|
Reasonings
I am compelled to reason out the Ideas that bring me into the ordeal of writing out such a manuscript as I am ploddingly manifesting and have been for quite some time. There seems to me a certain class of people(a) who ought to be able to be communicated the absolute difference between the quote what it is, “To Be and that it is Not” and the more Shakespearean, “To Be or Not To Be, that is the Question?” Somehow the domains do not transform and suddenly platonify upon reckoning with obvious superficial characteristics that are common across circumstances from Gold Mining to Plasma Physics (which I remind you lay behind man’s only known technology beyond the Nuclear Power that we depend on so dearly: That of Fusion Power). Therefore, mankind must adapt toward a certain asymmetry. A measure must be made to reduce Nuclear Power. The melt down at Fukushima Nuclear Plant is accountable for an knowably high and with no knowable maximum number of deaths in the coming years(1). The Nuclear Disaster at Fukushima is a sad instance of a toll that modern civilization’s fragile infrastructure, low in redundancy, and in the first-place a threat to many lives (e.g. risk of meltdown), owns moment for pause in the contemplations of the many of us who indeed live upon the very surface of this planet we call Earth, the object threatened by a lack of prudent safety measures (almost no measure to reduce the chance or severity of nuclear contamination is imprudent given the threat a meltdown represents).
Mankind does not each and all have equal knowledge of the environment in which we dwell. Those reading this text are among the lucky few who have achieved, or inherited (To one degree or another.), a terrific purvey of the world-wide similitude that men and women across the globe display. I have observed that every one of us can take joy in communication, expression, and varied experiences. That we often dwell amongst lonesome feelings if we are not engaged in dialog. Many tribal people of old tradition live with very different ideas of privacy (living a life entirely despite the non-ideation of it)..
Does not a dialog necessitate a level of acceptance that privacy has been sanctified and isolated from one’s person for the duration of interaction? Then what is the standard minimum privacy for an individual in terms of the Great Conversation? But I do not have to know everything that is going to happen next in order to foresee the benefits that the scientists behind a breakthrough of something such as Plasma and Quantum Physic’s rolling out of Fusion Power Plants may bring to the world. Let alone the benefit to their pocketbooks. Neither is there squat to know about Fusion before one sees the immense need to curtail any future meltdowns at Nuclear Power Plants by investing more dollars into creating and implementing more sophisticated safety protocol. A larger number of laboratories need to exist, and be involved in researching the basics of Nuclear Phenomena in order to search for a true breakthrough in understanding. Today’s method of sponsoring research has led us into future-material composites and yet we still don’t quite know where radioactive half-lifes.. go half-off to.
Perhaps.. now we can focus our priority on Nuclear Physic’s basic (pre-theory) Phenomenal characteristics in seeking out a real breakthrough observation that allows us to store radiation 999% more effectively in ½ the size of today’s barrel-boxes because the metallic container happens to be shaped like a hazelnut, an unexpected result from a small laboratory’s tinkering.. Maybe with a more expansive direction in the way we sponsor research, results from the wide and varied number of individual laboratories under the direction of entrepreneurial scientists are mathematically more likely to bring about the next breakthrough observation that enhances our understanding of Nuclear Energy, and our international implementation of it.
Even for a seemingly straightforward technology such as wind turbines, one can see how dimensions of merit emerged through a synthesis of the inputs of several actors.
