VOTE FOR STATS!
GSL vs. The World: Team Korea Vote (2019) - Page 6
Forum Index > SC2 General |
monami153
1 Post
VOTE FOR STATS! | ||
frenaco
1 Post
| ||
wizg
1 Post
| ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12116 Posts
On July 25 2019 18:13 sneakyfox wrote: Btw, if voting ended now this would actually be a pretty strong tournament. - Dark, Maru, Classic, TY, soO, Stats, Trap/PartinG, Inno - Serral, Neeb, SpeCial, Reynor, Scarlett, Showtime, HeroMarine, TIME That's a Code S Ro16 right there. No for Showtime, heromarine, Scarlett and time. No for Parting who out of the last 4 Code S was in the RO16 once. Innovation and soO in slump so hard to say if they're ATM RO16 caliber(usually they are though) I mean how can you call Scarlett RO16 Code S when she tried and failed every Code S this year? She ended 3rd, 4th and 4th IIRC in RO32 groups. | ||
Need
566 Posts
| ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
He deserves this spot, even if having PartinG would be fun. | ||
YUU1
1 Post
| ||
Harris1st
Germany6151 Posts
On July 25 2019 18:18 monami153 wrote: VOTE FOR STATS! Rofl! Stats is best :D This years Scarlett is a bit disappointing tbh. Seems lacking the drive to win | ||
AttackZerg
United States7453 Posts
Ty, Stats and soO For world - Reynor, Heromarine, Showtime Wish I could pick Elazer or Lambo.... both are far more interesting to watch (to me) but I tried to vote "Best in list". Ty is the least objective pick I made. I think he is very clever. | ||
JiechenW
1 Post
| ||
Zambrah
United States6832 Posts
You mean the white TYsoOsis | ||
Xain0n
Italy3963 Posts
On July 25 2019 18:38 deacon.frost wrote: No for Showtime, heromarine, Scarlett and time. No for Parting who out of the last 4 Code S was in the RO16 once. Innovation and soO in slump so hard to say if they're ATM RO16 caliber(usually they are though) I mean how can you call Scarlett RO16 Code S when she tried and failed every Code S this year? She ended 3rd, 4th and 4th IIRC in RO32 groups. It could very well be a Code S ro16(or very close to), just not the strongest possible lineup. | ||
v5872012
34 Posts
| ||
Kinm
1 Post
| ||
knotfun
41 Posts
this isnt even that big of tournament, is something just for fun (and for them, some money). really really bad taste to go for that whiny post and statement. and honestly, yesterday he was behind like 600 votes with like 3% of total preferences, how is it even possible that he recovered? looks like a giant scam lul | ||
Geo.Rion
7375 Posts
On July 25 2019 18:38 deacon.frost wrote: No for Showtime, heromarine, Scarlett and time. No for Parting who out of the last 4 Code S was in the RO16 once. Innovation and soO in slump so hard to say if they're ATM RO16 caliber(usually they are though) I mean how can you call Scarlett RO16 Code S when she tried and failed every Code S this year? She ended 3rd, 4th and 4th IIRC in RO32 groups. You have very interesting criteria for the ro16 tier pros. So it's someone who consistently makes it to ro16, but does not advance any further? | ||
Harris1st
Germany6151 Posts
| ||
RealityTheGreat
China564 Posts
| ||
arainkk
1 Post
| ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12116 Posts
On July 25 2019 20:27 Geo.Rion wrote: You have very interesting criteria for the ro16 tier pros. So it's someone who consistently makes it to ro16, but does not advance any further? What's your criteria then? My criteria is that they have to have the quality to reliably get to the RO16(and beyond) (I mean Code S RO16, obviously, when the discussion started with Code S RO16 post) That's why I mentioned soO and Innovation may not be RO16 players NOW but they are on paper as they usually get in. Now is the key word(ATM in this case doesn't mean the machine tha eats your card and doesn't give you money but At THe Moment ). Scarlett in 2019 isn't CodeS RO16 player. We can argue about her qualities oversea, fine. But we have the evidence from Season 1 to Season 3 RO32. She never made it. Parting made it once out of 4 cases. That means he's not where he used to be(Parting award, hello?). He's a RO32 player with a great promise but he's not there yet. Showtime, heromarine, time? Where do we have any evidence they're good enough to pass the RO32 test? No offense to those players, but how can we tell they're good enough to be on the level of Code S RO16? Tell me why you think these 3 are RO16 Code S players material. What results made you think that. I don't think so, they haven't been to Katowice main event which was 24 players nor they have been to Code S. I give a leeway to Serral as he's obvious top player similarly I give a leeway to Neeb, Reynor and mjr Special(who actually qualified to Code S RO16 and not just once). I don't think I'm being mean or harsh, but let's hear your side of the story Edit> BTW you didn't miss it's about Code S RO16 quality, did you? | ||
| ||