That's all i really want.
TL Mafia LVIII - Page 77
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
iamperfection
United States9635 Posts
That's all i really want. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
iamperfection
United States9635 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:13 marvellosity wrote: you should've stopped Palmar making this terribad wagon then, sweetheart. palmar gonna do what he wants. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
iamperfection
United States9635 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:14 kushm4sta wrote: marv can you be bothered to move your vote? ? At this stage I'd vote for Adam or Cheesecake. What are you asking? | ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
You should know that I hated the way Adam was playing immediately after the post that he wrote and you agreed with (about clarity and someone). We drew completely different conclusions after that post, I think I even called him scum in the thread, but you for some reason liked what he had to say. Then you 180 when he doesn't post, which is true of a lot of other people in the thread. The only reason I'm bothering questioning you is iamp is telling me I'm dumb. But please, none of your thoughts seem original, none of your content prior to me pushing your lynch was worth a damn. You seemed perfectly fine doing nothing but ride-along getting me lynched on day 1 with nothing else to be analysed from that day (well you threw out a couple of names for no reason). I just don't see anything that makes you look like townie. | ||
iamperfection
United States9635 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:16 Palmar wrote: Why should I believe you're town marv? Hell, even your list of reads were basically based on what I had written in the spreadsheet with some minor changes, including agreeing with me on Adam and pushing him as a read. You should know that I hated the way Adam was playing immediately after the post that he wrote and you agreed with (about clarity and someone). We drew completely different conclusions after that post, I think I even called him scum in the thread, but you for some reason liked what he had to say. Then you 180 when he doesn't post, which is true of a lot of other people in the thread. The only reason I'm bothering questioning you is iamp is telling me I'm dumb. But please, none of your thoughts seem original, none of your content prior to me pushing your lynch was worth a damn. You seemed perfectly fine doing nothing but ride-along getting me lynched on day 1 with nothing else to be analysed from that day (well you threw out a couple of names for no reason). I just don't see anything that makes you look like townie. I agreed with his suspicions of Clarity, and I made it perfectly clear exactly why I agreed with his suspicions of Clarity. The fact he has pushed nothing since and not followed up on it is more indicative than the original post. I seriously loathe that you haven't properly researched my meta when making this case. People have been suspicious of me many times for lack of content or bad Day 1s, LIII, Dwarf Fortess, Can't Believe, Paranoia, and probably some others I'm not forgetting. Why do I need to push original content from your reads sheet if I agree with them? I told you the differences in what I thought on the sheet, why would I say anything else? I don't get it. It should have been fairly apparent I'm quite suspicious of VE because I keep niggling at him about how he's voted. It should have been fairly apparent I'm quite suspicious of BC given how I've tried to canvas opinion on him and given my own that he just seems to be summarising/not lurking. I pushed you for precisely the reasons I gave in my post, about our discussion about how good your Day 1s were compared to your other days. It's annoying how you can't grasp how that conversation so recently into your play this game might have a significant effect on me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:22 marvellosity wrote: I agreed with his suspicions of Clarity, and I made it perfectly clear exactly why I agreed with his suspicions of Clarity. The fact he has pushed nothing since and not followed up on it is more indicative than the original post. I seriously loathe that you haven't properly researched my meta when making this case. People have been suspicious of me many times for lack of content or bad Day 1s, LIII, Dwarf Fortess, Can't Believe, Paranoia, and probably some others I'm not forgetting. Why do I need to push original content from your reads sheet if I agree with them? I told you the differences in what I thought on the sheet, why would I say anything else? I don't get it. It should have been fairly apparent I'm quite suspicious of VE because I keep niggling at him about how he's voted. It should have been fairly apparent I'm quite suspicious of BC given how I've tried to canvas opinion on him and given my own that he just seems to be summarising/not lurking. I pushed you for precisely the reasons I gave in my post, about our discussion about how good your Day 1s were compared to your other days. It's annoying how you can't grasp how that conversation so recently into your play this game might have a significant effect on me. I don't actually use meta. I think you're scum because of your gradual turn towards thinking I'm scum after repeatedly pointing out I can troll as either alignment. I think you're scum because in the process you saw no reason to ever seriously voice or out any special concerns or cases against anyone, except of course you agreed once with a guy I thought was scum writing a case on a guy I tentatively thought was town. I think you're scum because once you were called out for it your cases are weak, not very well thought out and contain very few specifics from this game, most of your observations have been generic (I point to your evaluation of froggynoddy for example). I think you're scum because you seem generally disinterested in who gets lynched and you didn't actively try to get people to agree with you. I don't care about your meta. I included that in the case because I remembered that you played differently in rockband, and a lot of people like that, and it's generally hard to whip town into shape to lynch. Since you remember our IRC conversations, you should also remember that I said I usually just write my cases to convince town, more than to prove people are scum. But hey, selective memory is good right? | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
So yeah, could get behind a Marv or a VE lynch. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:28 Palmar wrote: I don't actually use meta. I think you're scum because of your gradual turn towards thinking I'm scum after repeatedly pointing out I can troll as either alignment. I think you're scum because in the process you saw no reason to ever seriously voice or out any special concerns or cases against anyone, except of course you agreed once with a guy I thought was scum writing a case on a guy I tentatively thought was town. I think you're scum because once you were called out for it your cases are weak, not very well thought out and contain very few specifics from this game, most of your observations have been generic (I point to your evaluation of froggynoddy for example). I think you're scum because you seem generally disinterested in who gets lynched and you didn't actively try to get people to agree with you. I don't care about your meta. I included that in the case because I remembered that you played differently in rockband, and a lot of people like that, and it's generally hard to whip town into shape to lynch. Since you remember our IRC conversations, you should also remember that I said I usually just write my cases to convince town, more than to prove people are scum. But hey, selective memory is good right? To the bold, how is that relevant to why I pushed you? My evaluations are usually generic, so what? I thought froggy is town because he had some more aggressive tones in his posts than when as scum, do I need to quote that to show I'm reading the game? Or can you look at that yourself? Do you need me to press quote? What is there to say about Cheesecake that I can quote? Here, let's quote this bunch of one-liners he's made without scumhunting. Or I can just say its' the case, and again anyone can verify that it is the case. You should fucking care about meta, because it might actually draw you to the bloody right conclusion. An example: On August 09 2012 05:24 marvellosity wrote: ##Unvote Custos is actually getting involved in town affairs ##Vote: prplhz prplhz very much is not. I'm going to look more into the Forumite situation. Need to mull over what slOosh said to me and also see if I can make anything out of what seems to be a lot of 'meh' from people about it. That was my final vote, as town, in that game. That was all the reasoning I gave for it, and the guy I just unvoted I had voted for also not giving a shit about town. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On January 05 2013 00:12 iamperfection wrote: wouldn't it be nice if we all just lynched cc he flips scum and we all praise me as the new best in the world. That's all i really want. For justice then, ##Vote: Mr. Cheesecake | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
*hands marv a piece of paper* You can call me bad for 1 day in any game you'd like if you flip town. | ||
| ||