-Raghu Garud, Peter Karnoe(2003)
Best Regards,
2primenumbers
reference
Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy p277-300. Feb 2001 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001002
Raghu Garuda, , ,
Peter Karnøeb, 1,
Hegel, The Philosophy of Right
18th Century
(1)Consider that a group of thousands of humans are now living in a new biome of high radiation with free interbiome travel with non-irradiated zones. Consider the recent research into the Y-Chromosome that reveals an ability to rapidly change the very DNA traveling inside of a man’s body. And this DNA is passed into sex partners and, of course, to offspring in the natural course of reproduction. Populations of life (human, mammal, even viral lifeforms) in radiated zones will accelerate mutation of local pathogens due to the diminished immune system of its carriers. By this awful handicap to the human immune system, a Virus or Highly Sociable Bacteria benefits from an easier time incerting itself into and thriving among the composition of the population of life in the radiated biome.This conclusion reminds me of Jurassic Park and that helped me not feel sad, T-Rexes are cool, but it seems that we need to create travel restrictions (zero travel in or out of radiated zones) along with gigantic, electric fences with guards so that no living thing can cross the way into nor out of the radiation zone. Fact is we need legions of pilots behind computer terminals in a remote location flying drones and shooting down any type of bird and large retrofitted B-52s issuing regular “crop dustings” (along the whole loop of the gate’s wall) in the midst of pesticides being consistently emitted from geysers built upon the rook towers of the enormous, gated fence with armed guards that separates the possibility of zombies virus mutatnts from genociding Fukushima’s regional cities from our timeline of reality. Besides, viruses can easily travel overseas these days.
(a)certain class of people: footers are for geeks
 
|
It is no good to write about nature and science like you came out of your first philosophy lecture. It clouds what you want to say and alienates readers.
Iirc nobody has died from radioactivity leaking from Fukushima. It's not sure there will be a measurable amount of deaths due to radioactivity. Or in other words: Even if somebody dies, it's most likely we will never know.
Thus the death toll of Fukushima makes a piss poor argument against the use of NPP.
I'm not even sure what you want to say about research of plasma physics. Or privilege of Internet users.
|
2prime, just as a piece of constructive feedback from an anonymous reader, I think you need to learn to write (and probably speak) English more clearly.
For example, this series of sentences:
There seems to me a certain class of people(a) who ought to be able to be communicated the absolute difference between the quote what it is, “To Be and that it is Not” and the more Shakespearean, “To Be or Not To Be, that is the Question?” Somehow the domains do not transform and suddenly platonify upon reckoning with obvious superficial characteristics that are common across circumstances from Gold Mining to Plasma Physics
Is deeply confusing. Maybe you're a genius, I don't know...maybe its easy for you to understand what other people find nonsensical. But if you intend to post blogs and have people read them, it should be comprehensible to everyone!
Try to read what other users have written in the featured blogs section, as an example. I think reading and speaking to people in general will help you learn more about proper syntax and grammar. It is strange that you have still not learned how to write in proper English as I'm assuming you're at least 15 years old by now...all I can say is keep at it because otherwise your thoughts aren't all that useful to anyone garbled as they are (in my humble opinion).
Also I have to echo what Hryul wrote...no one died from Fukushima, even after it went through an earthquake and a tsunami. You have to admit that's pretty good, compared to the dozens if not hundreds that die from pollution from other carbon-based fuel sources.
|
On August 08 2014 06:36 2primenumbers wrote:
Hegel, The Philosophy of Right
18th Century
19th :p
5/5
|
With this kind of writing, you're going to do really well in philosophy class.
|
Hong Kong9160 Posts
Strunk and White
Omit needless words.
Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.
Actually, just read the entire thing before you write another set of words again and go through Microsoft Word right-click thesaurus just to pick the largest words without care for what they actually mean.
You will do well to do this before a grader gets a hold of your term paper and fails it.
http://www.bartleby.com/141/
(Edit: I'm clearly just mad because this blog ended up not being about nuclear war and nuclear strategy.)
|
strunk and white don't know shit about ART
|
|
|
Hong Kong9160 Posts
|
Russian Federation3631 Posts
On August 08 2014 11:44 bookwyrm wrote:
strunk and white don't know shit about ART
this guy knows what's up
|
On August 08 2014 09:12 Hryul wrote:
It is no good to write about nature and science like you came out of your first philosophy lecture. It clouds what you want to say and alienates readers.
