EPTtwo games at once, only because geript promised me on video this one would be good.
Handslaps and Fisticuff: A PYP Mini [M][T]
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
two games at once, only because geript promised me on video this one would be good. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 03 2014 22:44 yamato77 wrote: /in I will not be trying too hard this game. Also, last spot hype. I will, regardless of my alignment, try to lynch you or straight up shoot you if you don't try hard enough for my taste. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
This would be for example ridiculing someone's arguments, or straight up refusing to listen to them, maybe pretending they don't exist, or otherwise enrage people in a manner that is not just calling them idiots. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 04 2014 05:10 Grackaroni wrote: I don't think that strategy is working for you Palmar. All it did with HF was give him an excuse to go afk for another cycle. Not my fault all those people didn't vote for him. And he was better for the thread afk, when he came back he dazzled VE, better have him away. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 04 2014 06:08 Xatalos wrote: Hmm. Well, it kind of sucks for me :/ Is it that bad for you WOS if it's a bit earlier? Just roll with it We can then blame the americans if we lose. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
Do we know the order already? I picked 1/1 btw. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 17:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar are you scum? I think answering that question truthfully will negatively impact my chances of winning the game and thus I refuse to. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 19:01 Oatsmaster wrote: Policy lynch Palmar ##vote Palmar You can't just yell "policy lynch". You have to have an actual policy that I have broken. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 19:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: But Palmar just claimed scum/survivor. I did not do that. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 19:38 Oatsmaster wrote: The policy is lynching people who claim scum. I did not claim scum, therefore I have not broken your policy. Therefore you cannot say you're policy lynching me,. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 19:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wel lcan you explain then how your statement makes sense from town perspective? That was kinda what i was asking in the first place when i asked you to elaborate. If we first assume that the only reasonable answers to your question are "yes" and "no", then yes I can. If I am mafia, it should be obvious that answering the question "yes" (and thus truthfully) would increase the chances of me getting lynched significantly. It is not as obvious that a "no" answer as town will increase the chances I get lynched, and thus reduce town's chances of winning the game. The thing is a hard "no" answer to this question is not what I'd usually do as town. A more likely answer from me would be along the lines of "bitch please", "no, are you?" or "no, but I know who is *reasons*". All of those answers are both truthful and would (in my opinion) decrease the chances of me being lynched. However the short, hard "no" I would think is slightly suspicious coming from me. This is arguable, but I'd put the increased chance of me being lynched from the hard "no" at maybe a percent or so, small, but still valid. However what I'm surprised you haven't picked up on about Palmar is how inconsistent he is when presenting that original statement. The refusal to truthfully answer the question is based upon desire to win the game. The entire reason he does not provide the answer is that he thinks he cannot do so truthfully without decreasing his chances to win. However, given that the refusal is based on his own speculations about the game and how town might react to his statements, he should have also been able to deduce that the refusal would put him under even more scrutiny than answering "no" as town. This contradicts his initial motivation for not answering, as not providing the answer means he's under more suspicion than he would be if he answered truthfully as town. This leaves only the option that Palmar is scum, as then, and then only, would the suspicion be increased by a truthful answer compared to no answer. And while that wasn't his original baseline, the motivation for the answer given implies that's the case. I would vote for Palmar but seeing as he is me and that would once again reduce my chances to win I'm afraid I can't. But I hope people notice this contradiction in his play. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 20:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Unless you are suggesting i am mafia and therefore there are no "right answers" which is dumb in the first place and you should have still said "no". No I'm suggesting a simple answer would always be a bad answer. But I can tell that you don't agree so I think we must agree to disagree. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 19:41 marvellosity wrote: Palmar, you promisd before the game that you'd try to lynch yamato if he didn't put in sufficient effort. Are you abandoning this in your desire to be lazy, or are you gonna go full hypocrite instead? Or whence the change of heart in general? I have not decided the appropriate answer to this question yet. I may have been lying but I also may have been telling the truth. I think it's important I decide whether or not I was lying, as that will have an effect on how I vote today. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 20:21 marvellosity wrote: ok, as long as we are perfectly clear you are policy lynching someone rather than lynching for scumminess Unlike our friend Oats, I am fully aware of how policy lynches work, and what the requirements for executing them are. I usually make it abundantly clear when I'm policy lynching. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On March 05 2014 20:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: There is also this other thing on Palmar which is that my plan is actually really fucking good and only relies on townies agreeing with it (which leaves scum no other chance than to actually go with it) and this is a perfect fucking guise to not do so for Palmar as mafia as he can be stubborn and fuck with the plan just because he wants to shoot someone and that's why i also want to lynch him. what plan? I haven't read the thread dude. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
| ||
| ||
