• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:37
CEST 07:37
KST 14:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters9[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism7Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?121Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 7/8 Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 GSTL Announcement Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Terran or Protoss BW General Discussion Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? [ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters ASL22 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group A BWCL Season 65 Announcement [ASL22] Ro16 Group B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
F* the Children and Get Off …
TrAiDoS
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6224 users

Mathematica

Blogs > kineSiS-
Post a Reply
kineSiS-
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Korea (South)1068 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-06 04:40:02
July 05 2011 20:37 GMT
#1
This is a blog that will not pose a question and perhaps will not receive irrelevant and replies that juxtapose me with mediocrity and arrogance. Furthermore, I don't use thesaurus's in TL Blog posts as there is really no need to embellish my writing with use of such extravagant words. After all, it would be simply bombastic. But I admit, my rage in it was as much my fault as the last and I was banned for using, per say, ad hominem attacks against another TL user.





Anyways...

I'm not certain if anyone here has heard of Mathematica, but it is simply a great program.

Stephen Wolfram, founder of Wolfram Research, created Mathematica, a program who's purpose knows no bounds. For a link to this program, please look here:

http://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/

I have recently spent many hours attempting to learn the coding of Mathematica through watching lectures and by creating code for assignments online. Who knew that programming, even as basic as Mathematica, could be so difficult.

At this point, I'm not really sure what the purpose of this blog is, I fear that it is merely to write about useless things and elaborate on them by adding useless details.

I guess I open this blog for people to discuss, if they have heard about Mathematica, and what are their thoughts about it. ^_^

If you want to see something cool, import this line of code into your program!

The code is inside the spoiler and kudos to the person who realizes what this is a reference too, the code that is. Hint: Some of the assigned variable names allude to it.

Also there will be a warning when inputting it into Mathematica, disregard it.

+ Show Spoiler +

http://e.isabio.com/SR100/GameOfLifeStartData.png

Download that then input it's location in the Import line code by Ctrl + C once you click the image in your HDD or wherever it is.

life = Import["C:\\Users\\Alex\\Desktop\\GameOfLifeStartData.png",
"Data"];

Dimensions[life];

boardLength = Dimensions[life][[1]];
boardWidth = Dimensions[life][[2]];

lifeBoardOld = Table["", {i, 1, boardLength}, {j, 1, boardWidth}];

lifeBoardNew = lifeBoardOld;


For[i = 1, i <= boardLength, i++,
tempLength = Length[life[[i]]];
lifeBoardOld[[i, 1 ;; tempLength]] = life[[i]];
For[j = tempLength + 1, j <= boardWidth, j++,
lifeBoardOld[[i, j]] = 1;
]
]

For[i = 2, i <= boardLength - 1, i++,
For[j = 2, j <= boardWidth - 1, j++,

neighbor = 0;

If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];
]
]
i = 1
For[j = 2, j <= boardWidth - 1, j++,

neighbor = 0;

If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];
]

i = boardLength
For[j = 2, j <= boardWidth - 1, j++,

neighbor = 0;
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];
]


j = 1
For[i = 2, i <= boardLength - 1, i++,


neighbor = 0;

If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];
]

j = boardWidth
For[i = 2, i <= boardLength - 1, i++,


neighbor = 0;
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];


lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];
]


(* top left *)
neighbor = 0;
i = 1; j = 1;

If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];


(* top right *)
neighbor = 0;
i = 1; j = boardWidth;




If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i + 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];


lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];


(* bottom left *)
neighbor = 0;
i = boardLength; j = 1;



If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];

If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j + 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];


lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];

(* bottom right *)
neighbor = 0;
i = boardLength; j = boardWidth;

If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i - 1, j]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];
If[lifeBoardOld[[i, j - 1]] == 0, neighbor++, Null];



lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1;
If[neighbor == 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 0, Null];
If[neighbor == 2, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = lifeBoardOld[[i, j]], Null];
If[neighbor == 1, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] == 1, Null];
If[neighbor > 3, lifeBoardNew[[i, j]] = 1, Null];

lifeBoardOld = lifeBoardNew;

ArrayPlot[lifeBoardOld, ColorRules -> {1 -> White, 0 -> Black}]



On July 06 2011 06:31 ninjafetus wrote:
I think the code is for Conway's Game of Life.


Congratulations!!


*
neobowman
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada3324 Posts
July 05 2011 20:41 GMT
#2
So.... What does it do?
Trezeguet
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States2656 Posts
July 05 2011 20:47 GMT
#3
Checkers?
Horuku
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States405 Posts
July 05 2011 20:58 GMT
#4
Meh, MatLAB > Mathematica as far as academic and calculation purposes are concerned.
d<^^>b
Z3kk
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
4099 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-05 21:02:10
July 05 2011 20:59 GMT
#5
http://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/features/

Are some of its features, I guess.

