• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:54
CEST 10:54
KST 17:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26
StarCraft 2
General
Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
Mihu vs Korea Players Statistics Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 22381 users

Quantum Mechanics - Page 3

Blogs > 0x64
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
April 01 2013 20:48 GMT
#41
no can answer my question?
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24644 Posts
April 01 2013 20:51 GMT
#42
I can't seem to load the video, but isn't reflection of light off a boundary dependent on the conductivity? For example, a mirror is very conductive so most of the light reflects off of it, giving you a nice image of yourself. Water is much less conductive than silver or other metals. On the other hand, optical density for dielectrics plays a role, too. The reflectivity will depend on how much the speed decreases as light travels from air to water.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12246 Posts
April 01 2013 21:24 GMT
#43
I think (not sure) the reflection thing that Feynman talks about is an effect from quantum electrodynamics, which is the quantum theory of electromagnetic interaction, rather than quantum mechanics, which is the theory first developed in the 30s by Shroedinger etc. Quantum electrodynamics was the first quantum field theory developed (and one of the key areas in Feynman's research in the 50's), and it's some REALLY complex shit. Much more so than quantum mechanics, which is Shroedinger's equation, canonical commutation rules etc.

As far as structure of matter/applied quantum mechanics goes, wether a material is transparent or not depends on it's conductivity, yeah.
Here's the general idea: solving Shroedinger's equation for a system means finding which energies that system can have. For some systems, this energy is discrete, so only a select, precise levels are possible. This is the example in atom orbitals: the electrons can't orbit at whatever energy level they want, they must follow precise energy levels (and orbits). On the other hand, other systems can have any energy possible, which is known as a continous spectrum. This is the case, for example, in free photons.
When it comes to solids, the energy levels are organized in bands. Some intervals in energy are allowed, others aren't. Insulators are materials in which the bands are all filled completely. This means the electrons need a lot of energy to shift between one band and the other, more than visible light can give; this makes them transparent to radiation which has as much energy as the gap between one band and the other. Additionally it makes it harder to incite any kind of electric current, since you need so much energy to move the electrons.
Conductors on the other hand have half filled bands, which means it's possible that the electrons in a half filled band will absorb a smaller amount of energy (for example from visible light) and be excited without jumping from one band to the other.
In that sense, conductivity and reflection are dependent on each other. I'm sure there's more complex things going on as well, but that's how it was presented to me in the structure of matter class i took.

If you are interested in learning more about quantum electrodynamics i recommend reading Feynman's "QED". It's a collection of the lessons he gave (i believe they might even be the same as those videos) and it's a very good read, without any math. I read it in 12th grade and was able to understand most of it.
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-01 21:40:29
April 01 2013 21:34 GMT
#44
It doesn't really reflects in a sense that we are used to in everyday objects, the photons actually gets absorbed and released back in a random direction. and this process depends on a few things,

first it depend on what kind of light. if the light source is the sun then the photons produced by the sun has a continuous spectrum, meaning it has all different kind of wavelengths. If it's a light source that produce only a specific wavelength of photons then none of the photon will get absorbed unless we have the right kind of atom as the reflecting surface.

second it depend on the type of material the reflective surface is compose of, different kind of materials have different atoms, and different atoms only absorb few specific kind of wavelength photons and letting the other photons pass right through them without absorbing them. And that's because only the photons that have the right amount of energy will excite an atom and make its valence electron jump to the next orbital. Once the atom finish being excited and turn back into ground state, that energy it absorbed from the photon is released and turn back into a photon, but it is released in a random direction compare to the direction of the original photon that was absorbed a fraction of a seconds ago. and then percentage of the "reflected" photons depend on the range of absorb-able wavelength the atoms that made of the surface.

thirdly, out of all those randomly re-emitted photons from the surface, because they are randomly directed, some of them could be re-emitted further into the more atoms and gets absorbed again and again until they make their way out, those that made it out through the bottom will form a refraction, and those who make it out of the surface will from a reflection.

my question is about whether or not i understood what Fraynmen said about the photons that are being reflected and refracted. those 3 points i mention above all consider the photon as a particle, but to understand the reflection and refraction, we need to think of the photon as a wave. and here is what I am not sure about and want someone who know better to clarify or re-affirm, the randomly re-emitted photons also behave like waves and do go all over the place, however the waves of different photons have the same wavelength because they are all re-emitted from the same type of atom, hence if they are spaced apart with the right distance, they would ending up canceling each other out. and therefore the only place we don't see cancellation are where we will find the reflection and refraction.
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12246 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-01 21:57:10
April 01 2013 21:43 GMT
#45
As far as scattering processes and collisions go, to my knowledge photons are usually treated as a particle rather than a wave. Imagine a ball bouncing off a wall; in this case the reflective solid is the wall and the ball is the photon. The math used actually follows similar rules, ie, conservation of momentum and energy.

