• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:20
CEST 02:20
KST 09:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On7Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High15
Community News
5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)65$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 151Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada11Weekly Cups (Sept 22-28): MaxPax double, Zerg wins, PTR12BSL Season 218
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version) Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada Had to smile :) 2024/25 Off-Season Roster Moves SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update
Tourneys
$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 15 Stellar Fest Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025 Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight
Brood War
General
BSL Season 21 Any rep analyzer that shows resources situation? RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site [ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On Flash On JaeDongs ASL Struggles & Perseverance
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro8 Day 4 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 3 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup №3
Strategy
Current Meta I am doing this better than progamers do. Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy)
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Liquipedia App: Now Covering SC2 and Brood War!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final
Blogs
Mental Health In Esports: Wo…
TrAiDoS
[AI] Sorry, Chill, My Bad :…
Peanutsc
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1986 users

Constructive Feedback

Blogs > ChristianS
Post a Reply
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3200 Posts
October 12 2012 07:28 GMT
#1
Beta stages are a time to let your opinion be known. Blizzard maintains their beta forum precisely for this reason, and even though this is not the explicit purpose of the TL HotS forum, it is still clearly one purpose of the discussion there. Balance whining is tolerated a great deal more; the discussion focuses less on strategy ("how can we make the best of the tools we have?") and more on game design ("what would be a better set of tools for us to have been given?"); many posts are even directly addressed to Blizzard, or explicitly state what Blizzard should or shouldn't do.

And that's a good thing; the entire reason to do a closed or open beta in development of a game is to get constructive feedback. Giving feedback on TL is legitimate, too; Blizzard almost certainly keeps tabs on feedback from TL, and even if they didn't, good discussion of feedback here will almost certainly benefit the discussion on the Battle.net forums.

But there's an important note in there that's easy to miss: the entire reason to do a beta stage is to get constructive feedback. And that's where forums tend to fail you. Because if you tell a group of people on the internet to have a discussion, they'll do it. But if you tell them to have a useful discussion, your odds are considerably lower.

Consider feedback like this:

[image loading]
Mines didn't make him fly his broodlords into a corner with zero corruptor support.


From the player perspective, this is perfectly reasonable feedback. Because thinking as a player, what happened? Mines were too powerful, so you lost. Your win rate is too negatively affected by the addition of mines, so Blizzard should adjust it to address the issue.

But think for a moment from a designer's perspective. What, exactly, is the issue you're facing? Does the mine have too much health, so it can't properly be punished for running into battle and burrowing in the face of its enemies? Does it come out too fast, so proper defenses for a widow mine push can't be out yet? Is it too cheap, so widow mine armies consistently beat you on resources, even if they would be fine elsewhere.

From a designer's perspective, feedback like "widow mine op" is almost completely useless. In general you'd like to keep track of balance information, but without some information on why its imbalanced, or exactly what about the challenges presented by the widow mine make it inordinately difficult to beat, the feedback really hasn't contributed anything of worth.

[image loading]
"Widow mines totally negate mutalisk harassment" might be a more constructive form of feedback.


As I glance at the HotS forum right now, there is (predictably) a thread regarding nerfing the widow mine. + Show Spoiler +
See here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=374819
So let's glance at some of the feedback provided there:
On October 12 2012 03:44 captainwaffles wrote:
Okay so its no secret the widow mines are too strong with current numbers, but thats fine, numbers are malleable. The purpose of this thread is too discuss how the widow mine should be nerfed to make it a balanced but still useful unit.

The cost and supply are fine I don't think that needs any touching.

That started so promisingly. The premise is about looking past straight balance issues and getting into what design changes would be best. But then the very first sentence providing specific feedback is a totally unsupported assertion.

Unsupported assertions are a clear indicator of non-constructive feedback. If you believe something is true, you presumably have reasons for it (whether they are legitimate or not). Those reasons are the parts that Blizzard cares about. If, perhaps, you were an expert on matters regarding Starcraft, Blizzard would be a little more willing to take your word as gospel without asking for supporting evidence, but even then, the feedback isn't very valuable.
[image loading]
"Its explosions are too awesome" is also not constructive feedback.


On the other hand, take an example from captainwaffles' very same post:
Right now the widow mine is basically a hellion in terms of HP, it is very tanky, we have hellions for this role, the mine doesn't need to soak as much damage as it does now, considering the damage it deals. I propose a health reduction to 50 HP and see how that feels, I would not go any lower than 30.


This is useful feedback. Speaking to the role of a unit, redundancy with other units, etc. is a design concern. Whether that feedback is true or not is another matter, and probably differs depending on who you ask. But Blizzard can sort out the truth of the matter themselves. The main thing is that you've gotten useful, constructive feedback.

