EPTEnter the cobbler
TL Mafia LXI
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Enter the cobbler | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:57 yamato77 wrote: I already said I think most of the people posting (Rayn, Sharrant, Giygas) seem town. You, on the other hand, are worth looking at. Mafia is a game about finding mafia not town + waiting on lurkers for more reads? How about you analyze whos already here. Also still catching up but this is the single worst post ive seen to this point of reading | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Its day 1, id expect to not get those from me at this juncture. Yamato is likely scum, BM should be lynched or vigi'd. If drH doesn't appear within the next 12 hoursish he is almost deff scum. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 03:09 ObviousOne wrote: + Show Spoiler [huge text by hopeless] + On April 23 2013 02:03 Hopeless1der wrote: You didn't give a shit when you voted him Note that your vote post cites a lynch all miller claims as a policy for your vote. raynpelikoneet, Do you disagree? This is a 'yes' or 'no' question specifically referencing whether or not you used a policy to justify your initial vote on Bill Murray. Hopeless I will discuss Rayn with you for a moment, mainly because I have already talked to Rayn a bit and it's your turn. + Show Spoiler [summary crap] + As with what seems like several players here, I was under the impression that his original vote was a policy lynch on self-aware miller claims. I asked about it, and it later was clarified that BM saying 'sheverus shnape' was reason to call him scum. Then we talk about how it wasn't really a miller claim after all, and Rayn stayed on BM's nuts for it past the point of good reason. BM does what BM does. Rayn switch from null BM to town Sharrant puts him in a bad light. What makes me think Rayn is scum is how desperately long he was calling BM scum when the matter was still up in the air, like he had attached to a read and wouldn't let go of it for anything. I also disagree that the specific things in his original case on Sharrant make Sharrant likely to be scum. Why the fuck would miller claims = auto lynch, by the way? I don't vote for claims, especially ones that are unique to town, based solely on the claim. I can claim Testicular Nodule and that doesn't help my case at all, even though it's just as believable. Lynch players for scummy behavior, not bullshit claims on D1. Dear Policy Lynchers, BEAT THE PLAYERS NOT THE SETUP FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOTDOGS WITH MUSTARD. With great adoration and some purring, ObviousOne P.S. ##Vote Raynpelikoneet You are scum for what I bolded. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 04:39 yamato77 wrote: Why could only a mafia player make that statement? Simple, its setting up a situation in which a miller can claim to get himself not lynched. Guess what? if you are someone who gets red checks on you, you get lynched or shot. If I claim self aware miller and town accepts it, whats to stop mafia from doing it once? Whats to stop them from doing it period and hope to god a ton of other people don't claim? If you accept bullshit claims like that then it auto confirms people for no reason other than players are stupid. If you are someone who gets a red check when checked you die. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 04:50 Ace wrote: jesus yamato is bad at this game not everyone can be ace | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 04:54 Ace wrote: I dont understand why people are just letting him skate by. Rayne is guilty for being a tunneler, not being Scum. I don't see anything he's done that warrants a legit case against him. because people are bad? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 04:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Ace or BC, is there anyone you guys would like to lynch? The guy Im voting for? You know, the one I called out for having the single most scumtastic post in the thread? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 04:57 ObviousOne wrote: You called my post scum then voted for Yamato. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL I also called him scum before that and he has still the single worst post in the thread. Good attempt though | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 05:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why is OO scum by the bolded part you quoted BC? I mean, i also think he is scummy for throwing questions around and not doing anything with the answers, but why that exact comment makes him scum? There are like ~10 other people who think the same, what differs them from OO? I already answered that question on the previous page | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 05:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: Sorry, question worded badly. What differs OO from the other people who think the same? Hes good enough to know better. He dropped the opinion in a giant wall of useless text, and used it as a way to marginally work in a reason to vote for you. Given that it is an absolutely wrong opinion, and one that only a scum could stand behind to lynch someone (unless hes extremely bad) he must be scum. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 05:21 Vivax wrote: Or to put it differently, your conclusions are quick, have rather poor reasoning, little doubt, and your filter looks overall shit. I die d1 / n1 virtually every game where towns typically overall have terrible play / doing really wtf. Its to the point that anything I view as extremely easy to understand logically I will likely not explain fully. Why? Because I am not here to teach you how to play. Also anyone who bases reads on a player exclusively on a filter without the context of posts should be ashamed. