EPTi am gonna use my actual account, i aint scared of u smurfs.
TL Mafia LX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
i am gonna use my actual account, i aint scared of u smurfs. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
chez | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
(if we get someone soon enough) | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
quality is not likely to be a feature of said portrait | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
...then someone did it wayy better | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/7488arX.png) I feel like it's not really that obvious that you are a cat, also i don't think its clear that you are a menacing sort of fellow. I suggest that we lynch the next person to suggest a policy lynch | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 26 2013 09:08 Wade Fell wrote: I'm sorry there's a possibility you are a newer player, so I will explain thoroughly: The mayor has two votes, and the runner-up for mayor gains a power that's basically only useful to mafia. We can't just go voting townreads. We have to have people state clearly why they are voting who they are voting for, and potential mayoral candidates must clearly outline who they will use the lynch on and why. Anything less is bad. Yes, ideally you vote in the towniest player as mayor, but someone can be townie and useless. Mayor determines today's lynch. The idea that Mayor is irrelevant is one you should cast out of your mind as soon as possible. On the basis that it promotes a mafia agenda. The most important thing about the election is to get town into the two roles. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 26 2013 09:05 Wade Fell wrote: Make me the mayor. I'm a smurf, but I'll offer you a platform that should definitely convince you that your vote is best used to elect me. My platform: 1) Lynching MilkSuckler. Fuck that guy. 2) I will use my vote aggressively to push town agenda throughout the game. I am not afraid to write cases and lay down my vote. I am a serious person. Now before you flame me, let me turn you around with this question: do you believe milksuckler had that post prepared before the game started? of course he did. Everything about that screams "pre-prepared post" which is fine if he's town but he wrote that when he didn't know his alignment. He could quite easily be scum. Don't trust him. Lynch Milksuckler. ##vote Wade Fell Writing something pre-game tells us nothing, but wade tries to convince us that it s scummy. + Show Spoiler + The only thing scummy about it was that it was written by vivax in another game who is a generally notorious fellow or so i am told | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
i dont know him but calling "neutral behavior" "scummy behavior" is "scummy". It is ridiculous to talk about somebody's alignment being clear at this point in the game. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Toad, i want some sanity in here, are you sure your not running for mayor? It's not like you have bodyguards anyway... | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
the argument that we might think scum are town is disgusting. Besides nearly every game of mafia ever has a few players that look very town that are very town and if you read the thread and people are even a bit active it is not hard to find them even on day1. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 26 2013 09:46 jcarlsoniv wrote: What I'm saying is that you think his post is a "scum agenda" and I disagree because I agree with WF's sentiment. then why did you use dishonest scare tactics? | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
going to bed | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + since he wants to and since i don't want to play with him | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
I supported a prom lynch due to these posts: + Show Spoiler + On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote: are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 10:25 Toadesstern wrote: [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 10:21 Promethelax wrote: [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 10:17 Toadesstern wrote: prom could you respond to what I (and VE in response) said over here: [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 10:06 VisceraEyes wrote: [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote: [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote: Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote: My new platform is killing Layabout Read his posts hes scum[/QUOTE] Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote: [QUOTE]On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote: It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to: A. put in the time to read the thread B. both make and evaluate other's cases C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players. My lynch platform is: Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read ## vote geript[/QUOTE] Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game.[/QUOTE] He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. [/QUOTE] are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are[/QUOTE] This is something I noticed too. It sparked discussion - I'm left wondering what kind of discussion he thought RNG was supposed to generate if it didn't generate the kind he wanted.[/QUOTE] because again, the way you phrased that sounds awfully odd and I'm thinking of multiple explanations. None of them includes something you with a townie-mindset.[/QUOTE] Because I wanted it to gain some real traction. I had an idea about actually getting close and withdrawing my nomination since if scum was up for lynch they'd be pushing me as mayor where if there was a townie up for lynch they'd be pushing against me. It's a plan that only works if I get support on it. That was the discussion I wanted to spark. [/QUOTE] The basic idea was that Prom had stood for mayor under the premise that he would rng the lynch but then he turned around and said he had just wanted to create discussion. This is scummy because he didn't make enough of effort to create or encourage this discussion as he would be expected to do as town. Upon rereading I am not sure that he didn't do enough to push discussion. He mentions rng in a few posts but nobody really treats it as a valid option or says why it's a good/bad idea. The discussion naturally moves on and he lets it. Aside from that he posting is fine. I suppose he calls hasssy scummy for vanishing but he at least makes the effort to find out why hassy had gone + Show Spoiler + btw it was 3am uk time so maybe that | ||
| ||
