EPTIf it's about design issues then there should be a seperate thread for it. I for one would love to go to the balance thread and read discussions about actual balance issues and the current state of the game instead of "Protoss is poorly designed because of forcefield"
Regarding the Designated Balance Discussion Thread
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
If it's about design issues then there should be a seperate thread for it. I for one would love to go to the balance thread and read discussions about actual balance issues and the current state of the game instead of "Protoss is poorly designed because of forcefield" | ||
|
saddaromma
1129 Posts
On August 02 2013 18:18 DarkLordOlli wrote: May I formally request that the Balance Discussion Thread doesn't allow "this is what BW has that SC2 doesn't" anymore? It's not a balance discussion by any means, it doesn't address SC2 balance at all. It's just people whining about how much better BW was than SC2. If it's about design issues then there should be a seperate thread for it. I for one would love to go to the balance thread and read discussions about actual balance issues and the current state of the game instead of "Protoss is poorly designed because of forcefield" Since balance and design are closely related I don't know how can you sperate them. For example, helbats were fine balance-wise but were causing problems in TvT. Can it be discussed in balance thread? | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25159 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
| ||
|
qotsager
Germany585 Posts
| ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
On August 02 2013 20:31 saddaromma wrote: Since balance and design are closely related I don't know how can you sperate them. For example, helbats were fine balance-wise but were causing problems in TvT. Can it be discussed in balance thread? As you said yourself this has got nothing to do with balance. It is purely about design. | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25159 Posts
While there's a lot of overlap, we're not advocating a complete expungence of discussion related to Brood War abilities, or Brood War units. We're just advocating a drawing of the line between fundamental game design of SC2, and things that are more couched in the state of the game as it is, or suggestions that are realistically implementable. It's a source of much pointless derailing, but equally the discussion is interesting a lot of the time. It would be nice to split them so the design issues don't overlap and derail so frequently, but equally that they have a place they can be expressed. | ||
|
Hryul
Austria2609 Posts
On August 02 2013 20:31 saddaromma wrote: Since balance and design are closely related I don't know how can you sperate them. For example, helbats were fine balance-wise but were causing problems in TvT. Can it be discussed in balance thread? the rules would be simple and clear: stick to the units that are already in the game at this very moment and don't add any new units to the game. The thread should be about the current status of the game (and how to improve that) and not "add lurkers!! we luv em!!111" | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25159 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland25159 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
| ||
