On March 26 2013 10:54 Acrofales wrote:
However, if you BELIEVE OO is lying about not having read his role PM; you should really be in favour of lynching him. The ONLY reason to LIE about this, is because he's scum. There is no townie reason to lie and say you have not read your role PM.

The joking stage of the game is over and he's still trying to drag it on into seriousness. And looking back at his filter, he said a lot of things about how people should be interpreting OO's words without putting in his own opinion. And in general there isn't much real content in his filter. I think he's scum.

##vote acrofales

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 05:02 GMT

#280

The bold part doesn't mean anything, that's just what he had bolded in his post. The point is that that post is telling people to vote based on what's happening in the meaningless beginning parts of the game.

"Contentless" isn't about quantity, it's about how much of his posts have his own opinions on things. Which isn't really in his filter at all.

I don't know how prplhz is a primary suspicion in this game, he has 3 posts which all mean nothing.

InsertSmurfHere's analysis on Dandel looks like scum bait. No one bit it, which is unfortunate but these things don't always work.

I don't see anything weird about marv, is there a case on him? Because if there is then I don't remember reading it.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 05:28 GMT

#289

Acrofales was telling other people what they should do depending on whether they believed OO was lying. He did not mention if he thought OO was lying or not.

On March 26 2013 14:09 Hapahauli wrote:

Show nested quote +

Scum-bait in the sense that InsertSmurf is scummy, or that it's a bad case and that scum will usually bite on such things?

The latter.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 19:28 GMT

#494

Good morning everyone.

The case on Grack is really weak, and if it were made by someone other than Palmar it probably wouldn't be getting nearly as far as it is now.

Just because Smurf made a bad case doesn't mean he's scum. He looks town now and there shouldn't be any suspicion on him.

Acrofales is making a bit more sense but his case on me is just a bunch of OMGUS. Acro, who is your secondary suspect?

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 19:31 GMT

#498

oh sinani is here too.

Who do you think is scum?

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 19:45 GMT

#503

On March 27 2013 04:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Nisani: Why does Smurf look town now?

He never looked scum. The case he made was scumbait, it didn't catch anyone, he backpedaled, and now he's contributing to the thread.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 19:53 GMT

#506

On March 27 2013 04:47 Keirathi wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why are you so sure it was a "scumbait" case? Smurf never said "okay, okay. I was faking this case" or anything of the sort. He admitted that he was wrong, but that's a pretty huge difference.

Well it's possible that he believed the case when he wrote it. I don't think he did, but I can't explain his actions.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 20:08 GMT

#525

On March 27 2013 04:56 Keirathi wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why do you not think that he believed it when he made it? That's the part I'm confused about. Literally everything his has said about it after-the-fact points to him believing it when he said it, then changing his mind after people pointed out how terrible it was and him doing a bit more research.

Because it was a really bad case. Even if he wasn't wrong about his meta analysis, it still would have been a bad case.

I think we should stop discussing this until Smurf himself comes back to clear this up.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 20:30 GMT

#538

The initial case on Grack was bad, it was based off of his reactions to certain things, which weren't really scummy. He didn't do anything scummy after that. As I said earlier, the only reason people are voting for him is because of Palmar.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 21:06 GMT

#551

What the hell is wrong with Grack's "attitude" or "intention?" I don't see anything wrong with that.

It's possible that Palmar is scum. I'm more confident on Acrofales scum though.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 21:18 GMT

#559

I just read through Acro's filter again and I could be wrong about him.

I want to believe Palmar is scum but I've been wrong about him in the past which is why I'm not pushing against him.

I don't really know who else is scum. All of the current candidates are pretty bad. I'm gonna look into Cora.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 26 2013 21:27 GMT

#567

On March 27 2013 06:22 prplhz wrote:
@Nisani201 How do you feel about that sinani206 guy?

He has very little in his filter. He's playing slightly better than he usually does, idk if that's a scumtell or not.

I want to see what his reads are.

Nisani201

United States1400 Posts

March 27 2013 03:41 GMT

#729

I don't understand why we're still taking about this meta stuff. Just because OO’s play style is different in this game than another doesn't make him scum. In fact, it means absolutely nothing.

I agree that prplhz has been flying under the radar and he could be scum. I want to hear other's thoughts on it though.