EPT/s
/in
TL Mafia LXIX: Carol Of The Bells
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
/s /in | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 07 2014 19:31 Tubesock wrote: What the hell. /IN As the game hasn't started I'm assuming I can go back and edit my first post? You can edit everything pre-game yes. Also, if you feel you aren't ready to play yet you can always shadow a player. Shadowing is where you have a private chat with a player during the game and they explain everything they are doing /their thought processes. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 08 2014 07:43 Xatalos wrote: We'll see if I can hold my trend of longest D1 filter this time around  Not with me here! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Get rekt mafia | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 08:20 froggynoddy wrote: Gogogo. RNG sounds pretty silly. Though at least it would create some content and stop people from lurking. On the subject of lurking. having not played in a while... when I did play, town usually spent Day 1 arguing on whether to lynch lurkers, I assume this is still the case. I have to go to bed now (work in the morning) but pre-empting this topic lets just cut to the chase and all agree nicely that policy lynching is stupid, however in the absence of a decent slip to go on, lurkers are the best of bad lynch options. So what you're saying is policy lynches are terrible but if it all goes sour you want to policy lynch?? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote: @ Slam @ Damdred Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves. And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post? While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that. I'm still here and haven't made an excuse about leaving? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying in bold at all though. It's one thing to talk about policy but this is showing that first and foremost you did not read his post because: A) he wrote about not policy lynching lirkers because it's bad And B) he wrote about agreeing to policy lynch lurkers And secondly you are defending a person that "is an easy target to be scum read" when that person has done genuinely scummy things and you are brushing it off ##vote 27ninjabunnies Enjoy your date | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 08:41 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'm not brushing it off, I' trying to look at it objectively. I think what he said makes sense. A. I know what he said. I said he was talking about policy lynching and lurkers. I never specifically said what he thought about it. I don't think it's scummy. I think people are making something scummy out of nothing. Thanks for the vote  I knew it was to happen eventually, but I figured Ritoky would be the first to do it!And I will enjoy my date  Food and alcohol. what's better? Well no. You said people talking about lynching lurkers are "off" and he was an "easy target to look scummy" which is already a contradiction in one post and now you are saying you know what he said and it doesn't look bad and people are making mountains out of mole hills which is a contradiction with your first post. There's a great deal of backtracking in what you are saying and I don't like it. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 08:46 KelsierSC wrote: So i have noticed something with this set up. If you are scrooge just claim. You should fully explain any holes so that we all know what you're talking about and then can discuss whether it's safe to do it. Don't like all your small 1 liner posts wasted on nothing. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 08:50 KelsierSC wrote: where is the contradiction? she seems to be saying other people might find it scummy \flag him but she doesn't think it is? She literally says I agree in the first quote. While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that. To summarise: Defends a player that does something that she agrees is usually scummy (scummy in it's own right) Says that person is an easy target despite agreeing that people that do that are usually scummy (defending a player instead of letting the interrogation continue on someone she thinks would be scummy usually and says he's easy scum read??? Adds no value, detracts from momentum, isn't what her train of thought usually is) Says she knows what he said and it isn't actually scummy which contradicts him being a "easy scum read" because how can he be an easy scum read if what he's saying isn't scummy. It looks like a defence was made before even reading the content of the post tbh. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 09:02 27ninjabunnies wrote: Lmao. Okay, Templar top town for the rst of the day. I don't even care he voted me.That was the best thing I have evver read. As for being naughty on my date... well well well. We will just have to see;) He'll be here in five minutes so I'll leave you with this: Templar Town Damdred Town Slam semitownie Those I need to look more at: HF Vivax Kelsier Iffy: Froggy Kita (I expected more than just hey) Fecal I don't really like how two people jumped to defend me. That always makes me skeptical. Don't get me wrong, thank you for that, because it's absolutely true and makes sense. HF is making something out of nothing. Idk if it's reaction testing? Or backlash for me calling him out on his post. tbh, I'm not counting how many posts I make. I type a lot, I ask a lot of questions. If I get near my cap, well then, atleast I know I made a difference in the beginning of the day, instead of arguing later. Have fun everyone, and see you tomorrow! 2/3 of your top town are people that went after your "easy scum read" and your scum read IS actually the same guy??? Wtf wtf wtf Vote for the easy mafia ty! | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 09:05 KelsierSC wrote: I'm liking holyflare now, i didn't like his post about how he wasn't going to post, seemed like a good excuse to lurk. But he has backed it up with actual pressure.his pressure on nb is actually strong and the explanation is good. It also feels like town hf to me. Do you know how I play as mafia? This seems pretty baseless if you do and even more so if you don't. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 09:31 batsnacks wrote: HTS is looking awful There is no way she: 1. agrees with HF 2. thinks froggy is null 3. thinks bunnies is scummy 4. agrees with what bunnies said I agree that froggy isn't really scummy but ninja is. #comeatmebro Also kind of like tbatthat kelsiertrap | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 09:49 KelsierSC wrote: yeh people always say that but he analysed what she was saying and pointed out flaws, no one else did that and that is good d1 town play. I also dont like hts so If he was thinking along these lines then why did he neglect to mention anyone else that was following the same train of thought?? Why is it scummy to agree with someone but then also scum read them? (hint: its not) why is he even scum reading bunnies in the first place because from what we've said it's because she was taking weird contradictory stances on a player that looked scummy which an overwhelming amount of time makes that player being defended actually town. Not to mention we are scum reading bunnies for CHANGING her stance in the list post to accomodate what everyone had been saying and to "blend" in. You have strange reads kelsier, not liking the lack of thought at all. Would lynch list: bunnies, kelsier | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
The point is he doesnt acknowledge anything like this at all and just tries to pass off something that isnt scummy as scummy and then you town read him for it which doesn't make sense at all. You are throwing out a lot of easy reads based on little information and it doesn't look good for you my friend. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 09 2014 10:09 KelsierSC wrote: i gave you and bats as town right my ff read isn't an easy read at all. so I'm not throwing out easy reads at all. Anyway I explained bats did the analysis on hts and it felt towny to me. Plus his manner feels like the other town games bats has played You gave me a town read based on meta that is incomplete and didn't really factor in any game info other than "pressuring" which when you couple with my actual meta would mean nothing at all. Yet, when I say otherwise you somehow know it's still "town" Holyflare pressure rather than mafia. Your bats read as I explained to anyone looking critically does not make any sense at all but he's still a d1 town list. I can see you making an analysis point on him but what about the stuff I just explained? Why was he still a town read after I pointed out he was picking and choosing who scum were based on absolutely nothing (he even just admitted it)! | ||
| ||
