• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:18
CEST 08:18
KST 15:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation12$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Summer Games Done Quick 2025! US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 565 users

Manner is not an adjective - Page 6

Blogs > chrisSquire
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
qrs
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States3637 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-16 18:15:43
September 16 2010 18:13 GMT
#101
I'm fairly sure that nearly everyone who uses the word "manner" in this slang sense understands it as slang, so there's no need for a blog to educate them, but since you apparently care for things like this, you might like to know that you were wrong about this part:
On September 16 2010 21:52 chrisSquire wrote:

Manner simply refers to "a way of doing something".


"The manner in which he controls his Colossus is far superior to all others."

By qualifying with "well" or "bad" we can transform the noun "manner" into a descriptive adjective" thusly:

"The well-mannered host made sure to abide each and everyone of his guests' wishes.

N.B.
The word itself does not carry any qualities of its own (e.g. well mannered or bad mannered).

Even in a sentence such as "He is a mannered player" (where the word is used correctly in a grammatical sense) you still have not actually told us anything about his manner but just that he has a "way of doing things" which ought to be quite obvious in the first place.

The Oxford English Dictionary says:
mannered
, adj.
2. Having good manners; well-behaved, polite; refined, gracious, sophisticated. Now chiefly regional.
If you think about phrases like, "Where are your manners?", you see that "manners" can be used in the sense of "good manners". That's not in the least unusual for English, either: for another example, think of the word "principled" or the phrase "a man of principles".

edit: just noticed that Nony already made this point on the previous page. Oh well, at least I added chapter and verse.
'As per the American Heart Association, the beat of the Bee Gees song "Stayin' Alive" provides an ideal rhythm in terms of beats per minute to use for hands-only CPR. One can also hum Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust".' —Wikipedia
javy_
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1677 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-16 18:22:52
September 16 2010 18:17 GMT
#102
i agree completely with the OP. it drives me nuts how the term manner is thrown around in ways that don't make sense
♪~( ̄。 ̄)
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-16 18:34:41
September 16 2010 18:34 GMT
#103
This just in. Language changes in new and exciting ways due to cultural influences.


More news at eleven!
Too Busy to Troll!
mucker
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1120 Posts
September 16 2010 18:43 GMT
#104
On September 17 2010 03:08 Daigomi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2010 02:47 mucker wrote:
On September 17 2010 01:48 Daigomi wrote:
On September 17 2010 01:06 mucker wrote:
On September 17 2010 01:01 Daigomi wrote:
On September 17 2010 00:42 Nokarot wrote:
Its a phrase. If you know what it means, then it's doing its job.

If someone is saying "this is getting out of hand" they don't mean "i dropped something", they mean that the situation is escalating beyond control.

Which reminds me... amazing flash.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/529003

It's not a phrase, it's a word: "Manner/Mannered." Just like phrases however, there are correct and incorrect uses. A better example would be like saying "this is getting out to hand," with the intended meaning being it is escalating beyond control.
On September 17 2010 00:43 Gene wrote:
next he's going to tell us Google isnt a verb

It's more a case of the word already existing in the proper form, and then an incorrect form being used. People create new meanings and uses for words all the time, and that's fine. In this case though, the word already has the correct forms and tenses, and people are incorrectly using one form in place of another. It's like deciding that from now on the word "kick" will be past tense as well, when the form "kicked" already exists. "Yesterday I kick the ball," and then when someone points out the mistake you say that language is evolving.


So you don't think using words in new ways constitutes language change?

I'm not quite sure what you are asking. If you are referring to my last sentence, then it is language change of course, but if you look at my previous comment I pointed out that not all language change is good change. It's just difficult to believe that people would actively want to change one completely reasonable word "mannered" to one that's outside of the normal rules of grammar "manner" for no reason. That's why I dislike this change, because it changes the rules of grammar (to directly contradict the previous rules of grammar regarding the word) for no benefit, while increasing the complexity. It really is like deciding that the past tense word "kicked" will now be "kick" for no reason, even though using kick as past tense is clearly incorrect according to the current rules of grammar. It can be done, but when the word already has a past tense form that is commonly used ("kicked"), why change it to make it more complex?
.


So language change has to be "good change"? You know that languages can undergo incredibly drastic changes with regards to syntax and morphology, right? What do you think those changes look like while they are happening? Do you think language change happens with no overlap between old and new? Your kick example doesn't hold up anyways. That is a tense marking on a verb, conveying information and reducing ambiguity. When you're using "mannered" as an adjective it isn't strictly past tense, as in the sentence Nony is such a manner player. Isn't dropping the -ed a reduction in complexity there? What additional necessary information does the -ed contain in Nony is such a mannered player? That doesn't even sound right to me, needs well before mannered. If Nony is such a well mannered player can be reduced to Nony is such a manner player with no loss of meaning and no introduction of ambiguity is that not a "good change"?