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 05:22 ObviousOne wrote: Wat. I am extremely bad. Who told you I was good? Did you make that assumption to support your conclusion? I'm good enough to know better? That miller claims should be auto lynched? When we can just lynch people who are acting like mafia? You are telling me that lynching probable town is better than lynching probable scum and in trying to wrap my head around that, I just decided I need to smoke. Thanks for the gesture of good faith, I guess? The fuck am I reading? What reason does town have to make to ever claim miller? Seriously, tell me. All it does is clusterfuck a thread and leaves open ground for mafia to claim as well and thus be cleared as town as he claimed miller. Assume all miller claims are bullshit and kill. If you get red checked you get killed. Its pretty simple. You lynch people who are likely mafia. Town has no reason to ever claim miller EVEN IF THEY KNOW THEY ARE ONE. As all it does is create chaos. IE only mafia have a benefit to claim it thus should be lynched. As for extremely bad? Sorry I've seen you play. You aren't that bad and should be able to follow the logic I just outlined. Its straightforward and extremely basic. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 23 2013 05:38 Ace wrote: self aware millers should claim if the role counts are known, and should be expected to get policy lynched if the game goes on long enough. Otherwise not claiming can be brutal as Scum can claim it first and skate off. Role counts aren't known though so its a moot point. In a role counts game you can have the entire game mass claim and anywhere number of claims differ from whats listed you lynch/vig into thus forcing mafia to hide in the vanilla's or lose. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 24 2013 04:01 yamato77 wrote: So why didn't we lynch BC? And why did Vivax apparently post an intentionally misleading votecount? And why did people not listen to me and not hammer Oats? And why did Clarity apparently not care that town was lynching someone he didn't want to lynch? And why did no one decide to listen to the only person who gave a fuck about who we were lynching yesterday? uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh You don't lynch BC because he was right about who he pegged. You don't listen to you because you are scum. Clarity is likely not town thus he doesnt give to shits, and I have no clue why no one decided to listen to me. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 24 2013 04:29 Vivax wrote: + Show Spoiler + On April 24 2013 04:26 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You don't lynch BC because he was right about who he pegged. You don't listen to you because you are scum. Clarity is likely not town thus he doesnt give to shits, and I have no clue why no one decided to listen to me. Can I ask what your schedule is? It'd be nice to know when you're actually in the game. I guess people didn't lynch yamato cause, uh, you weren't there to provide better reasons or at least motivation to lynch him over Oats? I am aroundish till 9ish tonight, gone from then till sometime mid thursday afternoon, gone friday morning, gone sat morning and likely all saturday if plans stay as they are, gone sunday morning possibly afternoon/evening. I am busy. Nor should I have to be around to tell people how to make obvious choices. Yamato has done sweet fuck all. He trolled, spewed anti town shite, and only "contributed" when he was close to death. He calls oats scum then blindly comes out of no where and says he doesn't want to off him, says he wants to off ve for voting oats (which was thread sentiment) then attacks me blindly as well. He has done nothing productive. He has done basically nothing useful. The lynch on him vanished for no reason than oats was brought up as a lynch on shitty reasons. Towns need to realize how to step back and think about situations. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On April 24 2013 05:03 yamato77 wrote: If you idiots lynch me tomorrow, all hope is lost. Seriously look at this game. The only argument there USED TO BE against me is that I "wasn't contributing" or whatever, when now, I've contributed more meaningful analysis than almost anyone in the game. Look at BC's filter for yourselves and be amazed at the complete lack of "give-a-shit" you see in his scumhunting. Realize that I'm his ONLY scum read OF THE ENTIRE GAME. Stop listening to him. If Ace is going to be blind to BC, then he might well be mafia, too, for all I know, but don't let them bully you into voting me when the obvious proof is in front of you. You do realize I've done this exact same thing the last few games I was town? You know, called people out for being mafia via 1 post or general post sentiment. Guess what? ive been shot for it every time and been right for it. Now obviously I could end up being wrong about you. However you have done nothing to sway me in any way that I am wrong in my read. You are not playing in any way I can see that a townie would play in. I will give you credit though, Ace is likely not town. However he is also not likely mafia. And only scum read? Ive listed others. Good try though. You are the only one im pushing | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
I am now going to go through the thread and catch up on the day. However this may take me a bit of time so bare with me | ||
| ||