Out of the same thread:
On October 12 2012 03:51 Grendel wrote:
Imo range is fine.

What I think is needed: like you said hit points. But also:
- Burrow time increased
- Reduced splash to 35
- Unable to detect cloaked units.

I think with these parameters altered it would be a good unit.

The entire post is assertion. All of these things may be true; it may even be that implementing each of these changes would be the absolutely optimal design for the unit. But the feedback is not really useful; as far as Blizzard is concerned, Grendel is an expert at neither game design nor defeating Beowulf, so his opinions are worth nothing without evidentiary support.

To be fair to Grendel, let's take another example from one of his posts from another thread:
On October 11 2012 04:58 Grendel wrote:
Regarding Warpgate tech, while interesting, I really would wish if they just made it so that gateway armies would be produced FASTER than warpgate armies, instead of the other way around. That way both techs would still be viable (warpgate for the harassment, gateway for the normal producing of army). Ground units could be balanced accordingly then.

This is constructive criticism. Using gateways as gateways is, in current SC2, completely useless. There is room here for Blizzard to make improvements; and from the fact that gateways can turn back into warpgates, it seems like Blizzard might have at some point intended for gateways to be somewhat useful even when warpgate tech is out.

Conclusion:
Making constructive criticisms is hard work. You have to find evidence for your claims (ideally supported by replays). You need to think from a designer's perspective about your claims, even though the player perspective is probably a lot more natural to you. And when you're merely a poster on a forum, maybe you're not inclined to put that much time and effort into what you say. I understand that; I'm sure if someone wanted to go through my posting history they could find some flagrant examples of completely worthless comments.

But I think many people post on HotS forums because they honestly want their feedback to make a difference. They care about Starcraft, and they want it to be a better game. In which case I hope they'll try to take a second look at their posts, and consider whether what they're saying is really constructive. Because the more constructive feedback Blizzard gets in the beta, the more information they'll have about this game, the more informed decisions they can make, and ultimately, the better Starcraft will be.

*****
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
October 12 2012 07:44 GMT
#2
One of the best threads I've seen on TL. You should cross-post this at the Bnet forums too, they really need it
Что?
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
October 12 2012 13:51 GMT
#3
I disagree about the assertion peice, everyone here has to assert their idea because its not a thinking table as much as it is a conversation. Otherwise I completely agree with the idea of constructive feedback.
User was warned for too many mimes.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3200 Posts
October 12 2012 20:51 GMT
#4
On October 12 2012 16:44 Shady Sands wrote:
One of the best threads I've seen on TL. You should cross-post this at the Bnet forums too, they really need it

Woah, high praise for my blog, and from one of my favorite bloggers. Thanks! I feel like I should rework it a little for Bnet (feels weird citing TL discussions on Bnet), but I should probably write it up there, too.
On October 12 2012 22:51 docvoc wrote:
I disagree about the assertion peice, everyone here has to assert their idea because its not a thinking table as much as it is a conversation. Otherwise I completely agree with the idea of constructive feedback.

Fair enough. By asking for supporting evidence I didn't necessarily mean that they need to cite reputable sources like an academic article; just giving a sentence or two justifying your opinion. It seems to me that helps conversation, too, because when people know your reason for claiming something, they can better respond to it. But perhaps you're right that an online forum necessarily trades on assertions more than anything else.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
StateofReverie
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States633 Posts
October 13 2012 01:06 GMT
#5
Making constructive criticism means contributing feedback to the discussion. Unfortunately not all the feedback comes from the same perspective and is made with the same point = creates arguments
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
23:00
L4S: Americas
SteadfastSC260
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 260
UpATreeSC 144
SpeCial 124
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 407
NaDa 19
Dota 2
monkeys_forever386
capcasts181
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K497
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox176
Other Games
summit1g7031
shahzam731
Day[9].tv604
Maynarde303
C9.Mang0302
ViBE140
NeuroSwarm67
Mew2King64
ArmadaUGS34
Models1
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 59
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21605
• Ler60
Other Games
• imaqtpie1238
• Scarra741
• Day9tv604
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
10h 41m
Online Event
16h 41m
Online Event
1d 10h
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 17h
Safe House 2
1d 17h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
Dewalt vs kogeT
JDConan vs Tarson
RaNgeD vs DragOn
StRyKeR vs Bonyth
Aeternum vs Hejek
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
Maestros of the Game
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Acropolis #4 - TS2
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
Frag Blocktober 2025
Urban Riga Open #1
FERJEE Rush 2025
Birch Cup 2025
DraculaN #2
LanDaLan #3
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
WardiTV TLMC #15
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.