Language change doesn't have to be good change (although obviously it's better if changes in language simplify the language), but if we're actively choosing to change the language, then it's retarded to make the language more complex for no actual gain.

Not quite sure what your point is with sentences 2-4, and how it relates to the current situation. It seems like you are arguing for language evolution as a whole, which isn't really relevant here. We're not making an argument against some large scale trend which leads to overlap, this is a single case where the incorrect word was actively chosen. Rather than leading to a new set of rules which simplify language, this change will lead to an exception that needs to be made.

The kick example didn't have to do with the specific morphology, it had to do with the fact that a form of the word already exists, and that an incorrect form of the word is then used to replace the correct form. So, with regards to my example, the ed doesn't indicate tense, but it is part of a specific language rule which governs that situation: "Nony is such an educated/prepared/disciplined/mannered player." Someone specialising in linguistics can point out exactly what the rule is. The reason this is not a good is because, as I mentioned earlier, this is not some large scale simplification of the language but rather an exception completely unrelated to the current state of the language.

Notice that I do not mind the change from well mannered to mannered (I mention this in my first post on the topic). Omission is fine if the omission is generally understood. The problem is with the change in the grammar of this specific word, when established grammar rules for this class of word (and this word itself) already exists.


The point of those sentences 2-4 were to see if you actually understand the mechanics of language change, which clearly you do not. Entire syntactic or morphological rules do not change all at once. The usage of single words and phrases will change and it becomes a feedback loop with additional words in that class or syntactic structure undergoing the change until it has been reinforced to point where it becomes the default. Often times words will change even if it creates a redundant form, creates ambiguities or (apparently) unnecessary complexity. It starts with exceptions, in small communities or isolated groups. The usage of manner in gamer speak is exactly what language change looks like.
It's supposed to be automatic but actually you have to press this button.
nineninja9
Profile Joined March 2010
United States194 Posts
September 16 2010 18:45 GMT
#105
People freak out when "metagame" is used incorrectly but incorrect usage of "manner" is a sign of evolving languages?

Personally I agree with the view that we don't need to be particularly strict about word definitions, of course, I also extend this to "metagame" and so find that argument rather unreasonable as well.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
September 16 2010 19:06 GMT
#106
It's slang that's developed within gaming. Get over it.
Hello
Daigomi
Profile Blog Joined May 2006
South Africa4316 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-16 19:12:36
September 16 2010 19:09 GMT
#107
On September 17 2010 03:43 mucker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2010 03:08 Daigomi wrote:
On September 17 2010 02:47 mucker wrote:
On September 17 2010 01:48 Daigomi wrote:
On September 17 2010 01:06 mucker wrote:
On September 17 2010 01:01 Daigomi wrote:
On September 17 2010 00:42 Nokarot wrote:
Its a phrase. If you know what it means, then it's doing its job.

If someone is saying "this is getting out of hand" they don't mean "i dropped something", they mean that the situation is escalating beyond control.

Which reminds me... amazing flash.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/529003

It's not a phrase, it's a word: "Manner/Mannered." Just like phrases however, there are correct and incorrect uses. A better example would be like saying "this is getting out to hand," with the intended meaning being it is escalating beyond control.
On September 17 2010 00:43 Gene wrote:
next he's going to tell us Google isnt a verb

It's more a case of the word already existing in the proper form, and then an incorrect form being used. People create new meanings and uses for words all the time, and that's fine. In this case though, the word already has the correct forms and tenses, and people are incorrectly using one form in place of another. It's like deciding that from now on the word "kick" will be past tense as well, when the form "kicked" already exists. "Yesterday I kick the ball," and then when someone points out the mistake you say that language is evolving.


So you don't think using words in new ways constitutes language change?

I'm not quite sure what you are asking. If you are referring to my last sentence, then it is language change of course, but if you look at my previous comment I pointed out that not all language change is good change. It's just difficult to believe that people would actively want to change one completely reasonable word "mannered" to one that's outside of the normal rules of grammar "manner" for no reason. That's why I dislike this change, because it changes the rules of grammar (to directly contradict the previous rules of grammar regarding the word) for no benefit, while increasing the complexity. It really is like deciding that the past tense word "kicked" will now be "kick" for no reason, even though using kick as past tense is clearly incorrect according to the current rules of grammar. It can be done, but when the word already has a past tense form that is commonly used ("kicked"), why change it to make it more complex?
.


