you supposed to remember everything D::::
O well, i'm a glutton for pain ;D

He's a certified physics teacher

Only conditionally initially:

http://www.highered.nysed.gov/tcert/certificate/typesofcerts.htm#ci
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 54m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech124
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 1294
Leta 1140
BeSt 769
Hyuk 273
Larva 187
Mong 136
Mini 54
Soma 53
Killer 40
yabsab 28
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 23
ZergMaN 19
Aegong 17
Bale 11
hero 11
Noble 9
Purpose 5
Britney 0
Light 0
League of Legends
JimRising 549
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1119
shoxiejesuss975
olofmeister314
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King107
Other Games
Pyrionflax208
crisheroes188
RuFF_SC239
BEARDiaguz12
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 12
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 7
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV100
League of Legends
• Jankos2525
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Weekly
1h 54m
RSL Revival
1d
RSL Revival
1d 7h
Bombastic Starleague
1d 10h
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
OSC
2 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Bombastic Starleague
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
HomeStory Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
HomeStory Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
HomeStory Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
Douyu Cup 2026
Murky Cup 2026

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
SCTL 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
ASL Season 22:Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
BCC 2026
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
Heroes Pulsing #3
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.