EPTI'm gonna lynch you so hard it's gonna count retroactively in Les Mis
/in
Roulette Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
I'm gonna lynch you so hard it's gonna count retroactively in Les Mis /in | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.lenoxmedicalsupply.com/images/depends.jpg) It's for the best guys. | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
And yea, claiming is the obvious way to go. We have a lot of the town strategy squared away from the pregame talk. Love it. | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
 Answer honestly, is this the first time you've proposed a lurker lynch? | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
Of substance though, I have an early, tentative townread on you (Stutters) and layabout. Stutters for general thread presence/comfort/activity and layabout for picking on probably the scummiest post that has been made so far. Thoughts? | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
Oats, it's not difficult, when everyone claims, we have 100% accountability for all night actions. It is therefore very difficult for scum to use them for something anti-town. It also frustrates fake claims. | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
My thinking is I have no idea on his alignment just yet. Generally though being totally careless of the threads opinion of you is a townie trait, so he has that going for now. I gotta say I agree with layabout on jaybrundage. His entry into the thread was filled with trepidation On June 04 2013 09:13 jaybrundage wrote: So im down with the whole claim role thing. But if the scum can also get the roles it doesnt really lead us to any lynches. But i guess the point of it would be transparency and all that jazz. I hate playing with people i never played with before I cant rely on previous experiences  Also if anyone has not played with me I would suggest reading a previous game or two I play rather..... unorthodox (I occasionally be hardcore lynchbait DKinda all over the place but I always feel like day 1 is just typing shit until someone says something questionable. Then the Rage-arguments take place :D It looks to me like he is trying to defuse pressure on him before it even happens. 'I can't rely on previous experiences' is a prepackaged excuse to go light on scum hunting. 'I am occasionally lynch bate' is a prepackaged excuse for looking suspicious. It looks extremely self conscious. This point by layabout too is relevent. On June 04 2013 09:29 layabout wrote: If you say that you arent going to post, pressuring you for a contribution serves no purpose for a townie Meaningless pressure. It's a way of looking useful without actually being useful (shit-flinging at somebody who isn't going to be around to take umbrage). This is the direction I want to go. He looks the scummiest of anybody so far. ##vote jaybrundage | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
On June 05 2013 04:26 Vivax wrote: Anyway. First of all, I have three exams in the upcoming weeks, the 10th my oral as addendum to my written exam of today, two other written ones with two other orals, then another written one the 26th without oral. This is a disclaimer for everyone who will try to judge me on my activity. I should be reading books, not mafia, and I will give my best with the time I have. Judge me on the content of my posts. If anyone tries to dig up some meta shit or activity argument to push my lynch, they will be claiming scum in the thread, and I will hit them so hard that they will regret herping so hard that they derped. Now, off to le notions I have to rewrite, I'm slightly drunk sorry. @ Stutters Your case against prplhz is that you think he's wrong about what he says in his case, and that he plays differently from his past games. Nothing in what you say proves a scum mentality. You prove he's wrong about Zeph with more meta about Zeph. All your arguments seem to be meta, can you at least find me one that isn't? How is propping a case up based on faulty reasoning not a possible scum mentality? There is a difference between wrong reasoning and manipulative reasoning. His case was attempting to show it was the latter. I need to look at the games you cited Stutters when I have a bit more time. | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
| ||