Also, it's "per se", not "per say", and I think you may have misused the phrase.
Failure is not falling down over and over again. Failure is refusing to get back up.
MasterOfChaos
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Germany2896 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-05 21:07:10
July 05 2011 21:06 GMT
#6
The computer algebra parts of mathematica are pretty awesome. On the other hand I'm not too fond of its programming language.

On July 06 2011 05:58 Horuku wrote:
Meh, MatLAB > Mathematica as far as academic and calculation purposes are concerned.

Is that a useful comparison? Mathematica is primarily a computer algebra system, matlab a numerics program.
LiquipediaOne eye to kill. Two eyes to live.
xarthaz
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1704 Posts
July 05 2011 21:06 GMT
#7
Matlab is the one more commonly used for scripting, isnt it. Mathematica being more for symbolic math - the hardcore theoretical scientists, not the practical guys.
Aah thats the stuff..
n.DieJokes
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States3443 Posts
July 05 2011 21:24 GMT
#8
So what are its advantages over maple? Or are they not directly comparable?
MyLove + Your Love= Supa Love
ninjafetus
Profile Joined December 2008
United States231 Posts
July 05 2011 21:31 GMT
#9
I think the code is for Conway's Game of Life.
susySquark
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1692 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-05 21:37:23
July 05 2011 21:33 GMT
#10
On July 06 2011 05:58 Horuku wrote:
Meh, MatLAB > Mathematica as far as academic and calculation purposes are concerned.


Not even close. If you work at all with theory in any of the hard sciences (math, physics, chemistry), Mathematica is indispensable for handling symbolic math.

edit: I see I've been beaten to the punch XD

Can your matlab do this?

[image loading]
billyX333
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States1360 Posts
July 05 2011 22:14 GMT
#11
I really enjoy mathematica. I have absolutely no idea why people hate on it and constantly insist that MatLab>Mathematica. They are two completely different programs used for different purposes. Both are used very frequently by academics.

Anyways, what is your current level of mathematics? You can take mathematica based courses on vector calculus, ODE or linear algebra through the UIUC net math program. College credits and everything. You take exams with a proctor and any school that accepts UIUC credits will accept these credits.

I thoroughly understood vector calculus before taking their course (I already went through an entire textbook, took many practice final exams and never lost a point), but I was still challenged by some problems in their course. Obviously, since you're using a computer, you can do very complex, multi stepped word problems that would never be asked in an ordinary vector calc class because it would be impossible or take many hours to solve by hand.
Servius_Fulvius
Profile Joined August 2009
United States947 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-06 01:24:14
July 06 2011 01:18 GMT
#12
On July 06 2011 06:33 susySquark wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 05:58 Horuku wrote:
Meh, MatLAB > Mathematica as far as academic and calculation purposes are concerned.


Not even close. If you work at all with theory in any of the hard sciences (math, physics, chemistry), Mathematica is indispensable for handling symbolic math.

edit: I see I've been beaten to the punch XD

Can your matlab do this?

[image loading]


Oh! Oh! Maple Can!

[image loading]

It looks a bit different, though. And I wouldn't be able to evaluate the Whitaker Matrix without the help of Maple's numeric solver (which is nowhere close to Mathcads). Still, if it wasn't for Maple I'd be using Mathematica...

Edit: (ok, so the solution was cut off, but you get the point!)
susySquark
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1692 Posts
July 06 2011 02:00 GMT
#13
On July 06 2011 10:18 Servius_Fulvius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 06:33 susySquark wrote:
On July 06 2011 05:58 Horuku wrote:
Meh, MatLAB > Mathematica as far as academic and calculation purposes are concerned.


Not even close. If you work at all with theory in any of the hard sciences (math, physics, chemistry), Mathematica is indispensable for handling symbolic math.

edit: I see I've been beaten to the punch XD

Can your matlab do this?

[image loading]


Oh! Oh! Maple Can!

[image loading]

It looks a bit different, though. And I wouldn't be able to evaluate the Whitaker Matrix without the help of Maple's numeric solver (which is nowhere close to Mathcads). Still, if it wasn't for Maple I'd be using Mathematica...

Edit: (ok, so the solution was cut off, but you get the point!)


Heh yeah maple works too. I learned everything on mathematica though so thats what I'll stick to. The Laguerre / hypergeometric functions are just as inscrutable as Whittaker, but Laguerre shows up all the time in quantum solutions which is why I picked the example that I did. Anyways, matcad can suck it :D
SpiritoftheTunA
Profile Blog Joined August 2006
United States20903 Posts
July 06 2011 02:21 GMT
#14
my high school required mathematica for any math precalc or above

best requirement ever

<3
posting on liquid sites in current year
JodoYodo
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Canada1772 Posts
July 06 2011 03:30 GMT
#15
MATLAB is WAY more practical in terms of actual academic use for crunching data, running simulations, and getting results, i.e. practical lab work.
Dance dance dance 'till we run this town!
Servius_Fulvius
Profile Joined August 2009
United States947 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-06 04:15:56
July 06 2011 04:01 GMT
#16
On July 06 2011 11:00 susySquark wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 10:18 Servius_Fulvius wrote:
On July 06 2011 06:33 susySquark wrote:
On July 06 2011 05:58 Horuku wrote:
Meh, MatLAB > Mathematica as far as academic and calculation purposes are concerned.


