|
Honestly, I think it's difficult to argue that the chief amount of blame can be placed on anyone but the shooters.
Tons of kids get bullied but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
Tons of kids have shitty parents / maybe even abusive parents but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
This is like the video games makes people violent argument, there are so many people that go through exactly the same things these shooters go through and yet they don't go out and shoot people over it.
|
On January 21 2011 18:22 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: yeah i agree, blame the parents. too much terrible parenting nowadays, at least one needs to be off work and constantly supporting the kid in my humble opinion. traditionally it was the woman, but if the woman really wants to work, the man needs to bite the bullet and raise the kids (of course not counting gay parents)
that's what i'm planning to do if/when i have kids at least. as a child raised in a two-working-parent household (where i wasnt really consistently supported for anything, they let me quit piano, they didnt see my swimming lessons through, they didnt even teach me to ride the bicycle), i can clearly see it had an impact on my social skills, work ethic, and understanding of the world in retrospect. Or you can have their grandparents look after them. My grandma looked after me, and I love her very much to this day. Those were probably the best times of my life.
And yes, you should definitely blame the parents, but for the VT massacre, which was very personal to me because my dad was in the building right next to the shooting, you cannot blame the parents. They did give him counseling and support, but idk, the kid was messed up, and the kids that made fun of him didn't help.
|
On January 21 2011 18:54 DND_Enkil wrote: I dunno, i was under the impression that it is mostly due to being bullied by fellow students that theese students snap. If you treat someone like crap day after day after day sooner or later they will snap, the only question is if they can make it through school before they snap or not. If they can, they usually get away from the bullies and might recover.
Remember back in school, me and my friends where nerdy but not victims of the bullies, not on any regular basis at least. One day we saw one of the bullies knock his favorite victim down and one of my friends turned to me and said something along the lines of "If they ever tries to treat me like that i will get a gun and to hell with the consequences" (he did not mean getting knocked down, he meant the daily abuse never letting up), the rest of us mostly agreed but i am not sure who among us would have had the balls to actually do it. But i think we all would have wanted to. Parents would not really have mattered i dont think, unless they would have stepped in and kicked the crap out the bullies.
You know why it didnt happen to you guys? Because you had those exact feelings of "I will not let this happen" Most people don't appreciate being walked on and will stand up for themselves in some measure. Other people just get walked all over.
You don't have to win the fight that will undoubtedly ensure when you stand up for yourself. You just have to make it a phyrric victory for the bully. They learn right quick there are easier prey.
For those kids that snap, it's still a parenting failure in the sense that they never taught their kids to stand up for themselves. What kind of parent doesn't do that?
|
Of course the parents are partly to blame in nearly all cases. But more blame should be laid on the schools that failed to shut down on the bullying (it had to be extremely severe to cause such a response) and the kids themselves, they're old enough to know right from wrong and to have a semblance of free will.
ps. Did a student really go to school with a gun in his bag? That sounds ridiculous he could so easily get a gun and just walk to school with it. I mean I can't even begin to imagine where I'm gonna get a gun from let alone just walk unnoticed into my school
|
On January 21 2011 20:37 hoppipolla wrote: Of course the parents are partly to blame in nearly all cases. But more blame should be laid on the schools that failed to shut down on the bullying (it had to be extremely severe to cause such a response) and the kids themselves, they're old enough to know right from wrong and to have a semblance of free will.
ps. Did a student really go to school with a gun in his bag? That sounds ridiculous he could so easily get a gun and just walk to school with it. I mean I can't even begin to imagine where I'm gonna get a gun from let alone just walk unnoticed into my school Wrong! Once again lets take away personal responsibility and blame a societal construct that has only one purpose! A school is there to educate children not to shelter them. There will ALWAYS be bullying, it's part of human nature. Unless one is mentally handicapped they must be held responsible for their actions accordingly. Making exceptions to this rule will only foster a tolerance for negligent and irresponsible behavior.
|
On January 21 2011 20:00 AzTec wrote: Honestly, I think it's difficult to argue that the chief amount of blame can be placed on anyone but the shooters.
Tons of kids get bullied but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
Tons of kids have shitty parents / maybe even abusive parents but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
This is like the video games makes people violent argument, there are so many people that go through exactly the same things these shooters go through and yet they don't go out and shoot people over it.
I agree with this guy.
I pretty much hated High School my whole time going through. I didn't want to shoot up my school though. I just graduated like everyone else and went on with my life. Expressing your anger with violence is nowhere near normal.
|
On January 21 2011 20:00 AzTec wrote: Honestly, I think it's difficult to argue that the chief amount of blame can be placed on anyone but the shooters.
