EPTThe favicons of the regular tl-page and the streams have transparency.
Liquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 26
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
propulsion
Germany65 Posts
The favicons of the regular tl-page and the streams have transparency. | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
PS: SC had a relapse on the lung problem? Thats super bad ! ! | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On November 29 2011 07:40 MCDayC wrote: The SC format is much clearer and sexier for outlining GSL players. It gives a better idea of the players storyline, the Code S, Code A style was super confusing. PS: SC had a relapse on the lung problem? Thats super bad ! ! SC format as in BW or as in the player sC? But yes this format is far supperior but it does need three things a dedicated and/or skilled writer; making good paragraphs and sentences that aren't just an ordered list of events happening on a timeline, but rather a story told about multiple events in hindsight; and sources. The best way to write a good article is to provide sources for the statements and quotes. Which should be added into the text to enhance it further. | ||
|
BboyMeltdown
Italy2 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:BboyMeltdown/Terran_Strategy(italian) i'll start translating the other pages soon byez | ||
|
BboyMeltdown
Italy2 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:BboyMeltdown/OC_opening(italian) http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:BboyMeltdown/Fabbrica_veloce | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On November 29 2011 09:05 salle wrote: SC format as in BW or as in the player sC? But yes this format is far supperior but it does need three things a dedicated and/or skilled writer; making good paragraphs and sentences that aren't just an ordered list of events happening on a timeline, but rather a story told about multiple events in hindsight; and sources. The best way to write a good article is to provide sources for the statements and quotes. Which should be added into the text to enhance it further. I guess I mean both sC and the Brood War format, coincidentally enough. Written text is far superior. But even then, just ordering things chronologically is much better. No offence (I love liquipedia) but ordering the player text into Code A, then Code S is idiotic, and even more so now that there is going to be constant change between them now. | ||
|
TheNessman
United States4158 Posts
how do i do line breaks. T_T | ||
blahz0r
3030 Posts
On December 05 2011 12:15 TheNessman wrote: ... how do i do line breaks. T_T In what? tables? text? | ||
|
Mr Brightside
Australia21 Posts
| ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
ChapatiyaqPTSM
France1887 Posts
On December 01 2011 20:56 BboyMeltdown wrote: added 2 more ita translations : http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:BboyMeltdown/OC_opening(italian) http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:BboyMeltdown/Fabbrica_veloce Ciao BboyMeltdown! it's nice to see Liquipedia articles translated. I know it's not easy, and the massive amount of pages on Liquipedia can be scary for a translator. Some minor advices I will humbly give you:
Besides that, your articles look great. Keep up the good work!  I don't know much Italian, but I'm pretty good in Spanish, which helps to review your work.Also, take a look at this thread: Italian Liquipedia (if it's not already done). Unfortunately, their project seem to be put on hold. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19237 Posts
| ||
|
TheNessman
United States4158 Posts
text like i'm typing and i hit enter so like this but it comes out as one line in the wiki  | ||
|
ChapatiyaqPTSM
France1887 Posts
On December 08 2011 17:56 TheNessman wrote: text like i'm typing and i hit enter so like this but it comes out as one line in the wiki You could use the html tag for a line break (" "), like this<br /> like this new line that is also a new line | ||
|
Wren
United States745 Posts
| ||
|
pullarius1
United States523 Posts
| ||
|
Mystlord
United States10264 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:27 pullarius1 wrote: I don't know how draft approval works on the BW side of things, but it's way too slow. I got very discouraged from making edits to it since I knew it would be weeks before it would be useful to people. I just came across a an error in the WCG 2008 page that was corrected back in October and still has not been approved. As it stands, it says that Stork beat Castro 2-2, which should be an easy thing to spot check. Yeah that's our bad. Activity on the BW LP has dropped pretty low and the editors have all mostly jumped ship to LP2. The other editors and I are starting to work on it again though, so the backlog will get cleared soon enough. Again, apologies. | ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
On December 13 2011 14:14 Mystlord wrote: Yeah that's our bad. Activity on the BW LP has dropped pretty low and the editors have all mostly jumped ship to LP2. The other editors and I are starting to work on it again though, so the backlog will get cleared soon enough. Again, apologies. Yup, I spent hours doing Daum OSL prelims and it hasn't been validated a month later. But I saw you approving a bunch of stuffs yesterday, so I'm sure it will be alright ! Blahz0r is pretty active. | ||
|
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
| ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
On December 14 2011 17:21 salle wrote: It's a catch 22, the longer between new edits the longer between reviews, the longer between reviews the longer between new edits. I'll keep updating frequently, don't worry! It's just that most of the time, editing a page takes much longer than reviewing it. It's a little bit frustrating when you spend hours to edit a page and it takes really long to be validated, while the validation itself would probably only take a few minutes. I see that the SC2 LP trend of updating tournaments results in real-time has started on BW LP, so I think pages will be reviewed more othen ! | ||
| ||
User:BboyMeltdown/Fabbrica veloce