So language change has to be "good change"? You know that languages can undergo incredibly drastic changes with regards to syntax and morphology, right? What do you think those changes look like while they are happening? Do you think language change happens with no overlap between old and new? Your kick example doesn't hold up anyways. That is a tense marking on a verb, conveying information and reducing ambiguity. When you're using "mannered" as an adjective it isn't strictly past tense, as in the sentence Nony is such a manner player. Isn't dropping the -ed a reduction in complexity there? What additional necessary information does the -ed contain in Nony is such a mannered player? That doesn't even sound right to me, needs well before mannered. If Nony is such a well mannered player can be reduced to Nony is such a manner player with no loss of meaning and no introduction of ambiguity is that not a "good change"?


Language change doesn't have to be good change (although obviously it's better if changes in language simplify the language), but if we're actively choosing to change the language, then it's retarded to make the language more complex for no actual gain.

Not quite sure what your point is with sentences 2-4, and how it relates to the current situation. It seems like you are arguing for language evolution as a whole, which isn't really relevant here. We're not making an argument against some large scale trend which leads to overlap, this is a single case where the incorrect word was actively chosen. Rather than leading to a new set of rules which simplify language, this change will lead to an exception that needs to be made.

The kick example didn't have to do with the specific morphology, it had to do with the fact that a form of the word already exists, and that an incorrect form of the word is then used to replace the correct form. So, with regards to my example, the ed doesn't indicate tense, but it is part of a specific language rule which governs that situation: "Nony is such an educated/prepared/disciplined/mannered player." Someone specialising in linguistics can point out exactly what the rule is. The reason this is not a good is because, as I mentioned earlier, this is not some large scale simplification of the language but rather an exception completely unrelated to the current state of the language.

Notice that I do not mind the change from well mannered to mannered (I mention this in my first post on the topic). Omission is fine if the omission is generally understood. The problem is with the change in the grammar of this specific word, when established grammar rules for this class of word (and this word itself) already exists.


The point of those sentences 2-4 were to see if you actually understand the mechanics of language change, which clearly you do not. Entire syntactic or morphological rules do not change all at once. The usage of single words and phrases will change and it becomes a feedback loop with additional words in that class or syntactic structure undergoing the change until it has been reinforced to point where it becomes the default. Often times words will change even if it creates a redundant form, creates ambiguities or (apparently) unnecessary complexity. It starts with exceptions, in small communities or isolated groups. The usage of manner in gamer speak is exactly what language change looks like.

It's not that I don't understand how language changes. I just find the idea that the incorrect use of "manner" on a SC forum will lead to large scale syntactic and morphological changes absurd and didn't really consider it. Is that what you are arguing? That if we start using "manner" here it is more likely to lead to a large scale change than it is to becoming an exception? To take this further, are you arguing that we should all be consciously using incorrect forms of words which complexify the language at the time because they might lead to large scale simplifications later? Because that is the situation here.

Even if you were to assume that this change could lead to large scale changes. There is no way you could promote making conscious changes like these when you consider firstly how minute the chance of it leading to a substantive change is, and secondly the uncontrolled nature of the change. Even if it leads to a change, the chance that it's a simplifying change is not that great. All in all, the chance that this change will improve the language is tiny compared to the immediate effects of it being wrong right now, and the long term chance that it simply becomes a complex exception.
Moderator
Shiladie
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Canada1631 Posts
September 16 2010 19:10 GMT
#108
you can't take this away from us!
manner pylons!
manner players!
manner plays!
Mortician
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Bulgaria2332 Posts
September 16 2010 19:10 GMT
#109
So, you are saying the community completely raped the meaning of the word?
"If anything, the skill cap in sc2 is higher [than sc1] because there are a lot more things you can do at one given time. " darmousseh
Amnesia
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3818 Posts
September 16 2010 19:17 GMT
#110
Better question: Who gives a shit?

QQ more dude
Saturnize
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States2473 Posts
September 16 2010 19:22 GMT
#111
Why do people act as if language is set in stone -_-?
"Time to put the mustard on the hotdog. -_-"
FiBsTeR
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States415 Posts
September 16 2010 19:26 GMT
#112
On September 17 2010 04:22 Saturnize wrote:
Why do people act as if language is set in stone -_-?


This is basically the heart of the issue.

There's two schools of thought: either you believe that there is an unwavering standard of how language should be used (prescriptive grammarian) or you believe that this standard is set by how language is actually used (descriptive grammarian). You can't point to one of these and say "that's the right way", and there's no use arguing it because there are pros and cons of both views.
EsX_Raptor
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States2801 Posts
September 16 2010 19:51 GMT
#113
Bacesue we as hamnus hvae the tncendey to foamlzrie tinhgs to a pniot werhe erveobydy has to flloow a gevin satdrand. Tihs is psoilbsy due to the need of hvanig acrutcae, picerse ifnramioton (think eninengrieg), or as a maens to vliatade the sohcol sesytm.