Tons of kids get bullied but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
Tons of kids have shitty parents / maybe even abusive parents but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
This is like the video games makes people violent argument, there are so many people that go through exactly the same things these shooters go through and yet they don't go out and shoot people over it. tons of kids have similar situations, and history shows that a very small percentage will actually shoot people. that doesn't mean the situations aren't a big part to blame, that just means the chances of it turning into a shooting is very small. sure the parents are unlucky, but that doesn't mean they're absolutely absolved of blame. these cases should serve as a warning to parents in general to seek help for their kids or provide them a more nurturing environment if their environment is clearly wearing down on them. just because most of the kids don't end up shooting people doesn't mean they all turn out 'alright' either
|
actually in retrospect i'd best agree to blame nobody because nobody deserves blame for anything
lets love, not hate
|
I actually agree with this to a large degree. If a minor under your care commits crimes you are responsible unless you took provable steps trying to prevent it. If your child breaks a window, who pays for the repair?
Excluded or judged differently should be foster parents of known problem children, if you include these you will have no foster parents for these children.
|
On January 21 2011 21:01 Silentness wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2011 20:00 AzTec wrote: Honestly, I think it's difficult to argue that the chief amount of blame can be placed on anyone but the shooters.
Tons of kids get bullied but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
Tons of kids have shitty parents / maybe even abusive parents but they don't go out and shoot people over it.
This is like the video games makes people violent argument, there are so many people that go through exactly the same things these shooters go through and yet they don't go out and shoot people over it. I agree with this guy. I pretty much hated High School my whole time going through. I didn't want to shoot up my school though. I just graduated like everyone else and went on with my life. Expressing your anger with violence is nowhere near normal. Every situation when it comes to school violence really comes down to the individual case. Look at the boys from Columbine. They showed a lot of early signs that should've triggered some kind of reactions from their parents (stealing from neighbors, hiding fucking weapons in their homes, threatening another student's life). Some of these early actions you could argue are shared by many troubled teenagers. But the Columbine boys had nobody for support. They had nearly no friends. They had uninvolved parents. Nobody ever made an effort to help them, and so they were consumed by the hatred and darkness in their minds.
No, expressing anger through shooting people up isn't normal. But these weren't normal situations. Human beings are social creatures, and when you tear out social interactions from someone's life I'd say they cease to follow the same rules and thinking normal people do. Just think about how crazy shit has to get for them to shoot someone. Even after watching countless action movies and games and shit, could you possibly imagine yourself actually killing a person in front of you? Fuck no. That's on a whole 'nother level we just can't imagine.
|
And people just as loud shout that it must be the parents fault. I don't think either gives a very accurate idea of what really happened. I'd rather ask police investigators than get my opinions from sensationalist news and soccer moms.
Parents should this, parents should that... You know what, teenagers are very good at hiding things from their parents. All parents feel like their kid is just going thru a phase, and they talk to other parents and they don't understand their teenagers either. The issue is way more complex than this.
|
On January 21 2011 23:04 Yurie wrote: I actually agree with this to a large degree. If a minor under your care commits crimes you are responsible unless you took provable steps trying to prevent it. If your child breaks a window, who pays for the repair?
Excluded or judged differently should be foster parents of known problem children, if you include these you will have no foster parents for these children.
I read some pretty dumb stuff in this thread, but this takes the cake. I broke a window once, guess who paid for it? I did, my dad made me get a job and slowly work off the money needed that he had to use to pay for it. So no, in essence all he did was give me a loan and made me suffer the consequences. You can't blame parents for fucked up kids, you can only blame kids. I was a lot like the school shooters, but instead of letting it go far enough that I felt I needed to bring a gun, I just snapped one day like in the Christmas Story knocked him down and then just started wailing on him. After that people left me alone, but why was i too blame? I told the school about it and all they did was brush it off. In my mind the parents can't be around kids 24/7. They can't constantly sit over the kids shoulder whispering things the kids conscious should be whispering. So really it is more the school and society's fault, not parents.
|
If we blame the parents for everything that's fucked up in this world, why are most people still allowed to make kids? In case of school shootings I'd blame the kids who close these kids out or bully them and even that wouldn't make sense. Glad I'm not blaming anyone, people are fucked up & we just gotta deal with it.
|
As with most things, school shootings are far too complex to blame on parenting alone. Eric Harris of the Columbine shootings was on medication and had a psychiatrist. If nothing else, his parents were at the very least attentive enough to notice that he needed one.
I think a lot of people are looking at it the wrong way. Anyone who guns down a group of their peers is almost by definition "crazy". It's not as simple as "they were being bullied and couldn't take it anymore." Lots of people are bullied. Lots of people have shitty parents or go through shitty stuff yet school shootings are actually a relatively rare occurence when you take these things into consideration. There's often something more innate, some mental issue that was overlooked perhaps. At the very least, it's not as black and white as some people make it seem.
