EPTOn December 03 2007 08:34 TesisMech wrote:
he got banned for that? wtf
he got banned for that? wtf
he's a forum troll, sometimes his posts trick unsuspecting new people into thinkings he's for real
Let's sort this out - Page 2
| Blogs > JesusCruxRH |
|
Snet
United States3573 Posts
he's a forum troll, sometimes his posts trick unsuspecting new people into thinkings he's for real | ||
|
fight_or_flight
United States3988 Posts
On December 03 2007 11:58 Snet wrote: he's a forum troll, sometimes his posts trick unsuspecting new people into thinkings he's for real I didn't think he was a troll, and besides, most of his posts were in his blog. | ||
|
Aphelion
United States2720 Posts
On December 03 2007 12:38 fight_or_flight wrote: I didn't think he was a troll, and besides, most of his posts were in his blog. You don't know his history very well ;p | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On December 03 2007 08:34 TesisMech wrote: he got banned for that? wtf He's a previously frequently banned user. | ||
|
nA.Inky
United States794 Posts
As to JCRH, I won't pretend to know his history. I just know that what I saw seemed fine and he kept his posts within his own blog. Maybe he was up to some silly/lame stuff, but I only know what I saw. At the end, I did find his insults towards others questionable, especially considering that he was ostensibly trying to promote peaceful Christian values, but even then his insults were pretty tame compared to many that get thrown around on TL.net, including against him. As to this "using TL.net for a soapbox" stuff, I am curious what you all find acceptable and what is not acceptable, because as may be increasingly apparent, I create threads in which I speak my mind on some heavy issues. I try to always be respectful about it, but I do enjoy engaging conversation and argument. I've been a lurker on this website for about as long as this website has been around, and while a lot of conversation here is very immature (yet still often fun), there are also a lot of very intelligent people here, and I feel very happy to have this medium to discuss things with them. | ||
LosingID8
CA10828 Posts
| ||
|
lugggy
450 Posts
| ||
|
Aphelion
United States2720 Posts
On December 03 2007 15:03 nA.Inky wrote: I am curious what you all mean by the word "troll." As to JCRH, I won't pretend to know his history. I just know that what I saw seemed fine and he kept his posts within his own blog. Maybe he was up to some silly/lame stuff, but I only know what I saw. At the end, I did find his insults towards others questionable, especially considering that he was ostensibly trying to promote peaceful Christian values, but even then his insults were pretty tame compared to many that get thrown around on TL.net, including against him. As to this "using TL.net for a soapbox" stuff, I am curious what you all find acceptable and what is not acceptable, because as may be increasingly apparent, I create threads in which I speak my mind on some heavy issues. I try to always be respectful about it, but I do enjoy engaging conversation and argument. I've been a lurker on this website for about as long as this website has been around, and while a lot of conversation here is very immature (yet still often fun), there are also a lot of very intelligent people here, and I feel very happy to have this medium to discuss things with them. He has a history of stirring up crap over religion, even when he was atheist. If you read his whole range of posts you would have to know that he is either 1.)A genuine troll or 2.) completely psychotic. Everyone of his posts is completely close minded and transparent attempt to push his beliefs around. TL.net doesn't need one like him. | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On December 03 2007 23:22 lugggy wrote: It's important we silence people that are generating so much response, because too much response will obviously destroy this site. Only if the response generated is that of fickle and simple-midned people like you. Even then this won't "destroy this site," it'd just make it a breeding ground for trolls who can sway simpletons to stand up for them when they get banned or insulted. Defending a person you apparently know nothing about (due to the fact you are defending him despite his aforementioned history) with your sarcasm because you are improperly informed makes your case laughable. Read the responses of the people who have been here and know why he ought to be banned before making such a headstrong statement. | ||
|
TesisMech
Peru688 Posts
On December 03 2007 13:26 fanatacist wrote: He's a previously frequently banned user. Is that the justification? Funny that someone who disagree with the the majority here and makes a blog not harming anyone and very friendly gets banned and label as a troll, the only trolls i see is the people who throw insults around in RH blogs. Im surprise Idra didnt get banned instead of him ,the guy attacks people on a thread that someone DIED , thats acceptable? And pushing his beliefs around? no he is not its his blog his not pushing anyone to read, and the only time i saw him debating Atheism vs Christianity is in those type of religious threads where debate is acceptable. I would agree with the ban if he made threads in the general forum, but its his blog for god's sake. | ||
|
lugggy
450 Posts
On December 04 2007 05:51 fanatacist wrote: Only if the response generated is that of fickle and simple-midned people like you. Even then this won't "destroy this site," it'd just make it a breeding ground for trolls who can sway simpletons to stand up for them when they get banned or insulted. Defending a person you apparently know nothing about (due to the fact you are defending him despite his aforementioned history) with your sarcasm because you are improperly informed makes your case laughable. Read the responses of the people who have been here and know why he ought to be banned before making such a headstrong statement. I actually have read every single relevant post to this matter on the entire internet, so I alone have a right to express an opinion here. It takes a strong community to be afraid of what one person can possibly incite by his posts. Anyways I'm sure you're right and we are all safe now that his poisonous, poisonous presence has buried in the desert like the nuclear waste it was. I can't even remember how many times he ruined our attempts to have good threads. His destructive rampage is over and we can all rest assured now that the site will go back to kicking ass. But thanks  | ||
|
TesisMech
Peru688 Posts
| ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
EDIT: Sarcasm (the most original form of expression) leading to orgasm, obviously. | ||
|
TesisMech
Peru688 Posts
| ||
| ||