Not even close. If you work at all with theory in any of the hard sciences (math, physics, chemistry), Mathematica is indispensable for handling symbolic math.

edit: I see I've been beaten to the punch XD

Can your matlab do this?

[image loading]


Oh! Oh! Maple Can!

[image loading]

It looks a bit different, though. And I wouldn't be able to evaluate the Whitaker Matrix without the help of Maple's numeric solver (which is nowhere close to Mathcads). Still, if it wasn't for Maple I'd be using Mathematica...

Edit: (ok, so the solution was cut off, but you get the point!)


Heh yeah maple works too. I learned everything on mathematica though so thats what I'll stick to. The Laguerre / hypergeometric functions are just as inscrutable as Whittaker, but Laguerre shows up all the time in quantum solutions which is why I picked the example that I did. Anyways, matcad can suck it :D


Same for me, only in reverse. I never would have survived first year engineering grad school without it!

And I typo'd - matlab has the way better numerical solver than maple (not mathcad, though it has its own merits). I'm doing experimental research, so I don't need anything stronger than excel (for now).

I will give matlab credit - the process design group uses it A LOT. There are two other computational modeling groups - one writes their own code, the next takes Comsol code and modifies it. Comsol is very sexy, btw!

On July 06 2011 12:30 JodoYodo wrote:
MATLAB is WAY more practical in terms of actual academic use for crunching data, running simulations, and getting results, i.e. practical lab work.


Practical lab work? Not the examples you provided. Yes, it is a great tool for number crunching and simulations, but none of that is lab work. In fact my adviser calls them "canned engineering programs" fit for people that are too dangerous in a lab (yeah, he's not a pleasant guy sometimes...). The only ways I can see the two connect is if you're using matlab to run statistics on the results or numerically integrating the governing equations to match your results (which isn't as common as you'd think).

However, the tool is very powerful when validating/creating theory. At that point it's up the user which interface they prefer. Matlab makes differential algebraic equations very easy to solve if you understand the coding. Then again, you can create your own dae solver using vba in excel. I've also seen it done in mathcad. Or just make your own system in hopes to market it to a particular industry (a group at my school is coding microfluidics to create a software marketed to the oil industry).
kineSiS-
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Korea (South)1068 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-06 04:41:54
July 06 2011 04:38 GMT
#17
um.... I'm so confused. TT_TT

Anyways, I'm so happy that I was able to foster a safe debate that contained 0 flaming.

@NeoBowman and Trezeguet, Basically it is a not so simple program that utilizes code with mathematics and yes. That is basically it, but it can many practical things such as solve function, animate functions, create 3D animated objects, and much more!
kineSiS-
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Korea (South)1068 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-06 04:39:36
July 06 2011 04:39 GMT
#18
-Accident Deleted, Sorry-
]343[
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States10328 Posts
July 06 2011 05:32 GMT
#19
I used mathematica this past year for my research. It was... ok, I guess... numerical experiments are kind of annoying though T.T

though mathematica/wolfram alpha were integral to doing my quantum homework....
Writer
MoonBear
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
July 06 2011 15:51 GMT
#20
On July 06 2011 10:18 Servius_Fulvius wrote:
Oh! Oh! Maple Can!

[image loading]

It looks a bit different, though. And I wouldn't be able to evaluate the Whitaker Matrix without the help of Maple's numeric solver (which is nowhere close to Mathcads). Still, if it wasn't for Maple I'd be using Mathematica...

Edit: (ok, so the solution was cut off, but you get the point!)

Maple! Hehe, I remember using that. Good times. I'd probably be using Mathematica if my professor didn't give all his workings in Maple.

This argument about different programs shouldn't matter too much though as all their features are pretty derivative.
ModeratorA dream. Do you have one that has cursed you like that? Or maybe... a wish?
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2026 GSTL: Main Stage Day 5
Discussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 65
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2062
GuemChi 1377
Aegong 36
Yoon 16
Icarus 8
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm189
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 1275
Other Games
summit1g5647
JimRising 601
C9.Mang0140
Maynarde90
RuFF_SC287
Trikslyr31
ROOTCatZ29
Liquid`Ken15
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH334
• practicex 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2139
League of Legends
• Rush935
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
4h 23m
KCM Race Survival
4h 23m
OSC
16h 53m
Escore
1d 4h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 5h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
3 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
3 days
Serral vs Rogue
BlizzCon
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
GSL
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-08
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.