Also worth noting, a profile of school shooters from wikipedia:
While it may be simplistic to assume a straightforward "profile", the study did find certain similarities among the perpetrators. "The researchers found that killers do not 'snap'. They plan. They acquire weapons. These children take a long, considered, public path toward violence."[4] Princeton's Katherine Newman points out that, far from being "loners", the perpetrators are "joiners" whose attempts at social integration fail, that they let their thinking and even their plans be known, sometimes frequently over long periods of times.
|
quote instead of edit woops.
|
For all the people saying "its easy to get a gun in the U.S. as a child", can you please elaborate? When I was ten, I couldn't even dream of getting access to any firearms whatsoever. Most of these kids probably get them from their parents. This means that the parents don't know how to purchase a gun safe/something else to keep their kids away from the guns. I guess otherwise, maybe if you were involved with a gang or something it would be possible, but please don't act like a kid went to a gun show and bought the damn thing outright.
|
On January 21 2011 20:02 Tazza wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2011 18:22 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: yeah i agree, blame the parents. too much terrible parenting nowadays, at least one needs to be off work and constantly supporting the kid in my humble opinion. traditionally it was the woman, but if the woman really wants to work, the man needs to bite the bullet and raise the kids (of course not counting gay parents)
that's what i'm planning to do if/when i have kids at least. as a child raised in a two-working-parent household (where i wasnt really consistently supported for anything, they let me quit piano, they didnt see my swimming lessons through, they didnt even teach me to ride the bicycle), i can clearly see it had an impact on my social skills, work ethic, and understanding of the world in retrospect. Or you can have their grandparents look after them. My grandma looked after me, and I love her very much to this day. Those were probably the best times of my life. And yes, you should definitely blame the parents, but for the VT massacre, which was very personal to me because my dad was in the building right next to the shooting, you cannot blame the parents. They did give him counseling and support, but idk, the kid was messed up, and the kids that made fun of him didn't help.
if thats the case then i definitely say that you couldn't place any blame on the parents. i'd just like to know that a parent is trying you know?
|
On January 22 2011 01:40 Scruffy wrote: For all the people saying "its easy to get a gun in the U.S. as a child", can you please elaborate? When I was ten, I couldn't even dream of getting access to any firearms whatsoever. Most of these kids probably get them from their parents. This means that the parents don't know how to purchase a gun safe/something else to keep their kids away from the guns. I guess otherwise, maybe if you were involved with a gang or something it would be possible, but please don't act like a kid went to a gun show and bought the damn thing outright.
this also, a kid doesn't walk into walmart and grab a gun. they get them from an unlocked drawer in their parent's room.
|
On January 21 2011 20:57 THE_DOMINATOR wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2011 20:37 hoppipolla wrote: Of course the parents are partly to blame in nearly all cases. But more blame should be laid on the schools that failed to shut down on the bullying (it had to be extremely severe to cause such a response) and the kids themselves, they're old enough to know right from wrong and to have a semblance of free will.
ps. Did a student really go to school with a gun in his bag? That sounds ridiculous he could so easily get a gun and just walk to school with it. I mean I can't even begin to imagine where I'm gonna get a gun from let alone just walk unnoticed into my school Wrong! Once again lets take away personal responsibility and blame a societal construct that has only one purpose! A school is there to educate children not to shelter them. There will ALWAYS be bullying, it's part of human nature. Unless one is mentally handicapped they must be held responsible for their actions accordingly. Making exceptions to this rule will only foster a tolerance for negligent and irresponsible behavior.
Of cource they must be held responsible for thier actions, as should a person that every day pucnhes another person in the stomach for the fun of it. You can not wait with enacting punishment until the crime is severe enough, because sooner or later the victim will take the law into his own hands. And in the case of school shootings the rage is directed to everyone and he will "punish" everyone.
To clarify: School shooters should always be held 100% accountable for thier actions, but if we want to talk prevention we need to look at what caused this.
P.S. At least schools in sweden are legally bound to nurture and protect the kids in school and fight bullying at all times. And social bulliyng will never go away, but there is absolutely nothing that prevents us from eradicating physical repeated bullying.
|
Blaming parents is a lot more rational than a lot of the other suggestions out there, but it's only one aspect of several.
On top of that, the problems with the parents are likely several generations old. Most of us here who have the leisure time to troll TL at will on our fast computers and speedy internet connection have come from a comfortable background. I'm sure there are some exceptions, but for the most part, I think we can safely say that TL has a pretty privileged population.
This isn't always so for a lot of poorer families. That couple working several jobs with 5 kids? Yeah, that's probably how they grew up too. They don't know anything different. Maybe they only had one parent, who worked their ass off at some shitty minimum wage job just to feed the family. So they grew up with no real supervision, hanging out in the streets or whatnot with the other kids. No role models or anything. Next thing you know, she's pregnant at 16, and soon needs to take care of her own kid. The cycle repeats itself.
And on the topic of birth control: Again it's very much a class issue. I live in a really affluent part of the country. I can go to any pharmacy, grocery store, even fucking gas stations, and get contraceptives. I can afford to go to a doctor and get a prescription for birth control. It actually costs me next to nothing. It isn't like this everywhere. There are some parts of the country where it's fucking hard to get contraceptives.
So when a rich, upper/middle class kid shoots up a school, sure, you can probably put a chunk of the blame directly on the parents who really don't have much of an excuse for raising a violent little shit of a child. But a lot of the time, the parents are only living in the only world they know.
|
|
|
|