• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:14
CEST 15:14
KST 22:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL54Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Unit and Spell Similarities
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 626 users

Part Five: Balance

Blogs > ChristianS
Post a Reply
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3187 Posts
December 31 2011 06:59 GMT
#1
In previous installments of this blog, a general idea of an RTS game concept was envisioned, and a model game was constructed based on that original concept. Now that a model has been constructed, it's time to discuss in general terms how to balance that model.

Balance is a process that generally should come at the end of a game-building process, since any changes along the way could shift the balance significantly. That principle, however, comes with several caveats that should be taken into consideration much earlier in gameplay. The first is that all decisions made in the game design process will affect the eventual balancing process. Specifically, they will make it easier or more difficult. Choosing to make asymmetrical races will make the game more difficult to balance; making the game more complex will make balance even more difficult. Of course, this does not mean that the game should not have complexities. Instead, it means that a studio should be prepared to invest the time and money into balancing a complexity properly before they put it into the game. In the case of our project Replaceable Parts, the game will probably never make it past the theoretical stage, but we should still consider the balance implications of any game decisions we make.

Some complexities will make the game particularly difficult to balance. In particular, free win possibilities fall in this category. Examples of possibilities like this are dark templar in SC:BW or SC2; a dark templar in a base without detection is a free ticket to victory. Air unit rushes are a similar species. You can guarantee that these units were looked at very closely by Blizzard to ensure that they were stoppable. It is not necessarily bad to include such strategies in a game, but they are nightmares for balancing a game, and should be used lightly and with caution. A game that has too many free win buttons quickly becomes a game of coin flips and rock-paper-scissors, which is bad game design whether or not it creates a statistical imbalance in win rates.

Design decisions can also make balance easier. Scouting makes balance considerably easier, since the game can be balanced on the assumption that any strategy that approaches becoming too strong will also have telltale signs that indicate to the opposing player that the strategy might be coming. And, of course, there must be a way to beat that strategy once you pin your opponent on using it, so "counters" are a good way to ensure that the game remains relatively balanced. But "counter charts" are a slightly unsophisticated solution to the problem, and there are better ways to deal with problems.

For example, consider the infestor broodlord composition used in Starcraft 2 by Zergs. for some time it was considered imbalanced, and it is certainly a powerful army. One reason for this is that the units so neatly cover each others' weaknesses. Broodlords tend to be weak to either air units or clumps of ground units darting in to pick them off; infestors are fairly effective against air units, and destroy clumps that dart in. Infestors, meanwhile, are vulnerable to very small numbers of units darting in, and generally to large ground units; broodlords can easily kill any small numbers of units that dart in, and large ground armies are simply ineffective against broodlords. A group of marines large enough to dart in and kill some broodlords before dying to broodlings is large enough to fungal growth to great effect; a group small enough to render fungal growth impractical will be killed by broodlings before they can kill anything.

So many of the obvious "counters" that might appear on a table of counters are ineffective against the composition. Many called the composition imbalanced, and I'm not going to take a position on whether they were right or wrong. But the best response, at least, could not be found on any counters list. The weakness that infestors and broodlords share is immobility; the answer was (and is) not in another unit, but in hitting the Zerg where their army wasn't. So rather than designing units with counters from other races, it is better to design each unit with inherent weaknesses. Then enemy units will have potential answers to these weaknesses, but the "counter" terminology is not terribly useful, since not all weaknesses are answered by a specific unit.

These considerations are especially important for Replaceable Parts because it's based on a system in which the gameplay situations are not clear to the designer. A game could be designed with relatively few gameplay options, and designers could evaluate the strategic implications of all of these to balance such a game, but this wouldn't be a very good game. A better game is one complex enough that the strategies players will come up with may or may not be something the developers foresaw, but if the developers don't know what strategies will be used, they can't be certain that those strategies are balanced against each other. Given that this is the case, measures must be taken to ensure that there are responses to most strategies so that no strategy becomes too powerful.

There are some forces that help balance happen naturally. Players tend to evaluate their strategies based on win rates. So while they are always looking for the best strategy, they generally do not innovate greatly when a matchup is going in their favor (choosing instead to focus on other matchups). When they are losing, on the other hand, they search around for strategies that can swing the game more in their favor, and the more often they lose, the more creative they get. So the longer a matchup favors one race, the more and more likely that a strategy will be discovered that will swing things in the other direction, while the race that has been winning has not been developing their side of the matchup as much.

Of course, the majority of balancing goes on in the playtesting stage of a game. While Replaceable Parts will likely never make it to that stage, it is worth discussing how that can help the balance of a game and, more specifically, how it can not. Playtesting is a beautiful thing, and it can reveal facts about the game that no other design practice can. That said, everything discovered in this stage should be taken with a grain of salt. Players in this stage will find some strategy or set of strategies that they consider imbalanced, and they may be right, but more likely than not that strategy is just the best that someone could come up with in the brief playtesting stage. The strategies of your game will endure a great deal more development than could ever be simulated in the playtesting stage, and whatever strategy is being criticized will undoubtedly be figured out and beaten by the time the game makes it onto shelves. This doesn't mean playtesting is worthless, but it does mean that it cannot be trusted to find all issues before the game is released. Considering the balance implications of game decisions during the development stage is important to designing a well-balanced game, and measures can be taken that make balance easier.

*
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
12:00
Swiss Groups Day 2
WardiTV1206
TKL 381
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #93
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .477
TKL 381
BRAT_OK 97
MindelVK 43
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 11870
Horang2 2215
Bisu 1691
Jaedong 1469
Flash 1314
Larva 945
Mini 635
Stork 374
BeSt 371
actioN 352
[ Show more ]
Last 206
Soulkey 188
Hyun 164
hero 133
Mind 102
Sea.KH 60
sSak 56
TY 47
Mong 40
Icarus 21
GoRush 20
Free 18
Terrorterran 9
HiyA 8
Stormgate
NightEnD22
Dota 2
XcaliburYe599
canceldota216
Counter-Strike
zeus642
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor294
Other Games
Gorgc3381
singsing2942
B2W.Neo1368
DeMusliM613
Happy329
Fuzer 278
XaKoH 225
Lowko205
SortOf94
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3514
• WagamamaTV731
League of Legends
• Nemesis4308
Upcoming Events
FEL
2h 46m
RSL Revival
20h 46m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
22h 46m
WardiTV European League
22h 46m
BSL: ProLeague
1d 4h
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.