|
On August 17 2019 21:22 Jockmcplop wrote:
We allowed to use the N word in the politics thread now?
I don't see why anyone would wanna but I reported that and nothing happened.
Seems like a bad idea to me, regardless of context or the individual.
Should have grabbed a screenshot. I can't find it.
|
On August 17 2019 16:06 Muliphein wrote:
The fact that you can say "far from the worst and even reasonable" after I already put so much doubt on your ability to string together coherent thoughts says enough. There is so many levels in between those two statements. Wow
Doing the worst thing to your child or being a good parent; I guess you think it is reasonable for a parent to treat their kid how they believe a crazy violent cop would treat a criminal nigger. Because you never know when your kid is going to run into a cop, right? They better be ready then!
I truly hope you are just on drugs posting this. But you have a track record, it is insane.
it’s still there...
if someone were ever going to argue it was ok in context i’m sure they wouldn’t start here haha.
|
On August 18 2019 00:08 brian wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2019 16:06 Muliphein wrote:
The fact that you can say "far from the worst and even reasonable" after I already put so much doubt on your ability to string together coherent thoughts says enough. There is so many levels in between those two statements. Wow
Doing the worst thing to your child or being a good parent; I guess you think it is reasonable for a parent to treat their kid how they believe a crazy violent cop would treat a criminal nigger. Because you never know when your kid is going to run into a cop, right? They better be ready then!
I truly hope you are just on drugs posting this. But you have a track record, it is insane. it’s still there... if someone were ever going to argue it was ok in context i’m sure they wouldn’t start here haha.
WOW LOL
|
On August 18 2019 00:08 brian wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2019 16:06 Muliphein wrote:
The fact that you can say "far from the worst and even reasonable" after I already put so much doubt on your ability to string together coherent thoughts says enough. There is so many levels in between those two statements. Wow
Doing the worst thing to your child or being a good parent; I guess you think it is reasonable for a parent to treat their kid how they believe a crazy violent cop would treat a criminal nigger. Because you never know when your kid is going to run into a cop, right? They better be ready then!
I truly hope you are just on drugs posting this. But you have a track record, it is insane. it’s still there... if someone were ever going to argue it was ok in context i’m sure they wouldn’t start here haha.
I skimmed the last two threads (hangover). Thanks. Now for me to go have some fun!
Damn! They got banned. Back to drinking I suppose.
|
Just out of interesr, for what did DarkplasmBall get a warning?
Talking bad about majesty or wtf?
It even sparked many comments that all had way less content and no one got a warning for it. If its not allowed anymore that sharing a tweet of the potus and commenting on the insanity of it, then wtf?
|
On August 27 2019 02:18 Velr wrote:
Just out of interesr, for what did DarkplasmBall get a warning?
Talking bad about majesty or wtf?
It even sparked many comments that all had way less content and no one got a warning for it. If its not allowed anymore that sharing a tweet of the potus and commenting on the insanity of it, then wtf?
The comment was under the link.
At least that's what I'm guessing its for.
Post the comment, then underneath that your article/link, its in the header.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
|
I have always wondered what that rule is actually there for. Clearly it is important to someone, but i really couldn't care less if the thing you write is above or below the link/article/whatever.
|
On August 27 2019 02:27 Simberto wrote:
I have always wondered what that rule is actually there for. Clearly it is important to someone, but i really couldn't care less if the thing you write is above or below the link/article/whatever.
I would say the point is that the forum is supposed to be for OUR comments as users, not parroting articles, and forcing people to put their comment first is making it clear that the perspective on the source is the important thing, not just the source itself. That way we aren't just posting links with 'lol' underneath or some shit like that.
It actually makes alot of sense, in a kind of vague way.
|
Hm, don't know. I agree with the idea that you should post something relevant in addition to the source, but i don't see a huge difference whether the lol is above or below the source.
If anything, it seems more sensible to have it below the source, because that way i actually know what you are talking about when you comment on it. Otherwise, i usually read a comment, have no idea what is going on, then read the source, and then have to reread the comment afterwards because it only makes sense with that context.
|
Yeah there was a lot of discussion on that rule when it was first implemented, seemed like a form over substance kind of thing to me, but oh well. I’ll bet that’s DPB’s first or second warning ever lol
|
On August 27 2019 02:48 farvacola wrote:
Yeah there was a lot of discussion on that rule when it was first implemented, seemed like a form over substance kind of thing to me, but oh well. I’ll bet that’s DPB’s first or second warning ever lol
Him and I hung out for a few days not too long ago. Coincidence? I think not >:)
|
DarkplasmaBall warning seem kind of odd. Meanwhile iplaynettles get away with much worse, constantly.
Clearly this is an indication of a de-facto second standard for liberals in the thread.
|
On August 27 2019 04:04 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
DarkplasmaBall warning seem kind of odd. Meanwhile iplaynettles get away with much worse, constantly.
Clearly this is an indication of a de-facto second standard for liberals in the thread.
Pretty sure it's Clinton's paid mods doing their work.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37103 Posts
Yes, DPB was warned for posting his source first. The rules and guidelines clearly state that he needs to provide his supporting comment before he posts the source.
|
On August 27 2019 07:24 Seeker wrote:
Yes, DPB was warned for posting his source first. The rules and guidelines clearly state that he needs to provide his supporting comment before he posts the source.
The life of a criminal had begun, the path of fanatacist follows.
|
Just surprises me how much mileage you guys can get out of variations of "trump and his supporters are stupid and hopeless"
|
On August 27 2019 07:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Just surprises me how much mileage you guys can get out of variations of "trump and his supporters are stupid and hopeless"
And yet he keeps posting stupid shit on twitter as if....
as if...
That's exactly how he wants people to react...
|
On August 27 2019 08:07 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2019 07:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Just surprises me how much mileage you guys can get out of variations of "trump and his supporters are stupid and hopeless" And yet he keeps posting stupid shit on twitter as if.... as if... That's exactly how he wants people to react...
iirc this is something most of them recognized/noticed and yet... I don't get it.
|
On August 27 2019 08:07 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2019 07:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Just surprises me how much mileage you guys can get out of variations of "trump and his supporters are stupid and hopeless" And yet he keeps posting stupid shit on twitter as if.... as if... That's exactly how he wants people to react...
Or maybe it's as if...
As if...
He's actually stupid...
Occam's razor people. It's naive to think Trump is playing some kind of 4D chess by making people think he's stupid. It's much more likely that he's just exactly that.
|
On August 27 2019 15:06 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2019 08:07 Jockmcplop wrote:On August 27 2019 07:50 GreenHorizons wrote:
Just surprises me how much mileage you guys can get out of variations of "trump and his supporters are stupid and hopeless" And yet he keeps posting stupid shit on twitter as if.... as if... That's exactly how he wants people to react... Or maybe it's as if... As if... He's actually stupid... Occam's razor people. It's naive to think Trump is playing some kind of 4D chess by making people think he's stupid. It's much more likely that he's just exactly that.
It can be both. Not that it's especially complex, but his strategy is to provoke the conflict, not convince people or mediate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
