EPTThe set up would be that someone proposes a peer-reviewed article in almost any field of science (as long as it doesn't get so technical you need years of that subject to understand it). After the article has been decided upon, we read the article and evaluate how they went about doing their research. We can critique their assumptions and methods and basically just give an all-around opinion of the paper.
Anyways that's just the rough form of how it would go, if any are interested post suggestions to modify it. If I get around 5+ people that want to do this, I'll start it up. It should be good practice for those taking exams to get into graduate school.
If you choose yes on this poll, pm me your e-mail so I can contact you on how to get the papers.
Poll: Would you be interested in this?
(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): Fence Sitter
Example of a peer-reviewed paper:
Role of Selective Leptin Resistance in Diet-Induced Obesity Hypertension
This paper was published in the American Diabetes Association's Journal. A lot of the terms are very esoteric and so are some of the methods, but all can be defined by wikipedia, or a dictionary.
