|
A fun test to check if you are tonedeaf.
http://jakemandell.com/tonedeaf/
below 55% you can consider yourself tonedeaf. Excellent musicians seldom score above 80.
My brother who can play everything from Bach on the piano scored that. While poor little me only scored 58% lol. Seems he stole all that dna from me the bastard 
   
|
72%.
Some of those feel really hard just because of how long the phrases are.
|
United States24614 Posts
I recall doing this a while back... maybe there was a thread?
I tried it and of course the phone starts ringing during lol... I didn't need to get the phone but it threw me off! I think it helped that I recall doing this type of test before: 75%.
|
61%, Although I'm sure most of my mistakes came from me thinking there was a difference.
|
wtf, 83.3% O_o And I've done nothing with music, just started playing guitar recently.
|
80.6%, are you sure excellent musicians seldom score above 80? Never learned to play an instrument in my life :p
|
United States8476 Posts
I'm terrible with tones. =( 63.9%
|
88.9%, I don't think the test is as hard as it's made out to be.
|
72%, that was a pretty cool test, glad I'm not tonedeaf ;D
|
zzzz... my gf just hit 86.1%
And I was laughing at her when she tells me she hates visiting lectures where the profs have "weird voices" ... I'll try this tomorrow myself. :o
|
On February 03 2013 02:40 MrDudeMan wrote: 80.6%, are you sure excellent musicians seldom score above 80? Never learned to play an instrument in my life :p
It's what the test said somewhere. Maybe you just have a hidden talent :D
|
Haha I like the survey. "before you get to see your score please fill this in." And then one of the questions read. "what was your score on the tonedeaf test". How do you even do that mistake?
Edit: Looks like my score was 75%. Decent I guess.
|
I was like half paying attention and scored %91.7. Also, a few of these examples sounded like they were directly lifted from older games.
|
I got 77.8%. Sweet. Was a lot higher than I had expected.
|
United States24614 Posts
On February 03 2013 02:54 wo1fwood wrote: I was like half paying attention and scored %91.7. This reminds me of those people who "never study and always get maximum grades because of how easy it is." You should be a bit more humble... even on the internet lol.
|
63.9% Ha! Now I can tell my mom that I'm *not* tone deaf! Most of my problem was actually attention. I'll have to try it again when I'm not so sick and can focus...
|
On February 03 2013 02:56 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 02:54 wo1fwood wrote: I was like half paying attention and scored %91.7. This reminds me of those people who "never study and always get maximum grades because of how easy it is." You should be a bit more humble... even on the internet lol.
Aye lol, I wish we could see a list of recent results to see how many of those 90+ results are actually there  On the other hand, maybe we gamers are more adepted to computer tones?
|
On February 03 2013 02:56 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 02:54 wo1fwood wrote: I was like half paying attention and scored %91.7. This reminds me of those people who "never study and always get maximum grades because of how easy it is." You should be a bit more humble... even on the internet lol.
Everybody has a 14 inch penis on the internet man.
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ujAurqH.png)
25 years old, 16 years of guitar, 11 years of piano, and a shit ton of ear training since I was ten. I like that they make you guess what your score was before showing it, because I was so unsure of many of them that I guessed that I got 75%.
I think many people could get 100 if their audio is good enough. Also, you can't just listen to the melody, some of them had the bass line held for longer on the second clip even though the melody was the same.
|
United States8476 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:00 SolHeiM wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 02:56 micronesia wrote:On February 03 2013 02:54 wo1fwood wrote: I was like half paying attention and scored %91.7. This reminds me of those people who "never study and always get maximum grades because of how easy it is." You should be a bit more humble... even on the internet lol. Everybody has a 14 inch penis on the internet man. He kind of cheated cause he's a composer irl =P.
|
|
On February 03 2013 03:07 hypercube wrote:Yay, I'm not tone-deaf. + Show Spoiler +Probably. 58.3% 
Same as me  Not tone deaf but close. How's your singing? Mine is great, it just comes out of my throat a bit rotten and everyone starts running  Which is, of course, no reason to not sing when I'm drunk, besides the occasional friends lost.
|
On February 03 2013 03:00 Zandar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 02:56 micronesia wrote:On February 03 2013 02:54 wo1fwood wrote: I was like half paying attention and scored %91.7. This reminds me of those people who "never study and always get maximum grades because of how easy it is." You should be a bit more humble... even on the internet lol. Aye lol, I wish we could see a list of recent results to see how many of those 90+ results are actually there  On the other hand, maybe we gamers are more adepted to computer tones? Sorry, wan't intending to be a dick. Like monk said, I am a classically trained composer, so I should be scoring well on this kind of test as its very similar to a lot of aural skills testing that musicians do in college.