I don't think it has to do with interference because in reflection becuase you usually see an individual beam rather than a a interference pattern. Additionally, the light waves in a monochromatic weave woudln't necessarily cancel each other out simply because while they have the same wave length, they'd need to have opposite phases as well.
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
April 01 2013 21:48 GMT
#46
what is the phases you are speaking of?
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12246 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-01 21:58:30
April 01 2013 21:56 GMT
#47
An example of a monodimensional wave is:
f(x) = A*sin(k*x+p);

A is the amplitude, k is the weave number (which related to the frequency, which in turn is related to wavelength), x is the point in space, p is the phase.

If two waves (of identical wavelegth) have the same phase at a fixed point in space they are said to be in phase (i think that's the english expression), so they produce constructive interference: the amplitudes sum each other.
If they have opposite phases (for example one is 0 and the other is 180 degrees), they are said to be out of phase and the two amplitudes subtract each other, producing destructive interference. For example, these two functions (which can represent a wave) are out of phase: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=draw sin(x), sin(x+pi)

If photons are emitted with random phases you will not be able to see any kind of interference pattern. The reason you don't see interference patterns for every beam of light existing is because the phases don't interact with each other at a macroscopical level, since they will be all distributed randomly.

Note that this is classical physics. I don't know how things change in QED, i haven't studied any of it at a college level.
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-01 23:06:37
April 01 2013 22:52 GMT
#48
he talk about reflection off of a mirror @28:30 of this video "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMSgE62S6oo"

he talks about how light in nature will find the shortest path to the detector/observer, at around 40 he said something about the path that's not the shortest have their amplitude canceled out. in your equation, A is the amplitude, and only way for the A to be cancel out is to have the sin(k*x+p) to turn out to be opposite signs.
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12246 Posts
April 01 2013 23:09 GMT
#49
1) Feynman is fucking awesome.
2) Yeah. Basically what is happening is that all the contributions that are further away from the centered, "obvious" path have meaningless contributions, so it's as if the light was following the path everyone "experiences" at a macroscopic scale. Feynman explains it better than i do. The arrows he's talking about aren't related to wavelength though, they are phases (more or less). If you have time to either watch all of those videos or read QED (which is based on those lessons) you'll get it better than i can explain it.
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
April 01 2013 23:27 GMT
#50
Feynman is a master at explaining his ideas. even ppl like me who have limited understanding and only self taught for most part have a chance to understand what quantum mechanic is about.
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
April 01 2013 23:59 GMT
#51
... This conversation I've been reading has alternately been informative, interesting, and "oww my brain hurts".

It reminds me of reading a book about black holes in high school (can't remember which one, it was the '80s).
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
April 02 2013 00:39 GMT
#52
we don't need to be scientists to be interested and learn about these, the internet can help us become scientifically literate.
I started my investigation about what is dark matter and dark energy, and in order to know that, I go search the history of the discovery of them, and that lead me to learn about the blue and red shift of the spectrum, and then that lead me to learn about what exactly produces spectrum, and that lead me to learn about how photon electron interaction in an atom, and that lead me to learn about how scientists can figure out the temperature of the star based on it's spectrum, and that leads me to understand how we figure out the distance of the stars based on the temperature and spectrum, and the list goes on and on, I have no one to tell me what to learn, I am just following my interest. Feynman's lectures touches on what I learned and it makes a connection when he himself said over and over that even he the one who came up with these and won a Noble prize for it does not understand these at all.
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
April 02 2013 08:21 GMT
#53
On April 02 2013 09:39 rei wrote:
Feynman's lectures touches on what I learned and it makes a connection when he himself said over and over that even he the one who came up with these and won a Noble prize for it does not understand these at all.


That's one of the great things about Feynman. He's an honest scientist, and excels at conveying the wonder without sounding in the least bit condescending towards anyone.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 6m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech84
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3889
ToSsGirL 521
Aegong 160
firebathero 156
GoRush 143
Movie 73
Shine 43
Sharp 36
Barracks 28
Backho 20
[ Show more ]
Bale 20
Noble 18
yabsab 17
JulyZerg 4
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma607
XaKoH 375
XcaliburYe266
Fuzer 171
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss651
Stewie2K537
edward141
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King104
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor198
Other Games
singsing914
ceh9586
Happy426
crisheroes124
NeuroSwarm79
Pyrionflax0
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4565
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 71
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 15
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota246
League of Legends
• Stunt419
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
2h 6m
Replay Cast
15h 6m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 2h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 2h
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Cheesadelphia
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.