League of Legends ... Rant?
Blogs > Pieismyign |
Pieismyign
United States176 Posts
| ||
NonY
8748 Posts
| ||
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
Just type /ignore all at the beginning if you are in a bad mood and you won't hear anyone talk trash, though it might get in the way of communicating with your team. | ||
DerNebel
Denmark648 Posts
On November 07 2011 02:55 Liquid`Tyler wrote: This is the thread where your frustration is welcomed: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=220361 Lé this. Also, this is to be expected. The only real cure is to level up that kraken shell and shrug it off. oh wait you play LoL. Get your fortify summoner up I guess. | ||
Spiffeh
United States830 Posts
Unfortunately, yeah, you just kinda have to deal with it...lol. | ||
Atheros
United States84 Posts
| ||
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
| ||
Enki
United States2548 Posts
And if you are going to play ranked, try to find someone to duo queue with, and pick important roles likes carry/jungler, solo/jungler etc. Pick roles that will have the most impact on the game. SC2 is way less frustrating rofl. If I lose in SC2, well thats my fault. If I lose in LoL, I could have played a part in losing but mostly it seems to be the fault of my teammates. | ||
tobi9999
United States1966 Posts
"If I didn't miss those X CS, I could've bought another oracles, and we might've had a better chance." If you are really having a bad day, there is a reason why there is an ignore button. | ||
figq
12519 Posts
In comparison, in SC2 1v1 at least it's just one person, and he's the enemy, so I see this as much easier to deal with, plus you have ignore option, and it's not like ignoring them may affect negatively your play. Whereas in these games, most often your teammates are bashing you (if you are a noob like me) and that makes you even worse, because you actually have to find a way to work with these people. You can't just ignore them even if there was such option (which I don't think there is). | ||
shawster
Canada2485 Posts
everytime you win it's cuz you carried everytime you lose your teamates are shit. that's what people really think of themselves. there was a thread in riot forums polling people about their elo. no one knows their normal game elo so this was an approximation. it ended up having 70% of the community saying their elo was mid-high. mid-high would be around 1800 elo if everyone started at 1200 elo. of course the average for the community was more like 1400. just another example of all that illusory superiority jazz the problems of playing a team based game with 4 strangers haha. | ||
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On November 07 2011 04:07 shawster wrote: if you have a game where you can't objectively say you're better then people tend to overrate themselves. everytime you win it's cuz you carried everytime you lose your teamates are shit. that's what people really think of themselves. there was a thread in riot forums polling people about their elo. no one knows their normal game elo so this was an approximation. it ended up having 70% of the community saying their elo was mid-high. mid-high would be around 1800 elo if everyone started at 1200 elo. of course the average for the community was more like 1400. just another example of all that illusory superiority jazz the problems of playing a team based game with 4 strangers haha. The average for the community is nowhere near 1400 haha. I'm gonna guess you pegged 1400 as the average because that's similar to your rating? | ||
Ikonn
Netherlands1958 Posts
| ||
JSH
United States4109 Posts
But seriously, there are gamers like that Just kind of chill and not take it too personally | ||
shawster
Canada2485 Posts
On November 07 2011 04:34 UniversalSnip wrote: The average for the community is nowhere near 1400 haha. I'm gonna guess you pegged 1400 as the average because that's similar to your rating? average for the forum community you start off at 1200 and the average forum user is a little more intelligent then the average lol player. i wasn't 1400. im not gonna post what my normal elo was from way back when because it's irrelevant. oh btw i'm talking about normal game elo not ranked elo. normal game elo was revealed for a brief period of time when people found out how to get it. then it was patched. the average for a forum poster was probably more like 1300 elo. | ||
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
Maybe I'm just misunderstanding you, you seem to be arguing about something that is totally unrelated to what I'm saying | ||
shawster
Canada2485 Posts
On November 07 2011 04:54 UniversalSnip wrote: there are plenty of riot posts about this and the average ranked for active players was around 1250 last season. don't see any reason it would be different in normals, just more normal games so the numbers would be higher, but still map 1:1. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding you, you seem to be arguing about something that is totally unrelated to what I'm saying what i'm saying is that back when there was no ranked, players only had normal and they couldn't see the normal elo. players were polled and 70% of them said they were mid-high. of course this wasn't the case after people found out what their actual normal elo was during like a 2 week window when people could find out. the average elo is unrelated, what i'm saying is that when people can't see their elo they all think they're significantly higher than they actually are. | ||
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On November 07 2011 04:58 shawster wrote: what i'm saying is that back when there was no ranked, players only had normal and they couldn't see the normal elo. players were polled and 70% of them said they were mid-high. of course this wasn't the case after people found out what their actual normal elo was during like a 2 week window when people could find out. the average elo is unrelated, what i'm saying is that when people can't see their elo they all think they're significantly higher than they actually are. Ah ok. I did misunderstand. | ||
Sermokala
United States13689 Posts
| ||
boon2537
United States905 Posts
| ||
| ||