Liquidbet Ranking- Again
Forum Index > Website Feedback |
HaLoToss
United States357 Posts
| ||
Meat
Netherlands3751 Posts
i have been manually recalculating and you just have 3 points. yourvote winner 2 unknown 1,4 1,2 = 1 points total 1,4 2,4 = 2 points total 1,3 3,4 = 3 points total If you still got a problem be more specific plz | ||
Liquid`Spy
Netherlands1301 Posts
select vote: winners: points: crystal crystal 1 sonjjang sonjjang So I got both right and it says only 1 point, while with the other two I had only 1 out of 2 right and also got 1 point. But in the ranking list I have 4 points, which is correct since I guessed 4 out of 6 right in total. | ||
Meat
Netherlands3751 Posts
| ||
Pol
Poland1187 Posts
| ||
Imperium
United States614 Posts
| ||
X)Benny
France1270 Posts
On March 12 2003 18:31 Liquid`Meat wrote: nop you misunderstand the meaning of "points" behind the poll. It is how many is you CAN get if you guess the winner right (1 per player in this case). Challenge league is pretty easy compared to the starleague, so we give more points in the starleague. I think you should change that. I was confused with that too. No need to say how many points can be earned after the results are known. If I were you I would put the points that can be earned before the game is played, and what you got after. (ex: 0/2, 1/2 or 2/2) Also, you should give the same name to the same event: group A is not labeled the same as groups B and C. Also , you could find clear short labels for the games. For exemple: OGN Chal A, OGN Dual A, OGN 16 A, KPGA..., One more, you could tell the actual score (5/8) on the player's page, and the ranking. And do you intend to do something for the ones who miss a round or join Liquibet late? Anyway, great work. This new feature is really a lot of fun. | ||
Liquid`Spy
Netherlands1301 Posts
On March 12 2003 18:31 Liquid`Meat wrote: nop you misunderstand the meaning of "points" behind the poll. It is how many is you CAN get if you guess the winner right (1 per player in this case). Challenge league is pretty easy compared to the starleague, so we give more points in the starleague. I see, okay no complaints then =) | ||
Liquid`Nazgul
22426 Posts
On March 13 2003 01:13 X)Benny wrote: I think you should change that. I was confused with that too. No need to say how many points can be earned after the results are known. If I were you I would put the points that can be earned before the game is played, and what you got after. (ex: 0/2, 1/2 or 2/2) I personally think it's very obvious that it's about how much can be earned Also, you should give the same name to the same event: group A is not labeled the same as groups B and C. Also , you could find clear short labels for the games. For exemple: OGN Chal A, OGN Dual A, OGN 16 A, KPGA..., Why? Except for the discription of Group A it fits perfectly, right? One more, you could tell the actual score (5/8) on the player's page, and the ranking. It shows the actual score and I think showing it as (5/8), (3/4), etc doesn't do the ranking any good. And do you intend to do something for the ones who miss a round or join Liquibet late? I was thinking of letting them come in with an amount of points equal to that of the lowest amount of points by someone who voted for every Liquibet. This is only an idea so far and haven't discussed it with anyone but mensrea. If you have any thoughts on how to do this best they're very welcome. Anyway, great work. This new feature is really a lot of fun. | ||
X)Benny
France1270 Posts
I had another look at the page: - OK for the names given to the items, except OGN group A which is different to the other OGN groups - I think "select 2 players" is useless, especially after you have voted, but even before. Maybe you could have "select 2 players" and "1 point each" before the player bet "" and "1 point each" after the vote "" and "2/2" after the group was played. - I'd like to see my score and my ranking on my page. I also think that on the ranking page, all equal scores should have the same ranking. - no idea for the new players. roll 2d4 and add charisma Once again don't take this as a critic, I enjoy you site, just want to share my thoughts to try to make it even better. It's interesting to see that eventhough there are 200+ players in Liquibet, no one has a perfect 6/6 nor a 0/6. In fact there wasn't even any 0/4 or 4/4 before group C results! p.s: Meat, still some viewing problems with opera (with the "news forum replays ..." line), and the top page adds don't show up anymore on my comp. | ||
Mkoms
United States128 Posts
On March 13 2003 22:16 X)Benny wrote: It's interesting to see that eventhough there are 200+ players in Liquibet, no one has a perfect 6/6 nor a 0/6. In fact there wasn't even any 0/4 or 4/4 before group C results! That's probably because everyone voted for Nazgul... | ||
| ||