|
On April 04 2019 03:19 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2019 18:05 oBlade wrote:Is it any kind of backseat moderating to call people PBUs in a thread and say like to disregard them? Also, On April 03 2019 10:17 KwarK wrote:
If he found a Pastafarian willing to do it I’d expect them to pat him down and let him in to administer the last seasoning or whatever. The prison’s reason for denying equal accsss to religious counseling is spurious. On April 03 2019 10:17 KwarK wrote:
administer the last seasoning How do I cancel a TL- gift? The whole system is build on "back seat moderating" that is what the report feature is. Writing something in the feedback thread is simply putting a public name to the report.
Sorry I didn't mean here. Feedback is feedback. But in actual threads you can see people going "X is a PBU just ignore him." Like, if he is a PBU really, they should be telling a mod to ban him. Except PBUs also get new chances if you ever see "Try harder on your next account." Which may be the case sometimes. You should ignore someone because they're stupid, which is probably why they became a PBU, not because of that accusation I think. Or if they're not a PBU then it derails a thread to call them one falsely.
|
On April 04 2019 21:07 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2019 03:19 JimmiC wrote:On April 03 2019 18:05 oBlade wrote:Is it any kind of backseat moderating to call people PBUs in a thread and say like to disregard them? Also, On April 03 2019 10:17 KwarK wrote:
If he found a Pastafarian willing to do it I’d expect them to pat him down and let him in to administer the last seasoning or whatever. The prison’s reason for denying equal accsss to religious counseling is spurious. On April 03 2019 10:17 KwarK wrote:
administer the last seasoning How do I cancel a TL- gift? The whole system is build on "back seat moderating" that is what the report feature is. Writing something in the feedback thread is simply putting a public name to the report. Sorry I didn't mean here. Feedback is feedback. But in actual threads you can see people going "X is a PBU just ignore him." Like, if he is a PBU really, they should be telling a mod to ban him. Except PBUs also get new chances if you ever see "Try harder on your next account." Which may be the case sometimes. You should ignore someone because they're stupid, which is probably why they became a PBU, not because of that accusation I think. Or if they're not a PBU then it derails a thread to call them one falsely.
PBUs don't get new chances. It's sarcasm from the mods because certain PBUs don't put a lot of work into hiding the fact that they are exactly that.
The problem with PBUs is that if you actually put work into hiding it, it's very difficult for mods to find out. The only thing left to give an indication is how they're posting (First post in the politics thread bashing left/right winged people is an obvious giveaway). For instance I am pretty certain that someone regularly in the Politics thread right now is a PBU, given by how aggressive his first few posts are (which is rare with actual new users). It isn't, however, proof, so they can't really ban him over it.
|
Shield got a new chance, you just have ask verrrry nicely.
He didn't hide his PBU status so I guess that's a bad example.
|
|
|
On April 04 2019 21:07 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2019 03:19 JimmiC wrote:On April 03 2019 18:05 oBlade wrote:Is it any kind of backseat moderating to call people PBUs in a thread and say like to disregard them? Also, On April 03 2019 10:17 KwarK wrote:
If he found a Pastafarian willing to do it I’d expect them to pat him down and let him in to administer the last seasoning or whatever. The prison’s reason for denying equal accsss to religious counseling is spurious. On April 03 2019 10:17 KwarK wrote:
administer the last seasoning How do I cancel a TL- gift? The whole system is build on "back seat moderating" that is what the report feature is. Writing something in the feedback thread is simply putting a public name to the report. Sorry I didn't mean here. Feedback is feedback. But in actual threads you can see people going "X is a PBU just ignore him." Like, if he is a PBU really, they should be telling a mod to ban him. Except PBUs also get new chances if you ever see "Try harder on your next account." Which may be the case sometimes. You should ignore someone because they're stupid, which is probably why they became a PBU, not because of that accusation I think. Or if they're not a PBU then it derails a thread to call them one falsely.
I think the mechanism is self-correcting. After a few easy spots of PBUs, the crowd got a little excited. After one or two more when they look foolish and cliquish, it'll die down.
|
|
|
|
|
On April 11 2019 06:32 JimmiC wrote:
I'm going to use this feedback thread for something rare, positive feedback. The thread is a really good read right now, there is very different opinions all interacting and not being absolute dicks to each other. In my time participating it might be the best it has ever been. GJ team liquid politics thread!
TL.net politics thread* 
|
|
|
With all the hot air in the last few pages the thread should be hosted on TeamGas instead.
|
I gotta say GHs posting quality has been outstanding and I'm glad he's back.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36921 Posts
On April 16 2019 12:18 Zambrah wrote:
I gotta say GHs posting quality has been outstanding and I'm glad he's back.
This is his last chance. We’re all watching him like hawks.
|
that’s sad to hear. outside of the necessitated extra work of dual politics threads, was his blog otherwise not viewed as an unqualified success?
i feel like i must be out of the loop on something. what did he use his ‘last’ chance on, so to speak?
|
On April 16 2019 23:41 brian wrote:
that’s sad to hear. outside of the necessitated extra work of dual politics threads, was his blog otherwise not viewed as an unqualified success?
i feel like i must be out of the loop on something. what did he use his ‘last’ chance on, so to speak?
There's a whole ~10page thread on why GH was banned...
|
Dueling blog bans got cumbersome
|
ah, thank you, i had somehow missed that thread.
though now having read at least half of it, i’m really no closer to any real understanding, unless the entirety of the problem is within PMs. having not seen any, it seemed to be the only valid criticism.
|
Nothingburger Nothingburger Nothingburger
I know TL don't moderate the truth, but surely at some point, it must be against good conversation to insist something repeatedly without evidence, simply writing "I already wrote that" repeatedly instead.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36921 Posts
On April 18 2019 18:46 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Nothingburger Nothingburger Nothingburger
I know TL don't moderate the truth, but surely at some point, it must be against good conversation to insist something repeatedly without evidence, simply writing "I already wrote that" repeatedly instead.
Care to elaborate?
|
No seeker, in here we like to insinuate.
|
Passive aggressive website feedback! Where you hint at people you’d like to see banned, vaguely referencing truth and good conversation.
On April 16 2019 22:23 Seeker wrote:
If you’re going to passive/aggressively hint that some users need to be actioned more often/need to be looked at more closely, then just PM me. We’re not mind readers. Please just be blunt and forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
