EPT/in
Roulette Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
/in | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 04 2013 08:06 Zephirdd wrote: This daypost is so empty. I feel like something is missing. Anyways how about estabilish the plan of claiming vigi/dt roles ON THE NEXT DAY if you roll them during the night? Ace said pre-game how this benefits town, so it should be a nobrainer right?  I don't see the downside to claiming roles and actions since you will no longer have them. We will get more information and mafia have little chance to counterclaim. So I am in favour. + Show Spoiler + No more exams + GoT this day is best day | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 04 2013 09:22 VayneAuthority wrote: I'm just trollin' around with the theme, I didn't actually drink today nor yesterday. What is your concern jaybrundage? If you say that you arent going to post, pressuring you for a contribution serves no purpose for a townie | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 04 2013 10:23 s0Lstice wrote: Nothing really. Just a lil flight of fancy/fun. Of substance though, I have an early, tentative townread on you (Stutters) and layabout. Stutters for general thread presence/comfort/activity and layabout for picking on probably the scummiest post that has been made so far. Thoughts? I open every game like that and i have no clue about stutters. There's nothing particularly wrong with townreads but in general it's best to keep them out of the thread. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 04 2013 10:43 Oatsmaster wrote: im lazy Can someone claim scum then we lynch that guy? I have an idea! Instead of that, we just lynch you Oats? @stutters basically, town doesn't really benefit from knowing who you think is town but scum do since it makes you easier to manipulate. If a bunch of players say that somebody is town based on weak reasoning/little information then people will strengthen their read due to other people agreeing with them. This is quite problematic if said person is scum and it can happen quite easily if everybody is swapping townreads. There are other reasons but i cba it's 3am. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 04 2013 11:59 jaybrundage wrote: + Show Spoiler + Layabout its not even real pressure it seems pretty obvious to me that he was role playing. Havent you ever wanted to poke a drunk with a stick :D On June 04 2013 09:29 layabout wrote: If you say that you arent going to post, pressuring you for a contribution serves no purpose for a townie Also i plan to pressure who ever i want for any reason i want or for no reason at all. I dislike his attitude | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
I don't see anybody that looks worse. Vayneauthority said he would do stuff and didn't but it's not been a long time since then. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 05 2013 02:03 Stutters695 wrote: What do you guys think of Oats trolling? Just him not giving a shit or scum? I was ignoring it on the basis that in some point during the next 48 hours he will call anybody that called him scum for being trolly mafia, and he might stop being trolly at that time. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
This is finally a game of mafia!!! hooray! | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 05 2013 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Layabout you want to lynch jay for his attitude? Is there anything else? Do you think the most active player atm (WoS) cannot be mafia? The point is to lynch scum, not people you dont like. What do you think of what i brought up against WoS? Also what do you think about Ace/zeph atm? jay has gone from empty posts to omgus. That isn't how i would expect a town play to play, especially when the pressure jay was under was so low. He should not be so worried about 2 votes and the everyone that votes for me is scum argument is crappy. WaveOfShadow In every game i can recall the hypersupermegaactive players are always town, even in games where somebody like bh is scum and posts a ton the most active players are still town. If scum is the most active player in the thread and they aren't just spamming then then don't deserve to get lynched. Our problem right now is that the activity levels are too low, killing active players only makes this worse. And since the activity has been low since the start WoS is correct to be concerned about it so i see no harm in him say he might want to lynch a lurker. If there is anything scummy about it it's that he tentatively puts the idea forward possibly because he is worried about people jumping on him for LaL. Lynching Ace is okay since he hasn't done anything, but his posts have reflected my own feeling about the game and there are other who have also done nothing. He hasn't done anything to make me want to keep him alive but at the same time i see no reason to choose ace specifically. I think zephird's push is bad but it is not inherently scummy, his response to pressure was townlike and towards the beginning he was trying to get the thread moving in the right direction which was quite needed. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 04 2013 19:25 prplhz wrote: hey i'm trying to post more because usually i get brought up as a lurker lynch on d1. that didn't use to bother me but i decided before this game that maybe i should try not to get brought up as a lynch d1 in every single game i play. also people complain at me for not having clear scum reads on d1 so i'm just going to pretend that my very tentative scum reads are MUST LYNCH WITH INTENSITY scum reads instead. Alright. Right now my Zephirdd is my MUST LYNCH WITH INTENSITY scum read. His early posting seems very careful such as "Ace said pre-game how this benefits town, so it should be a nobrainer right?" It's like he thinks this is a good plan but he'd rather hear what someone else thinks before he makes a decision on it. I mean "nobrainer" and "right?" are just two words that shouldn't be in the same sentence unless you're kinda split on where you stand. In this post he gives someone the advice to go look at Smurf Mini Mafia, a game which couldn't have less to do with this game. He wants him to just avoid meta analysis which seems like a scum move to me since meta analysis can be really good. Also this post seems really off. Scum care a lot about how they appear in the thread and this post looks like he wants to appear like a guy who just votes for a strong player with no fear or hesitation (ostensibly a townie trait). He doesn't do this as town though, looked through his last three games (all town games) and in all games those games there wasn't a single vote like this. He always has reasonable for his votes. So yea, I feel that right now Zephirdd is the right way to go. A combination of posting style and the weird Ace vote. ##Vote Zephirdd How 'bout it fellas? Look at how nice this case looks. At a glance you might think that prplhz has made some reasonable point. But read it through again carefully. In fact prplhz just take a few small things that zephird has done makes wild inferences and to create scummyness where there is none.He deliberately fails to add context. ##unvote ##voteprplhz + Show Spoiler + You may note that prplhz is quite not commital but at that early stage in the game i consider that sensible and do not count it against him | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Cases like that are still characteristic of prphlz's scum play. But it look's like i willl need to move my vote again and think there is a good chance that [UoN]Sentinel or raynpelikoneet is mafia jumping onto WoS to get the wagon rolling. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 05 2013 22:03 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Wait did you just accuse him of being scum and then defend him in the same post No but that is a point i was tempted to make but realized it was bad so i wanted to say that before somebody else did. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 05 2013 22:34 Oatsmaster wrote: except that isnt actually accurate anymore. And you should stop posting useless and short posts. LOL | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 06 2013 00:16 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: OK first off the Vayne vote was a joke. That much should be obvious. I was wrong about WoS being a scum given his more recent posting. He seems to be more focused on finding scum now that D1 is in full swing. So now we have Oats who has little content and sheeps anyone who isn't Ace. And Ace doesn't even look scum. [##Unvote] [##Vote Oatsmaster] Did wos die and flip town then? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
If you are town you cannot know if you are right or wrong because you do not know the other persons alignment. I am suggesting that sentinel scumslipped. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On June 06 2013 01:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay. so you are voting me for my activity. Fine, whatever, there is nothing i can do about it for 1,5 weeks. I have no laptop and im still working for 12h/day. Maybe i should not join games before that then. Oats if Ace does post more fluff i'm certainly in killing him. There is no reason to not contribute anything. I havn't had time to look at sentinel yet. Sloosh wanting to let the discussion to stay only at me/sent is scummy, not going to explain why, because everyone should see it. Idk wtf layabout is doing, making a case on prpl and then debunking points from it in the same post.. Wtf. Im going to stand behind my read on vayne for the reasons i have stated, as he seems to be the only one to realize that is true. WoS if your comment about Vivax was sarcasm, why is jay scum? And why is your vote on someone else? And why are you not trying to expand the read at all? I know, because you are scum. I responded to your questions. I suggested we lynch you. You lie about me to discredit me. | ||
| ||