Iirc nobody has died from radioactivity leaking from Fukushima. It's not sure there will be a measurable amount of deaths due to radioactivity. Or in other words: Even if somebody dies, it's most likely we will never know.
Thus the death toll of Fukushima makes a piss poor argument against the use of NPP.
I'm not even sure what you want to say about research of plasma physics. Or privilege of Internet users.
http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/458822-rejecting-technological-determinism#10
To everyone in this thread: look at this guy's past posts. No really, go read some of them. He is a nutcase or a devout troll or possibly some mixture. Don't link to his youtube channel, that will just encourage him.
|
So many big and unnecessary words that it clutters your actual message. Idk if you are in college or whatever but a piece like this would go into the trash of most competent professors mainly because your sentence structuring and word relationships are messy and disorganized, sorry to say. I can't even give you a real opinion on what you wrote because I struggled so much getting through each sentence that I gave up trying to absorb all of it.
Sorry dude. Proofread and dumb it down a bit if you want a public response to it.
|
On August 08 2014 09:12 Hryul wrote:
It is no good to write about nature and science like you came out of your first philosophy lecture. It clouds what you want to say and alienates readers.
Iirc nobody has died from radioactivity leaking from Fukushima. It's not sure there will be a measurable amount of deaths due to radioactivity. Or in other words: Even if somebody dies, it's most likely we will never know.
Thus the death toll of Fukushima makes a piss poor argument against the use of NPP.
I'm not even sure what you want to say about research of plasma physics. Or privilege of Internet users.
IT is the trolls such as yourself with no conscience of the passage of time who reward the fools who build financial deathtraps for future generations and bring real physical hazards such as war and nuclear meltdowns upon the human race. You and the fool are one and the same. That no-one has died from Fukushima's radioactive spill is a bald-faced lie given the evidence of nuclear radiation's effect upon the human organism and the fact that huge swathes of human populations have been exposed to radiation not typically scene at the Earth surface were nuclear disaster not an option (or if safety were better provided for).
Best Regards,
2primenumbers
|
More crazy than is scene in the average blog.
|
On August 09 2014 05:52 DefMatrixUltra wrote:
More crazy than is scene in the average blog.
I've scene what you did there.
|
You can write normal dude. Remember half a year ago when you wrote this?
+ Show Spoiler +On February 26 2014 17:31 2primenumbers wrote:
JOKE THREAD ROFL NOOBS
I'm a twisted psycho with schemes and plans laid out bare
I take that ho whenever I please she gets on her back
position myself just so in that spot so I hit the G thang
That's my Goal,
$100,000 G's before the year's done
My hood rats know that with that kind of case I'll throw 'em a bone
This year I think we'll rent out Richard Branson's private island to mark this milestone
I'll invite your Ma' so even she won't be around to visit your tombstone
Rest in Pieces Noob
Nice try professor green.
|
On August 09 2014 05:34 2primenumbers wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2014 09:12 Hryul wrote:
It is no good to write about nature and science like you came out of your first philosophy lecture. It clouds what you want to say and alienates readers.
Iirc nobody has died from radioactivity leaking from Fukushima. It's not sure there will be a measurable amount of deaths due to radioactivity. Or in other words: Even if somebody dies, it's most likely we will never know.
Thus the death toll of Fukushima makes a piss poor argument against the use of NPP.
I'm not even sure what you want to say about research of plasma physics. Or privilege of Internet users. IT is the trolls such as yourself with no conscience of the passage of time who reward the fools who build financial deathtraps for future generations and bring real physical hazards such as war and nuclear meltdowns upon the human race. You and the fool are one and the same. That no-one has died from Fukushima's radioactive spill is a bald-faced lie given the evidence of nuclear radiation's effect upon the human organism and the fact that huge swathes of human populations have been exposed to radiation not typically scene at the Earth surface were nuclear disaster not an option (or if safety were better provided for). Best Regards, 2primenumbers
I haven't scene this evidence of yours but I would love to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