Also its very likely that helps, considering the basic synthesis techniques that have been used from early games. The more familiar you are to these things the more adept you'll probably be at identification.
Edit: ok, so I made a more concerted effort to actually listen, and scored %97.2.
+ Show Spoiler [img] +
|
On February 03 2013 03:11 Zandar wrote:Same as me  Not tone deaf but close. How's your singing? Mine is great, it just comes out of my throat a bit rotten 
IDK, no one heard it and lived to tell the tale. I guess if singing and music were a core economic subject I would have been considered special.
Seriously, I can't sing and can't play any musical insturment
|
United States24614 Posts
What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body.
|
Because if you are near tone deaf you have a problem to sing the proper tones, so you sing a lot more false tones compared to someone who's not that tone deaf I think.
|
77.8 and I've been playing music for some time. I know I messed up some of them unnecessarily, so I feel like a noob. It doesn't seem to me like the "seldom above 80" thing would be quite true, though.
|
83.3% Correct I play music, but I'm only a drummer (of ~5 - 6 years)
|
On February 03 2013 03:15 micronesia wrote: What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body.
I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference.
|
On February 03 2013 03:13 wo1fwood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 03:00 Zandar wrote:On February 03 2013 02:56 micronesia wrote:On February 03 2013 02:54 wo1fwood wrote: I was like half paying attention and scored %91.7. This reminds me of those people who "never study and always get maximum grades because of how easy it is." You should be a bit more humble... even on the internet lol. Aye lol, I wish we could see a list of recent results to see how many of those 90+ results are actually there  On the other hand, maybe we gamers are more adepted to computer tones? Sorry, wan't intending to be a dick. Like monk said, I am a classically trained composer, so I should be scoring well on this kind of test as its very similar to a lot of aural skills testing that musicians do in college. Also its very likely that helps, considering the basic synthesis techniques that have been used from early games. The more familiar you are to these things the more adept you'll probably be at identification.
It's true, but it's also talent. I can play some random keys on the piano and my brother knows which notes/tones they were, just by hearing. I can't even hear if it's false or not.
He can explain to me why Bach is so perfect mathematicly, many complex melodies on top of eachother. Perfect harmony. I can understand it, but I cannot hear why it's so perfect. Because I cannot hear it if those melodies together produce false tones or not.
|
United States24614 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:20 G_G wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 03:15 micronesia wrote: What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body. I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference. I would guess you are right, but it seems like many people link your abilities on a test like this with your singing abilities... that seems incorrect to me. Maybe being tone deaf in the context of this test can hurt, but I doubt that it's the only factor that contributes to why your singing sounds worse to you then to an observer.
|
Man, I thought I was doing horribly as I went through this, but 86.1%. I basically relied on remembering the rhythm and seeing if either phrase sounded like it had "wrong notes" in it. Only a few sounded like they weren't even close.
I played the flute all through high school, but was never that serious about it; I never practiced outside of school and haven't touched it since. I do listen to a fair amount of classical, though. I'll have my wife try it later, she took classical piano lessons for 8 years or so and always did well at competitions.
|
On February 03 2013 03:17 Zandar wrote: Because if you are near tone deaf you have a problem to sing the proper tones, so you sing a lot more false tones compared to someone who's not that tone deaf I think. But it doesn't work the other way around -- having perfect pitch won't make you a good singer.
|
On February 03 2013 03:24 Iranon wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 03:17 Zandar wrote: Because if you are near tone deaf you have a problem to sing the proper tones, so you sing a lot more false tones compared to someone who's not that tone deaf I think. But it doesn't work the other way around -- having perfect pitch won't make you a good singer.
Yes that's true, only goes the other way.
|
On February 03 2013 03:22 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 03:20 G_G wrote:On February 03 2013 03:15 micronesia wrote: What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body. I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference. I would guess you are right, but it seems like many people link your abilities on a test like this with your singing abilities... that seems incorrect to me. Maybe being tone deaf in the context of this test can hurt, but I doubt that it's the only factor that contributes to why your singing sounds worse to you then to an observer. Being able to hear these rhythmic/harmonic or timbral differences really well, and being able to reproduce them with accuracy on your voice are somewhat different skills, though there is a lot of overlap (like being able to hear should help in reproduction, but I've known a lot of musicians who can identify these differences, but cant reproduce them vocally).
