• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:36
CEST 02:36
KST 09:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202530RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 589 users

Constructive Feedback

Blogs > ChristianS
Post a Reply
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3188 Posts
October 12 2012 07:28 GMT
#1
Beta stages are a time to let your opinion be known. Blizzard maintains their beta forum precisely for this reason, and even though this is not the explicit purpose of the TL HotS forum, it is still clearly one purpose of the discussion there. Balance whining is tolerated a great deal more; the discussion focuses less on strategy ("how can we make the best of the tools we have?") and more on game design ("what would be a better set of tools for us to have been given?"); many posts are even directly addressed to Blizzard, or explicitly state what Blizzard should or shouldn't do.

And that's a good thing; the entire reason to do a closed or open beta in development of a game is to get constructive feedback. Giving feedback on TL is legitimate, too; Blizzard almost certainly keeps tabs on feedback from TL, and even if they didn't, good discussion of feedback here will almost certainly benefit the discussion on the Battle.net forums.

But there's an important note in there that's easy to miss: the entire reason to do a beta stage is to get constructive feedback. And that's where forums tend to fail you. Because if you tell a group of people on the internet to have a discussion, they'll do it. But if you tell them to have a useful discussion, your odds are considerably lower.

Consider feedback like this:

[image loading]
Mines didn't make him fly his broodlords into a corner with zero corruptor support.


From the player perspective, this is perfectly reasonable feedback. Because thinking as a player, what happened? Mines were too powerful, so you lost. Your win rate is too negatively affected by the addition of mines, so Blizzard should adjust it to address the issue.

But think for a moment from a designer's perspective. What, exactly, is the issue you're facing? Does the mine have too much health, so it can't properly be punished for running into battle and burrowing in the face of its enemies? Does it come out too fast, so proper defenses for a widow mine push can't be out yet? Is it too cheap, so widow mine armies consistently beat you on resources, even if they would be fine elsewhere.

From a designer's perspective, feedback like "widow mine op" is almost completely useless. In general you'd like to keep track of balance information, but without some information on why its imbalanced, or exactly what about the challenges presented by the widow mine make it inordinately difficult to beat, the feedback really hasn't contributed anything of worth.

[image loading]
"Widow mines totally negate mutalisk harassment" might be a more constructive form of feedback.


As I glance at the HotS forum right now, there is (predictably) a thread regarding nerfing the widow mine. + Show Spoiler +
See here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=374819
So let's glance at some of the feedback provided there:
On October 12 2012 03:44 captainwaffles wrote:
Okay so its no secret the widow mines are too strong with current numbers, but thats fine, numbers are malleable. The purpose of this thread is too discuss how the widow mine should be nerfed to make it a balanced but still useful unit.

The cost and supply are fine I don't think that needs any touching.

That started so promisingly. The premise is about looking past straight balance issues and getting into what design changes would be best. But then the very first sentence providing specific feedback is a totally unsupported assertion.

Unsupported assertions are a clear indicator of non-constructive feedback. If you believe something is true, you presumably have reasons for it (whether they are legitimate or not). Those reasons are the parts that Blizzard cares about. If, perhaps, you were an expert on matters regarding Starcraft, Blizzard would be a little more willing to take your word as gospel without asking for supporting evidence, but even then, the feedback isn't very valuable.
[image loading]
"Its explosions are too awesome" is also not constructive feedback.


On the other hand, take an example from captainwaffles' very same post:
Right now the widow mine is basically a hellion in terms of HP, it is very tanky, we have hellions for this role, the mine doesn't need to soak as much damage as it does now, considering the damage it deals. I propose a health reduction to 50 HP and see how that feels, I would not go any lower than 30.


This is useful feedback. Speaking to the role of a unit, redundancy with other units, etc. is a design concern. Whether that feedback is true or not is another matter, and probably differs depending on who you ask. But Blizzard can sort out the truth of the matter themselves. The main thing is that you've gotten useful, constructive feedback.

Out of the same thread:
On October 12 2012 03:51 Grendel wrote:
Imo range is fine.