Heovwer, I sppourt crrecot gramamr to aiovd tihs secainro.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2010 20:13 GMT
#114
On September 17 2010 04:26 FiBsTeR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2010 04:22 Saturnize wrote:
Why do people act as if language is set in stone -_-?


This is basically the heart of the issue.

There's two schools of thought: either you believe that there is an unwavering standard of how language should be used (prescriptive grammarian) or you believe that this standard is set by how language is actually used (descriptive grammarian). You can't point to one of these and say "that's the right way", and there's no use arguing it because there are pros and cons of both views.


There are two prevailing views on continents. One says that they always looked the way they do now and the other says "that the continents had once formed a single landmass before breaking apart and drifting to their present locations". There are pros and cons to both views: one of them is considerably simpler and has the pedigree of thousands of years of tradition, while the other is supported by evidence and explains a number of other observations. You can't just point to one of them and say "that's the right way".
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
zobz
Profile Joined November 2005
Canada2175 Posts
September 16 2010 20:17 GMT
#115
Although silly to misuse words like this, this particular word has taken on a new meaning which is referred to exclusively when it's used as another part of speach. The alternative, to say that someone is "well-mannered" or "has good manners" sort of sounds like you're a stereotypical old lady talking about someone's gentlemenliness, as opposed to one's good sportsmanship or e-ettiquete, which i think most people agree sounds rather lame. The ungrammatical mutation of the word indicates more clearly that it's some accepted form of internet speak with which you should already be familiar, thus allowing people to feel cooler when talking about someone's manners, even to a less savvy audience.
"That's not gonna be good for business." "That's not gonna be good for anybody."
B12ad
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States137 Posts
September 16 2010 20:37 GMT
#116
whoa manner~! This thread be very gm.
Fontong
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States6454 Posts
September 16 2010 21:27 GMT
#117
Ok, let's all stop using colloquialisms forever!
[SECRET FONT] "Dragoon bunker"
ironchef
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Canada1350 Posts
September 16 2010 21:32 GMT
#118
grammar pylon!

Message board = informal writing setting.(See I just used an equal sign!) Clarity and readability is more important than form. We can use whatever variations, especially one as commonly known and 'harmless' as manner. (ie it is intuitive and obvious, and not totally ugly.. for example "leet speak" is commonly known, but ugly so I would discourage using it more hehe)

I actually prefer this way of English. If you hear a new term, you often can figure out the meaning by context and logic. That is the only way shakespeare plays will make any sense lol.
“Because your own strength is unequal to the task, do not assume that it is beyond the powers of man; but if anything is within the powers and province of man, believe that it is within your own compass also.” - Marcus Aurelius
CosmicAC
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States238 Posts
September 16 2010 22:56 GMT
#119
On September 16 2010 22:18 LuckyFool wrote:
If language never evolved we'd all be speaking some sort of ancient prehistoric grunting language from the early years of B.C.E.

that being said I wouldn't want to have to learn english through the teamliquid forums. (news articles are well written but the overall TL poster is quite a grammatical noob or does not take the time/effort to post in good english, I know I don't)

oh and it's quite fun when you meetup with TL users or other people from the community to use these words in these ways. :D


This. Language is all about change... do you think all the words in the English language were invented at once?
To follow the path: look to the master, follow the master, walk with the master, see through the master, become the master.
Dog22
Profile Joined April 2010
United States140 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-16 23:14:54
September 16 2010 23:06 GMT
#120
I actually agree with the OP. I don't really mind THAT much, but it is a bit annoying. I know that most of the TL community disagrees... oh well, it's just preference.

I don't really feel that using words incorrectly is a form of evolution. In fact, I think it's the opposite...but once again that's just my opinion. I also don't claim that my grammar is perfect either, in fact it's far from it. I, for one, can't stand that things like "bling bling" are being added as a normal part of the language. Like I said, I don't think it's "evolving". Just my thoughts -- to each his own.

edit: I am also guilty of using phrases like "manner pylon" I guess I'm just a hypocrite.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 42m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 193
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 224
Noble 127
PianO 111
Bale 22
JulyZerg 9
Dota 2
ODPixel178
NeuroSwarm91
League of Legends
JimRising 765
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor103
Other Games
summit1g8886
Stewie2K912
shahzam790
monkeys_forever467
SortOf61
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38137
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH360
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota229
League of Legends
• Lourlo1305
• Stunt533
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 42m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
6h 42m
Replay Cast
17h 42m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 9h
OSC
1d 13h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.