What this guy is testing isn't whether you can sing back pitches accurately, but how well you can recognize the aforementioned changes.
|
Never had musical instruction
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/iMvGcrg.png)
Apparently I'm super talented yet I dont know jackshit about music at all, don't even play any instrument...
|
Btw I used 'false', since that's the dutch word for 2 tones who don't sound good together, not sure if that's the word in English too. I google translated 'valse toon' and it gave me 'false tone'
|
|
I got a score of 86.1 % 28 years old male with no music experience except singing when i drive to work and back.
|
I thought about it some more, and I realized that through exercises and tests from my teachers and some music courses, I've actually spent several hundred hours at least (over 16 years) just listening to music and having to tap out the rhythm or identify some other aspect of what I had heard. One thing my second guitar teacher did was play a short passage of a piece he knows but I don't, that has two melodies, and then I would play back each of the melodies separately. I think that's why I heard differences between clips that had no difference in the melody, because I was listening to the whole thing by habit. I would actually like a program that generated a random melody and bass line/second melody (doesn't have to sound good), and then a second one with a minor change. It would actually be good practice.
I'm starting to think this is like IQ tests, where the more you take, the better you get at them, even though you're not actually getting any smarter in general, just better at IQ tests.
|
On February 03 2013 03:42 Sicion wrote: I got a score of 86.1 % 28 years old male with no music experience except singing when i drive to work and back.
I guess it shows that amount of being tone deaf is mostly about the talent you are born with. While practice can make it even better, I don't think I can ever reach 80
|
Also, if you reach 80+ you will post your results here. If you reach 60- fat chance you won't
|
Another 86.1% . Diamond league here too, I guess. 
Looking at the stats after the result page, it looks like the average is 73%, so I guess the thing about talented musicians is just to make people more relaxed about their score / influence guesses about their ability.
As for people redoing - I'm sure I could get 100 if I "properly concentrated" since it tells you the answers afterwards. :p
It's also interesting to see that only 23% of people got no. 33 right (I didn't).
|
91%, shoulda been higher, I didn't really understand the quiz for the first few questions lol.
|
|
Zzzz 80.6%, although didn't realize until the very end when I started noticing too many of the same melody but different timings that the timings probably didn't matter...
|
63% or something, despite many years of musical training from elementary though high school (though it's been 5 years since I touched an instrument)....
I always did know my natural pitch perception was quite poor, and my singing is bad too, so not really surprised how low I got.
I think if the test was conducted using traditional orchestral instruments I would have scored higher. I guess people with better natural ability and/or more training can adjust to hearing the abstract electronic sounds.
ps. I really hate to confirm the stereotype, but I was a violist...
|
On February 03 2013 03:22 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 03:20 G_G wrote:On February 03 2013 03:15 micronesia wrote: What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body. I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference. I would guess you are right, but it seems like many people link your abilities on a test like this with your singing abilities... that seems incorrect to me. Maybe being tone deaf in the context of this test can hurt, but I doubt that it's the only factor that contributes to why your singing sounds worse to you then to an observer.
It could affect your ability to be in tune. What I would expect is that someone scoring well on this test is that they would recognize easily if they are off in pitch when singing something or singing alone with something.
However, this says nothing about their ability to correctly adjust pitch and get back to singing on key. That has a mechanical aspect. You can know you are out of tune but not have the coordination to be able to adjust and anticipate upcoming pitches correctly.
It also says nothing about your technique/tone/resonance. You might be wonderfully in tune but be singing in a raspy, nasal tone.
|
75%
I think I missed a lot of them because I was only listening for the melody.
|
83.3 % , I guess I had luck.
I can't make any differences between " good " and " bad " earphones for example and I have shitty taste when it comes to music ( that doesn't mean I can't hear but still ).
And I agree with all the " the long one are hard " , especially if they are the same ...
|
83.3 for me. Also as I was going through the quiz, I felt like some of the songs were from like Zelda and Mario games a bit. Then I read here that someone else thought the same haha.
|
|
86.1%, I redid it after trying to get better score and paying more attention but I got 86.1% again 
im pretty sure I can't get better score now xD
|
Lalalaland34486 Posts
I got 75%. I don't know how I feel about this test, I have perfect pitch and can easily identify any note you play for me. But this test tests more than just that, a huge part of it is memory alone.