What I think is needed: like you said hit points. But also:
- Burrow time increased
- Reduced splash to 35
- Unable to detect cloaked units.

I think with these parameters altered it would be a good unit.

The entire post is assertion. All of these things may be true; it may even be that implementing each of these changes would be the absolutely optimal design for the unit. But the feedback is not really useful; as far as Blizzard is concerned, Grendel is an expert at neither game design nor defeating Beowulf, so his opinions are worth nothing without evidentiary support.

To be fair to Grendel, let's take another example from one of his posts from another thread:
On October 11 2012 04:58 Grendel wrote:
Regarding Warpgate tech, while interesting, I really would wish if they just made it so that gateway armies would be produced FASTER than warpgate armies, instead of the other way around. That way both techs would still be viable (warpgate for the harassment, gateway for the normal producing of army). Ground units could be balanced accordingly then.

This is constructive criticism. Using gateways as gateways is, in current SC2, completely useless. There is room here for Blizzard to make improvements; and from the fact that gateways can turn back into warpgates, it seems like Blizzard might have at some point intended for gateways to be somewhat useful even when warpgate tech is out.

Conclusion:
Making constructive criticisms is hard work. You have to find evidence for your claims (ideally supported by replays). You need to think from a designer's perspective about your claims, even though the player perspective is probably a lot more natural to you. And when you're merely a poster on a forum, maybe you're not inclined to put that much time and effort into what you say. I understand that; I'm sure if someone wanted to go through my posting history they could find some flagrant examples of completely worthless comments.

But I think many people post on HotS forums because they honestly want their feedback to make a difference. They care about Starcraft, and they want it to be a better game. In which case I hope they'll try to take a second look at their posts, and consider whether what they're saying is really constructive. Because the more constructive feedback Blizzard gets in the beta, the more information they'll have about this game, the more informed decisions they can make, and ultimately, the better Starcraft will be.

*****
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
October 12 2012 07:44 GMT
#2
One of the best threads I've seen on TL. You should cross-post this at the Bnet forums too, they really need it
Что?
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
October 12 2012 13:51 GMT
#3
I disagree about the assertion peice, everyone here has to assert their idea because its not a thinking table as much as it is a conversation. Otherwise I completely agree with the idea of constructive feedback.
User was warned for too many mimes.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3188 Posts
October 12 2012 20:51 GMT
#4
On October 12 2012 16:44 Shady Sands wrote:
One of the best threads I've seen on TL. You should cross-post this at the Bnet forums too, they really need it

Woah, high praise for my blog, and from one of my favorite bloggers. Thanks! I feel like I should rework it a little for Bnet (feels weird citing TL discussions on Bnet), but I should probably write it up there, too.
On October 12 2012 22:51 docvoc wrote:
I disagree about the assertion peice, everyone here has to assert their idea because its not a thinking table as much as it is a conversation. Otherwise I completely agree with the idea of constructive feedback.

Fair enough. By asking for supporting evidence I didn't necessarily mean that they need to cite reputable sources like an academic article; just giving a sentence or two justifying your opinion. It seems to me that helps conversation, too, because when people know your reason for claiming something, they can better respond to it. But perhaps you're right that an online forum necessarily trades on assertions more than anything else.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
StateofReverie
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States633 Posts
October 13 2012 01:06 GMT
#5
Making constructive criticism means contributing feedback to the discussion. Unfortunately not all the feedback comes from the same perspective and is made with the same point = creates arguments
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 133
ProTech53
SpeCial 0
StarCraft: Brood War
NaDa 78
Aegong 60
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1111
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Cuddl3bear1
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1395
Coldzera 413
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox346
AZ_Axe100
Other Games
tarik_tv8949
Day[9].tv1244
shahzam522
ViBE203
C9.Mang0201
Maynarde172
Livibee62
Liquid`Ken12
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1354
BasetradeTV27
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 45
• rockletztv 15
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5063
Other Games
• Scarra1419
• Day9tv1244
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
9h 24m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 9h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.