EPTParanoia Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On November 30 2012 08:54 MrZentor wrote: People assume that if you're too uptight, you're mafia, so the first few pages are always just spam created by people trying to out-relax each other. So have some fun!!  On November 30 2012 08:55 Dandel Ion wrote: I think we should be serious and scumhunt. Having fun is wrong. Lynch? | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
No defense = Mafia. VoteX10:Dandel Ion | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
AND bad spelling, I am making a case within my head as we speak. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:00 Zealos wrote: AND bad spelling, I am making a case within my head as we speak. Oh dear, what a brainfart. I have misjudged you. Unvote | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:15 Dandel Ion wrote: I'm a noob too, and you already lynched me  So inconsistant We only voted. More lies from the scum. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On November 30 2012 09:17 Dandel Ion wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383489¤tpage=10#195 Zealos confirmed for not reading the thread. Yeah ok, thats reasonable. You're still scummier than the little bit under my big toenail though. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
The way you avoid mafia being able to ask questions all game and not give opinions is to ask similar questions of them. If everyone on the town team keep pressuring one another, and the mafia team, then eventually it becomes obvious who is scum, | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On December 01 2012 03:09 debears wrote: Marv, I will wait til answer that when dandel gives me a response to the above question Sigh, I know where this is going.... | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On December 01 2012 03:10 marvellosity wrote: what has dandel's responses got to do with it? you're fundamentally contradicting yourself and that has nothing to do with what dandel responds with... You may as well let him wait for a little, though I'm pretty sure what he comes up with will be not relevant to the contradiction. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On December 01 2012 03:15 marvellosity wrote: why? why do you want him to wait to explain a contradiction which only relies on what he's posted and nothing to do with what dandel has posted? why would you want that? explain yourself, cretinous fiend. Because explaining it could potentially ruin his "plan" which is pretty likely to fail anyway, but we may as well give him the benefit of the doubt with 27ish hours left of the day. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On December 01 2012 03:26 austinmcc wrote: Dandel Ion (now DI) said he'd be gone because it's Friday. So we're waiting for a response from someone who explicitly said he wouldn't be here. While it may partially ruin debears' ability to confirm whether DI is doing whatever debears thinks DI is doing, I'm more interested in debears right now than what DI may or may not have been doing yesterday. I'd rather debears explain what he's thinking, not drag his heels and have more time to respond, and be up front about his thoughts. DI can confirm later or not. Well, from what I gather, it's something to do with, depending on what guides he's read on TL, there are different pieces of advice written. One piece of advice in one of the guides is about how town players should never state their "Noobiness" due to the fact it won't benefit them at all. Presumably, if he had answered Debears question saying he had read that particular guide, Debears would then assume he was using the info from said guide in a mafia way. Or something along those lines. I may be wrong, and it's almost certainly easier if Debears answers it himself... | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
I don't think Debears is mafia | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On December 02 2012 00:58 debears wrote: I see him as scummy here for not doing anything. He claims his d1 pattern is saying nothing for most of d1 as defense. I show him that he's wrong How is that not related to this game? Agreed. Looking at what is happening HERE, all I am seeing is an angry Vet making no real contribution to the game. Btw, I had a mad friday, and have been busy most of today, so I won't really have time to add much till the lynch. I will be more involved in the coming days, but until then I'm pretty useless. One thing I have noticed is that Marv seems to be playing differently than how I remember him. I played a scumgame against his Town play, and he was aggressive, asking a ton of questions, and wouldn't rest till he had me killed. This game he seems to be acting much more passively... | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On December 02 2012 02:29 Lazermonkey wrote: Why is this? There are plenty of time untill the lynch=alot of time to make reads. Your filter is empty as you yourself point out. But that is not the most alarming IMO. You really haven't been scum hunting at all. You have a few null or slight town reads but most of all you are being extremly wish washy. You say Ace looks like an angry vet with no contribution. Does this make Ace scum do you think? You say marv plays differently, but does that make him scum? You say you don't think Debears is scum, although you provide no analysis. You don't think Xata is scum. What do you think then? ##FoS Zealos I did give reasoning for debears. Ace I would call scum if he were a different player, but no one seems to be too keen to push him yet, so I'm willing to leave it for now. Plenty of time ≠ plenty of free time till lynch. I am pointing out marv plays differently. Perhaps scum, perhaps a blue trying to protect himself, may just be acting differently for no reason. I am saying what I am thinking and seeing in the thread. I have not outright called anyone scum yet, but I don't feel I have had enough time to read over to decide who deserves the lynch. I would say the earlier stuff with DI and debears was a little dodgy, but equally, it had too much read into it at the time. The current votes on Xata seem to be the best bet for the time being. This is for instance seems a little.. odd... On December 01 2012 04:16 Xatalos wrote: Well, it's always good to post real content in my eyes. Maybe some of my suspicions faded, but I still don't have a good feeling about you (sorry  ). Something about that post just feels forced... Like it were a tactical move to look better instead of actually having a beneficial effect on the thread.I'm used to blowing things out of proportions though. I'll have to consider my vote a lot more until I can be satisfied with having catched a strongly likely Mafia. The sorry in particular, along with the end of the post strike me as weird. "Hey, I think you might be mafia, really sorry about that. Also, for anyone reading this, I wouldn't listen to me, because I'm probably wrong, but at least I'm contributing right? Right?! I don't really like using meta as an argument, so I'm gonna ignore trying to tie it in to his past games as mafia and/or town, but from what I've read so far, this guy seems the best lynch candidate. ##Vote:Xatalos | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
On December 02 2012 05:05 Xatalos wrote: Wut? This post is extremely indecisive and THIS is a prime example of an unconvinced/unconvincing argument: "The current votes on Xata seem to be the best bet for the time being. This is for instance seems a little.. odd..." What kind of a reasoning is that? Can you get any more bandwagony? Indecisive, yet results in a vote. Surely that makes it decisive? Your posts have seemed odd, and all the parts where you are questioning yourself is not something a town player would do. Once or twice from a new player, maybe, but you just seem to not want anyone to pay attention to you... | ||
| ||