Was still fun to give it a try. ^_^
|
Got 70% with cheap earbud audio in a room with TV playing in the background. I think using a 1000$ noise cancelling headset would make this so much easier .
Edit: 0 experience in playing an instrument.
|
75%. I had no clue what I was doing. Just sort of listened to the two and if one seemed wrong I mashed the red button. I think I have pretty shitty hearing tbh when it comes to music.
|
I think it depends on how much you focus lol, I actually did pretty bad but I have perfect pitch. Maybe it's a memory thing :x
|
|
Wasn't paying attention -> 66%. Paying attention -> 77%... I think it's about memory imo.
|
86.1%. It's weird because I play the drums and haven't done theory extensively. Think I also could have done better if I wasn't on my shittop, but thats not really an excuse :p
|
|
Yeah, I just did it again and tried to pay attention; went up to 83%. I still spaced out though lol, imho it's much more about focus/memory than about recognizing pitch, at least for me. There were a lot of false alarms for me, probably because the simpler ones would stand out a TON, but when there were longer passages, I just lost focus or couldn't remember.
|
![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/1WtOn)
Paradox much? How do I fill in the form if I don't know my score; yet in order to know my score I must fill in the form -_-
|
United States8476 Posts
1. It's supposed to be your best guess. 2. It's optional.
|
Guessed 69.4% because I thought it was really hard, got 91.7%. I took piano lessons for 5 years when I was younger.
Edit: just noticed my dark templar icon... goes well with my sig!
|
United States24614 Posts
On February 03 2013 05:00 L_Master wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 03:22 micronesia wrote:On February 03 2013 03:20 G_G wrote:On February 03 2013 03:15 micronesia wrote: What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body. I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference. I would guess you are right, but it seems like many people link your abilities on a test like this with your singing abilities... that seems incorrect to me. Maybe being tone deaf in the context of this test can hurt, but I doubt that it's the only factor that contributes to why your singing sounds worse to you then to an observer. It could affect your ability to be in tune. What I would expect is that someone scoring well on this test is that they would recognize easily if they are off in pitch when singing something or singing alone with something. Our voice sounds different to us than it does to others, though. The way in which it sounds different will vary from person to person, independent of the results of this test, I believe.
|
On February 03 2013 06:34 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2013 05:00 L_Master wrote:On February 03 2013 03:22 micronesia wrote:On February 03 2013 03:20 G_G wrote:On February 03 2013 03:15 micronesia wrote: What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body. I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference. I would guess you are right, but it seems like many people link your abilities on a test like this with your singing abilities... that seems incorrect to me. Maybe being tone deaf in the context of this test can hurt, but I doubt that it's the only factor that contributes to why your singing sounds worse to you then to an observer. It could affect your ability to be in tune. What I would expect is that someone scoring well on this test is that they would recognize easily if they are off in pitch when singing something or singing alone with something. Our voice sounds different to us than it does to others, though. The way in which it sounds different will vary from person to person, independent of the results of this test, I believe. Yes, but the very idea of pitch is that of an objective metric with which to measure a certain aural quality of a piece of sound (most of the "differences" in hearing your own voice versus a bystander hearing it deal with timbre and tone more than pitch). In other words, a singer with perfect pitch sings a G, and although that G does not sound exactly like the one played on a pitch pipe, it is still most certainly a G. Similarly, although two people might hear the same note differently, it's pitch is going to be one of the aspects that two listeners agree on most strongly, given that they both have good senses of relative pitch.
On that note, it is worthwhile to keep in mind that "perfect pitch" is rather rare and means that an individual is able to create and recognize a healthy musical note without external assistance from something like a pitch pipe or piano. "relative pitch" is a skill that most musicians and fans of music tend to develop as they become familiar with musical phraseology and tonal space, and means that an individual is able to recognize and at times fill in musical intervals (fill in blanks of this McDonald's slogan, "Ba da ba __ __, I'm lovin it")
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/sT3YYeF.png)
I only took it once but did try to pay close attention. For the record, I can't play any instruments and I don't sing very well.
|
75% correct. I think I mistakenly thought that two phrases were different when they were really the same.
|
86.1% :o
Many years of piano
|
88.9% I've been forced to take piano, drums, and guitar lessons from the time I was maybe 7 years old and I'm 22 now. Can't really play any instrument very well though lol ^^
I thought I hit like 70% at best. Was very happy to see 88% lol
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/dP0FVTD.png) Oh yeah, I am more than a bit tone deaf lol
|
75%. I'm not a musician but I make some electronic music. Listening to sampled loops over and over and over was very similar to this so I think that helped me out.
|
I can not possibly remember the sequence of even one of those samples. I have NO idea how big of a difference I am listening for, I found it so frustrating that I bailed out.
