TL Mafia 2 [GG]
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 18 2008 23:26 Ace wrote: If more than 4 people PM Ghar about being DT thats GREAT for the Town. Because now we'd have a suspect list and people caught false role claiming meaning we certainly have some Mafia cornered. . Uhhhh no? You can't say that people who are faking the Detective spot are necessarily mafia. They can be townies as well. Don't forget it's the Mafia vs. The Townies & The Townies vs. The Townies. | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 19 2008 00:10 Lenwe wrote: If the mayor that is elected is mafia, I think the mafia win with that plan. They get to remove the mayor and one detective from the game for the price of only one of their members. If however the mayor is a townie, the plan sounds good to me. With the detective roles I assume we will find out if the mayor is a mafia member anyway since there is bound to be at least one detective checking that. Right now it is hard to trust anyone, but near impossible to point out the mafia members (unless they do something really stupid). We, as the town, have to be careful to accuse anyone since the mafia can easily benefit from that. If we start accusing other townies and fighting amongst ourselves the mafia have nothing worry about in the beginning. Also something Bill307 said in the write-up post made a lot of sense to me. While Ghar's plan indeed is good and it does give direction, it also really bad if we elect a mayor that turns out to be mafia. So, considering Randomburn put in the effort to send out pm's before the roles were handed out, there being a 20/130 chance he then got a mafia role and with the excellent voting record he had last game, I am inclined to go with him for mayor. All that said and done, I wouldn't vote for someone who sent out PM's before the game began if he wanted to be mayor. His attitude can also change within that short period. I wouldn't vote for him because he bought interest before the game even began, so it takes away from the potential fact that he could be mafia. | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 19 2008 00:15 Ace wrote: Why would ANY Townie that isn't a moron claim the DT role? Anyone faking DT has to be Mafia, because any Townie doing that after reading all these posts explaining the plan would realize they are hurting the Town by doing so. also, this is not in any way Townies vs Townies. At all. More so it's the uninformed majority vs the informed minority, and one of the ways to get around that trend is to share info with those that we 100% know is innocent. lol did you play last game? | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 19 2008 00:50 Ace wrote: I read it, and thats the exact situation I'm trying to avoid this time around. 1/130 remember that. | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 20 2008 01:16 Falcynn wrote: We've gone over this a bunch of times already. A detective will check out the mayor, if he's mafia then the detective will post his findings. After that we lynch the detective, if he turns blue then we lynch the mayor (we lynch the detective to deter mafiosos from spreading false rumors and declaring themselves detective). Edit: and dinmsab, you have to post your votes in Chuiu's blog, not here. Do you guys know how fucked we will be if we elect a mafia member to the mayoral position? Not saying this is a bad plan, but I'd rather not know that information, or if this is found out early keep him on until later because the bodyguards will be of no use to him unless mafia fake kills him. We need double lynches and the mayor will be more inclined to cooperate early on. So I hope we don't find out our mayor is mafia early and just cut his head. | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 22 2008 07:50 Alventenie wrote: There is no reason to be impatient or nervous on night 1. You have a 9/110 chance of dieing, and think of the odds that 7/110 could be watching one of those 9, to save them! The odds of protection is slim with such high numbers. We won't see better results until closer to the end. This is the mafia's chance to get more key role players. | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 30 2008 05:14 Falcynn wrote: I'm starting to realize that this plan of Ace's is probably more suited to smaller games. With a large game like this we have way too many people stirring shit up and confusing everybody. edit: and we didn't have 7000 clues...more like 2. See?! GJ killing Ghar :/ | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 30 2008 09:47 qrs wrote: *Jaw drops*. If Ghar was a townie, I'm done with clue interpretation. Looks like you're done interpreting clues. | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 30 2008 19:35 Alethios wrote: You probably know this, but "Snake Charmer" was the Codename for Bill (the leader) of the Deadly Vipers Assassination Squad. Anytime. The people, such as myself, who voted but "shouldn't have" are actually doing the town a favour. If the mafia count on those two lists combined don't increase, the extra people are all townies. Waiting on Ace to post the counts. I hope we are still getting them. --------- Ace seems to think he can win without our help. The vigilantes will be busy won't they? I asked why I should 'abstain.' I never got an answer so I never took back my vote. Having people (like myself) abstain makes us look bad in the long run because you can then turn around and say: "well Amber[LighT] never actually voted, and to protect himself he just abtained." All I wanted was to know why I was to abstain. I didn't see an answer. You guys will shoot yourselves in the foot if we just vote because of 'other circumstances.' And I want to get this straight: We wanted to kill our medic?! (or did we actually think he was mafia?) | ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On March 31 2008 13:12 Falcynn wrote: lol, we're not allowed to elect a new mayor . yah so lets be careful before saying we will kill our mayor yes? | ||
| ||