Actually it's just for gamesource where it makes a big difference...
I still get way worse performance without aero even when minimized (and scaleport 10%), with the x-split screen capture method and also with various directshow filters.
Blogs > R1CH |
TBO
Germany1350 Posts
Actually it's just for gamesource where it makes a big difference... I still get way worse performance without aero even when minimized (and scaleport 10%), with the x-split screen capture method and also with various directshow filters. | ||
Avean
Norway449 Posts
| ||
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
| ||
storkfan
493 Posts
| ||
Flaiker
Germany235 Posts
| ||
[F_]aths
Germany3947 Posts
| ||
Valeranth
United States100 Posts
| ||
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
On April 18 2012 22:03 [F_]aths wrote: Is there an option to downscale with either method (Xsplit or DXTory) with actually downsample the picture instead of just removing pixels? Xsplit offers an optimization for text but this only works well for exact factor 2 downscaling. If I want to scale down by lets say factor 3, I still get very much aliasing due to the pixel discarding instead of proper downsampling. DXTory and XSplit both downsize via resampling. Nearest neighbor would look way worse than it actually does. On April 18 2012 22:28 Valeranth wrote: Will you ever test other methods such as using Adobe's Flash Media Encoder? No since xsplit's x264 encoder is far superior in every way. | ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
| ||
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
| ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
What is the "synchronous surface lock" you speak of in the OP by the way? edit: nvm, found it | ||
Treva
United States533 Posts
| ||
[F_]aths
Germany3947 Posts
On April 18 2012 23:29 R1CH wrote: It does look bad. The "Optimize text resize" option only seems to use bilinear downsampling for optimized resizing, but this only works when the factor to scale down is 2.0 at max, otherwise again pixels are lost without being weighted into downsampled pixels.Show nested quote + On April 18 2012 22:03 [F_]aths wrote: Is there an option to downscale with either method (Xsplit or DXTory) with actually downsample the picture instead of just removing pixels? Xsplit offers an optimization for text but this only works well for exact factor 2 downscaling. If I want to scale down by lets say factor 3, I still get very much aliasing due to the pixel discarding instead of proper downsampling. DXTory and XSplit both downsize via resampling. Nearest neighbor would look way worse than it actually does. Same for DXTory: If I scale down 1920x1080 to 640x480 (factor 3.0) pixels are lost. | ||
storkfan
493 Posts
On April 18 2012 23:29 R1CH wrote: i get better performance with VP6 codec on FMLE than xsplit lowest quality encoder. Just saying.Show nested quote + On April 18 2012 22:03 [F_]aths wrote: Is there an option to downscale with either method (Xsplit or DXTory) with actually downsample the picture instead of just removing pixels? Xsplit offers an optimization for text but this only works well for exact factor 2 downscaling. If I want to scale down by lets say factor 3, I still get very much aliasing due to the pixel discarding instead of proper downsampling. DXTory and XSplit both downsize via resampling. Nearest neighbor would look way worse than it actually does. Show nested quote + On April 18 2012 22:28 Valeranth wrote: Will you ever test other methods such as using Adobe's Flash Media Encoder? No since xsplit's x264 encoder is far superior in every way. | ||
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
On April 19 2012 02:20 storkfan wrote: Show nested quote + i get better performance with VP6 codec on FMLE than xsplit lowest quality encoder. Just saying.On April 18 2012 23:29 R1CH wrote: On April 18 2012 22:03 [F_]aths wrote: Is there an option to downscale with either method (Xsplit or DXTory) with actually downsample the picture instead of just removing pixels? Xsplit offers an optimization for text but this only works well for exact factor 2 downscaling. If I want to scale down by lets say factor 3, I still get very much aliasing due to the pixel discarding instead of proper downsampling. DXTory and XSplit both downsize via resampling. Nearest neighbor would look way worse than it actually does. On April 18 2012 22:28 Valeranth wrote: Will you ever test other methods such as using Adobe's Flash Media Encoder? No since xsplit's x264 encoder is far superior in every way. Well VP6 looks like ass compared to x264, so it's not surprising that it would be faster. | ||
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
On April 19 2012 01:53 [F_]aths wrote: Show nested quote + It does look bad. The "Optimize text resize" option only seems to use bilinear downsampling for optimized resizing, but this only works when the factor to scale down is 2.0 at max, otherwise again pixels are lost without being weighted into downsampled pixels.On April 18 2012 23:29 R1CH wrote: On April 18 2012 22:03 [F_]aths wrote: Is there an option to downscale with either method (Xsplit or DXTory) with actually downsample the picture instead of just removing pixels? Xsplit offers an optimization for text but this only works well for exact factor 2 downscaling. If I want to scale down by lets say factor 3, I still get very much aliasing due to the pixel discarding instead of proper downsampling. DXTory and XSplit both downsize via resampling. Nearest neighbor would look way worse than it actually does. Same for DXTory: If I scale down 1920x1080 to 640x480 (factor 3.0) pixels are lost. The scaling done when you add sources that aren't 1:1 to xsplit is pretty bad and you have no control over it. There's two solutions, either scale on the capture side so your sources are 1:1 in xsplit (dxtory scaling I believe is bicubic) or run your xsplit scene at 1920x1080 or whatever size your source is, then use one of the resize options on the channel page. | ||
[F_]aths
Germany3947 Posts
My issue is low upstream bandwidth (currently I use 440 kBit for video) so I would like to test 640x360 instead of streaming in 960x540. I did not find any resampling options in DXTory, I can just set a new size as percentage or in pixels. | ||
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
| ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
| ||
Avean
Norway449 Posts
XSplit -> 140-160 fps Dxtory -> 60-90fps Thats a huge difference. Havent changed any option in dxtory except turned off recording to a file, set fps to 30 (same as xsplit) and recording in 720 (same as xsplit). | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 19163 StormgateCalm 3882 Rain 2068 Mini 1033 Soulkey 230 Dewaltoss 133 firebathero 132 HiyA 44 Rock 23 GoRush 11 [ Show more ] Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games Grubby3530 ScreaM1966 Beastyqt1163 hiko1087 FrodaN958 ceh9596 Dendi503 ArmadaUGS255 Hui .153 NeuroSwarm82 Trikslyr61 Organizations StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • MindelVK 21 StarCraft: Brood War• HeavenSC 21 • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel • intothetv • Laughngamez YouTube • IndyKCrew Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
OSC
ByuN vs MaxPax
The PondCast
Master's Coliseum
StarCraft2.fi
BSL: GosuLeague
Master's Coliseum
Korean StarCraft League
StarCraft2.fi
SOOP
Creator vs Solar
[ Show More ] Master's Coliseum
Cheesadelphia
Master's Coliseum
OlimoLeague
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|