My audio-buffers seem tiny. I have actually failed the test to become an air traffic controller because I could not memorize sequences of letters that I only were able to hear. If I can SEE things, I almost have perfect recall.
|
94.4%, and I have no musical background. My penis feels big.
|
On February 03 2013 02:23 Zandar wrote:A fun test to check if you are tonedeaf. http://jakemandell.com/tonedeaf/below 55% you can consider yourself tonedeaf. Excellent musicians seldom score above 80. My brother who can play everything from Bach on the piano scored that. While poor little me only scored 58% lol. Seems he stole all that dna from me the bastard 
I doubt that excellent musicians score that low. I've never studied music, and never played an instrument, but I scored 83.3%. I should add that I lost focus a few times and had to guess, too.
|
83.3..and that's with misclicking a wrong answer. doesn't seem to be particularly hard...
|
69.4% and I've been playing the trumpet for like 6 years I just have horrible ADD lol...
|
80.6% aww yea now I feel better about myself 
Cool test though.
|
what?!?!? 77.8% correct and I was talking to my brother for the last 10 questions.
|
I have terrible music memory and I just barely got 57%, woo!
|
94.4%. Years of classical piano, strings, ear training, perfect pitch, and generally listening to a lot of music. Not a professional musician though.
I also guessed 94.4%, which confused me since I didn't know whether it was telling me the score I guessed or my actual score.
|
This is really cool! I got around 80%! :D I don't really play any instruments or know how to read notes or anything though. I just sing for fun.
|
83.3%, thought I'd do a lot worse. o_O Seems more like a memory test IMO.
|
83.3%. Interesting statistic on one of the questions (only 23% of people get it right).
|
88.9%
MAAAN if i didn't screw up on the first 2 or 3 because i had no idea wtf was going on I think i could've got over 90%
I do think its more of a concentration and memory test, the changes in pitch/tone are quite obvious. You don't need to be musically inclined unless the changes were EXTREMELY subtle.
EDIT: Oh i only screwed up one of them, still could've got over 90% though.
|
^ same 88.9% here
been 1 year in band like 10+ years ago,the funny thing is my hearing is strong that i can hear footsteps [w/o footware] or random sound of a screw in my fan sometimes.
|
86.1%
33 seems off with the 2nd note (maybe because the 2nd to last note is so different and it throws people off?). I also messed up on #1 because I wasnt paying much attention and didnt know what to expect. I hate that it doesnt show how long the audio clip is D:
EDIT: I am a poor musician because I dont have good consistent timing, I always rush notes. This was from when I played piano as a kid like 20 years ago though.
|
83.3%
not sure if I chose 'different' on things that were actually the same too frequently, since for a few of them I didn't remember the phrase exactly the first time and felt like I heard something different the second time
also I think it would make more sense if musicians rarely scored *below* 80%, so I'm wondering if that was a typo
|
I got 72% on 2nd try. I'm sure my 1st time was better, as I focused more, but I couldn't find out how to see my score.
|
Good test to make people feel special and think they have like a hidden talent :D
I do think its more of a concentration and memory test, the changes in pitch/tone are quite obvious. You don't need to be musically inclined unless the changes were EXTREMELY subtle.
Pretty much my thoughts aswell. Close your eyes and focus.
|
94.4% correct. 27 years of age, 10 years of guitar, 10 years of violin, compositions since I was 14.
|
55.6% and no musical schooling since elementary school.
Tone-deaf? no wonder why my Chinese is so bad.
|
94.4% :O
My only musical training came from like 3 years of piano when I was like in elementary/grade school, 5 or 6 years of middle school/high school band, and umm I guess 3 monthes of osu.
The osu is just recent, the piano/band thing was 10+ years ago lol
|
|
|
|