People still might lurk, you never know.

Gonna ignore that stupidass vote cause
1. If I dont mention it. Im crazy
2. If I care about it, Im scum.
SO NON ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE POST RIGHT HERE.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 02:12 GMT

#194

For Mayor meaning that you get to stand in front of all the people with a cool chain around your neck, and an escape route right underneath you?
Right.
That Mayor. I approve.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 02:21 GMT

#196

Mocsta, you might break the voting tallies!!!

Also, a football bat is useful.
You can run around smacking people with it. And beating up scum. SCUM.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 02:46 GMT

#199

Basically standerd talk.

I am going to be open and transparent in my play. I will be as forthcoming as I can with my scumreads and thoughts at any point in the game. I expect that my actions and motives will speak louder than my words.

Who doesnt say this? Like lol whats the point of writing this.

As a counterarguement,
I say we lynch the scummiest person available to us.
Who cares who scum sent up? How do we lynch scum in a normal game? Because they are scummy right?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 02:56 GMT

#201

???
I dont have a tendency/history of looking like scum,
IT WAS 1 game. A very bad game.

Well yes, if all 3 candidates are town reads, which I think could be likely especially in the first few days, then we lynch the least useful so far.

I dont see why we have to speculate on who scum would send up..
Just lynch the scummiest person. EASY.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 02:58 GMT

#202

Also, WHERE DID YOU GO VE?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 03:10 GMT

#204

What are you even saying?
BLABLABLA
lets lynch the scummiest person.
Seriously thats all you are saying.

A method that I raised to reduce the WIFOM potential of the nomination mechanic, is to overall increase town quality of play to thus,

Yeah, this also works in normal, non nomination games.
All the things you are saying also applies to standerd games, which makes it fucking useless.

I dont think this game is as simple as "lynch the scummiest person".

It is.

Ok if you disagree, then in 3 lines or less, say why.
Also expound on how we should scumhunt and raise the quality of play

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 03:56 GMT

#206

I dont care if my 'post structure' mimicks my scum play. Im not scum here and thats all that matters.

[b]##Vote: Mocsta

If you want me to expound on what constitutes solid town play. It is to avoid the copying your play.

You cant even be bothered to seriously help town. Just snipe at Oats for playing badly.

I think you dont understand my meaning of the scummiest player. For me, its the player who is mostly likely gonna flip scum.
I guess for you its a unsuspicious character who has some scummy play. Oh.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 03:56 GMT

#207

EBWOP:
##Vote: Mocsta

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 04:29 GMT

#209

Oats, this game is obviously too much of a step up in difficulty for your current forum-mafia skill level.
Just quit and let someone that knows how to play replace you.

Shitting on people is not cool. And I dont know why a town player would do this, therefore you are scum.
It makes ABSOLUTLY no sense that a town player would tell you

'UNINSTALL, LEAVE PLEASE YOU SUCK'

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 04:30 GMT

#210

I know why Marv+others ragequit.
Well.
So anyone other than Mocsta that want to butt in?
I would appreciate it. :D

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 04:41 GMT

#213

Go on,
Explain how I am not promoting discussion.

Also, this seems eerily familiar to your start in Newbie mafia XXXV where you were scum. I wonder why

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

February 06 2013 04:46 GMT

#214

On February 06 2013 13:40 Mocsta wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why do you think there is high potential for the nomination candidates to be all town?

The reason I think so is so we are forced to lynch a potentially strong player before they really 'hit' their stride.

Also, it is better for Scum in the long run that there are useless and uninvested townies which will only become evident after the first few days. For example, Austin was pretty involved day 1 in LIX, however his activity dropped off tremendously.

However, I think we should discuss this tomorrow and spend today scumhunting. Difficult to do with only me and you :/
I realise that the sentence could be misconstrued as I am assuming you are town.

In fact, I think you are scum, but its early days, and premature burial is not a thing I am fond of.